In order to enable future improvements to our attribute diagnostics,
this moves info from ParsedAttr into CommonAttributeInfo, then makes
this type the base of the *Attr and ParsedAttr types. Quite a bit of
refactoring took place, including removing a bunch of redundant Spelling
Index propogation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67368
llvm-svn: 371875
Reland after https://reviews.llvm.org/D66806 fixed the false-positive diagnostics.
Summary:
This fixes inference of gsl::Pointer on std::set::iterator with libstdc++ (the typedef for iterator
on the template is a DependentNameType - we can only put the gsl::Pointer attribute
on the underlaying record after instantiation)
inference of gsl::Pointer on std::vector::iterator with libc++ (the class was forward-declared,
we added the gsl::Pointer on the canonical decl (the forward decl), and later when the
template was instantiated, there was no attribute on the definition so it was not instantiated).
and a duplicate gsl::Pointer on some class with libstdc++ (we first added an attribute to
a incomplete instantiation, and then another was copied from the template definition
when the instantiation was completed).
We now add the attributes to all redeclarations to fix thos issues and make their usage easier.
Reviewers: gribozavr
Subscribers: Szelethus, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66179
llvm-svn: 371182
This reverts commit r369591, because it causes the formerly-reliable
-Wreturn-stack-address warning to start issuing false positives.
Testcase provided on the commit thread.
llvm-svn: 369677
Summary:
This fixes inference of gsl::Pointer on std::set::iterator with libstdc++ (the typedef for iterator
on the template is a DependentNameType - we can only put the gsl::Pointer attribute
on the underlaying record after instantiation)
inference of gsl::Pointer on std::vector::iterator with libc++ (the class was forward-declared,
we added the gsl::Pointer on the canonical decl (the forward decl), and later when the
template was instantiated, there was no attribute on the definition so it was not instantiated).
and a duplicate gsl::Pointer on some class with libstdc++ (we first added an attribute to
a incomplete instantiation, and then another was copied from the template definition
when the instantiation was completed).
We now add the attributes to all redeclarations to fix thos issues and make their usage easier.
Reviewers: gribozavr
Subscribers: Szelethus, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66179
llvm-svn: 369591
Summary:
Hard code gsl::Owner/gsl::Pointer for std types. The paper mentions
some types explicitly. Generally, all containers and their iterators are
covered. For iterators, we cover both the case that they are defined
as an nested class or as an typedef/using. I have started to test this
implementation against some real standard library implementations, namely
libc++ 7.1.0, libc++ 8.0.1rc2, libstdc++ 4.6.4, libstdc++ 4.8.5,
libstdc++ 4.9.4, libstdc++ 5.4.0, libstdc++ 6.5.0, libstdc++ 7.3.0,
libstdc++ 8.3.0 and libstdc++ 9.1.0.
The tests are currently here
https://github.com/mgehre/llvm-project/blob/lifetime-ci/lifetime-attr-test.shhttps://github.com/mgehre/llvm-project/blob/lifetime-ci/lifetime-attr-test.cpp
I think due to their dependency on a standard library, they are not a good fit
for clang/test/. Where else could I put them?
Reviewers: gribozavr, xazax.hun
Subscribers: rnkovacs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64448
llvm-svn: 368147
attributes from declaration over attributes from '#pragma clang attribute'
Before this commit users had an issue when using #pragma clang attribute with
availability attributes:
The explicit attribute that's specified next to the declaration is not
guaranteed to be preferred over the attribute specified in the pragma.
This commit fixes this by introducing a priority field to the availability
attribute to control how they're merged. Attributes with higher priority are
applied over attributes with lower priority for the same platform. The
implicitly inferred attributes are given the lower priority. This ensures that:
- explicit attributes are preferred over all other attributes.
- implicitly inferred attributes that are inferred from an explicit attribute
are discarded if there's an explicit attribute or an attribute specified
using a #pragma for the same platform.
