There seems to be a consensus that we should allow 0D vectors:
https://llvm.discourse.group/t/should-we-have-0-d-vectors/3097
This commit is only the first step: it changes the verifier and the parser to
allow vectors like `vector<f32>` (but does not allow explicit 0 dimensions,
i.e., `vector<0xf32>` is not allowed).
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114086
The change is based on the proposal from the following discussion:
https://llvm.discourse.group/t/rfc-memreftype-affine-maps-list-vs-single-item/3968
* Introduce `MemRefLayoutAttr` interface to get `AffineMap` from an `Attribute`
(`AffineMapAttr` implements this interface).
* Store layout as a single generic `MemRefLayoutAttr`.
This change removes the affine map composition feature and related API.
Actually, while the `MemRefType` itself supported it, almost none of the upstream
can work with more than 1 affine map in `MemRefType`.
The introduced `MemRefLayoutAttr` allows to re-implement this feature
in a more stable way - via separate attribute class.
Also the interface allows to use different layout representations rather than affine maps.
For example, the described "stride + offset" form, which is currently supported in ASM parser only,
can now be expressed as separate attribute.
Reviewed By: ftynse, bondhugula
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111553
Precursor: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110200
Removed redundant ops from the standard dialect that were moved to the
`arith` or `math` dialects.
Renamed all instances of operations in the codebase and in tests.
Reviewed By: rriddle, jpienaar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110797
Lots of custom ops have hand-rolled comma-delimited parsing loops, as does
the MLIR parser itself. Provides a standard interface for doing this that
is less error prone and less boilerplate.
While here, extend Delimiter to support <> and {} delimited sequences as
well (I have a use for <> in CIRCT specifically).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110122
SparseElementsAttr currently does not perform any verfication on construction, with the only verification existing within the parser. This revision moves the parser verification to SparseElementsAttr, and also adds additional verification for when a sparse index is not valid.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109189
Currently the builtin dialect is the default namespace used for parsing
and printing. As such module and func don't need to be prefixed.
In the case of some dialects that defines new regions for their own
purpose (like SpirV modules for example), it can be beneficial to
change the default dialect in order to improve readability.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107236
In a region with multiple blocks the verifier will try to look for
dominance and may get successor list for blocks, even though a block
may be empty or does not end with a terminator.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104411
This CL introduces a generic attribute (called "encoding") on tensors.
The attribute currently does not carry any concrete information, but the type
system already correctly determines that tensor<8xi1,123> != tensor<8xi1,321>.
The attribute will be given meaning through an interface in subsequent CLs.
See ongoing discussion on discourse:
[RFC] Introduce a sparse tensor type to core MLIR
https://llvm.discourse.group/t/rfc-introduce-a-sparse-tensor-type-to-core-mlir/2944
A sparse tensor will look something like this:
```
// named alias with all properties we hold dear:
#CSR = {
// individual named attributes
}
// actual sparse tensor type:
tensor<?x?xf64, #CSR>
```
I see the following rough 5 step plan going forward:
(1) introduce this format attribute in this CL, currently still empty
(2) introduce attribute interface that gives it "meaning", focused on sparse in first phase
(3) rewrite sparse compiler to use new type, remove linalg interface and "glue"
(4) teach passes to deal with new attribute, by rejecting/asserting on non-empty attribute as simplest solution, or doing meaningful rewrite in the longer run
(5) add FE support, document, test, publicize new features, extend "format" meaning to other domains if useful
Reviewed By: stellaraccident, bondhugula
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99548
The patch enables the use of index type in vectors. It is a prerequisite to support vectorization for indexed Linalg operations. This refactoring became possible due to the newly introduced data layout infrastructure. The data layout of a module defines the bitwidth of the index type needed to verify bitcasts and similar vector operations.
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99948
In particular for Graph Regions, the terminator needs is just a
historical artifact of the generalization of MLIR from CFG region.
Operations like Module don't need a terminator, and before Module
migrated to be an operation with region there wasn't any needed.
To validate the feature, the ModuleOp is migrated to use this trait and
the ModuleTerminator operation is deleted.
This patch is likely to break clients, if you're in this case:
- you may iterate on a ModuleOp with `getBody()->without_terminator()`,
the solution is simple: just remove the ->without_terminator!
- you created a builder with `Builder::atBlockTerminator(module_body)`,
just use `Builder::atBlockEnd(module_body)` instead.
- you were handling ModuleTerminator: it isn't needed anymore.
- for generic code, a `Block::mayNotHaveTerminator()` may be used.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98468
This has been a TODO for a while, and prevents breakages for attributes/types that contain floats that can't roundtrip outside of the hex format.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98808
Based on the following discussion:
https://llvm.discourse.group/t/rfc-memref-memory-shape-as-attribute/2229
The goal of the change is to make memory space property to have more
expressive representation, rather then "magic" integer values.
