provided when the optimization is disabled. In particular, split
the completion context CCC_Other into two contexts: CCC_Other, which
means that it's an undisclosed context for which any other results are
unwelcome, and CCC_Recovery, which is used in recovery cases.
Since we're now using the completion context within the completion
results builder, make sure that it's always set to something.
Fixes <rdar://problem/8470644>.
llvm-svn: 114704
into the clients, e.g., the printing code-completion consumer and
c-index-test. Clients may want to re-sort the results anyway.
Provide a libclang function that sorts the results.
3rd try. How embarrassing.
llvm-svn: 112180
into the clients, e.g., the printing code-completion consumer and
c-index-test. Clients may want to re-sort the results anyway.
Provide a libclang function that sorts the results.
llvm-svn: 112149
code-completion results cached by ASTUnit, sort the resulting result
set. This makes testing far, far easier, so this commit also includes
tests for the previous few fixes.
llvm-svn: 112070
- move DeclSpec &c into the Sema library
- move ParseAST into the Parse library
Reflect this change in a thousand different includes.
Reflect this change in the link orders.
llvm-svn: 111667
when the CXTranslationUnit_CacheCompletionResults option is given to
clang_parseTranslationUnit(). Essentially, we compute code-completion
results for macro definitions after we have parsed the file, then
store an ASTContext-agnostic version of those results (completion
string, cursor kind, priority, and active contexts) in the
ASTUnit. When performing code completion in that ASTUnit, we splice
the macro definition results into the results provided by the actual
code-completion (which has had macros turned off) before libclang gets
those results. We use completion context information to only splice in
those results that make sense for that context.
With a completion involving all of the macros from Cocoa.h and a few other
system libraries (totally ~8500 macro definitions) living in a
precompiled header, we get about a 9% performance improvement from
code completion, since we no longer have to deserialize all of the
macro definitions from the precompiled header.
Note that macro definitions are merely the canary; the cache is
designed to also support other top-level declarations, which should be
a bigger performance win. That optimization will be next.
Note also that there is no mechanism for determining when to throw
away the cache and recompute its contents.
llvm-svn: 111051
completion within the translation unit using the same command-line
arguments for parsing the translation unit. Eventually, we'll reuse
the precompiled preamble to improve code-completion performance, and
this also gives us a place to cache results.
Expose this function via the new libclang function
clang_codeCompleteAt(), which performs the code completion within a
CXTranslationUnit. The completion occurs in-process
(clang_codeCompletion() runs code completion out-of-process).
llvm-svn: 110210
1) Suppress diagnostics as soon as we form the code-completion
token, so we don't get any error/warning spew from the early
end-of-file.
2) If we consume a code-completion token when we weren't expecting
one, go into a code-completion recovery path that produces the best
results it can based on the context that the parser is in.
llvm-svn: 104585
definitions, e.g., after
-
or
- (id)
we'll find all of the "likely" instance methods that one would want to
declare or define at this point. In the latter case, we only produce
results whose return types match "id".
llvm-svn: 100587
CIndex functions that (1) map from a reference or declaration to the
corresponding definition, if available, and (2) determine whether a
given declaration cursor is also a definition. This eliminates a lot
of duplication in the cursor kinds, and maps more closely to the Clang
ASTs.
This is another API + ABI breaker with no deprecation. Yay, progress.
llvm-svn: 93893
the "typed" text, first, then take into account
nested-name-specifiers, name hiding, etc. This means that the
resulting sort is actually alphabetical :)
llvm-svn: 93370
C++ grammatical constructs that show up in top-level (namespace-level)
declarations, member declarations, template declarations, statements,
expressions, conditions, etc. For example, we now provide a pattern
for
static_cast<type>(expr)
when we can have an expression, or
using namespace identifier;
when we can have a using directive.
Also, improves the results of code completion at the beginning of a
top-level declaration. Previously, we would see value names (function
names, global variables, etc.); now we see types, namespace names,
etc., but no values.
llvm-svn: 93134
declaration by providing patterns for "getter = <method>" and "setter
= <method>". As part of this, invented a new "pattern" result kind
that is merely a semantic string. The "pattern" result kind should
help with other kinds of code templates.
llvm-svn: 89277
- Provide Sema in callbacks, instead of requiring it in constructor. This
eliminates the need for a factory function. Clients now just pass the object
to consume the results in directly.
- CodeCompleteConsumer is cheap to construct, so building it whenever we are
doing code completion is reasonable.
Doug, please review.
llvm-svn: 87099
- Introduce more code-completion string "chunk" kinds that describe
symbols, the actual text that the user is expected to type, etc.
- Make the generation of macro results optional, since it can be
slow
- Make code-completion accessible through the C API, marshalling the
code-completion results through a temporary file (ick) to maintain
process separation.
The last doesn't have tests yet.
llvm-svn: 86306
- Filter out unnamed declarations
- Filter out declarations whose names are reserved for the
implementation (e.g., __bar, _Foo)
- Place OVERLOAD: or COMPLETION: at the beginning of each
code-completion result, so we can easily separate them from other
compilation results.
llvm-svn: 83680
results for other, textual completion. For call completion, we now
produce enough information to show the function call argument that we
are currently on.
llvm-svn: 82592
members found in base classes have the same ranking as members found
in derived classes. However, we will introduce an informative note for
members found in base classes, showing (as a nested-name-specifier)
the qualification to name the base class, to make it clear which
members are from bases.
llvm-svn: 82586
"->", or "::" if we will be looking into a dependent context. It's not
wrong to use the "template" keyword, but it's to needed, either.
llvm-svn: 82307
template smarter, by taking into account which function template
parameters are deducible from the call arguments. For example,
template<typename RandomAccessIterator>
void sort(RandomAccessIterator first, RandomAccessIterator last);
will have a code-completion string like
sort({RandomAccessIterator first}, {RandomAccessIterator last})
since the template argument for its template parameter is
deducible. On the other hand,
template<class X, class Y>
X* dyn_cast(Y *Val);
will have a code-completion string like
dyn_cast<{class X}>({Y *Val})
since the template type parameter X is not deducible from the function
call.
llvm-svn: 82306
Douglas Gregor