Summary:
Added basic representation and parsing/sema handling of array-shaping
operations. Array shaping expression is an expression of form ([s0]..[sn])base,
where s0, ..., sn must be a positive integer, base - a pointer. This
expression is a kind of cast operation that converts pointer expression
into an array-like kind of expression.
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, jdoerfert
Subscribers: guansong, arphaman, cfe-commits, caomhin, kkwli0
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74144
Summary: We mark these decls as invalid.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77037
Summary:
If the bitwith expr contains errors, we mark the field decl invalid.
This patch also tweaks the behavior of ObjCInterfaceDecl to be consistent with
existing RecordDecl -- getObjCLayout method is only called with valid decls.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76953
Summary:
The kernel kmalloc function may return a constant value ZERO_SIZE_PTR
if a zero-sized block is allocated. This special value is allowed to
be passed to kfree and should produce no warning.
This is a simple version but should be no problem. The macro is always
detected independent of if this is a kernel source code or any other
code.
Reviewers: Szelethus, martong
Reviewed By: Szelethus, martong
Subscribers: rnkovacs, xazax.hun, baloghadamsoftware, szepet, a.sidorin, mikhail.ramalho, Szelethus, donat.nagy, dkrupp, gamesh411, Charusso, martong, ASDenysPetrov, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76830
Iterator checkers (and planned container checkers) need the option
aggressive-binary-operation-simplification to be enabled. Without this
option they may cause assertions. To prevent such misuse, this patch adds
a preventive check which issues a warning and denies the registartion of
the checker if this option is disabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75171
The __builtin_stdarg_start is the legacy spelling of __builtin_va_start.
It should behave exactly the same, but for the last 9 years it would
behave subtly different for diagnostics. Follow the change from
29ad95b232 to require custom type checking.
Currently, bpf does not specify 128bit alignment in its
layout spec. So for a structure like
struct ipv6_key_t {
unsigned pid;
unsigned __int128 saddr;
unsigned short lport;
};
clang will generate IR type
%struct.ipv6_key_t = type { i32, [12 x i8], i128, i16, [14 x i8] }
Additional padding is to ensure later IR->MIR can generate correct
stack layout with target layout spec.
But it is common practice for a tracing program to be
first compiled with target flag (e.g., x86_64 or aarch64) through
clang to generate IR and then go through llc to generate bpf
byte code. Tracing program often refers to kernel internal
data structures which needs to be compiled with non-bpf target.
But such a compilation model may cause a problem on aarch64.
The bcc issue https://github.com/iovisor/bcc/issues/2827
reported such a problem.
For the above structure, since aarch64 has "i128:128" in its
layout string, the generated IR will have
%struct.ipv6_key_t = type { i32, i128, i16 }
Since bpf does not have "i128:128" in its spec string,
the selectionDAG assumes alignment 8 for i128 and
computes the stack storage size for the above is 32 bytes,
which leads incorrect code later.
The x86_64 does not have this issue as it does not have
"i128:128" in its layout spec as it does permits i128 to
be alignmented at 8 bytes at stack. Its IR type looks like
%struct.ipv6_key_t = type { i32, [12 x i8], i128, i16, [14 x i8] }
The fix here is add i128 support in layout spec, the same as
aarch64. The only downside is we may have less optimal stack
allocation in certain cases since we require 16byte alignment
for i128 instead of 8. But this is probably fine as i128 is
not used widely and in most cases users should already
have proper alignment.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76587
The main purpose of introducing these builtins is to add a range
metadata [1, 1025) on the work group size loaded from dispatch
ptr, which cannot be done by source code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76772
scope.
There are a few contexts in which we assume a name is a template name;
if such a context is one where we should perform an unqualified lookup,
and lookup finds nothing, we would form a dependent template name even
if the name is not dependent. This happens in particular for the lookup
of a pseudo-destructor.
In passing, rename ActOnDependentTemplateName to just ActOnTemplateName
given that we apply it for non-dependent template names too.
Instead of bailing out of parsing when we encounter an invalid
template-name or template arguments in a template-id, produce an
annotation token describing the invalid construct.
This avoids duplicate errors and generally allows us to recover better.
In principle we should be able to extend this to store some kinds of
invalid template-id in the AST for tooling use, but that isn't handled
as part of this change.
Currently -fno-unroll-loops is ignored when doing LTO on Darwin. This
patch adds a new -lto-no-unroll-loops option to the LTO code generator
and forwards it to the linker if -fno-unroll-loops is passed.
