init list formatting. This suggestion has now gone into the LLVM coding
standards, and is particularly relevant now that we're using C++11.
Updated a really ridiculous number of tests to reflect this change.
llvm-svn: 202637
Before:
auto result = SomeObject
// Calling someFunction on SomeObject
.someFunction();
After:
auto result = SomeObject
// Calling someFunction on SomeObject
.someFunction();
llvm-svn: 201138
Mozilla and WebKit seem to use a space after @property (verified by
grepping their codebases) so we turn this on there as well.
Change by Christian Legnitto. Thank you!
llvm-svn: 200320
encodes the canonical rules for LLVM's style. I noticed this had drifted
quite a bit when cleaning up LLVM, so wanted to clean up Clang as well.
llvm-svn: 198686
Unexpectedly, it seems that people commonly know what they were doing
when writing a comment.
Also, being more conservative about comment breaking has the advantage
of giving more flexibility. If a linebreak within the comment can
improve formatting, the author can add it (after which clang-format
won't undo it). There is no way to override clang-format's behavior if
it breaks a comment.
llvm-svn: 197698
Formatting this:
void f() { // 1 space initial indent.
int i;
#define A \
int i; \
int j;
int k; // Format this line.
}
void f() {
#define A 1 // Format this line.
}
Before:
void f() { // 1 space initial indent.
int i;
#define A \
int i; \
int j;
int k; // Format this line.
}
void f() {
#define A 1 // Format this line.
}
After:
void f() { // 1 space initial indent.
int i;
#define A \
int i; \
int j;
int k; // Format this line.
}
void f() {
#define A 1 // Format this line.
}
llvm-svn: 197494
BreakConstructorInitializersBeforeComma is true.
This option is used in WebKit style, so this also ensures initializer lists are
not put on a single line, as per the WebKit coding guidelines.
Patch by Florian Sowade!
llvm-svn: 197386
Summary:
Added BraceBreakingStyle::BS_GNU. I'm not sure about the correctness of
static initializer formatting, but compound statements should be fine.
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
CC: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2372
llvm-svn: 197138
Summary:
This still misses a few important features, so there's no mention of
this style in the help message, but a few style rules are implemented.
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
CC: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2371
llvm-svn: 196928
Summary:
Allow predefined styles to define different options for different
languages so that one can run:
clang-format -style=google file1.cpp file2.js
or use a single .clang-format file with "BasedOnStyle: Google" for both c++ and
JS files.
Added Google style for JavaScript with "BreakBeforeTernaryOperators" set to
false.
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
CC: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2364
llvm-svn: 196909
Summary:
The rule from the GNU style states:
"We find it easier to read a program when it has spaces before the open-parentheses and after the commas."
http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/standards.html#index-spaces-before-open_002dparen
This patch makes clang-format adds an option to put spaces before almost all open parentheses, except the cases, where different behavior is dictated by the style rules or language syntax:
* preprocessor:
** function-like macro definitions can't have a space between the macro name and the parenthesis;
** `#if defined(...)` can have a space, but it seems, that it's more frequently used without a space in GCC, for example;
* never add spaces after unary operators;
* adding spaces between two opening parentheses is controlled with the `SpacesInParentheses` option;
* never add spaces between `[` and `(` (there's no option yet).
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
CC: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2326
llvm-svn: 196901
Summary:
Allow tryFitMultipleLinesInOne join unwrapped lines when
ContinuationIndenter::mustBreak doesn't agree. But don't merge any lines, that
are separate in the input.
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
CC: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2321
llvm-svn: 196378
Before:
int aaaa; // This line is formatted.
// The comment continues ..
// .. here.
Before:
int aaaa; // This line is formatted.
// The comment continues ..
// .. here.
This fixes llvm.org/PR17914.
llvm-svn: 195954
Previously, clang-format could create quite corrupt formattings if
individual lines of nested blocks (e.g. in "DEBUG({})" or lambdas) were
used. With this patch, it tries to extend the formatted regions to leave
around some reasonable format without always formatting the entire
surrounding statement.
llvm-svn: 195925
No functional changes intended. However, it seems to have found a buggy
behavior in one of the tests. I think this structure is generally
desirable and it will make a planned bugfix significantly easier.
llvm-svn: 195634
Summary:
Now based on token merging. Now they are not only prevented from being
split, but are actually formatted as comparison operators.
Reviewers: djasper, klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
CC: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2240
llvm-svn: 195354
Summary:
The AllowShortFunctionsOnASingleLine option now controls short function
body placement on a single line independent of the BreakBeforeBraces option.
Updated tests using BreakBeforeBraces other than BS_Attach.
Addresses http://llvm.org/PR17888
Reviewers: klimek, djasper
Reviewed By: klimek
CC: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2230
llvm-svn: 195256
Before, clang-format would always format entire nested blocks, which
can be unwanted e.g. for long DEBUG({...}) statements. Also
clang-format would not allow to merge lines in nested blocks (e.g. to
put "if (a) return;" on one line in Google style).
This is the first step of several refactorings mostly focussing on the
additional functionality (by reusing the "format many lines" code to
format the children of a nested block). The next steps are:
* Pull out the line merging into its own class.
* Seperate the formatting of many lines from the formatting of a single
line (and the analysis of the solution space).
llvm-svn: 194090
Same as SpacesInParentheses, this option allows adding a space inside
the '<' and '>' of a template parameter list.
Patch by Christopher Olsen.
This fixes llvm.org/PR17301.
llvm-svn: 193614
Specifically make clang-format less eager to break after the opening
parenthesis of a function call.
Before:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa + aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa);
After:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa +
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa);
Apparently that is preferable. This penalties are adapted
conservatively, we might have to increase them a little bit further.
llvm-svn: 193410
Before:
DEBUG({ // Comment that used to confuse clang-format.
fdafas();
});
Before:
DEBUG({ // Comments are now fine.
fdafas();
});
This fixed llvm.org/PR17619.
llvm-svn: 193051
Before, clang-format would not adjust leading indents if it found a
structural error (e.g. unmatched {}). It seems, however, that
clang-format has gotten good enough at parsing the code structure that
this hurts in almost all cases. Commonly, while writing code, it is
very useful to be able to correclty indent incomplete if statements or
for loops.
In case this leads to errors that we don't anticipate, we need to find
out and fix those.
This fixed llvm.org/PR17594.
llvm-svn: 192988
Summary:
Store IndentationLevel in ParentState and use it instead of the
Line::Level when indening.
Also fixed incorrect indentation level calculation in formatFirstToken.
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
CC: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1797
llvm-svn: 192563
In certain macros or incorrect string literals, the token stream can
contain 'unknown' tokens, e.g. a single backslash or a set of empty
ticks. clang-format simply treated them as whitespace and removed them
prior to this patch.
This fixes llvm.org/PR17215
llvm-svn: 192490