It will allow to have more clean ASM form:
```
gpu.func @test(%arg0: memref<100xf32, "workgroup">)
// instead of
gpu.func @test(%arg0: memref<100xf32, 3>)
```
Explanation for `Attribute` choice instead of plain `string`:
* `Attribute` classes allow to use more type safe API based on RTTI.
* `Attribute` classes provides faster comparison operator based on
pointer comparison in contrast to generic string comparison.
* `Attribute` allows to store more complex things, like structs or dictionaries.
It will allows to have more complex memory space hierarchy.
This commit preserve old integer-based API and implements it on top
of the new one.
Depends on D97476
Reviewed By: rriddle, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96145
In the overwhelmingly common case, enum attribute case strings represent valid identifiers in MLIR syntax. This revision updates the format generator to format as a keyword in these cases, removing the need to wrap values in a string. The parser still retains the ability to parse the string form, but the printer will use the keyword form when applicable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94575
Zero bit integer types are supported by IntegerType for consistency,
but the asmparser never got updated. Allow them to be parsed, as
required to fix CIRCT issue #316
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93089
This fixes a crash when no elements are parsed, but the type expects at least one.
Fixes PR#47763
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92982
- When a block is not empty and does not end with a terminator, flag the error on the
last operation of the block instead of the start of the block.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90988
- Verify that attributes parsed using a custom parser do not have duplicates.
- If there are duplicated in the attribute dictionary in the input, they get caught during the
dictionary parsing.
- This check verifies that there is no duplication between the parsed dictionary and any
attributes that might be added by the custom parser (or when the custom parsing code
adds duplicate attributes).
- Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48025
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90502
This revision optimizes the parsing of hex strings by using the checked variant of llvm::fromHex, and adding a specialized method to Token for extracting hex strings. This leads a large decrease in compile time when parsing large hex constants (one example: 2.6 seconds -> 370 miliseconds)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90266
This also beefs up the test coverage:
- Make unranked memref testing consistent with ranked memrefs.
- Add testing for the invalid element type cases.
This is not quite NFC: index types are now allowed in unranked memrefs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85541
Some dialects have semantics which is not well represented by common
SSA structures with dominance constraints. This patch allows
operations to declare the 'kind' of their contained regions.
Currently, two kinds are allowed: "SSACFG" and "Graph". The only
difference between them at the moment is that SSACFG regions are
required to have dominance, while Graph regions are not required to
have dominance. The intention is that this Interface would be
generated by ODS for existing operations, although this has not yet
been implemented. Presumably, if someone were interested in code
generation, we might also have a "CFG" dialect, which defines control
flow, but does not require SSA.
The new behavior is mostly identical to the previous behavior, since
registered operations without a RegionKindInterface are assumed to
contain SSACFG regions. However, the behavior has changed for
unregistered operations. Previously, these were checked for
dominance, however the new behavior allows dominance violations, in
order to allow the processing of unregistered dialects with Graph
regions. One implication of this is that regions in unregistered
operations with more than one op are no longer CSE'd (since it
requires dominance info).
I've also reorganized the LangRef documentation to remove assertions
about "sequential execution", "SSA Values", and "Dominance". Instead,
the core IR is simply "ordered" (i.e. totally ordered) and consists of
"Values". I've also clarified some things about how control flow
passes between blocks in an SSACFG region. Control Flow must enter a
region at the entry block and follow terminator operation successors
or be returned to the containing op. Graph regions do not define a
notion of control flow.
see discussion here:
https://llvm.discourse.group/t/rfc-allowing-dialects-to-relax-the-ssa-dominance-condition/833/53
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80358
The error message in the `std.constant` verifier for function-typed constants
had the name of the undefined function hardcoded to `bar`. Report the actual
name instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82666
Summary:
- Print function name when ReturnOp verification fails
- This helps easily finding the invalid ReturnOp in an IR dump.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81513
This simplifies a lot of handling of BoolAttr/IntegerAttr. For example, a lot of places currently have to handle both IntegerAttr and BoolAttr. In other places, a decision is made to pick one which can lead to surprising results for users. For example, DenseElementsAttr currently uses BoolAttr for i1 even if the user initialized it with an Array of i1 IntegerAttrs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81047
It is possible for optimizations to create SSA code which violates
the dominance property in unreachable blocks. Equivalently, dominance
computed using normal mechanisms is undefined in unreachable blocks.
See discussion here: https://llvm.discourse.group/t/rfc-allowing-dialects-to-relax-the-ssa-dominance-condition/833/51
This patch only checks the dominance condition inside blocks which are
reachable from the the entry block of their region. Note that the
dominance conditions of regions contained in an unreachable block are
still checked.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79922
The types of forward references are checked that they match with other
uses, but they do not check they match with the definition.
func @forward_reference_type_check() -> (i8) {
br ^bb2
^bb1:
return %1 : i8
^bb2:
%1 = "bar"() : () -> (f32)
br ^bb1
}
Would be parsed and the use site of '%1' would be silently changed to
'f32'.