Reviewers: thegameg, steven_wu
Reviewed By: thegameg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76916
in the debug info with -fdebug-prefix-map.
rdar://problem/55685132
This reapplies an earlier attempt to commit this without
modifications.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76385
Built-in SVE types are trivial, since they're trivially copyable
and support default construction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76692
SVE types are trivially copyable: they can be copied simply
by reproducing the byte representation of the source object.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76691
Summary:
Unsigned types can alias the corresponding signed types. I don't see
that this is explicitly mentioned in the Embedded-C specification, but
I think it should work the same as for the integer types.
Patch by: materi
Reviewers: ebevhan, leonardchan
Reviewed By: leonardchan
Subscribers: kosarev, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76856
This is the second part loosely extracted from D71179 and cleaned up.
This patch provides semantic analysis support for `omp begin/end declare
variant`, mostly as defined in OpenMP technical report 8 (TR8) [0].
The sema handling makes code generation obsolete as we generate "the
right" calls that can just be handled as usual. This handling also
applies to the existing, albeit problematic, `omp declare variant
support`. As a consequence a lot of unneeded code generation and
complexity is removed.
A major purpose of this patch is to provide proper `math.h`/`cmath`
support for OpenMP target offloading. See PR42061, PR42798, PR42799. The
current code was developed with this feature in mind, see [1].
The logic is as follows:
If we have seen a `#pragma omp begin declare variant match(<SELECTOR>)`
but not the corresponding `end declare variant`, and we find a function
definition we will:
1) Create a function declaration for the definition we were about to generate.
2) Create a function definition but with a mangled name (according to
`<SELECTOR>`).
3) Annotate the declaration with the `OMPDeclareVariantAttr`, the same
one used already for `omp declare variant`, using and the mangled
function definition as specialization for the context defined by
`<SELECTOR>`.
When a call is created we inspect it. If the target has an
`OMPDeclareVariantAttr` attribute we try to specialize the call. To this
end, all variants are checked, the best applicable one is picked and a
new call to the specialization is created. The new call is used instead
of the original one to the base function. To keep the AST printing and
tooling possible we utilize the PseudoObjectExpr. The original call is
the syntactic expression, the specialized call is the semantic
expression.
[0] https://www.openmp.org/wp-content/uploads/openmp-TR8.pdf
[1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D61399#change-496lQkg0mhRN
Reviewers: kiranchandramohan, ABataev, RaviNarayanaswamy, gtbercea, grokos, sdmitriev, JonChesterfield, hfinkel, fghanim, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: bollu, guansong, openmp-commits, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75779
This is the first part extracted from D71179 and cleaned up.
This patch provides parsing support for `omp begin/end declare variant`,
as defined in OpenMP technical report 8 (TR8) [0].
A major purpose of this patch is to provide proper math.h/cmath support
for OpenMP target offloading. See PR42061, PR42798, PR42799. The current
code was developed with this feature in mind, see [1].
[0] https://www.openmp.org/wp-content/uploads/openmp-TR8.pdf
[1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D61399#change-496lQkg0mhRN
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74941
Summary:
- Even though the bindless surface/texture interfaces are promoted,
there are still code using surface/texture references. For example,
[PR#26400](https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26400) reports the
compilation issue for code using `tex2D` with texture references. For
better compatibility, this patch proposes the support of
surface/texture references.
- Due to the absent documentation and magic headers, it's believed that
`nvcc` does use builtins for texture support. From the limited NVVM
documentation[^nvvm] and NVPTX backend texture/surface related
tests[^test], it's believed that surface/texture references are
supported by replacing their reference types, which are annotated with
`device_builtin_surface_type`/`device_builtin_texture_type`, with the
corresponding handle-like object types, `cudaSurfaceObject_t` or
`cudaTextureObject_t`, in the device-side compilation. On the host
side, that global handle variables are registered and will be
established and updated later when corresponding binding/unbinding
APIs are called[^bind]. Surface/texture references are most like
device global variables but represented in different types on the host
and device sides.
- In this patch, the following changes are proposed to support that
behavior:
+ Refine `device_builtin_surface_type` and
`device_builtin_texture_type` attributes to be applied on `Type`
decl only to check whether a variable is of the surface/texture
reference type.
+ Add hooks in code generation to replace that reference types with
the correponding object types as well as all accesses to them. In
particular, `nvvm.texsurf.handle.internal` should be used to load
object handles from global reference variables[^texsurf] as well as
metadata annotations.
+ Generate host-side registration with proper template argument
parsing.
