For example,
<https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/132/builds/3929>
has this diagnostic:
```
/opt/gcc/9.3.0/snos/include/g++/bits/stl_tree.h:780:8: error: static assertion failed: comparison object must be invocable as const
780 | is_invocable_v<const _Compare&, const _Key&, const _Key&>,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
```
In input dump annotations, `check:2'1` indicates diagnostic 1 for the
`CHECK` directive on check file line 2. Without this patch,
`-dump-input` computes the diagnostic index with the assumption that
FileCheck *consecutively* produces all diagnostics for the same
pattern. Already, that can be a false assumption, as in the examples
below. Moreover, it seems like a brittle assumption as FileCheck
evolves. Finally, it actually complicates the implementation even if
it makes it slightly more efficient.
This patch avoids that assumption. Examples below show results after
applying this patch. Before applying this patch, `'N` is omitted
throughout these examples because the implementation doesn't notice
there's more than one diagnostic per pattern.
First, `CHECK-LABEL` violates the assumption because `CHECK-LABEL`
tries to match twice, and other directives can match in between:
```
$ cat check
CHECK: foobar
CHECK-LABEL: foobar
$ FileCheck -vv check < input |& tail -8
<<<<<<
1: text
2: foobar
label:2'0 ^~~~~~
check:1 ^~~~~~
label:2'1 X error: no match found
3: text
>>>>>>
```
Second, `--implicit-check-not` is obviously processed many times among
other directives:
```
$ cat check
CHECK: foo
CHECK: foo
$ FileCheck -vv -dump-input=always -implicit-check-not=foo \
check < input |& tail -16
<<<<<<
1: text
not:imp1'0 X~~~~
2: foo
check:1 ^~~
not:imp1'1 X
3: text
not:imp1'1 ~~~~~
4: foo
check:2 ^~~
not:imp1'2 X
5: text
not:imp1'2 ~~~~~
6:
eof:2 ^
>>>>>>
```
Reviewed By: thopre, jhenderson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97813
In future patches I will be setting the IsText parameter frequently so I will refactor the args to be in the following order. I have removed the FileSize parameter because it is never used.
```
static ErrorOr<std::unique_ptr<MemoryBuffer>>
getFile(const Twine &Filename, bool IsText = false,
bool RequiresNullTerminator = true, bool IsVolatile = false);
static ErrorOr<std::unique_ptr<MemoryBuffer>>
getFileOrSTDIN(const Twine &Filename, bool IsText = false,
bool RequiresNullTerminator = true);
static ErrorOr<std::unique_ptr<MB>>
getFileAux(const Twine &Filename, uint64_t MapSize, uint64_t Offset,
bool IsText, bool RequiresNullTerminator, bool IsVolatile);
static ErrorOr<std::unique_ptr<WritableMemoryBuffer>>
getFile(const Twine &Filename, bool IsVolatile = false);
```
Reviewed By: jhenderson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99182
This patch consists of the initial changes to help distinguish between text and binary content correctly on z/OS. I would like to get feedback from Windows users on setting OF_None for all ToolOutputFiles. This seems to have been done as an optimization to prevent CRLF translation on Windows in the past.
Reviewed By: zibi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97785
A more general name might be match-time error propagation. That is,
it's conceivable we'll one day have non-numeric errors that require
the handling fixed by this patch.
Without this patch, FileCheck behaves as follows:
```
$ cat check
CHECK-NOT: [[#0x8000000000000000+0x8000000000000000]]
$ FileCheck -vv -dump-input=never check < input
check:1:54: remark: implicit EOF: expected string found in input
CHECK-NOT: [[#0x8000000000000000+0x8000000000000000]]
^
<stdin>:2:1: note: found here
^
check:1:15: error: unable to substitute variable or numeric expression: overflow error
CHECK-NOT: [[#0x8000000000000000+0x8000000000000000]]
^
$ echo $?
0
```
Notice that the exit status is 0 even though there's an error.
Moreover, FileCheck doesn't print the error diagnostic unless both
`-dump-input=never` and `-vv` are specified.