- implicitly inferred attributes that are inferred from an attribute in the
#pragma are not used if there's an explicit, explicit #pragma, or an
implicit attribute inferred from an explicit attribute for the declaration.
This is the resulting ranking:
`platform availability > platform availability from pragma > inferred availability > inferred availability from pragma`
rdar://46390243
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56892
llvm-svn: 352084
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Namespaces are introduced by adding an "identifier." before a
push/pop directive. Pop directives with namespaces can only pop a
attribute group that was pushed with the same namespace. Push and pop
directives that don't opt into namespaces have the same semantics.
This is necessary to prevent a pitfall of using multiple #pragma
clang attribute directives spread out in a large file, particularly
when macros are involved. It isn't easy to see which pop corripsonds
to which push, so its easy to inadvertently pop the wrong group.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55628
llvm-svn: 349845
This reverts commit r345487, which reverted r345486. I think the crashes were
caused by an OOM on the builder, trying again to confirm...
llvm-svn: 345517
This commit enables pushing an empty #pragma clang attribute push, then adding
multiple attributes to it, then popping them all with #pragma clang attribute
pop, just like #pragma clang diagnostic. We still support the current way of
adding these, #pragma clang attribute push(__attribute__((...))), by treating it
like a combined push/attribute. This is needed to create macros like:
DO_SOMETHING_BEGIN(attr1, attr2, attr3)
// ...
DO_SOMETHING_END
rdar://45496947
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53621
llvm-svn: 345486
information is then discarded with a warning to the user that we don't
support it.
This patch gets us one step closer by getting the info down into the
AST in most cases.
Reviewed by: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49865
llvm-svn: 339693
Recommit of r335084 after revert in r335516.
... instead of prepending it at the beginning (the original behavior
since implemented in r122535 2010-12-23). This builds up an
AttributeList in the the order in which the attributes appear in the
source.
The reverse order caused nodes for attributes in the AST (e.g. LoopHint)
to be in the reverse order, and therefore printed in the wrong order in
-ast-dump. Some TODO comments mention this. The order was explicitly
reversed for enable_if attribute overload resolution and name mangling,
which is not necessary anymore with this patch.
The change unfortunately has some secondary effect, especially on
diagnostic output. In the simplest cases, the CHECK lines or expected
diagnostic were changed to the the new output. If the kind of
error/warning changed, the attributes' order was changed instead.
This unfortunately causes some 'previous occurrence here' hints to be
textually after the main marker. This typically happens when attributes
are merged, but are incompatible to each other. Interchanging the role
of the the main and note SourceLocation will also cause the case where
two different declaration's attributes (in contrast to multiple
attributes of the same declaration) are merged to be reverse. There is
no easy fix because sometimes previous attributes are merged into a new
declaration's attribute list, sometimes new attributes are added to a
previous declaration's attribute list. Since 'previous occurrence here'
pointing to locations after the main marker is not rare, I left the
markers as-is; it is only relevant when the attributes are declared in
the same declaration anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48100
llvm-svn: 338800
Basically, "AttributeList" loses all list-like mechanisms, ParsedAttributes is
switched to use a TinyPtrVector (and a ParsedAttributesView is created to
have a non-allocating attributes list). DeclaratorChunk gets the later kind,
Declarator/DeclSpec keep ParsedAttributes.
Iterators are added to the ParsedAttribute types so that for-loops work.
llvm-svn: 336945
This is similar to the LLVM change https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290.
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\@brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\@brief //g' $i & done
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46320
llvm-svn: 331834
Found via codespell -q 3 -I ../clang-whitelist.txt
Where whitelist consists of:
archtype
cas
classs
checkk
compres
definit
frome
iff
inteval
ith
lod
methode
nd
optin
ot
pres
statics
te
thru
Patch by luzpaz! (This is a subset of D44188 that applies cleanly with a few
files that have dubious fixes reverted.)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44188
llvm-svn: 329399
'#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
The second recommit (r309106) was reverted because the "non-default #pragma
pack value chages the alignment of struct or union members in the included file"
warning proved to be too aggressive for external projects like Chromium
(https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=749197). This recommit
makes the problematic warning a non-default one, and gives it the
-Wpragma-pack-suspicious-include warning option.
