There's a generic partial specialization for all std::vector<T> that
does what's desired, so no need for this full specialization that's
causing an ODR violation anyway.
llvm-svn: 318712
Normally this would be cleaned up by promoting the condition operand next. But in the attached case we promoted the result from v2i48 to v2i64 and the condition from v2i1 to v2i48. Then we tried to "promote" the v2i48 condition back to v2i1 because that's what the SetCC result type for v2i64 is on X86 with VLX. But promote is either a NOP or SIGN_EXTEND and this would need a truncation.
With the change here we now get the SetCC type of v2i1 when we're handling the result promotion and the operand no longer needs to be promoted itself.
Fixes PR35272.
llvm-svn: 318706
Summary:
while investigating performance degradation of imagick benchmark
there were found inefficient pattern for UINT_TO_FP conversion.
That pattern causes RAW hazard in assembly code. Specifically,
uitofp IR operator results in poor assembler :
st %i0, [%fp - 952]
ldd [%fp - 952], %f0
it stores 32-bit integer register into memory location and then
loads 64-bit floating point data from that location.
That is exactly RAW hazard case. To optimize that case it is
possible to use SPISD::ITOF and SPISD::XTOF for conversion from
integer to floating point data type and to use ISD::BITCAST to
copy from integer register into floating point register.
The fix is to write custom UINT_TO_FP pattern using SPISD::ITOF,
SPISD::XTOF, ISD::BITCAST.
Patch by Alexey Lapshin
Reviewers: fedor.sergeev, jyknight, dcederman, lero_chris
Reviewed By: jyknight
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36875
llvm-svn: 318704
This adds support for ADL in the range based <algorithm> extensions
(llvm::for_each etc.).
Also adds the helper functions llvm::adl::begin and llvm::adl::end which wrap
std::begin and std::end with ADL support.
Saw this was missing from a recent llvm weekly post about adding llvm::for_each
and thought I might add it.
Patch by Stephen Dollberg!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40006
llvm-svn: 318703
This was reverted due to the tests being run twice on some
build bots. Each run had a slightly different configuration
due to the way in which it was being invoked. This fixes
the problem (albeit in a somewhat hacky way). Hopefully in
the future we can get rid of the workflow of running
debuginfo-tests as part of clang, and then this hack can
go away.
llvm-svn: 318697
Commit b5cbc7760ab8 ("[bpf] allow direct and indirect calls")
allowed more than one function in the bpf program, and
commit 114353884415 ("bpf: fix a bug in trunc-op optimization")
fixed a bug in trunc-op optimization which only showed up
with more than one function in the bpf program.
This patch added a test case for trunc-op optimization
for bpf programs with two functions. Reverting commit
"bpf: fix a bug in trunc-op optimization" will cause
failure for this test case.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
llvm-svn: 318695
Summary:
Add the following heuristics for irreducible loop metadata:
- When an irreducible loop header is missing the loop header weight metadata,
give it the minimum weight seen among other headers.
- Annotate indirectbr targets with the loop header weight metadata (as they are
likely to become irreducible loop headers after indirectbr tail duplication.)
These greatly improve the accuracy of the block frequency info of the Python
interpreter loop (eg. from ~3-16x off down to ~40-55% off) and the Python
performance (eg. unpack_sequence from ~50% slower to ~8% faster than GCC) due to
better register allocation under PGO.
Reviewers: davidxl
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39980
llvm-svn: 318693
MachineSink attempts to place instructions near the basic blocks where
they are needed. Once an instruction has been sunk, its location
relative to other instructions is no longer consistent with the
original source code. In order to ensure correct single-stepping and
profiling, the debug location for sunk instructions is either merged
with the insertion point or erased if the target successor block is
empty.
Patch by Matthew Voss!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39933
llvm-svn: 318679
Summary:
SROA can fail in rewriting alloca but still rewrite a phi resulting
in dead instruction elimination. The Changed flag was not being set
correctly, resulting in downstream passes using stale analyses.
The included test case will assert during the second BDCE pass as a
result.
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39921
llvm-svn: 318677
Summary:
This change reverts r318575 and changes FindDynamicShadowStart() to
keep the memory range it found mapped PROT_NONE to make sure it is
not reused. We also skip MemoryRangeIsAvailable() check, because it
is (a) unnecessary, and (b) would fail anyway.