The same problem occurs when `CHECK-NOT` does have a match but a
capture fails due to overflow: exit status is 0, and no diagnostic is
printed unless both `-dump-input=never` and `-vv` are specified. The
usefulness of capturing from `CHECK-NOT` is questionable, but this
case should certainly produce an error.
With this patch, FileCheck always includes the error diagnostic and
has non-zero exit status for the above examples. It's conceivable
that this change will cause some existing tests to fail, but my
assumption is that they should fail. Moreover, with nearly every
project enabled, this patch didn't produce additional `check-all`
failures for me.
This patch also extends input dumps to include such numeric error
diagnostics for both expected and excluded patterns.
As noted in fixmes in some of the tests added by this patch, this
patch worsens an existing issue with redundant diagnostics. I'll fix
that bug in a subsequent patch.
Reviewed By: thopre, jhenderson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98086
When commit da108b4ed4 introduced
the CHECK-NEXT directive, it added logic to skip to the next line when
printing a diagnostic if the current matching position is at the end of
a line. This was fine while FileCheck did not support regular expression
but since it does now it can be confusing when the pattern to match
starts with the expectation of a newline (e.g. CHECK-NEXT: {{\n}}foo).
It is also inconsistent with the column information in the diagnostic
which does point to the end of line.
This commit removes this logic altogether, such that failure to match
diagnostic for such cases would show the end of line and be consistent
with the column information. The commit also adapts all existing
testcases accordingly.
Note to reviewers: An alternative approach would be to restrict the code
to only skip to the next line if the first character of the pattern is
known not to match a whitespace-like character. This would respect the
original intent but keep the inconsistency in terms of column info and
requires more code. I've only chosen this current approach by laziness
and would be happy to restrict the logic instead.
Reviewed By: jdenny, jhenderson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93341
Link: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-October/146162.html "[RFC] FileCheck: (dis)allowing unused prefixes"
If a downstream project using lit needs time for transition,
add the following to `lit.local.cfg`:
```
from lit.llvm.subst import ToolSubst
fc = ToolSubst('FileCheck', unresolved='fatal')
config.substitutions.insert(0, (fc.regex, 'FileCheck --allow-unused-prefixes'))
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95849
cl::ZeroOrMore allows the option to be specified multiple times, which makes
downstream projects possible to specify a default value in lit configuration
while some tests can override the value.
If more than a prefix is provided - e.g. --check-prefixes=CHECK,FOO - we
don't report if (say) FOO is never used. This may lead to a gap in our
test coverage.
This patch introduces a new option, --allow-unused-prefixes. It
currently is set to true, keeping today's behavior. After we explicitly
set it in tests where this behavior was actually intentional, we will
switch it to false by default.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90281
This relands e9a3d1a401 which was originally
missing linking LLVMSupport into LLMVFileCheck which broke the SHARED_LIBS build.
Original summary:
The actual FileCheck logic seems to be implemented in LLVMSupport. I don't see a
good reason for having FileCheck implemented there as it has a very specific use
while LLVMSupport is a dependency of pretty much every LLVM tool there is. In
fact, the only use of FileCheck I could find (outside the FileCheck tool and the
FileCheck unit test) is a single call in GISelMITest.h.
This moves the FileCheck logic to its own LLVMFileCheck library. This way only
FileCheck and the GlobalISelTests now have a dependency on this code.
Reviewed By: jhenderson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86344
The actual FileCheck logic seems to be implemented in LLVMSupport. I don't see a
good reason for having FileCheck implemented there as it has a very specific use
while LLVMSupport is a dependency of pretty much every LLVM tool there is. In
fact, the only use of FileCheck I could find (outside the FileCheck tool and the
FileCheck unit test) is a single call in GISelMITest.h.
This moves the FileCheck logic to its own LLVMFileCheck library. This way only
FileCheck and the GlobalISelTests now have a dependency on this code.
