Literal sections can be deduplicated before running ICF. That makes it
easy to compare them during ICF: we can tell if two literals are
constant-equal by comparing their offsets in their OutputSection.
LLD-ELF takes a similar approach.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, gkm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104671
libunwind uses unwind info to find the function address belonging
to the current instruction pointer. libunwind/src/CompactUnwinder.hpp's
step functions read functionStart for UNWIND_X86_64_MODE_STACK_IND
(and for nothing else), so these encodings need a dedicated entry
per function, so that the runtime can get the stacksize off the
`subq` instrunction in the function's prologue.
This matches ld64.
(CompactUnwinder.hpp from https://opensource.apple.com/source/libunwind/
also reads functionStart in a few more cases if `SUPPORT_OLD_BINARIES` is set,
but it defaults to 0, and ld64 seems to not worry about these additional
cases.)
Related upstream bug: https://crbug.com/1220175
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104978
`icfEqClass` only makes sense on ConcatInputSections since (in contrast
to literal sections) they are deduplicated as an atomic unit.
Similarly, `hasPersonality` and `replacement` don't make sense on
literal sections.
This mirrors LLD-ELF, which stores `icfEqClass` only on non-mergeable
sections.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, gkm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104670
We previously did this only for x86_64, but it turns out that
arm64 needs this too -- see PR50791.
Ultimately this is a hack, and we should avoid over-aligning strings
that don't need it. I'm just having a hard time figuring out how ld64 is
determining the right alignment.
No new test for this since we were already testing this behavior for
x86_64, and extending it to arm64 seems too trivial.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104835
Add tests for pending TODOs, plus some global cleanups:
* No fold: func has personality/LSDA
* Fold: reference to absolute symbol with different name but identical value
* No fold: reloc references to absolute symbols with different values
* No fold: N_ALT_ENTRY symbols
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104721
"""Bitcode symbols only exist before LTO runs, and only serve the purpose of
resolving visibility so LTO can better optimize. Running LTO creates ObjFiles
from BitcodeFiles, and those ObjFiles contain regular Defined symbols (with
isec set and all) that will replace the bitcode symbols. So things should
(hopefully) work as-is :)"""
-- https://reviews.llvm.org/rGdbbc8d8333f29cf4ad6f4793da1adf71bbfdac69#inline-6081
Fixes PR50529. With this, lld-linked Chromium base_unittests passes on arm macs.
Surprisingly, no measurable impact on link time.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104681
The variable used to need the wider scope, but doesn't after the
reland. See LC_LINKER_OPTIONS-related discussion on
https://reviews.llvm.org/D104353 for background.
Real zerofill sections go after __thread_bss, since zerofill sections
must all be at the end of their segment and __thread_bss must be right
after __thread_data.
Works fine already, but wasn't tested as far as I can tell.
Also tweak comment about zerofill sections a bit.
No behavior change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104609
We make it less than INT_MAX in order not to conflict with the ordering
of zerofill sections, which must always be placed at the end of their
segment.
This is the more structural fix for the issue addressed in {D104596}.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104607
The exact location doesn't matter, but it should be in front
of __thread_bss. We put it right in front of __thread_data
which is where ld64 seems to put it as well.
Fixes PR50769.
(As mentioned on the bug, there is probably a more structural
fix too, see comment 5. If we don't address this, it's likely
we'll run into this again with other synthetic sections. But
for now, let's fix the immediate breakage.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104596
...instead of S_NON_LAZY_SYMBOL_POINTERS. This matches ld64.
Part of PR50769.
While here, also remove an old TODO that was done in D87178.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104594
findLibrary() returned a StringRef while findFramework & other helper
functions returned std::strings. Standardize on std::string.
(I initially tried making the helper functions all return StringRefs,
but I realized we shouldn't return input StringRefs since their
lifetimes would not be obvious from the calling code.)
Previously, we asserted that such a case was invalid, but in fact
`ld -r` can emit such symbols if the input contained a (true) private
extern, or if it contained a symbol started with "L".
Non-extern symbols marked as private extern are essentially equivalent
to regular TU-scoped symbols, so no new functionality is needed.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104502
The `icf` command-line option is not present in ld64, so it should use the LLD option syntax, which begins with double dashes and separates primary option from any suboption with the equal sign.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104548
ICF = Identical C(ode|OMDAT) Folding
This is the LLD ELF/COFF algorithm, adapted for MachO. So far, only `-icf all` is supported. In order to support `-icf safe`, we will need to port address-significance tables (`.addrsig` directives) to MachO, which will come in later diffs.
`check-{llvm,clang,lld}` have 0 regressions for `lld -icf all` vs. baseline ld64.
We only run ICF on `__TEXT,__text` for reasons explained in the block comment in `ConcatOutputSection.cpp`.
Here is the perf impact for linking `chromium_framekwork` on a Mac Pro (16-core Xeon W) for the non-ICF case vs. pre-ICF:
```
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 20 4.27 4.44 4.34 4.349 0.043029977
+ 20 4.37 4.46 4.405 4.4115 0.025188761
Difference at 95.0% confidence
0.0625 +/- 0.0225658
1.43711% +/- 0.518873%
(Student's t, pooled s = 0.0352566)
```
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, int3
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103292
We need to dedup archive loads (similar to what we do for dylib
loads).
