Commit Graph

19 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Julian Lettner 96adb78b12 [lit] Set --single-process for single tests and --threads=1
Summary:
Automatically upgrade debugging experience (single process, no thread
pool) when:
  1) we only run a single test
  2) user specifies `-j1`

Details:
Fix `--max-failures` in single process mode. Option did not have an
effect in single process mode.

Add display feedback for single process mode. Adapted test.

Improve argument checking (require positive integers).

`--single-process` is now essentially an alias for `-j1`. Should we
remove it?

Reviewers: rnk

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58249

llvm-svn: 354068
2019-02-14 22:30:07 +00:00
Eric Fiselier 1989f7e04f make XFAIL, REQUIRES, and UNSUPPORTED support multi-line expressions
llvm-svn: 351668
2019-01-20 00:51:02 +00:00
Joel E. Denny fc01dd281d [lit] Terminate ": RUN at line N" with ";" not "&&"
This fixes projects/compiler-rt/test/fuzzer/sigusr.test, which was
broken by r333614.  The trouble was that "&&" changes the command for
which "$!" gives the pid.

llvm-svn: 333620
2018-05-31 03:40:37 +00:00
Joel E. Denny 31b373963f [lit] Report line number for failed RUN command
(Relands r333584, reverted in 333592.)

When debugging test failures with -vv (or -v in the case of the
internal shell), this makes it easier to locate the RUN line that
failed.  For example, clang's test/Driver/linux-ld.c has 892 total RUN
lines, and clang's test/Driver/arm-cortex-cpus.c has 424 RUN lines
after concatenation for line continuations.

When reading the generated shell script, this also makes it easier to
locate the RUN line that produced each command.

To support reporting RUN line numbers in the case of the internal
shell, this patch extends the internal shell to support the null
command, ":", except pipelines are not supported.

To support reporting RUN line numbers in the case of windows cmd.exe
as the external shell, this patch extends -vv to set "echo on" instead
of "echo off" in bat files.  (Support for windows cmd.exe as a lit
external shell will likely be dropped later, but I found out too
late.)

Reviewed By: delcypher,	asmith, stella.stamenova, jmorse, lebedev.ri, rnk

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44598

llvm-svn: 333614
2018-05-31 00:55:32 +00:00
Joel E. Denny 71792c741e Revert r333584: [lit] Report line number for failed RUN command
It breaks test-suite.

llvm-svn: 333592
2018-05-30 21:07:27 +00:00
Joel E. Denny b6423479a1 [lit] Report line number for failed RUN command
(Relands r330755 (reverted in r330848) with fix for PR37239.)

When debugging test failures with -vv (or -v in the case of the
internal shell), this makes it easier to locate the RUN line that
failed.  For example, clang's test/Driver/linux-ld.c has 892 total RUN
lines, and clang's test/Driver/arm-cortex-cpus.c has 424 RUN lines
after concatenation for line continuations.

When reading the generated shell script, this also makes it easier to
locate the RUN line that produced each command.

To support reporting RUN line numbers in the case of the internal
shell, this patch extends the internal shell to support the null
command, ":", except pipelines are not supported.

To support reporting RUN line numbers in the case of windows cmd.exe
as the external shell, this patch extends -vv to set "echo on" instead
of "echo off" in bat files.  (Support for windows cmd.exe as a lit
external shell will likely be dropped later, but I found out too
late.)

Reviewed By: delcypher,	asmith, stella.stamenova, jmorse, lebedev.ri, rnk

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44598

llvm-svn: 333584
2018-05-30 19:42:27 +00:00
Reid Kleckner 1ca666886f Revert r330755 "[lit] Report line number for failed RUN command"
It is causing many tests to fail on Windows buildbots:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x64-ninja-win7/builds/10211

llvm-svn: 330848
2018-04-25 17:30:00 +00:00
Joel E. Denny 8a475307bd [lit] Report line number for failed RUN command
When debugging test failures with -vv (or -v in the case of the
internal shell), this makes it easier to locate the RUN line that
failed.  For example, clang's test/Driver/linux-ld.c has 892 total RUN
lines, and clang's test/Driver/arm-cortex-cpus.c has 424 RUN lines
after concatenation for line continuations.