Reviewed By: jhenderson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86344
Substitutions are already reported in the diagnostics appearing before
the input dump in the case of failed directives, and they're reported
in traces (produced by `-vv -dump-input=never`) in the case of
successful directives. However, those reports are not always
convenient to view while investigating the input dump, so this patch
adds the substitution report to the input dump too. For example:
```
$ cat check
CHECK: hello [[WHAT:[a-z]+]]
CHECK: [[VERB]] [[WHAT]]
$ FileCheck -vv -DVERB=goodbye check < input |& tail -8
<<<<<<
1: hello world
check:1 ^~~~~~~~~~~
2: goodbye word
check:2'0 X~~~~~~~~~~~ error: no match found
check:2'1 with "VERB" equal to "goodbye"
check:2'2 with "WHAT" equal to "world"
>>>>>>
```
Without this patch, the location reported for a substitution for a
directive match is the directive's full match range. This location is
misleading as it implies the substitution itself matches that range.
This patch changes the reported location to just the match range start
to suggest the substitution is known at the start of the match. (As
in the above example, input dumps don't mark any range for
substitutions. The location info in that case simply identifies the
right line for the annotation.)
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini, thopre
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83650
In FileCheck.rst, add `-dump-input-context` and `-dump-input-filter`,
and fix some `-dump-input` documentation.
In `FileCheck -help`, `cl::value_desc("kind")` is being ignored for
`-dump-input-filter`, so just drop it.
Extend `-dump-input=help` to mention FILECHECK_OPTS.
This makes the input dump filtering implemented by D82203 more
configurable. D82203 enables filtering out everything but the initial
input lines of error diagnostics (plus some context). This patch
enables including any line with any kind of annotation.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83097
For example, given `-dump-input-context=3 -vv`, the following now
shows more leading context for the error than requested because a
leading ellipsis would occupy the same number of lines as it would
elide:
```
<<<<<<
1: foo6
2: foo5
3: foo4
4: foo3
5: foo2
6: foo1
7: hello world
check:1 ^~~~~
check:2 X~~~~ error: no match found
8: foo1
check:2 ~~~~
9: foo2
check:2 ~~~~
10: foo3
check:2 ~~~~
.
.
.
>>>>>>
```
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83526
This patch is motivated by discussions at each of:
* <https://reviews.llvm.org/D81422>
* <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-June/142369.html>
When input is dumped as specified by `-dump-input=fail`, this patch
filters the dump to show only input lines that are the starting lines
of error diagnostics plus the number of contextual lines specified
`-dump-input-context` (defaults to 5).
When `-dump-input=always`, there might be not be any errors, so all
input lines are printed, as without this patch.
Here's some sample output with `-dump-input-context=3 -vv`:
```
<<<<<<
.
.
.
13: foo
14: foo
15: hello world
check:1 ^~~~~~~~~~~
16: foo
check:2'0 X~~ error: no match found
17: foo
check:2'0 ~~~
18: foo
check:2'0 ~~~
19: foo
check:2'0 ~~~
.
.
.
27: foo
check:2'0 ~~~
28: foo
check:2'0 ~~~
29: foo
check:2'0 ~~~
30: goodbye word
check:2'0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~
check:2'1 ? possible intended match
31: foo
check:2'0 ~~~
32: foo
check:2'0 ~~~
33: foo
check:2'0 ~~~
.
.
.
>>>>>>
```
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini, arsenm, jhenderson, rsmith, SjoerdMeijer, Meinersbur, lattner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82203
Document the default of `fail` in `-help`. Extend `-dump-input=help`
to help users find related command-line options, but let `-help`
provide their full documentation.
Reviewed By: probinson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83091
`FILECHECK_OPTS` was implemented so that a test runner, such as CI,
can specify FileCheck debugging options, such as `-v` and `-vv`.
However, if a test suite has a FileCheck call that already specifies
`-v` or `-vv`, then that call will fail if `FILECHECK_OPTS` also
specifies it.
For `-vv`, this problem already exists:
`clang/test/CodeGen/aarch64-v8.2a-fp16-intrinsics-constrained.c`
It's not yet clear if the `-vv` in that test was intentional, but this
usage shouldn't fail anyway. It's already true that FileCheck permits
`-vv` and `-v` together even though `-vv` implies `-v`.
