Summary:
The usefulness of **modernize-use-override** can be reduced if you have to live in an environment where you support multiple compilers, some of which sadly are not yet fully C++11 compliant
some codebases have to use override as a macro OVERRIDE e.g.
```
// GCC 4.7 supports explicit virtual overrides when C++11 support is enabled.
```
This allows code to be compiled with C++11 compliant compilers and get warnings and errors that clang, MSVC,gcc can give, while still allowing other legacy pre C++11 compilers to compile the code. This can be an important step towards modernizing C++ code whilst living in a legacy codebase.
When it comes to clang tidy, the use of the **modernize-use-override** is one of the most useful checks, but the messages reported are inaccurate for that codebase if the standard approach is to use the macros OVERRIDE and/or FINAL.
When combined with fix-its that introduce the C++11 override keyword, they become fatal, resulting in the modernize-use-override check being turned off to prevent the introduction of such errors.
This revision, allows the possibility for the replacement **override **to be a macro instead, Allowing the clang-tidy check to be run on both pre and post C++11 code, and allowing fix-its to be applied.
Reviewers: alexfh, JonasToth, hokein, Eugene.Zelenko, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: alexfh, JonasToth
Subscribers: lewmpk, malcolm.parsons, jdoerfert, xazax.hun, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57087
llvm-svn: 355132
Summary: Detect a few expressions as likely character expressions, see PR27723.
Reviewers: xazax.hun, alexfh
Subscribers: rnkovacs, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58609
llvm-svn: 355089
Summary:
The text was written mostly by Sam McCall, screenshots are mostly made
by me.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58710
llvm-svn: 354992
Summary:
Suppose `clangd::` is unresolved in the following example. Currently,
we simply use "clangd::" as the query scope. We can do better by combining with
accessible scopes in the context. The query scopes can be `{clangd::, clang::clangd::}`.
```
namespace clang { clangd::^ }
```
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, sammccall, hokein, kadircet
Reviewed By: kadircet
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58448
llvm-svn: 354963
Summary:
D58340 enables indexing of USRs, this makes sure test in clangd are
aligned with the change
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58341
llvm-svn: 354879
Summary:
This is a further optimization of r350803, we drop docs in static index for
symbols not being indexed for completion, while keeping the docs in dynamic
index (we rely on dynamic index to get docs for class members).
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56539
llvm-svn: 354792
Summary:
We are less certain it is the correct fix. Also, clang doesn't apply FixIt to
the source code in macro.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58525
llvm-svn: 354664
Summary:
Clangd was reporting implicit symbols, like results of implicit cast
expressions during code navigation, which is not desired. For example:
```
struct Foo{ Foo(int); };
void bar(Foo);
vod foo() {
int x;
bar(^x);
}
```
Performing a GoTo on the point specified by ^ would give two results one
pointing to line `int x` and the other for definition of `Foo(int);`
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, sammccall
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, mgrang, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58495
llvm-svn: 354585
Summary:
Implicit functions are outside the control of source authors and should
be exempt from style restrictions.
Tested via running clang tools tests.
This is an amended followup to https://reviews.llvm.org/D57207
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: jdoerfert, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58095
llvm-svn: 354534
Summary:
The analsis on the throwing behvaiour on functions and statements gave only
a binary answer whether an exception could occur and if yes which types are
thrown.
This refactoring allows keeping track if there is a unknown factor, because the
code calls to some functions with unavailable source code with no `noexcept`
information.
This 'potential Unknown' information is propagated properly and can be queried
separately.
Reviewers: lebedev.ri, aaron.ballman, baloghadamsoftware, alexfh
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri, baloghadamsoftware
Subscribers: xazax.hun, rnkovacs, a.sidorin, Szelethus, donat.nagy, dkrupp, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57883
llvm-svn: 354517
Summary:
The assertion checking that a range of a node is a token range does
not hold in case of "split" tokens, e.g. between two closing template
argument lists (`vector<vector<int>>`).
Reviewers: kadircet, sammccall
Reviewed By: kadircet
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58447
llvm-svn: 354507
Summary: To take up the .clangd folder for other potential uses in the future.
Reviewers: kadircet, sammccall
Reviewed By: kadircet
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58440
llvm-svn: 354505
Eric Liu