The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
#includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
Original message:
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309386
The warning fires on non-suspicious code in Chromium. Reverting until a
solution is figured out.
> Recommit r308327 2nd time: Add a warning for missing
> '#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
>
> The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
> change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
> in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
> #includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
> alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
>
> Original message:
>
> This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
>
> - When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
> - When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
> by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
> - When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
> value.
>
> rdar://10184173
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309186
'#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
#includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
Original message:
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309106
This seems to have broken the sanitizer-x86_64-linux buildbot. Reverting until
it's fixed, especially since this landed just before the 5.0 branch.
> This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
>
> - When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
> - When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
> by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
> - When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
> value.
>
> rdar://10184173
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308455
and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308441
of '#pragma pack' in included files
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308327
This patch provides a means to specify section-names for global variables,
functions and static variables, using #pragma directives.
This feature is only defined to work sensibly for ELF targets.
One can specify section names as:
#pragma clang section bss="myBSS" data="myData" rodata="myRodata" text="myText"
One can "unspecify" a section name with empty string e.g.
#pragma clang section bss="" data="" text="" rodata=""
Reviewers: Roger Ferrer, Jonathan Roelofs, Reid Kleckner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33412
llvm-svn: 304705
UBSAN 'invalid value' failures
The commit r300556 introduced a UBSAN issue that was caught by
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap. The DenseMap
failed to create an empty/tombstone value as the empty/tombstone values for the
SubjectMatchRule enum were not valid enum constants.
llvm-svn: 300591
This is a recommit of r300539 that was reverted in r300543 due to test failures.
The original commit message is displayed below:
The new '#pragma clang attribute' directive can be used to apply attributes to
multiple declarations. An attribute must satisfy the following conditions to
be supported by the pragma:
- It must have a subject list that's defined in the TableGen file.
- It must be documented.
- It must not be late parsed.
- It must have a GNU/C++11 spelling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30009
llvm-svn: 300556
The new '#pragma clang attribute' directive can be used to apply attributes to
multiple declarations. An attribute must satisfy the following conditions to
be supported by the pragma:
- It must have a subject list that's defined in the TableGen file.
- It must be documented.
- It must not be late parsed.
- It must have a GNU/C++11 spelling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30009
llvm-svn: 300539
This adds the new pragma and the first variant, contract(on/off/fast).
The pragma has the same block scope rules as STDC FP_CONTRACT, i.e. it can be
placed at the beginning of a compound statement or at file scope.
Similarly to STDC FP_CONTRACT there is no need to use attributes. First an
annotate token is inserted with the parsed details of the pragma. Then the
annotate token is parsed in the proper contexts and the Sema is updated with
the corresponding FPOptions using the shared ActOn function with STDC
FP_CONTRACT.
After this the FPOptions from the Sema is propagated into the AST expression
nodes. There is no change here.
I was going to add a 'default' option besides 'on/off/fast' similar to STDC
FP_CONTRACT but then decided against it. I think that we'd have to make option
uppercase then to avoid using 'default' the keyword. Also because of the
scoped activation of pragma I am not sure there is really a need a for this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31276
llvm-svn: 299470
This patch serializes the state of #pragma pack. It preserves the state of the
pragma from a PCH/from modules in a file that uses that PCH/those modules.
rdar://21359084
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31241
llvm-svn: 299226
FPContractModeKind is the codegen option flag which is already ternary (off,
on, fast). This makes it universally the type for the contractable info
across the front-end:
* In FPOptions (i.e. in the Sema + in the expression nodes).
* In LangOpts::DefaultFPContractMode which is the option that initializes
FPOptions in the Sema.