---
[^nvvm]: https://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/pdf/NVVM_IR_Specification.pdf
[^test]: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/llvm/llvm-project/master/llvm/test/CodeGen/NVPTX/tex-read-cuda.ll
[^bind]: See section 3.2.11.1.2 ``Texture reference API` in [CUDA C Programming Guide](https://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/pdf/CUDA_C_Programming_Guide.pdf).
[^texsurf]: According to NVVM IR, `nvvm.texsurf.handle` should be used. But, the current backend doesn't have that supported. We may revise that later.
Reviewers: tra, rjmccall, yaxunl, a.sidorin
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76365
There was a misisng space between the -march and --cuda-gpu-arch
arguments, so --cuda-gpu-arch wasn't actually being parsed. I'm not
sure what the intent of the sm_10 run lines were, but they error as an
unsupported architecture. Switch these to something else.
This reverts commit 0788acbccb.
This reverts commit c2d7a1f79cedfc9fcb518596aa839da4de0adb69: Revert "[clangd] Add test for FindTarget+RecoveryExpr (which already works). NFC"
It causes a crash on invalid code:
class X {
decltype(unresolved()) foo;
};
constexpr int s = sizeof(X);
Summary:
This patch introduces command-line support for the Armv8.6-a architecture and assembly support for BFloat16. Details can be found
https://community.arm.com/developer/ip-products/processors/b/processors-ip-blog/posts/arm-architecture-developments-armv8-6-a
in addition to the GCC patch for the 8..6-a CLI:
https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2019-11/msg02647.html
In detail this patch
- march options for armv8.6-a
- BFloat16 assembly
This is part of a patch series, starting with command-line and Bfloat16
assembly support. The subsequent patches will upstream intrinsics
support for BFloat16, followed by Matrix Multiplication and the
remaining Virtualization features of the armv8.6-a architecture.
Based on work by:
- labrinea
- MarkMurrayARM
- Luke Cheeseman
- Javed Asbar
- Mikhail Maltsev
- Luke Geeson
Reviewers: SjoerdMeijer, craig.topper, rjmccall, jfb, LukeGeeson
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Subscribers: stuij, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, dexonsmith, danielkiss, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76062
If an error happens which is related to a container the Container
Modeling checker adds note tags to all the container operations along
the bug path. This may be disturbing if there are other containers
beside the one which is affected by the bug. This patch restricts the
note tags to only the affected container and adjust the debug checkers
to be able to test this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75514
Summary: Previously, we dropped the AST node for nonexistent member exprs.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76764
Container operations such as `push_back()`, `pop_front()`
etc. increment and decrement the abstract begin and end
symbols of containers. This patch introduces note tags
to `ContainerModeling` to track these changes. This helps
the user to better identify the source of errors related
to containers and iterators.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73720
As reported in PR45298 and PR45299, vector_size type checking would
crash when done in a situation where the scalar is dependent, such as
a member of the current instantiation.
This is because the scalar checking ensures that you can implicitly
convert a value to a vector-type as long as it doesn't require
truncation. It does this by using the constant evaluator to get the
value as a float. Unfortunately, if the scalar is dependent (such as a
member of the current instantiation), we would hit the assert in the
evaluator.
This patch suppresses the truncation- of-value check in the first phase
of translation. All values are properly errored upon instantiation. This
has one minor regression, in that previously in a non-asserts build,
template<typename T>
struct S {
float4 f(float4 f) {
return k + f;
}
static constexpr k = 1.1; // causes a truncation on conversion.
};
would error immediately. Because 'k' is value dependent (as a
member-of-the-current-instantiation), this would still be evaluatable
(despite normally asserting). Due to this patch, this diagnostic is
delayed until instantiation time.
Summary:
This patch implements the following CDE intrinsics:
T __arm_vcx1q_m(int coproc, T inactive, uint32_t imm, mve_pred_t p);
T __arm_vcx2q_m(int coproc, T inactive, U n, uint32_t imm, mve_pred_t p);
T __arm_vcx3q_m(int coproc, T inactive, U n, V m, uint32_t imm, mve_pred_t p);
T __arm_vcx1qa_m(int coproc, T acc, uint32_t imm, mve_pred_t p);
T __arm_vcx2qa_m(int coproc, T acc, U n, uint32_t imm, mve_pred_t p);
T __arm_vcx3qa_m(int coproc, T acc, U n, V m, uint32_t imm, mve_pred_t p);
The intrinsics are not part of the released ACLE spec, but internally at
Arm we have reached consensus to add them to the next ACLE release.
Reviewers: simon_tatham, MarkMurrayARM, ostannard, dmgreen
Reviewed By: simon_tatham
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, danielkiss, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76610
SPIRV2.0 Spec only specifies Linux mangling, however our downstream has
use for a Windows mangling for these types.
