Change insert/extract subreg instructions to be able to be used in TableGen patterns.
Use the above features to reimplement an x86-64 pseudo instruction as a pattern.
llvm-svn: 48130
precision integers. This won't actually work
(and most of the code is dead) unless the new
legalization machinery is turned on. While
there, I rationalized the handling of i1, and
removed some bogus (and unused) sextload patterns.
For i1, this could result in microscopically
better code for some architectures (not X86).
It might also result in worse code if annotating
with AssertZExt nodes turns out to be more harmful
than helpful.
llvm-svn: 46280
1. Legalize now always promotes truncstore of i1 to i8.
2. Remove patterns and gunk related to truncstore i1 from targets.
3. Rename the StoreXAction stuff to TruncStoreAction in TLI.
4. Make the TLI TruncStoreAction table a 2d table to handle from/to conversions.
5. Mark a wide variety of invalid truncstores as such in various targets, e.g.
X86 currently doesn't support truncstore of any of its integer types.
6. Add legalize support for truncstores with invalid value input types.
7. Add a dag combine transform to turn store(truncate) into truncstore when
safe.
The later allows us to compile CodeGen/X86/storetrunc-fp.ll to:
_foo:
fldt 20(%esp)
fldt 4(%esp)
faddp %st(1)
movl 36(%esp), %eax
fstps (%eax)
ret
instead of:
_foo:
subl $4, %esp
fldt 24(%esp)
fldt 8(%esp)
faddp %st(1)
fstps (%esp)
movl 40(%esp), %eax
movss (%esp), %xmm0
movss %xmm0, (%eax)
addl $4, %esp
ret
llvm-svn: 46140
x86 backend where instructions were not marked maystore/mayload, and perf issues where
instructions were not marked neverHasSideEffects. It would be really nice if we could
write patterns for copy instructions.
I have audited all the x86 instructions down to MOVDQAmr. The flags on others and on
other targets are probably not right in all cases, but no clients currently use this
info that are enabled by default.
llvm-svn: 45829
based what flag to set on whether it was already marked as
"isRematerializable". If there was a further check to determine if it's "really"
rematerializable, then I marked it as "mayHaveSideEffects" and created a check
in the X86 back-end similar to the remat one.
llvm-svn: 45132
adjustment fields, and an optional flag. If there is a "dynamic_stackalloc" in
the code, make sure that it's bracketed by CALLSEQ_START and CALLSEQ_END. If
not, then there is the potential for the stack to be changed while the stack's
being used by another instruction (like a call).
This can only result in tears...
llvm-svn: 44037
Turn a store folding instruction into a load folding instruction. e.g.
xorl %edi, %eax
movl %eax, -32(%ebp)
movl -36(%ebp), %eax
orl %eax, -32(%ebp)
=>
xorl %edi, %eax
orl -36(%ebp), %eax
mov %eax, -32(%ebp)
This enables the unfolding optimization for a subsequent instruction which will
also eliminate the newly introduced store instruction.
llvm-svn: 43192
Evan Cheng