I noticed this issue after building some Swift stuff that used
`-force_load_swift_libs`, as it caused some Swift archives to be loaded
many times.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104353
I removed them in rG5de7467e982 but @thakis pointed out that
they were useful to keep, so here they are again. I've also converted
the `!isCoalescedWeak()` asserts into `!shouldOmitFromOutput()` asserts,
since the latter check subsumes the former.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104169
It's a warning in ld64. While having LLD be stricter would be nice, it
makes it harder for it to be a drop-in replacement into existing builds.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104333
I *think* this is the fix, with the regression being introduced by
D104199. Not 100% sure since MSAN isn't supported on my Mac machine, and
it'll take some time to spin up a Linux box... will look at the
buildbots for answers
I wanted to see if we would get any perf wins out of this, but
it doesn't seem to be the case. But it still seems worth committing.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104200
We don't need to define any special behavior for this section,
so creating a subclass for it is redundant.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104199
`outSecFileOff` and the associated `getFileOffset()` accessors were
unnecessary.
For all the cases we care about, `outSecFileOff` is the same as
`outSecOff`. The only time they deviate is if there are zerofill
sections within a given segment. But since zerofill sections are always
at the end of a segment, the only sections where the two values deviate
are zerofill sections themselves. And we never actually query the
outSecFileOff of zerofill sections.
As for `getFileOffset()`, the only place it was being used was to
calculate the offset of the entry symbol. However, we can compute that
value by just taking the difference between the address of the entry
symbol and the address of the Mach-O header. In fact, this appears to be
what ld64 itself does. This difference is the same as the file offset as
long as there are no intervening zerofill sections, but since `__text`
is the first section in `__TEXT`, this never happens, so our previous
use of `getFileOffset()` was not wrong -- just inefficient.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104177
Sort the addresses stored in FunctionStarts section.
Previously we were encoding potentially large numbers (due to unsigned overflow).
Test plan: make check-all
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103662
D103977 broke a bunch of stuff as I had only tested the release build
which eliminated asserts.
I've retained the asserts where possible, but I also removed a bunch
instead of adding a whole lot of verbose ConcatInputSection casts.
Literal sections are not atomically live or dead. Rather,
liveness is tracked for each individual literal they contain. CStrings
have their liveness tracked via a `live` bit in StringPiece, and
fixed-width literals have theirs tracked via a BitVector.
The live-marking code now needs to track the offset within each section
that is to be marked live, in order to identify the literal at that
particular offset.
Numbers for linking chromium_framework on my 3.2 GHz 16-Core Intel Xeon W
with both `-dead_strip` and `--deduplicate-literals`, with and without this diff
applied:
```
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 20 4.32 4.44 4.375 4.372 0.03105174
+ 20 4.3 4.39 4.36 4.3595 0.023277502
No difference proven at 95.0% confidence
```
This gives us size savings of about 0.4%.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103979
This is motivated by an upcoming diff in which the
WordLiteralInputSection ctor sets itself up based on the value of its
section flags. As such, it needs to be passed the `flags` value as part
of its ctor parameters, instead of having them assigned after the fact
in `parseSection()`. While refactoring code to make that possible, I
figured it would make sense for the other InputSections to also take
their initial values as ctor parameters.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103978
These fields currently live in the parent InputSection class,
but they should be specific to ConcatInputSection, since the other
InputSection classes (that contain literals) aren't atomically live or
dead -- rather their component string/int literals should have
individual liveness states. (An upcoming diff will add liveness bits for
StringPieces and fixed-sized literals.)
I also factored out some asserts for isCoalescedWeak() in MarkLive.cpp.
We now avoid putting coalesced sections in the `inputSections` vector,
so we don't have to check/assert against it everywhere.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103977
Conceptually, the implementation is pretty straightforward: we put each
literal value into a hashtable, and then write out the keys of that
hashtable at the end.
In contrast with ELF, the Mach-O format does not support variable-length
literals that aren't strings. Its literals are either 4, 8, or 16 bytes
in length. LLD-ELF dedups its literals via sorting + uniq'ing, but since
we don't need to worry about overly-long values, we should be able to do
a faster job by just hashing.
That said, the implementation right now is far from optimal, because we
add to those hashtables serially. To parallelize this, we'll need a
basic concurrent hashtable (only needs to support concurrent writes w/o
interleave reads), which shouldn't be to hard to implement, but I'd like
to punt on it for now.
Numbers for linking chromium_framework on my 3.2 GHz 16-Core Intel Xeon W:
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 20 4.27 4.39 4.315 4.3225 0.033225703
+ 20 4.36 4.82 4.44 4.4845 0.13152846
Difference at 95.0% confidence
0.162 +/- 0.0613971
3.74783% +/- 1.42041%
(Student's t, pooled s = 0.0959262)
This corresponds to binary size savings of 2MB out of 335MB, or 0.6%.
It's not a great tradeoff as-is, but as mentioned our implementation can
be signficantly optimized, and literal dedup will unlock more
opportunities for ICF to identify identical structures that reference
the same literals.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, gkm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103113
Not sure sectionType() carries its weight, but while we have it
we should use it consistently.
No behavior change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104027
Jez Ng