Summary:
TargetLoweringBase::Expand is defined as "Try to expand this to other ops,
otherwise use a libcall." For ISD::UDIV and ISD::SDIV, the choice between
the two possibilities was defined in a rather convoluted way:
- if DIVREM is legal, expand to DIVREM
- if DIVREM has a custom lowering, expand to DIVREM
- if DIVREM libcall is defined and a remainder from the same division is
computed elsewhere, expand to a DIVREM libcall
- else, expand to a DIV libcall
This had the undesirable effect that if both DIV and DIVREM are implemented
as libcalls, then ISD::UDIV and ISD::SDIV are expanded to the heavier DIVREM
libcall, even when the remainder isn't used.
The new code adds a new LegalizeAction, TargetLoweringBase::LibCall, so that
backends can directly control whether they prefer an expansion or a conversion
to a libcall. This makes the generic lowering code even more generic,
allowing its reuse in a wider range of target-specific configurations.
The useful effect is that ARM backend will now generate a call
to __aeabi_{i,u}div rather than __aeabi_{i,u}divmod in cases where
it doesn't need the remainder. There's no functional change outside
the ARM backend.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, rengolin
Subscribers: t.p.northover, llvm-commits, aemerson
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13862
llvm-svn: 250826
The mask value type for maskload/maskstore GCC builtins is never a vector of
packed floats/doubles.
This patch fixes the following issues:
1. The mask argument for builtin_ia32_maskloadpd and builtin_ia32_maskstorepd
should be of type llvm_v2i64_ty and not llvm_v2f64_ty.
2. The mask argument for builtin_ia32_maskloadpd256 and
builtin_ia32_maskstorepd256 should be of type llvm_v4i64_ty and not
llvm_v4f64_ty.
3. The mask argument for builtin_ia32_maskloadps and builtin_ia32_maskstoreps
should be of type llvm_v4i32_ty and not llvm_v4f32_ty.
4. The mask argument for builtin_ia32_maskloadps256 and
builtin_ia32_maskstoreps256 should be of type llvm_v8i32_ty and not
llvm_v8f32_ty.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13776
llvm-svn: 250817
This wasn't doing anything useful. They weren't explicitly used
anywhere, and the RegScavenger ignores reserved registers.
This for some reason caused a random scheduling change in the test.
Getting the check lines to pass is too frustrating, and there's probably
not too much value in checking the vector case's operands N times.
llvm-svn: 250794
Currently, in MachineBlockPlacement pass the loop is rotated to let the best exit to be the last BB in the loop chain, to maximize the fall-through from the loop to outside. With profile data, we can determine the cost in terms of missed fall through opportunities when rotating a loop chain and select the best rotation. Basically, there are three kinds of cost to consider for each rotation:
1. The possibly missed fall through edge (if it exists) from BB out of the loop to the loop header.
2. The possibly missed fall through edges (if they exist) from the loop exits to BB out of the loop.
3. The missed fall through edge (if it exists) from the last BB to the first BB in the loop chain.
Therefore, the cost for a given rotation is the sum of costs listed above. We select the best rotation with the smallest cost. This is only for PGO mode when we have more precise edge frequencies.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10717
llvm-svn: 250754
Convert two halfword loads into a single 32-bit word load with bitfield extract
instructions. For example :
ldrh w0, [x2]
ldrh w1, [x2, #2]
becomes
ldr w0, [x2]
ubfx w1, w0, #16, #16
and w0, w0, #ffff
llvm-svn: 250719
Emit the CFI instructions after all code transformation have been done.
This will avoid any interference between CFI instructions and packetization.
llvm-svn: 250714
The mapping of these two intrinsics in ARMInstrInfo.td had a small
omission which lead to their operands not being validated/transformed
before being lowered into usat and ssat instructions. This can cause
incorrect instructions to be emitted.