Compare D70784, which fixed the same problem for `-dump-input`.
Reviewed By: jhenderson, thopre
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82601
Having the input dumped on failure seems like a better
default: I debugged FileCheck tests for a while without knowing
about this option, which really helps to understand failures.
Remove `-dump-input-on-failure` and the environment variable
FILECHECK_DUMP_INPUT_ON_FAILURE which are now obsolete.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81422
Sometimes you want to disable a FileCheck directive without removing
it entirely, or you want to write comments that mention a directive by
name. The `COM:` directive makes it easy to do this. For example,
you might have:
```
; X32: pinsrd_1:
; X32: pinsrd $1, 4(%esp), %xmm0
; COM: FIXME: X64 isn't working correctly yet for this part of codegen, but
; COM: X64 will have something similar to X32:
; COM:
; COM: X64: pinsrd_1:
; COM: X64: pinsrd $1, %edi, %xmm0
```
Without this patch, you need to use some combination of rewording and
directive syntax mangling to prevent FileCheck from recognizing the
commented occurrences of `X32:` and `X64:` above as directives.
Moreover, FileCheck diagnostics have been proposed that might complain
about the occurrences of `X64` that don't have the trailing `:`
because they look like directive typos:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-April/140610.html>
I think dodging all these problems can prove tedious for test authors,
and directive syntax mangling already makes the purpose of existing
test code unclear. `COM:` can avoid all these problems.
This patch also updates the small set of existing tests that define
`COM` as a check prefix:
- clang/test/CodeGen/default-address-space.c
- clang/test/CodeGenOpenCL/addr-space-struct-arg.cl
- clang/test/Driver/hip-device-libs.hip
- llvm/test/Assembler/drop-debug-info-nonzero-alloca.ll
I think lit should support `COM:` as well. Perhaps `clang -verify`
should too.
Reviewed By: jhenderson, thopre
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79276
This will prove especially helpful after D79276, which introduces
comment prefixes. Specifically, identifying whether there's a
uniqueness violation will be helpful as prefixes will be required to
be unique across both check prefixes and comment prefixes.
Also, remove a related comment about `cl::list` that no longer seems
relevant now that FileCheck is also a library.
Reviewed By: jhenderson, thopre
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79375
Sometimes you want to disable a FileCheck directive without removing
it entirely, or you want to write comments that mention a directive by
name. The `COM:` directive makes it easy to do this. For example,
you might have:
```
; X32: pinsrd_1:
; X32: pinsrd $1, 4(%esp), %xmm0
; COM: FIXME: X64 isn't working correctly yet for this part of codegen, but
; COM: X64 will have something similar to X32:
; COM:
; COM: X64: pinsrd_1:
; COM: X64: pinsrd $1, %edi, %xmm0
```
Without this patch, you need to use some combination of rewording and
directive syntax mangling to prevent FileCheck from recognizing the
commented occurrences of `X32:` and `X64:` above as directives.
Moreover, FileCheck diagnostics have been proposed that might complain
about the occurrences of `X64` that don't have the trailing `:`
because they look like directive typos:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-April/140610.html>
I think dodging all these problems can prove tedious for test authors,
and directive syntax mangling already makes the purpose of existing
test code unclear. `COM:` can avoid all these problems.
This patch also updates the small set of existing tests that define
`COM` as a check prefix:
- clang/test/CodeGen/default-address-space.c
- clang/test/CodeGenOpenCL/addr-space-struct-arg.cl
- clang/test/Driver/hip-device-libs.hip
- llvm/test/Assembler/drop-debug-info-nonzero-alloca.ll
I think lit should support `COM:` as well. Perhaps `clang -verify`
should too.
Reviewed By: jhenderson, thopre
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79276
This will prove especially helpful after D79276, which introduces
comment prefixes. Specifically, identifying whether there's a
uniqueness violation will be helpful as prefixes will be required to
be unique across both check prefixes and comment prefixes.
Also, remove a related comment about `cl::list` that no longer seems
relevant now that FileCheck is also a library.