When reading the generated shell script, this also makes it easier to
locate the RUN line that produced each command.

To support reporting RUN line numbers in the case of the internal
shell, this patch extends the internal shell to support the null
command, ":", except pipelines are not supported.

Reviewed By: asmith, delcypher

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44598

llvm-svn: 330755
2018-04-24 18:43:25 +00:00
Zachary Turner f734daf36d [lit] Fix the lit unit tests.
A few tests were manually constructing a LitConfig object, since
I added a new argument to it this was triggering some failures
I didn't detect.  `ninja check-lit` passes now.

llvm-svn: 313461
2017-09-16 15:48:30 +00:00
Reid Kleckner 0ff0eacf32 Un-XFAIL some internal lit tests on Windows, they pass for me locally
llvm-svn: 309144
2017-07-26 18:04:18 +00:00
Brian Gesiak 0787253cb6 [lit] Mark several of lit's tests XFAIL on Windows
Summary:
rL257221 attempted to run lit's own test suite continuously, but that
commit was reverted because lit's test suite does not pass on Windows.
Because lit's tests do not run continuously, they often regress.

In order to un-revert rL257221, mark lit tests that fail as XFAIL for
Windows platforms.

Test Plan:
On a Windows development environment, follow the instructions in
utils/lit/README.txt to run lit's test suite:

```
utils/lit/lit.py \
    --path /path/to/your/llvm/build/bin \
    utils/lit/tests
```

Verify that the test suite is run and a successful exit code is
returned.

Reviewers: mgorny, rnk, delcypher, beanz

Reviewed By: rnk

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35879

llvm-svn: 309123
2017-07-26 15:10:50 +00:00
Brian Gesiak 600f04a435 lit: remove python2-isms
Summary:
`assert.assertItemEqual` went away in Python 3. Seeing how lists
are ordered, comparing a list against each other should work just
as well.

Patch by @jbergstroem (Johan Bergström).

Reviewers: modocache, gparker42

Reviewed By: modocache

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31229

llvm-svn: 298479
2017-03-22 04:23:01 +00:00
Greg Parker 17db7704cd Reinstate "r292904 - [lit] Allow boolean expressions in REQUIRES and XFAIL
and UNSUPPORTED"

This reverts the revert in r292942.

llvm-svn: 293007
2017-01-25 02:26:03 +00:00
Alex Lorenz 9111cc217d Revert "r292904 - [lit] Allow boolean expressions in REQUIRES and XFAIL
and UNSUPPORTED"

After r292904 llvm-lit fails to emit the test results in the XML format for
Apple's internal buildbots.

rdar://30164800

llvm-svn: 292942
2017-01-24 16:17:04 +00:00
Greg Parker ed0a95cbec [lit] Allow boolean expressions in REQUIRES and XFAIL and UNSUPPORTED
A `lit` condition line is now a comma-separated list of boolean expressions. 
Comma-separated expressions act as if each expression were on its own 
condition line:
For REQUIRES, if every expression is true then the test will run. 
For UNSUPPORTED, if every expression is false then the test will run. 
For XFAIL, if every expression is false then the test is expected to succeed. 
As a special case "XFAIL: *" expects the test to fail.