I've also added tests for the remaining two saturating arithmatic
intrinsics @llvm.arm.qadd and @llvm.arm.qsub as they are missing
codegen tests.
llvm-svn: 250697
Add FastISel support for SSE4A scalar float / double non-temporal stores
Follow up to D13698
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13773
llvm-svn: 250610
Summary:
This is a temporary hack until we get around to remapping the vreg
numbers to local numbers. Dead vregs cause bad numbering and make
consumers sad.
We could also just look at debug info an use named locals instead, but
vregs have to work properly anyways so there!
Reviewers: binji, sunfish
Subscribers: jfb, llvm-commits, dschuff
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13839
llvm-svn: 250594
Summary:
Some shared code for handling eh.exceptionpointer and eh.exceptioncode
needs to not share the part that truncates to 32 bits, which is intended
just for exception codes.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13747
llvm-svn: 250588
Our previous value of "16 + 8 + MaxCallFrameSize" for ParentFrameOffset
is incorrect when CSRs are involved. We were supposed to have a test
case to catch this, but it wasn't very rigorous.
The main effect here is that calling _CxxThrowException inside a
catchpad doesn't immediately crash on MOVAPS when you have an odd number
of CSRs.
llvm-svn: 250583
The motivation for this patch starts with PR20134:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20134
void foo(int *a, int i) {
a[i] = a[i+1] + a[i+2];
}
It seems better to produce this (14 bytes):
movslq %esi, %rsi
movl 0x4(%rdi,%rsi,4), %eax
addl 0x8(%rdi,%rsi,4), %eax
movl %eax, (%rdi,%rsi,4)
Rather than this (22 bytes):
leal 0x1(%rsi), %eax
cltq
leal 0x2(%rsi), %ecx
movslq %ecx, %rcx
movl (%rdi,%rcx,4), %ecx
addl (%rdi,%rax,4), %ecx
movslq %esi, %rax
movl %ecx, (%rdi,%rax,4)
The most basic problem (the first test case in the patch combines constants) should also be fixed in InstCombine,
but it gets more complicated after that because we need to consider architecture and micro-architecture. For
example, AArch64 may not see any benefit from the more general transform because the ISA solves the sexting in
hardware. Some x86 chips may not want to replace 2 ADD insts with 1 LEA, and there's an attribute for that:
FeatureSlowLEA. But I suspect that doesn't go far enough or maybe it's not getting used when it should; I'm
also not sure if FeatureSlowLEA should also mean "slow complex addressing mode".
I see no perf differences on test-suite with this change running on AMD Jaguar, but I see small code size
improvements when building clang and the LLVM tools with the patched compiler.
A more general solution to the sext(add nsw(x, C)) problem that works for multiple targets is available
in CodeGenPrepare, but it may take quite a bit more work to get that to fire on all of the test cases that
this patch takes care of.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13757
llvm-svn: 250560
Summary:
We now use the block for the catchpad itself, rather than its normal
successor, as the funclet entry.
Putting the normal successor in the map leads downstream funclet
membership computations to erroneous results.
Reviewers: majnemer, rnk
Subscribers: rnk, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13798
llvm-svn: 250552
Summary: The syntax has changed a bit recently.
Reviewers: binji
Subscribers: llvm-commits, jfb, sunfish, dschuff
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13821
llvm-svn: 250535
Summary:
When a cleanup's cleanupendpad or cleanupret targets a catchendpad, stop
trying to propagate the cleanup's parent's color to the catchendpad, since
what's needed is the cleanup's grandparent's color and the catchendpad
will get that color from the catchpad linkage already. We already had
this exclusion for invokes, but were missing it for
cleanupendpad/cleanupret.
Also add a missing line that tags cleanupendpads' states in the
EHPadStateMap, without with lowering invokes that target cleanupendpads
which unwind to other handlers (and so don't have the -1 state) will fail.
This fixes the reduced IR repro in PR25163.
