This matches gnu archive behavior and since archive member order can change
which member is used, not changing the order on replacement looks like the
right thing to do.
This patch also refactors the logic for which archive member to keep and
whether to move it to a helper function (computeInsertAction). The
nesting in computeNewArchiveMembers was getting a bit confusing.
llvm-svn: 186829
Based on Peter Collingbourne's destructor patches.
Prior to this change, clang was considering ?1 to be the complete
destructor and the base destructor, which was wrong. This lead to
crashes when clang tried to emit two LLVM functions with the same name.
In this ABI, TUs with non-inline dtors might not emit a complete
destructor. They are emitted as inline thunks in TUs that need them,
and they always delegate to the base dtors of the complete class and its
virtual bases. This change uses the DeferredDecls machinery to emit
complete dtors as needed.
Currently in clang try body destructors can catch exceptions thrown by
virtual base destructors. In the Microsoft C++ ABI, clang may not have
the destructor definition, in which case clang won't wrap the virtual
virtual base destructor calls in a try-catch. Diagnosing this in user
code is TODO.
Finally, for classes that don't use virtual inheritance, MSVC always
calls the base destructor (?1) directly. This is a useful code size
optimization that avoids emitting lots of extra thunks or aliases.
Implementing it also means our existing tests continue to pass, and is
consistent with MSVC's output.
We can do the same for Itanium by tweaking GetAddrOfCXXDestructor, but
it will require further testing.
Reviewers: rjmccall
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1066
llvm-svn: 186828
GNU ar when not given the a or b modifiers replaces archive members in the
same location of the old ones. I am about to implement that in llvm-ar. For
now, just don't depend on the current llvm-ar behavior on this test.
llvm-svn: 186823
No functionality change.
In Sema helper functions:
* renamed isTypeName as HasTypenameKeyword
In UsingDecl:
* renamed get/setUsingLocation to get/setUsingLoc
* renamed is/setTypeName as has/setTypename
llvm-svn: 186816
After Ulrich's r180677 (thanks!) TableGen is intelligent enough to
handle tied constraints involving complex operands properly, so
virtually all of the ARM custom converters are now unnecessary.
llvm-svn: 186810
A constructor for an abstract class does not call constructors for virtual
base classes, so it is not an error if no initializer is present for the
virtual base and the virtual base cannot be default initialized.
Also provide a (disabled by default, for now) warning for the case where a
virtual base class's initializer is ignored in an abstract class's constructor,
and address a defect in DR257 where it was not carried through to C++11's rules
for implicit deletion of special member functions.
Based on a patch by Maurice Bos.
llvm-svn: 186803
optimize, to follow the permissions granted in N3664. Under those rules, only
calls generated by new-expressions and delete-expressions are permitted to be
optimized, and direct calls to ::operator new and ::operator delete must be
treated as normal calls.
llvm-svn: 186799
With this fix, only changed regions will be replaced in vim's buffer.
Thereby, marks should mostly be left intact. Furthermore, this is a
better fix for the performance problem in conjunction with
'foldmethod=syntax' (see r186660).
llvm-svn: 186789
helper function. This leaves both trivial cases handled entirely in
helper functions and merely manages the list of allocas to process in
the run method.
The next step will be to handle all of the trivial promotion work prior
to even creating the core class and the subsequent simplifications that
enables.
llvm-svn: 186784
a single block into the helper routine. This takes advantage of the fact
that we can directly replace uses prior to any store with undef to
simplify matters and unconditionally promote allocas only used within
one block.
I've removed the special handling for the case of no stores existing.
This has no semantic effect but might slow things down. I'll fix that in
a later patch when I refactor this entire thing to be easier to manage
the different cases.
llvm-svn: 186783
handles the general cases.
The hope is to refactor this so that we don't end up building the entire
class for the trivial cases. I also want to lift a lot of the early
pre-processing in the initial segment of run() into a separate routine,
and really none of it needs to happen inside the primary promotion
class.
These routines in particular used none of the actual state in the
promotion class, so they don't really make sense as members.
llvm-svn: 186781
This struct is nicely independent of everything else, and we already
needed a foward declaration here. It's simpler to just define it
immediately.
llvm-svn: 186780
Rafael Espindola