Unfortunately, the SPIRV
spec specifies a single mangling for all pipe types, despite clang
allowing overloading on these types. Because of this, this patch
chooses to mangle the read/writability and element type for the windows
mangling.
The windows manglings in the test all demangle according to demangler:
"void __cdecl test1(struct __clang::ocl_pipe<int,1>)
"void __cdecl test2(struct __clang::ocl_pipe<float,0>)
"void __cdecl test2(struct __clang::ocl_pipe<int,1>)
"void __cdecl test3(struct __clang::ocl_pipe<int const,1>)
"void __cdecl test4(struct __clang::ocl_pipe<union
__clang::__vector<unsigned char,3>,1>)
"void __cdecl test5(struct __clang::ocl_pipe<union
__clang::__vector<int,4>,1>)
"void __cdecl test_reserved_read_pipe(struct __clang::_ASCLglobal<struct
Person > * __ptr64,struct __clang::ocl_pipe<struct Person,1>)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75685
In order to support non-user-named kernels, SYCL needs some way in the
integration headers to name the kernel object themselves. Initially, the
design considered just RTTI naming of the lambdas, this results in a
quite unstable situation in light of some device/host macros.
Additionally, this ends up needing to use RTTI, which is a burden on the
implementation and typically unsupported.
Instead, we've introduced a builtin, __builtin_unique_stable_name, which
takes a type or expression, and results in a constexpr constant
character array that uniquely represents the type (or type of the
expression) being passed to it.
The implementation accomplishes that simply by using a slightly modified
version of the Itanium Mangling. The one exception is when mangling
lambdas, instead of appending the index of the lambda in the function,
it appends the macro-expansion back-trace of the lambda itself in the
form LINE->COL[~LINE->COL...].
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76620
Casts from an SVE type to itself aren't very useful, but they are
supposed to be valid, and could occur in things like macro expansions.
Such casts already work for C++ and are tested by sizeless-1.cpp.
This patch makes them work for C too.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76694
When compiling C, a ?: between two values of the same SVE type
currently gives an error such as:
incompatible operand types ('svint8_t' (aka '__SVInt8_t') and 'svint8_t')
It's supposed to be valid to select between (cv-qualified versions of)
the same SVE type, so this patch adds that case.
These expressions already work for C++ and are tested by
SemaCXX/sizeless-1.cpp.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76693
Summary:
These were accidentally left out of D76123. I added tests for the
other three instructions in this small cross-product family (vqdmlah,
vqrdmlah, vqrdmlash) but missed this one.
Reviewers: miyuki
Reviewed By: miyuki
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, dmgreen, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76714
The code was pretending to be doing something useful with vectors, but
really it was doing nothing: the element type of a vector is always a
scalar type, so constWithPadding would always just return the input constant.
Split off from D75661 so it can be reviewed separately.
While I'm here, also add testcase to show missing vector handling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76528
Summary:
After we parse the switch condition, we don't do the type check for
type-dependent expr (e.g. TypoExpr) (in Sema::CheckSwitchCondition), then the
TypoExpr is corrected to an invalid-type expr (in Sema::MakeFullExpr) and passed
to the ActOnStartOfSwitchStmt, which triggers the assertion.
Fix https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/311
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76592
The argument after -Xarch_device will be added to the arguments for CUDA/HIP
device compilation and will be removed for host compilation.
The argument after -Xarch_host will be added to the arguments for CUDA/HIP
host compilation and will be removed for device compilation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76520
Normally clang avoids creating expressions when it encounters semantic
errors, even if the parser knows which expression to produce.
This works well for the compiler. However, this is not ideal for
source-level tools that have to deal with broken code, e.g. clangd is
not able to provide navigation features even for names that compiler
knows how to resolve.
The new RecoveryExpr aims to capture the minimal set of information
useful for the tools that need to deal with incorrect code:
source range of the expression being dropped,
subexpressions of the expression.
We aim to make constructing RecoveryExprs as simple as possible to
ensure writing code to avoid dropping expressions is easy.
Producing RecoveryExprs can result in new code paths being taken in the
frontend. In particular, clang can produce some new diagnostics now and
we aim to suppress bogus ones based on Expr::containsErrors.
We deliberately produce RecoveryExprs only in the parser for now to
minimize the code affected by this patch. Producing RecoveryExprs in
Sema potentially allows to preserve more information (e.g. type of an
expression), but also results in more code being affected. E.g.
SFINAE checks will have to take presence of RecoveryExprs into account.