Reviewers: pcc, vitalybuka, kcc
Subscribers: srhines, kubamracek, mgorny, llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40203
llvm-svn: 318666
The instructions addis,addi, bl are used to calculate the address of TLS thread
local variables. These TLS access code sequences are generated repeatedly every
time the thread local variable is accessed. By communicating to Machine CSE that
X2 is guaranteed to have the same value within the same function call (so called
Caller Preserved Physical Register), the redundant TLS access code sequences are
cleaned up.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39173
llvm-svn: 318661
Manually update test r600.amdgpu-alias-analysis.ll for amdgiz environment
since it cannot be done by script.
The two pointers are swapped in the output because PrintResults in
AliasAnalysisEvaluator.cpp sorts the strings obtained from printAsOperand
before printing them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40131
llvm-svn: 318660
Move the hazard scheduling pass to after the long branch pass, as the
long branch pass can create forbiddden slot hazards. Rather than complicating
the implementation of the long branch pass to handle forbidden slot hazards,
just reorder the passes.
llvm-svn: 318657
The VSX versions have the advantage of a full 64-register target whereas the FP
ones have the advantage of lower latency and higher throughput. So what we’re
after is using the faster instructions in low register pressure situations and
using the larger register file in high register pressure situations.
The heuristic chooses between the following 7 pairs of instructions.
PPC::LXSSPX vs PPC::LFSX
PPC::LXSDX vs PPC::LFDX
PPC::STXSSPX vs PPC::STFSX
PPC::STXSDX vs PPC::STFDX
PPC::LXSIWAX vs PPC::LFIWAX
PPC::LXSIWZX vs PPC::LFIWZX
PPC::STXSIWX vs PPC::STFIWX
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38486
llvm-svn: 318651
Summary:
This patch fixes an issue so that the right alias is printed when the instruction has tied operands. It checks the number of operands in the resulting instruction as opposed to the alias, and then skips over tied operands that should not be printed in the alias.
This allows to generate the preferred assembly syntax for the AArch64 'ins' instruction, which should always be displayed as 'mov' according to the ARM Architecture Reference Manual. Several unit tests have changed as a result, but only to reflect the preferred disassembly. Some other InstAlias patterns (movk/bic/orr) needed a slight adjustment to stop them becoming the default and breaking other unit tests.
Please note that the patch is mostly the same as https://reviews.llvm.org/D29219 which was reverted because of an issue found when running TableGen with the Address Sanitizer. That issue has been addressed in this iteration of the patch.
Reviewers: rengolin, stoklund, huntergr, SjoerdMeijer, rovka
Reviewed By: rengolin, SjoerdMeijer
Subscribers: fhahn, aemerson, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40030
llvm-svn: 318650
This patch adds a new abstraction layer to VPlan and leverages it to model the planned
instructions that manipulate masks (AND, OR, NOT), introduced during predication.
The new VPValue and VPUser classes model how data flows into, through and out
of a VPlan, forming the vertices of a planned Def-Use graph. The new
VPInstruction class is a generic single-instruction Recipe that models a
planned instruction along with its opcode, operands and users. See
VectorizationPlan.rst for more details.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38676
llvm-svn: 318645
Add instruction selector test for RSBri, which is derived from
AsI1_rbin_irs, and make sure it doesn't get mistaken for SUBri, which is
derived from the very similar AsI1_bin_irs pattern.
llvm-svn: 318643
Remove some of the instruction selector tests for binary operators (and,
or, xor). These are all derived from the same kind of TableGen pattern,
AsI1_bin_irs, so there's no point in testing all of them.
llvm-svn: 318642
In rL316552, we ban intersection of unsigned latch range with signed range check and vice
versa, unless the entire range check iteration space is known positive. It was a correct
functional fix that saved us from dealing with ambiguous values, but it also appeared
to be a very restrictive limitation. In particular, in the following case:
loop:
%iv = phi i32 [ 0, %preheader ], [ %iv.next, %latch]
%iv.offset = add i32 %iv, 10
%rc = icmp slt i32 %iv.offset, %len
br i1 %rc, label %latch, label %deopt
latch:
%iv.next = add i32 %iv, 11
%cond = icmp i32 ult %iv.next, 100
br it %cond, label %loop, label %exit
Here, the unsigned iteration range is `[0, 100)`, and the safe range for range
check is `[-10, %len - 10)`. For unsigned iteration spaces, we use unsigned
min/max functions for range intersection. Given this, we wanted to avoid dealing
with `-10` because it is interpreted as a very big unsigned value. Semantically, range
check's safe range goes through unsigned border, so in fact it is two disjoint
ranges in IV's iteration space. Intersection of such ranges is not trivial, so we prohibited
this case saying that we are not allowed to intersect such ranges.
