Summary:
For the extended defaultmap, most of the work is inside sema.
The only difference for codegen is to set different initial
maptype for different implicit-behavior.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, ABataev
Reviewed By: ABataev
Subscribers: dreachem, sandoval, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #openmp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69204
The AssociationIteratorTy type will be copied in a range-based for loop.
Make the copy explicit to avoid the -Wrange-loop-analysis warning.
This avoids new warnings due to D68912 adds -Wrange-loop-analysis to -Wall.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70045
Summary:
There seems to be no evidence that having internal linkage for the function
was intentional. Since 'static' functions are normally used only in .cpp
files, using 'inline' in the header file is more appropriate.
Reviewers: Anastasia
Reviewed By: Anastasia
Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69242
Summary:
- HIP/CUDA host side needs to use device kernel symbol name to match the
device side binaries. Without a consistent naming between host- and
device-side compilations, it's risky that wrong device binaries are
executed. Consistent naming is usually not an issue until unnamed
types are used, especially the lambda. In this patch, the consistent
name mangling is addressed for the extended lambdas, i.e. the lambdas
annotated with `__device__`.
- In [Itanium C++ ABI][1], the mangling of the lambda is generally
unspecified unless, in certain cases, ODR rule is required to ensure
consisent naming cross TUs. The extended lambda is such a case as its
name may be part of a device kernel function, e.g., the extended
lambda is used as a template argument and etc. Thus, we need to force
ODR for extended lambdas as they are referenced in both device- and
host-side TUs. Furthermore, if a extended lambda is nested in other
(extended or not) lambdas, those lambdas are required to follow ODR
naming as well. This patch revises the current lambda mangle numbering
to force ODR from an extended lambda to all its parent lambdas.
- On the other side, the aforementioned ODR naming should not change
those lambdas' original linkages, i.e., we cannot replace the original
`internal` with `linkonce_odr`; otherwise, we may violate ODR in
general. This patch introduces a new field `HasKnownInternalLinkage`
in lambda data to decouple the current linkage calculation based on
mangling number assigned.
[1]: https://itanium-cxx-abi.github.io/cxx-abi/abi.html
Reviewers: tra, rsmith, yaxunl, martong, shafik
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68818
llvm-svn: 375309
This adds support for rewriting <, >, <=, and >= to a normal or reversed
call to operator<=>, for rewriting != to a normal or reversed call to
operator==, and for rewriting <=> and == to reversed forms of those same
operators.
Note that this is a breaking change for various C++17 code patterns,
including some in use in LLVM. The most common patterns (where an
operator== becomes ambiguous with a reversed form of itself) are still
accepted under this patch, as an extension (with a warning). I'm hopeful
that we can get the language rules fixed before C++20 ships, and the
extension warning is aimed primarily at providing data to inform that
decision.
llvm-svn: 375306
Part of C++20 Concepts implementation effort. Added Concept Specialization Expressions that are created when a concept is refe$
D41217 on Phabricator.
(recommit after fixing failing Parser test on windows)
llvm-svn: 374903
Part of C++20 Concepts implementation effort. Added Concept Specialization Expressions that are created when a concept is referenced with arguments, and tests thereof.
llvm-svn: 374882
Added parsing/sema/codegen support for 'parallel master taskloop'
constructs. Some of the clauses, like 'grainsize', 'num_tasks', 'final'
and 'priority' are not supported in full, only constant expressions can
be used currently in these clauses.
llvm-svn: 374791
The static analyzer is warning about potential null dereferences, but we should be able to use castAs<> directly and if not assert will fire for us.
llvm-svn: 373826
We previously failed to treat an array with an instantiation-dependent
but not value-dependent bound as being an instantiation-dependent type.
We now track the array bound expression as part of a constant array type
if it's an instantiation-dependent expression.
llvm-svn: 373685
Summary:
- Rearrange the atomic expr order to the API order when rebuilding
atomic expr during template instantiation.
Reviewers: erichkeane
Subscribers: jfb, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67924
llvm-svn: 372640
RebuildAtomicExpr was skipping doing semantic analysis which broke in
the cases where the expressions were not dependent. This resulted in the
ImplicitCastExpr from an array to a pointer being lost, causing a crash
in IR CodeGen.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67854
llvm-svn: 372422
initializers.
This has some interesting interactions with our existing extensions to
support C99 designated initializers as an extension in C++. Those are
resolved as follows:
* We continue to permit the full breadth of C99 designated initializers
in C++, with the exception that we disallow a partial overwrite of an
initializer with a non-trivially-destructible type. (Full overwrite
is OK, because we won't run the first initializer at all.)
* The C99 extensions are disallowed in SFINAE contexts and during
overload resolution, where they could change the meaning of valid
programs.
