Commit Graph

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Francis Visoiu Mistrih 25528d6de7 [CodeGen] Unify MBB reference format in both MIR and debug output
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format, print
MBB references as '%bb.5'.

The MIR printer prints the IR name of a MBB only for block definitions.

* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#" << ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)->getNumber\(\)/" << printMBBReference(*\1)/g'
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#" << ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)\.getNumber\(\)/" << printMBBReference(\1)/g'
* find . \( -name "*.txt" -o -name "*.s" -o -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#([0-9]+)/%bb.\1/g'
* grep -nr 'BB#' and fix

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40422

llvm-svn: 319665
2017-12-04 17:18:51 +00:00
Sanjay Patel bbd4c79c8f Use the 'arcp' fast-math-flag when combining repeated FP divisors
This is a usage of the IR-level fast-math-flags now that they are propagated to SDNodes. 
This was originally part of D8900.

Removing the global 'enable-unsafe-fp-math' checks will require auto-upgrade and 
possibly other changes.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9708

llvm-svn: 251450
2015-10-27 20:27:25 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 133e68b45c ignore duplicate divisor uses when transforming into reciprocal multiplies (PR24141)
PR24141: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24141
contains a test case where we have duplicate entries in a node's uses() list.

After r241826, we use CombineTo() to delete dead nodes when combining the uses into
reciprocal multiplies, but this fails if we encounter the just-deleted node again in
the list.

The solution in this patch is to not add duplicate entries to the list of users that
we will subsequently iterate over. For the test case, this avoids triggering the
combine divisors logic entirely because there really is only one user of the divisor.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11345

llvm-svn: 243500
2015-07-28 23:28:22 +00:00
Sanjay Patel e2361d4a18 fix an invisible bug when combining repeated FP divisors
This patch fixes bugs that were exposed by the addition of fast-math-flags in the DAG:
r237046 ( http://reviews.llvm.org/rL237046 ):

1. When replacing a division node, it's not enough to RAUW.
   We should call CombineTo() to delete dead nodes and combine again.
2. Because we are changing the DAG, we can't return an empty SDValue
   after the transform. As the code comments say:

    Visitation implementation - Implement dag node combining for different node types.
    The semantics are as follows: Return Value:
      SDValue.getNode() == 0 - No change was made
      SDValue.getNode() == N - N was replaced, is dead and has been handled.
      otherwise - N should be replaced by the returned Operand.

The new test case shows no difference with or without this patch, but it will crash if
we re-apply r237046 or enable FMF via the current -enable-fmf-dag cl::opt.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9893

llvm-svn: 241826
2015-07-09 17:28:37 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 093fb170a6 [x86] enable machine combiner reassociations for scalar single-precision multiplies
llvm-svn: 241752
2015-07-08 22:35:20 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 7024b8121a [x86] Implement combineRepeatedFPDivisors
Set the transform bar at 2 divisions because the fastest current
x86 FP divider circuit is in SandyBridge / Haswell at 10 cycle
latency (best case) relative to a 5 cycle multiplier. 
So that's the worst case for this transform (no latency win), 
but multiplies are obviously pipelined while divisions are not,
so there's still a big throughput win which we would expect to
show up in typical FP code.

These are the sequences I'm comparing:

  divss   %xmm2, %xmm0
  mulss   %xmm1, %xmm0
  divss   %xmm2, %xmm0

Becomes:

  movss   LCPI0_0(%rip), %xmm3    ## xmm3 = mem[0],zero,zero,zero
  divss   %xmm2, %xmm3
  mulss   %xmm3, %xmm0
  mulss   %xmm1, %xmm0
  mulss   %xmm3, %xmm0

[Ignore for the moment that we don't optimize the chain of 3 multiplies
into 2 independent fmuls followed by 1 dependent fmul...this is the DAG
version of: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21768 ...if we fix that,
then the transform becomes even more profitable on all targets.]

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8941

llvm-svn: 235012
2015-04-15 15:22:55 +00:00