What semantics of this safe range actually means is that we can start from `-10` and go
up increasing the `%iv` by one until we reach `%len - 10` (for simplicity let's assume that
`%len - 10` is a reasonably big positive value).
In particular, this safe iteration space includes `0, 1, 2, ..., %len - 11`. So if we were able to return
safe iteration space `[0, %len - 10)`, we could safely intersect it with IV's iteration space. All
values in this range are non-negative, so using signed/unsigned min/max for them is unambiguous.
In this patch, we alter the algorithm of safe range calculation so that it returnes a subset of the
original safe space which is represented by one continuous range that does not go through wrap.
In order to reach this, we use modified SCEV substraction function. It can be imagined as a function
that substracts by `1` (or `-1`) as long as the further substraction does not cause a wrap in IV iteration
space. This allows us to perform IRCE in many situations when we deal with IV space and range check
of different types (in terms of signed/unsigned).
We apply this approach for both matching and not matching types of IV iteration space and the
range check. One implication of this is that now IRCE became smarter in detection of empty safe
ranges. For example, in this case:
loop:
%iv = phi i32 [ %begin, %preheader ], [ %iv.next, %latch]
%iv.offset = sub i32 %iv, 10
%rc = icmp ult i32 %iv.offset, %len
br i1 %rc, label %latch, label %deopt
latch:
%iv.next = add i32 %iv, 11
%cond = icmp i32 ult %iv.next, 100
br it %cond, label %loop, label %exit
If `%len` was less than 10 but SCEV failed to trivially prove that `%begin - 10 >u %len- 10`,
we could end up executing entire loop in safe preloop while the main loop was still generated,
but never executed. Now, cutting the ranges so that if both `begin - 10` and `%len - 10` overflow,
we have a trivially empty range of `[0, 0)`. This in some cases prevents us from meaningless optimization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39954
llvm-svn: 318639
We must collect all AddModes even if they are the same.
This is due to Original value is different but we need all original
values collected as they are used as anchors in common phi finding.
Reviewers: john.brawn, reames
Reviewed By: john.brawn
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40166
llvm-svn: 318638
As the first test shows, we could transform an llvm intrinsic which never sets errno
into a libcall which could set errno (even though it's marked readnone?), so that's
not ideal.
It's possible that we can also transform a libcall which could set errno to an
intrinsic given the fast-math-flags constraint, but that's deferred to determine
exactly which set of FMF are needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40150
llvm-svn: 318628
The 'ord' and 'uno' predicates have a logic operation for NAN built into their definitions:
FCMP_ORD = 7, ///< 0 1 1 1 True if ordered (no nans)
FCMP_UNO = 8, ///< 1 0 0 0 True if unordered: isnan(X) | isnan(Y)
So we can simplify patterns like this:
(fcmp ord (known NNAN), X) && (fcmp ord X, Y) --> fcmp ord X, Y
(fcmp uno (known NNAN), X) || (fcmp uno X, Y) --> fcmp uno X, Y
It might be better to split this into (X uno 0) | (Y uno 0) as a canonicalization, but that
would be another patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40130
llvm-svn: 318627
kernel verifier is becoming smarter and soon will support
direct and indirect function calls.
Remove obsolete error from BPF backend.
Make call to use PCRel_4 fixup.
'bpf to bpf' calls are distinguished from 'bpf to kernel' calls
by insn->src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_CALL == 1 which is used as relocation
indicator similar to ld_imm64->src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_MAP_FD == 1
The actual 'call' instruction remains the same for both
'bpf to kernel' and 'bpf to bpf' calls.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
llvm-svn: 318614
Summary:
Currently, LIT configures the LLVM binary path before the Clang binary path. However this breaks testing out-of-tree Clang builds (where the LLVM binary path includes a copy of Clang).
This patch reverses the order of the paths when looking for Clang, putting the Clang binary directory first.
Reviewers: zturner, beanz, chapuni, modocache, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: mgorny, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40217
llvm-svn: 318607
David Blaikie