Reviewers: majnemer, andrew.w.kaylor, rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13797
llvm-svn: 250534
Summary:
Follow the same syntax as for the spec repo. Both have evolved slightly
independently and need to converge again.
This, along with wasmate changes, allows me to do the following:
echo "int add(int a, int b) { return a + b; }" > add.c
./out/bin/clang -O2 -S --target=wasm32-unknown-unknown add.c -o add.wack
./experimental/prototype-wasmate/wasmate.py add.wack > add.wast
./sexpr-wasm-prototype/out/sexpr-wasm add.wast -o add.wasm
./sexpr-wasm-prototype/third_party/v8-native-prototype/v8/v8/out/Release/d8 -e "print(WASM.instantiateModule(readbuffer('add.wasm'), {print:print}).add(42, 1337));"
As you'd expect, the d8 shell prints out the right value.
Reviewers: sunfish
Subscribers: jfb, llvm-commits, dschuff
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13712
llvm-svn: 250480
D4796 taught LLVM to fold some atomic integer operations into a single
instruction. The pattern was unaware that the instructions clobbered
flags. I fixed some of this issue in D13680 but had missed INC/DEC.
This patch adds the missing EFLAGS definition.
llvm-svn: 250438
Summary:
x86 codegen is clever about generating good code for relaxed
floating-point operations, but it was being silly when globals and
immediates were involved, forgetting where the global was and
loading/storing from/to the wrong place. The same applied to hard-coded
address immediates.
Don't let it forget about the displacement.
This fixes https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25171
A very similar bug when doing floating-points atomics to the stack is
also fixed by this patch.
This fixes https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25144
Reviewers: pete
Subscribers: llvm-commits, majnemer, rsmith
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13749
llvm-svn: 250429
Summary:
The -mcpu=mips16 option caused the Integrated Assembler to crash because
it couldn't figure out the architecture revision number to write to the
.MIPS.abiflags section. This CPU definition has been removed because, like
microMIPS, MIPS16 is an ASE to a base architecture.
Reviewers: vkalintiris
Subscribers: rkotler, llvm-commits, dsanders
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13656
llvm-svn: 250407
AVX-512 bit shuffle fails on 32 bit since we create a vector of 64-bit constants.
I split 8x64-bit const vector to 16x32 on 32-bit mode.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13644
llvm-svn: 250390
Recommit r250342: move coal-sections-powerpc.s to subdirectory for powerpc.
Some background on why we don't have to use *coal* sections anymore:
Long ago when C++ was new and "weak" had not been standardized, an attempt was
made in cctools to support C++ inlines that can be coalesced by putting them
into their own section (TEXT/textcoal_nt instead of TEXT/text).
The current macho linker supports the weak-def bit on any symbol to allow it to
be coalesced, but the compiler still puts weak-def functions/data into alternate
section names, which the linker must map back to the base section name.
This patch makes changes that are necessary to prevent the compiler from using
the "coal" sections and have it use the non-coal sections instead when the
target architecture is not powerpc:
TEXT/textcoal_nt instead use TEXT/text
TEXT/const_coal instead use TEXT/const
DATA/datacoal_nt instead use DATA/data
If the target is powerpc, we continue to use the *coal* sections since anyone
targeting powerpc is probably using an old linker that doesn't have support for
the weak-def bits.
Also, have the assembler issue a warning if it encounters a *coal* section in
the assembly file and inform the users to use the non-coal sections instead.
rdar://problem/14265330
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13188
llvm-svn: 250370
Recommit r250342: add -arch=ppc32 to the RUN lines of powerpc tests.
Some background on why we don't have to use *coal* sections anymore:
Long ago when C++ was new and "weak" had not been standardized, an attempt was
made in cctools to support C++ inlines that can be coalesced by putting them
into their own section (TEXT/textcoal_nt instead of TEXT/text).
The current macho linker supports the weak-def bit on any symbol to allow it to
be coalesced, but the compiler still puts weak-def functions/data into alternate
section names, which the linker must map back to the base section name.