Reviewed By: jhenderson, thopre
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79375
There are few `std::vector<std::string>` members in
`FileCheckRequest`. This patch changes these arrays to `std::vector<StringRef>`
and refactors the code related to cleanup/improve/simplify it.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78202
Without this patch, `--dump-input` annotations on a single input line
are sorted by the associated directive's check-file line. That seemed
fine because that's often identical to the order in which FileCheck
looks for matches for those directives.
The first problem is that an `--implicit-check-not` pattern has no
check-file line. The logical equivalent is sorting in command-line
order, but that's not implemented.
The second problem is that, unlike a directive, an
`--implicit-check-not` pattern applies at many points, between many
different pairs of directives. However, sorting in command-line order
gathers all its associated diagnostics together at one point in an
input line's list of annotations.
In general, it seems to be easier to understand FileCheck's logic when
annotations on a single input line are sorted in the order FileCheck
produced the associated diagnostics, so this patch makes that change.
As documented in the patch, the annotation sort order is also
especially relevant to `CHECK-LABEL`, `CHECK-NOT`, and `CHECK-DAG`, so
this patch updates or extends tests to check the sort makes sense for
them. (However, the sort for `CHECK-DAG` annotations should not
actually be altered by this patch.)
Reviewed By: thopre
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77607
Currently, `--dump-input` implies that all `--implicit-check-not`
patterns appear on line 1 by printing annotations like:
```
1: foo bar baz
not:1 !~~ error: no match expected
```
This patch changes that to:
```
1: foo bar baz
not:imp1 !~~ error: no match expected
```
`imp1` indicates the first `--implicit-check-not` pattern.
Reviewed By: thopre
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77605
Summary: Replace '-' in the error message with <stdin>. This is also consistent with another error message in the code.
Reviewers: jhenderson, probinson, jdenny, grimar, arichardson
Reviewed By: jhenderson
Subscribers: thopre, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73793
Problem: `FILECHECK_OPTS` was implemented so that a test runner, such
as a bot, can specify FileCheck debugging options, such as
`-dump-input=fail`. However, some existing test suites have FileCheck
calls that already specify `-dump-input=fail` or `-dump-input=always`.
Without this patch, such tests fail under such a test runner because
FileCheck doesn't accept multiple occurrences of `-dump-input`.
Solution: This patch permits multiple occurrences of `-dump-input` by
assigning precedence to its values in the following descending order:
`help`, `always`, `fail`, and `never`. That is, any occurrence of
`help` always obtains help, and otherwise the behavior is similar to
`-v` vs. `-vv` in that the option specifying the greatest verbosity
has precedence.
Rationale: My justification for the new behavior is as follows. I
have not experienced use cases where, either as a test runner or as a
test author, I want to **limit** the permitted debugging verbosity
(except as a test author in FileCheck's or lit's test suites where the
FileCheck debugging output itself is under test, but the solution
there is `env FILECHECK_OPTS=`, and I imagine we should use the same
solution anywhere else this need might occur). Of course, as either a
test runner or test author, it is useful to **increase** debugging
verbosity.
Reviewed By: probinson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70784
The FileCheck utility is enhanced to support a `--ignore-case`
option. This is useful in cases where the output of Unix tools
differs in case (e.g. case not specified by Posix).
Reviewers: Bigcheese, jakehehrlich, rupprecht, espindola, alexshap, jhenderson, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68146
llvm-svn: 374538
The FileCheck utility is enhanced to support a `--ignore-case`
option. This is useful in cases where the output of Unix tools
differs in case (e.g. case not specified by Posix).
Reviewers: Bigcheese, jakehehrlich, rupprecht, espindola, alexshap, jhenderson, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68146
llvm-svn: 374339
Summary:
Remove use of FileCheckPatternContext and FileCheckString concrete types
from FileCheck API to allow moving it and the other implementation only
only declarations into a private header file.