Another way to look at this change is that before fp-contractable on/off were
the only states handled to the front-end:
* For "on", FMA folding was performed by the front-end
* For "fast", we simply forwarded the flag to TargetOptions to handle it in
LLVM
Now off/on/fast are all exposed because for fast we will generate
fast-math-flags during CodeGen.
This is toward moving fp-contraction=fast from an LLVM TargetOption to a
FastMathFlag in order to fix PR25721.
---
This is a recommit of r299027 with an adjustment to the test
CodeGenCUDA/fp-contract.cu. The test assumed that even
though -ffp-contract=on is passed FE-based folding of FMA won't happen.
This is obviously wrong since the user is asking for this explicitly with the
option. CUDA is different that -ffp-contract=fast is on by default.
The test used to "work" because contract=fast and contract=on were maintained
separately and we didn't fold in the FE because contract=fast was on due to
the target-default. This patch consolidates the contract=on/fast/off state
into a ternary state hence the change in behavior.
---
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31167
llvm-svn: 299033
FPContractModeKind is the codegen option flag which is already ternary (off,
on, fast). This makes it universally the type for the contractable info
across the front-end:
* In FPOptions (i.e. in the Sema + in the expression nodes).
* In LangOpts::DefaultFPContractMode which is the option that initializes
FPOptions in the Sema.
Another way to look at this change is that before fp-contractable on/off were
the only states handled to the front-end:
* For "on", FMA folding was performed by the front-end
* For "fast", we simply forwarded the flag to TargetOptions to handle it in
LLVM
Now off/on/fast are all exposed because for fast we will generate
fast-math-flags during CodeGen.
This is toward moving fp-contraction=fast from an LLVM TargetOption to a
FastMathFlag in order to fix PR25721.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31167
llvm-svn: 299027
Sema holds the current FPOptions which is adjusted by 'pragma STDC
FP_CONTRACT'. This then gets propagated into expression nodes as they are
built.
This encapsulates FPOptions so that this propagation happens opaquely rather
than directly with the fp_contractable on/off bit. This allows controlled
transitioning of fp_contractable to a ternary value (off, on, fast). It will
also allow adding more fast-math flags later.
This is toward moving fp-contraction=fast from an LLVM TargetOption to a
FastMathFlag in order to fix PR25721.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31166
llvm-svn: 298877
In r268085 "[MS] Make #pragma pack use PragmaStack<> class." there was an
uninitialized variable 'Alignment', which caused the following failure:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-ppc64be-linux/builds/1758
Zero-initialize the variable to fix this failure.
llvm-svn: 268129
Make implementation of #pragma pack consistent with other "stack" pragmas.
Use PragmaStack<> class instead of old representation of internal stack.
Don't change compiler's behavior.
TODO:
1. Introduce diagnostics on popping named slots from pragma stacks.
Reviewer: rnk
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19727
llvm-svn: 268085
Slightly updated version, double-checked build and tests.
Improve implementation of MS pragmas that use stack + compatibility fixes.
This patch:
1. Changes implementation of #pragma vtordisp to use PragmaStack class
that other stack pragmas use;
2. Fixes "#pragma vtordisp()" behavior - it shouldn't affect the stack;
3. Supports "save-restore" of pragma stacks on enter / exit a C++ method
body, as MSVC does.
TODO:
1. Change implementation of #pragma pack to use the same approach;
2. Introduce diagnostics on popping named stack slots, as MSVC does.
Reviewers:
rnk, thakis
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19361
llvm-svn: 268029
Rework implementation of several MS pragmas that use internal stack:
vtordisp, {bss|code|const|data}_seg.
This patch:
1. Makes #pragma vtordisp use PragmaStack class as *_seg pragmas do;
2. Fixes "#pragma vtordisp()" behavior: it shouldn't affect stack;
3. Saves/restores the stacks on enter/exit a C++ method body.
llvm-svn: 267866
This is like r262493, but for pragma detect_mismatch instead of pragma comment.
The two pragmas have similar behavior, so use the same approach for both.
llvm-svn: 262506
Dmitry Mikulin