This commit adds a test for this case, and a check during parsing for
the types to match.
Patch by Matthew Parkinson <mattpark@microsoft.com>
Closes D79317.
This revision allows for creating DenseElementsAttrs and accessing elements using std::complex<APInt>/std::complex<APFloat>. This allows for opaquely accessing and transforming complex values. This is used by the printer/parser to provide pretty printing for complex values. The form for complex values matches that of std::complex, i.e.:
```
// `(` element `,` element `)`
dense<(10,10)> : tensor<complex<i64>>
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79296
It's common in many dialects to use tensors to themselves hold tensor shapes (for example, the shape is itself the result of some non-trivial calculation). Currently, such dialects have to use `tensor<?xi64>` or worse (like allowing either i32 or i64 tensors to represent shapes). `tensor<?xindex>` is the natural type to represent this, but is currently disallowed. This patch allows it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76726
Summary:
The attribute parser fails to correctly parse unsigned 64 bit
attributes as the check `isNegative ? (int64_t)-val.getValue() >= 0
: (int64_t)val.getValue() < 0` will falsely detect an overflow for
unsigned values larger than 2^63-1.
This patch reworks the overflow logic to instead of doing arithmetic
on int64_t use APInt::isSignBitSet() and knowledge of the attribute
type.
Test-cases which verify the de-facto behavior of the parser and
triggered the previous faulty handing of unsigned 64 bit attrbutes are
also added.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76493
Summary:
This revision removes all of the functionality related to successor operands on the core Operation class. This greatly simplifies a lot of handling of operands, as well as successors. For example, DialectConversion no longer needs a special "matchAndRewrite" for branching terminator operations.(Note, the existing method was also broken for operations with variadic successors!!)
This also enables terminator operations to define their own relationships with successor arguments, instead of the hardcoded "pass-through" behavior that exists today.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75318
This revision add support for formatting successor variables in a similar way to operands, attributes, etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74789
Thus far IntegerType has been signless: a value of IntegerType does
not have a sign intrinsically and it's up to the specific operation
to decide how to interpret those bits. For example, std.addi does
two's complement arithmetic, and std.divis/std.diviu treats the first
bit as a sign.
This design choice was made some time ago when we did't have lots
of dialects and dialects were more rigid. Today we have much more
extensible infrastructure and different dialect may want different
modelling over integer signedness. So while we can say we want
signless integers in the standard dialect, we cannot dictate for
others. Requiring each dialect to model the signedness semantics
with another set of custom types is duplicating the functionality
everywhere, considering the fundamental role integer types play.
This CL extends the IntegerType with a signedness semantics bit.
This gives each dialect an option to opt in signedness semantics
if that's what they want and helps code sharing. The parser is
modified to recognize `si[1-9][0-9]*` and `ui[1-9][0-9]*` as
signed and unsigned integer types, respectively, leaving the
original `i[1-9][0-9]*` to continue to mean no indication over
signedness semantics. All existing dialects are not affected (yet)
as this is a feature to opt in.
More discussions can be found at:
https://groups.google.com/a/tensorflow.org/d/msg/mlir/XmkV8HOPWpo/7O4X0Nb_AQAJ
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72533
Summary: DenseElementsAttr is used to store tensor data, which in some cases can become extremely large(100s of mb). In these cases it is much more efficient to format the data as a string of hex values instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74922
Summary: bfloat16 doesn't have a valid APFloat format, so we have to use double semantics when storing it. This change makes sure that hexadecimal values can be round-tripped properly given this fact.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72667
Summary: The current syntax for AffineMapAttr and IntegerSetAttr conflict with function types, making it currently impossible to round-trip function types(and e.g. FuncOp) in the IR. This revision changes the syntax for the attributes by wrapping them in a keyword. AffineMapAttr is wrapped with `affine_map<>` and IntegerSetAttr is wrapped with `affine_set<>`.
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache, ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72429
This simplifies the implementation quite a bit, and removes the need for explicit string munging. One change is made to some of the enum elements of SPV_DimAttr to ensure that they are proper identifiers; The string form is now prefixed with 'Dim'.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 278027132
This allows dialect-specific attributes to be attached to func results. (or more specifically, FunctionLike ops).
For example:
```
func @f() -> (i32 {my_dialect.some_attr = 3})
```
This attaches my_dialect.some_attr with value 3 to the first result of func @f.
Another more complex example:
```
func @g() -> (i32, f32 {my_dialect.some_attr = "foo", other_dialect.some_other_attr = [1,2,3]}, i1)
```
Here, the second result has two attributes attached.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 275564165
Michal Terepeta