Reviewers: jhenderson, chandlerc, jdenny, probinson, grimar, arichardson, rnk
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68186
llvm-svn: 373211
Without this patch, `-dump-input` prints a diagnostic at the end of
its marker range. For example:
```
1: Start.
check:1 ^~~~~~
2: Bad.
next:2 X~~~
3: Many lines
next:2 ~~~~~~~~~~
4: of input.
next:2 ~~~~~~~~~
5: End.
next:2 ~~~~ error: no match found
```
This patch moves it to the beginning like this:
```
1: Start.
check:1 ^~~~~~
2: Bad.
next:2 X~~~ error: no match found
3: Many lines
next:2 ~~~~~~~~~~
4: of input.
next:2 ~~~~~~~~~
5: End.
next:2 ~~~~
```
The former somehow looks nicer because the diagnostic doesn't appear
to be somewhere within the marker range. However, the latter is more
practical, especially when the marker range includes the remainder of
a very long dump. First, in the case of an error, this patch enables
me to search the dump for `error:` and usually immediately land where
the detected error began. Second, when trying to follow FileCheck's
logic, it's best to read top down, so this patch enables me to see
each diagnostic as soon as I encounter its marker.
Reviewed By: thopre
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65702
llvm-svn: 368786
1. raw_ostream supports ANSI colors so that you can write messages to
the termina with colors. Previously, in order to change and reset
color, you had to call `changeColor` and `resetColor` functions,
respectively.
So, if you print out "error: " in red, for example, you had to do
something like this:
OS.changeColor(raw_ostream::RED);
OS << "error: ";
OS.resetColor();
With this patch, you can write the same code as follows:
OS << raw_ostream::RED << "error: " << raw_ostream::RESET;
2. Add a boolean flag to raw_ostream so that you can disable colored
output. If you disable colors, changeColor, operator<<(Color),
resetColor and other color-related functions have no effect.
Most LLVM tools automatically prints out messages using colors, and
you can disable it by passing a flag such as `--disable-colors`.
This new flag makes it easy to write code that works that way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65564
llvm-svn: 367649
Enable dumping output only if FILECHECK_DUMP_INPUT_ON_FAILURE is set to
a non-empty value. This is necessary to support disabling it via
POSIX-compliant env(1) that does not support '-u' argument,
and therefore fix regression caused by r366980.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65334
llvm-svn: 367122
Summary:
Terminology introduced by [[#]] blocks is confusing and does not
integrate well with existing terminology.
First, variables referred by [[]] blocks are called "pattern variables"
while the text a CHECK directive needs to match is called a "CHECK
pattern". This is inconsistent with variables in [[#]] blocks since
[[#]] blocks are also found in CHECK pattern yet those variables are
called "numeric variable".
Second, the replacing of both [[]] and [[#]] blocks by the value of the
variable or expression they contain is represented by a
FileCheckPatternSubstitution class. The naming refers to being a
substitution in a CHECK pattern but could be wrongly understood as being
a substitution of a pattern variable.
Third and lastly, comments use "numeric expression" to refer both to the
[[#]] blocks as well as to the numeric expressions these blocks contain
which get evaluated at match time.
This patch solves these confusions by
- calling variables in [[]] and [[#]] blocks as string and numeric
variables respectively;
- referring to [[]] and [[#]] as substitution *blocks*, with the former
being a string substitution block and the latter a numeric
substitution block;
- calling [[]] and [[#]] blocks to be replaced by the value of a
variable or expression they contain a substitution (as opposed to
definition when these blocks are used to defined a variable), with the
former being a string substitution and the latter a numeric
substitution;
- renaming the FileCheckPatternSubstitution as a FileCheckSubstitution
class with FileCheckStringSubstitution and
FileCheckNumericSubstitution subclasses;
- restricting the use of "numeric expression" to refer to the expression
that is evaluated in a numeric substitution.
While numeric substitution blocks only support numeric substitutions of
numeric expressions at the moment there are plans to augment numeric
substitution blocks to support numeric definitions as well as both a
numeric definition and numeric substitution in the same numeric
substitution block.