This patch makes changes that are necessary to prevent the compiler from using
the "coal" sections and have it use the non-coal sections instead when the
target architecture is not powerpc:
TEXT/textcoal_nt instead use TEXT/text
TEXT/const_coal instead use TEXT/const
DATA/datacoal_nt instead use DATA/data
If the target is powerpc, we continue to use the *coal* sections since anyone
targeting powerpc is probably using an old linker that doesn't have support for
the weak-def bits.
Also, have the assembler issue a warning if it encounters a *coal* section in
the assembly file and inform the users to use the non-coal sections instead.
rdar://problem/14265330
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13188
llvm-svn: 250349
Some background on why we don't have to use *coal* sections anymore:
Long ago when C++ was new and "weak" had not been standardized, an attempt was
made in cctools to support C++ inlines that can be coalesced by putting them
into their own section (TEXT/textcoal_nt instead of TEXT/text).
The current macho linker supports the weak-def bit on any symbol to allow it to
be coalesced, but the compiler still puts weak-def functions/data into alternate
section names, which the linker must map back to the base section name.
This patch makes changes that are necessary to prevent the compiler from using
the "coal" sections and have it use the non-coal sections instead when the
target architecture is not powerpc:
TEXT/textcoal_nt instead use TEXT/text
TEXT/const_coal instead use TEXT/const
DATA/datacoal_nt instead use DATA/data
If the target is powerpc, we continue to use the *coal* sections since anyone
targeting powerpc is probably using an old linker that doesn't have support for
the weak-def bits.
Also, have the assembler issue a warning if it encounters a *coal* section in
the assembly file and inform the users to use the non-coal sections instead.
rdar://problem/14265330
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13188
llvm-svn: 250342
PR25157 identifies a bug where a load plus a vector shuffle is
incorrectly converted into an LXVDSX instruction. That optimization
is only valid if the load is of a doubleword, and in the noted case,
it was not. This corrects that problem.
Joint patch with Eric Schweitz, who provided the bugpoint-reduced test
case.
llvm-svn: 250324
This patch teaches x86 fast-isel how to select nontemporal stores.
On x86, we can use MOVNTI for nontemporal stores of doublewords/quadwords.
Instructions (V)MOVNTPS/PD/DQ can be used for SSE2/AVX aligned nontemporal
vector stores.
Before this patch, fast-isel always selected 'movd/movq' instead of 'movnti'
for doubleword/quadword nontemporal stores. In the case of nontemporal stores
of aligned vectors, fast-isel always selected movaps/movapd/movdqa instead of
movntps/movntpd/movntdq.
With this patch, if we use SSE2/AVX intrinsics for nontemporal stores we now
always get the expected (V)MOVNT instructions.
The lack of fast-isel support for nontemporal stores was spotted when analyzing
the -O0 codegen for nontemporal stores.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13698
llvm-svn: 250285
Summary:
Emit the handler and clause locations immediately after the standard
xdata.
Clauses are emitted in the same order and format used to communiate them
to the CLR Execution Engine.
Add a lit test to verify correct table generation on a small but
interesting example function.
Reviewers: majnemer, andrew.w.kaylor, rnk
Subscribers: pgavlin, AndyAyers, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13451
llvm-svn: 250219
The comment says this was stopped because it was unlikely to be
profitable. This is not true if you want to combine vector loads
with multiple components.
For a simple case that looks like
t0 = load t0 ...
t1 = load t0 ...
t2 = load t0 ...
t3 = load t0 ...
t4 = store t0:1, t0:1
t5 = store t4, t1:0
t6 = store t5, t2:0
t7 = store t6, t3:0
We want to get all of these stores onto a chain
that is a TokenFactor of these N loads. This mostly
solves the AMDGPU merge-stores.ll regressions
with -combiner-alias-analysis for merging vector
stores of vector loads.
llvm-svn: 250138
Artyom Skrobov