* C++20 disallows reordering of initializers. We only check for that for
the simple cases that the C++20 rules permit (designators of the form
'.field_name =' and continue to allow reordering in other cases).
It would be nice to improve this behavior in future.
* All C99 designated initializer extensions produce a warning by
default in C++20 mode. People are going to learn the C++ rules based
on what Clang diagnoses, so it's important we diagnose these properly
by default.
* In C++ <= 17, we apply the C++20 rules rather than the C99 rules, and
so still diagnose C99 extensions as described above. We continue to
accept designated C++20-compatible initializers in C++ <= 17 silently
by default (but naturally still reject under -pedantic-errors).
This is not a complete implementation of P0329R4. In particular, that
paper introduces new non-C99-compatible syntax { .field { init } }, and
we do not support that yet.
This is based on a previous patch by Don Hinton, though I've made
substantial changes when addressing the above interactions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59754
llvm-svn: 370544
If dependent types appear in pointers or references we allow addr
space deduction because the addr space in template argument will
belong to the pointee and not the pointer or reference itself.
We also don't diagnose addr space on a function return type after
template instantiation. If any addr space for the return type was
provided on a template parameter this will be diagnosed during the
parsing of template definition.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62584
llvm-svn: 366417
Since pointee doesn't require context sensitive addr space deduction
it's easier to handle pointee of dependent types during templ
instantiation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64400
llvm-svn: 366063
Ignore trailing NullStmts in compound expressions when determining the result type and value. This is to match the GCC behavior which ignores semicolons at the end of compound expressions.
Patch by Dominic Ferreira.
llvm-svn: 365498
This commit adds a new builtin, __builtin_bit_cast(T, v), which performs a
bit_cast from a value v to a type T. This expression can be evaluated at
compile time under specific circumstances.
The compile time evaluation currently doesn't support bit-fields, but I'm
planning on fixing this in a follow up (some of the logic for figuring this out
is in CodeGen). I'm also planning follow-ups for supporting some more esoteric
types that the constexpr evaluator supports, as well as extending
__builtin_memcpy constexpr evaluation to use the same infrastructure.
rdar://44987528
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62825
llvm-svn: 364954
Summary:
this revision adds Lexing, Parsing and Basic Semantic for the consteval specifier as specified by http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1073r3.html
with this patch, the consteval specifier is treated as constexpr but can only be applied to function declaration.
Changes:
- add the consteval keyword.
- add parsing of consteval specifier for normal declarations and lambdas expressions.
- add the whether a declaration is constexpr is now represented by and enum everywhere except for variable because they can't be consteval.
- adapt diagnostic about constexpr to print constexpr or consteval depending on the case.
- add tests for basic semantic.
Reviewers: rsmith, martong, shafik
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: eraman, efriedma, rnkovacs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61790
llvm-svn: 363362
packs.
Two changes:
* Track odr-use via FunctionParmPackExprs to properly handle dependent
odr-uses of packs in generic lambdas.
* Do not instantiate implicit captures; instead, regenerate them by
instantiating the body of the lambda. This is necessary to
distinguish between cases where only one element of a pack is
captured and cases where the entire pack is captured.
This reinstates r362358 (reverted in r362375) with a fix for an
uninitialized variable use in UpdateMarkingForLValueToRValue.
llvm-svn: 362531
Two changes:
* Track odr-use via FunctionParmPackExprs to properly handle dependent
odr-uses of packs in generic lambdas.
* Do not instantiate implicit captures; instead, regenerate them by
instantiating the body of the lambda. This is necessary to
distinguish between cases where only one element of a pack is
captured and cases where the entire pack is captured.
........
Fixes http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-win buildbot failures
llvm-svn: 362375
packs.
Two changes:
* Track odr-use via FunctionParmPackExprs to properly handle dependent
odr-uses of packs in generic lambdas.
* Do not instantiate implicit captures; instead, regenerate them by
instantiating the body of the lambda. This is necessary to
distinguish between cases where only one element of a pack is
captured and cases where the entire pack is captured.
llvm-svn: 362358
Summary:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41909 describes an issue in which
a generic lambda that takes a dependent argument `auto set` causes the
template instantiation machinery for coroutine body statements to crash
with an ICE. The issue is two-fold:
1. The paths taken by the template instantiator contain several asserts
that the coroutine promise must not have a dependent type.
2. The template instantiator unconditionally builds corotuine statements
that depend on the promise type, which cannot be dependent.
To work around the issue, prevent the template instantiator from building
dependent coroutine statements if the coroutine promise type is dependent.
Since we only expect this to occur in the case of a generic lambda, limit
the workaround behavior to just that case.
Reviewers: GorNishanov, EricWF, lewissbaker, tks2103
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62550
llvm-svn: 362348
potentially-evaluated.
