Summary:
The affected LIT test intends to test the correct use of divergence
analysis to detect a divergent branch with a uniform predicate. The
passes involved are LLVM IR passes, but the test runs llc and tries to
match against generated ISA, which makes it hard to demonstrate that
the intended behavior was really tested. Replaced this with a test
that invokes opt on the required passes and then checks for the
appropriate changes in the LLVM IR.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75267
Summary:
Check that a s_cbranch_execz is not a loop exit before removing it.
As the pass is generating infinite loops.
Reviewers: cdevadas, arsenm, nhaehnle
Reviewed By: nhaehnle
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, yaxunl, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, kerbowa, llvm-commits, dstuttard, foad
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72997
The current implementation of skip insertion (SIInsertSkip) makes it a
mandatory pass required for correctness. Initially, the idea was to
have an optional pass. This patch inserts the s_cbranch_execz upfront
during SILowerControlFlow to skip over the sections of code when no
lanes are active. Later, SIRemoveShortExecBranches removes the skips
for short branches, unless there is a sideeffect and the skip branch is
really necessary.
This new pass will replace the handling of skip insertion in the
existing SIInsertSkip Pass.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68092
The current implementation of skip insertion (SIInsertSkip) makes it a
mandatory pass required for correctness. Initially, the idea was to
have an optional pass. This patch inserts the s_cbranch_execz upfront
during SILowerControlFlow to skip over the sections of code when no
lanes are active. Later, SIRemoveShortExecBranches removes the skips
for short branches, unless there is a sideeffect and the skip branch is
really necessary.
This new pass will replace the handling of skip insertion in the
existing SIInsertSkip Pass.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68092
Patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D43256 introduced more aggressive loop layout optimization which depends on profile information. If profile information is not available, the statically estimated profile information(generated by BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp) is used. If user program doesn't behave as BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp expected, the layout may be worse.
To be conservative this patch restores the original layout algorithm in plain mode. But user can still try the aggressive layout optimization with -force-precise-rotation-cost=true.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65673
llvm-svn: 369664
It caused assertions to fire when building Chromium:
lib/CodeGen/LiveDebugValues.cpp:331: bool
{anonymous}::LiveDebugValues::OpenRangesSet::empty() const: Assertion
`Vars.empty() == VarLocs.empty() && "open ranges are inconsistent"' failed.
See https://crbug.com/992871#c3 for how to reproduce.
> Patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D43256 introduced more aggressive loop layout optimization which depends on profile information. If profile information is not available, the statically estimated profile information(generated by BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp) is used. If user program doesn't behave as BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp expected, the layout may be worse.
>
> To be conservative this patch restores the original layout algorithm in plain mode. But user can still try the aggressive layout optimization with -force-precise-rotation-cost=true.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65673
llvm-svn: 368579
Patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D43256 introduced more aggressive loop layout optimization which depends on profile information. If profile information is not available, the statically estimated profile information(generated by BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp) is used. If user program doesn't behave as BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp expected, the layout may be worse.
To be conservative this patch restores the original layout algorithm in plain mode. But user can still try the aggressive layout optimization with -force-precise-rotation-cost=true.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65673
llvm-svn: 368339
Current findBestLoopTop can find and move one kind of block to top, a latch block has one successor. Another common case is:
* a latch block
* it has two successors, one is loop header, another is exit
* it has more than one predecessors
If it is below one of its predecessors P, only P can fall through to it, all other predecessors need a jump to it, and another conditional jump to loop header. If it is moved before loop header, all its predecessors jump to it, then fall through to loop header. So all its predecessors except P can reduce one taken branch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43256
llvm-svn: 363471
"Divergence driven ISel. Assign register class for cross block values
according to the divergence."
that discovered the design flaw leading to several issues that
required to be solved before.
This change reverts AMDGPU specific changes and keeps common part
unaffected.
llvm-svn: 362749
Details: To make instruction selection really divergence driven it is necessary to assign
the correct register classes to the cross block values beforehand. For the divergent targets
same value type requires different register classes dependent on the value divergence.
Reviewers: rampitec, nhaehnle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59990
This commit was reverted because of the build failure.
The reason was mlformed patch.
Build failure fixed.
llvm-svn: 361741
Details: To make instruction selection really divergence driven it is necessary to assign
the correct register classes to the cross block values beforehand. For the divergent targets
same value type requires different register classes dependent on the value divergence.
Reviewers: rampitec, nhaehnle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59990
llvm-svn: 361644
Summary:
If a divergent branch instruction is marked as divergent by propagation
rule 2 in DivergencePropagator::exploreSyncDependency() and its condition
is uniform, that branch would incorrectly be assumed to be uniform.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56331
llvm-svn: 350532
Sameer Sahasrabuddhe