Reviewers: jhenderson, jdenny, probinson, arichardson
Subscribers: hiraditya, arichardson, probinson, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62146
llvm-svn: 361445
Both LLVM 8.0.0 and current trunk fail to compile on Solaris with GCC 8.1.0:
/vol/llvm/src/llvm/dist/utils/FileCheck/FileCheck.cpp: In function ‘void DumpAnnotatedInput(llvm::raw_ostream&, const llvm::FileCheckRequest&, llvm::StringRef, std::vector<InputAnnotation>&, unsigned int)’:
/vol/llvm/src/llvm/dist/utils/FileCheck/FileCheck.cpp:408:41: error: call of overloaded ‘log10(unsigned int&)’ is ambiguous
unsigned LineNoWidth = log10(LineCount) + 1;
^
In file included from /vol/gcc-8/lib/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.11/8.1.0/include-fixed/math.h:24,
from /vol/gcc-8/include/c++/8.1.0/cmath:45,
from /vol/llvm/src/llvm/dist/include/llvm-c/DataTypes.h:28,
from /vol/llvm/src/llvm/dist/include/llvm/Support/DataTypes.h:16,
from /vol/llvm/src/llvm/dist/include/llvm/ADT/Hashing.h:47,
from /vol/llvm/src/llvm/dist/include/llvm/ADT/ArrayRef.h:12,
from /vol/llvm/src/llvm/dist/include/llvm/Support/CommandLine.h:22,
from /vol/llvm/src/llvm/dist/utils/FileCheck/FileCheck.cpp:18:
/vol/gcc-8/lib/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.11/8.1.0/include-fixed/iso/math_iso.h:209:21: note: candidate: ‘long double std::log10(long double)’
inline long double log10(long double __X) { return __log10l(__X); }
^~~~~
/vol/gcc-8/lib/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.11/8.1.0/include-fixed/iso/math_iso.h:170:15: note: candidate: ‘float std::log10(float)’
inline float log10(float __X) { return __log10f(__X); }
^~~~~
/vol/gcc-8/lib/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.11/8.1.0/include-fixed/iso/math_iso.h:70:15: note: candidate: ‘double std::log10(double)’
extern double log10 __P((double));
^~~~~
Fixed by using std::log10 instead, which allowed the compilation on i386-pc-solaris2.11
and sparc-sun-solaris2.11 to continue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60043
llvm-svn: 357509
Summary:
While the backend code of FileCheck relies on definition of variable
from the command-line to have an equal sign '=' and a variable name
before that, the frontend does not actually enforce it. This leads to
FileCheck crashing when invoked with invalid syntax for the -D option.
This patch adds the missing validation in the frontend. It also makes
the -D option an AlwaysPrefix option to be able to detect -D=FOO as
being a define without variable and -D as missing its value.
Copyright:
- Linaro (changes in version 2 of revision D55940)
- GraphCore (changes in later versions)
Reviewers: jdenny
Subscribers: JonChesterfield, hiraditya, kristina, probinson,
llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55940
llvm-svn: 353173
The old diagnostic form of the trace produced by -v and -vv looks
like:
```
check1:1:8: remark: CHECK: expected string found in input
CHECK: abc
^
<stdin>:1:3: note: found here
; abc def
^~~
```
When dumping annotated input is requested (via -dump-input), I find
that this old trace is not useful and is sometimes harmful:
1. The old trace is mostly redundant because the same basic
information also appears in the input dump's annotations.
2. The old trace buries any error diagnostic between it and the input
dump, but I find it useful to see any error diagnostic up front.
3. FILECHECK_OPTS=-dump-input=fail requests annotated input dumps only
for failed FileCheck calls. However, I have to also add -v or -vv
to get a full set of annotations, and that can produce massive
output from all FileCheck calls in all tests. That's a real
problem when I run this in the IDE I use, which grinds to a halt as
it tries to capture all that output.
When -dump-input=fail|always, this patch suppresses the old trace from
-v or -vv. Error diagnostics still print as usual. If you want the
old trace, perhaps to see variable expansions, you can set
-dump-input=none (the default).
Reviewed By: probinson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55825
llvm-svn: 351881
Joel E. Denny