Initial implementation only works in C++ mode, as it relies on compiler
postponing diagnostics on dependent expressions. C and ObjC often do not
do this, so they require more work to make sure we do not produce too
many bogus diagnostics on the new expressions.
See documentation of RecoveryExpr for more details.
original patch from Ilya
This change is based on https://reviews.llvm.org/D61722
Reviewers: sammccall, rsmith
Reviewed By: sammccall, rsmith
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69330
Some methods are sometimes declared in the @implementation blocks which
can cause undiagnosed clashes.
Just write a checkObjCDirectMethodClashes() for this purpose.
Also make sure that "unavailable" selectors do not inherit
objc_direct_members.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76643
Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <phabouzit@apple.com>
Radar-ID: rdar://problem/59332804, rdar://problem/59782963
On Windows, when the LLVM toolchain is in the current path (%PATH%), fusing the linker yields c:\{path}\lld.exe whereas the hip tests did not expect the .exe part.
This only happens if LLD is not present in the build folder, which consequently makes the code in Driver::GetProgramPath() to fall back to %PATH% and platform-specific search, which includes the .exe part (see https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/master/clang/lib/Driver/Driver.cpp#L4733).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76631
Upon calling one of the functions `std::advance()`, `std::prev()` and
`std::next()` iterators could get out of their valid range which leads
to undefined behavior. If all these funcions are inlined together with
the functions they call internally (e.g. `__advance()` called by
`std::advance()` in some implementations) the error is detected by
`IteratorRangeChecker` but the bug location is inside the STL
implementation. Even worse, if the budget runs out and one of the calls
is not inlined the bug remains undetected. This patch fixes this
behavior: all the bugs are detected at the point of the STL function
invocation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76379
Whenever the analyzer budget runs out just at the point where
`std::advance()`, `std::prev()` or `std::next()` is invoked the function
are not inlined. This results in strange behavior such as
`std::prev(v.end())` equals `v.end()`. To prevent this model these
functions if they were not inlined. It may also happend that although
`std::advance()` is inlined but a function it calls inside (e.g.
`__advance()` in some implementations) is not. This case is also handled
in this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76361
There's inconsistency in handling array types between the
`distributeFunctionTypeAttrXXX` functions and the
`FunctionTypeUnwrapper` in `SemaType.cpp`.
This patch lets `FunctionTypeUnwrapper` apply function type attributes
through array types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75109
Summary: If the size parameter of `__builtin_memcpy_inline` comes from an un-instantiated template parameter current code would crash.
Reviewers: efriedma, courbet
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76504
Summary:
Since the conditional operator cannot be used with vector conditions
in C, we need a builtin to be able to express this operation in C
source.
Reviewers: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, sunfish, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76538
The .i files in the clang tests (2 files) were not run by lit :
clang/test/CodeGen/debug-info-preprocessed-file.i
clang/test/FrontEnd/processed-input.i
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75853
accept as an extension.
This attempts to accept the same cases a GCC, plus cases where a
comparison is rewritten to an operator== with an integral but non-bool
return type; this is sufficient to avoid most problems with various
major open-source projects (such as ICU) and appears to fix all but one
of the comparison-related C++20 build breaks in LLVM.
This approach is being pursued for standardization.
Before this patch a Clang module skeleton CU would have a
DW_AT_comp_dir pointing to the directory of the module map file, and
this information was not used by anyone. Even worse, LLDB actually
resolves relative DWO paths by appending it to DW_AT_comp_dir. This
patch sets it to the same directory that is used as the main CU's
compilation directory, which would make the LLDB code work.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76377
region.
According to OpenMP 5.0, exactly one scan directive must appear in the loop body of an enclosing worksharing-loop, worksharing-loop SIMD, or simd construct on which a reduction clause with the inscan modifier is present.
FinishThunk, and the invariant of setting and then unsetting
CurCodeDecl, was added in 7f416cc426 (2015). The invariant didn't
exist when I added this musttail codepath in ab2090d107 (2014).
Recently in 28328c3771, I started using this codepath on non-Windows
platforms, and users reported problems during release testing (PR44987).
The issue was already present for users of EH on i686-windows-msvc, so I
added a test for that case as well.
Reviewed By: hans
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76444
Discovered by a downstream user, we found that the CallGraph ignores
callees unless they are defined. This seems foolish, and prevents
combining the report with other reports to create unified reports.
Additionally, declarations contain information that is likely useful to
consumers of the CallGraph.
This patch implements this by splitting the includeInGraph function into
two versions, the current one plus one that is for callees only. The
only difference currently is that includeInGraph checks for a body, then
calls includeCalleeInGraph.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76435
Florian Hahn