Examples:
# Test is expected fail on 64-bit Apple simulators and pass everywhere else
XFAIL: x86_64 && apple && !macosx
# Test is unsupported on Windows and on non-Ubuntu Linux 
# and supported everywhere else
UNSUPPORTED: linux && !ubuntu, system-windows

Syntax: 
* '&&', '||', '!', '(', ')'. 'true' is true. 'false' is false.
* Each test feature is a true identifier. 
* Substrings of the target triple are true identifiers for UNSUPPORTED 
 and XFAIL, but not for REQUIRES. (This matches the current behavior.)
* All other identifiers are false.
* Identifiers are [-+=._a-zA-Z0-9]+

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D18185

llvm-svn: 292904
2017-01-24 09:58:02 +00:00
Greg Parker d972882f06 Revert "[lit] Allow boolean expressions in REQUIRES and XFAIL and UNSUPPORTED"
This change needs to be better-coordinated with libc++.

llvm-svn: 292900
2017-01-24 08:58:20 +00:00
Greg Parker 2ab45201e7 [lit] Allow boolean expressions in REQUIRES and XFAIL and UNSUPPORTED
A `lit` condition line is now a comma-separated list of boolean expressions. 
Comma-separated expressions act as if each expression were on its own 
condition line:
For REQUIRES, if every expression is true then the test will run. 
For UNSUPPORTED, if every expression is false then the test will run. 
For XFAIL, if every expression is false then the test is expected to succeed. 
As a special case "XFAIL: *" expects the test to fail.

Examples:
# Test is expected fail on 64-bit Apple simulators and pass everywhere else
XFAIL: x86_64 && apple && !macosx
# Test is unsupported on Windows and on non-Ubuntu Linux 
# and supported everywhere else
UNSUPPORTED: linux && !ubuntu, system-windows

Syntax: 
* '&&', '||', '!', '(', ')'. 'true' is true. 'false' is false.
* Each test feature is a true identifier. 
* Substrings of the target triple are true identifiers for UNSUPPORTED 
  and XFAIL, but not for REQUIRES. (This matches the current behavior.)
* All other identifiers are false.
* Identifiers are [-+=._a-zA-Z0-9]+

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D18185

llvm-svn: 292896
2017-01-24 08:45:50 +00:00
Eric Fiselier df87d070c9 [lit] Support custom parsers in parseIntegratedTestScript
Summary:
Libc++ frequently has the need to parse more than just the builtin *test keywords* (`RUN`, `REQUIRES`, `XFAIL`, ect). For example libc++ currently needs a new keyword `MODULES-DEFINES: macro list...`. Instead of re-implementing the script parsing in libc++ this patch allows `parseIntegratedTestScript` to take custom parsers.

This patch introduces a new class `IntegratedTestKeywordParser` which implements the logic to parse/process a test keyword. Parsing of various keyword "kinds" are supported out of the box, including 'TAG', 'COMMAND', and 'LIST', which parse keywords such as `END.`, `RUN:` and `XFAIL:` respectively.

As an example after this change libc++ can implement the `MODULES-DEFINES` simply using: 
```
mparser = IntegratedTestKeywordParser('MODULES-DEFINES:', ParserKind.LIST)
parseIntegratedTestScript(test, additional_parsers=[mparser])
macro_list = mparser.getValue()
```


Reviewers: ddunbar, modocache, rnk, danalbert, jroelofs

Subscribers: mgrang, llvm-commits, cfe-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27005

llvm-svn: 288694
2016-12-05 20:21:21 +00:00
Brian Gesiak 8d89c3c6f7 [lit] Run unit tests as part of lit test suite
Summary:
The Python file `utils/lit/lit/ShUtil.py` contains:

1. Logic used by lit itself
2. A set of unit tests for that logic, which can be run by invoking
  `python utils/lit/lit/ShUtil.py`

Move these unit tests to a `tests/unit` subdirectory of lit, and run
the tests as part of lit's test suite. This ensures that, should the
lit test suite be included in LLVM's own regression test suite, these
unit tests will also be run.

(Instructions on how to run lit's test suite can be found in
`utils/lit/README.txt`.)

Reviewers: ddunbar, echristo, delcypher, beanz

Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25411

llvm-svn: 283968
2016-10-12 03:35:04 +00:00