This ensures that every potentially-evaluated expression is built in a
potentially-evaluated context. No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 362336
Syntax:
asm [volatile] goto ( AssemblerTemplate
:
: InputOperands
: Clobbers
: GotoLabels)
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Extended-Asm.html
New llvm IR is "callbr" for inline asm goto instead "call" for inline asm
For:
asm goto("testl %0, %0; jne %l1;" :: "r"(cond)::label_true, loop);
IR:
callbr void asm sideeffect "testl $0, $0; jne ${1:l};", "r,X,X,~{dirflag},~{fpsr},~{flags}"(i32 %0, i8* blockaddress(@foo, %label_true), i8* blockaddress(@foo, %loop)) #1
to label %asm.fallthrough [label %label_true, label %loop], !srcloc !3
asm.fallthrough:
Compiler need to generate:
1> a dummy constarint 'X' for each label.
2> an unique fallthrough label for each asm goto stmt " asm.fallthrough%number".
Diagnostic
1> duplicate asm operand name are used in output, input and label.
2> goto out of scope.
llvm-svn: 362045
capturing expression or statement.
No functionality change yet. The intent is that we will also delay
building the initialization expression until the enclosing context, so
that:
a) we build the initialization expression in the right context, and
b) we can elide captures that are not odr-used, as suggested by P0588R1.
This also consolidates some duplicated code building capture fields into
a single place.
llvm-svn: 361893
This permits an init-capture to introduce a new pack:
template<typename ...T> auto x = [...a = T()] { /* a is a pack */ };
To support this, the mechanism for allowing ParmVarDecls to be packs has
been extended to support arbitrary local VarDecls.
llvm-svn: 361300
Summary:
This patch implements the source location builtins `__builtin_LINE(), `__builtin_FUNCTION()`, `__builtin_FILE()` and `__builtin_COLUMN()`. These builtins are needed to implement [`std::experimental::source_location`](https://rawgit.com/cplusplus/fundamentals-ts/v2/main.html#reflection.src_loc.creation).
With the exception of `__builtin_COLUMN`, GCC also implements these builtins, and Clangs behavior is intended to match as closely as possible.
Reviewers: rsmith, joerg, aaron.ballman, bogner, majnemer, shafik, martong
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: rnkovacs, loskutov, riccibruno, mgorny, kunitoki, alexr, majnemer, hfinkel, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37035
llvm-svn: 360937
new expression.
This was voted into C++20 as a defect report resolution, so we
retroactively apply it to all prior language modes (though it can never
actually be used before C++11 mode).
llvm-svn: 360006
If an address_space attribute is defined in a macro, print the macro instead
when diagnosing a warning or error for incompatible pointers with different
address_spaces.
We allow this for all attributes (not just address_space), and for multiple
attributes declared in the same macro.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51329
llvm-svn: 359826
Summary:
This reverts rL352390 / D57280.
As discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D57112#inline-506781,
'flush' clause does not exist in the OpenMP spec, it can not be
specified, and `OMPFlushClause` class is just a helper class.
Now, here's the caveat. I have read @ABataev's
> Well, I think it would be good to filter out OMPC_flush somehow
> because there is no such clause actually, it is a pseudo clause
> for better handling of the flush directive.
as if that clause is pseudo clause that only exists for the sole
purpose of simplifying the parser. As in, it never reaches AST.
I did not however try to verify that. Too bad, i was wrong.
It absolutely *does* reach AST. Therefore my understanding/justification
for the change was flawed, which makes the patch a regression which **must** be reverted.
@gribozavr has brought that up again in https://reviews.llvm.org/D57112#inline-521238
> > ...
> Sorry to be late for this discussion, but I don't think this conclusion
> follows. ASTMatchers are supposed to match the AST as it is.
> Even if OMPC_flush is synthetic, it exists in the AST, and users might
> want to match it. I think users would find anything else (trying to filter
> out AST nodes that are not in the source code) to be surprising. For example,
> there's a matcher materializeTemporaryExpr even though this AST node is a
> Clang invention and is not a part of the C++ spec.
>
> Matching only constructs that appear in the source code is not feasible with
> ASTMatchers, because they are based on Clang's AST that exposes tons of semantic
> information, and its design is dictated by the structure of the semantic information.
> See "RFC: Tree-based refactorings with Clang" in cfe-dev for a library that will
> focus on representing source code as faithfully as possible.
>
> Not to even mention that this code is in ASTTypeTraits, a general library for
> handling AST nodes, not specifically for AST Matchers...
Reviewers: gribozavr, ABataev, rjmccall, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: gribozavr, ABataev
Subscribers: dylanmckay, guansong, arphaman, jdoerfert, cfe-commits, gribozavr, ABataev
Tags: #clang, #openmp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58979
llvm-svn: 355486
Nico Weber