The previous patch added a member set to store instructions that we
could allow to wrap. But this wasn't cleared between searches meaning
that they could get promoted, incorrectly, during the promotion of a
separate valid chain.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62254
llvm-svn: 361462
Summary:
Allow struct fields SRA and dead stores. This works by considering fields accesses from getElementPtr to be considered as a possible pointer root that can be cleaned up.
We check that the variable can be SRA by recursively checking the sub expressions with the new isSafeSubSROAGEP function.
basically this allows the array in following C code to be optimized out
struct Expr {
int a[2];
int b;
};
static struct Expr e;
int foo (int i)
{
e.b = 2;
e.a[i] = 1;
return e.b;
}
Reviewers: greened, bkramer, nicholas, jmolloy
Reviewed By: jmolloy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61911
llvm-svn: 361460
Summary:
In this patch, `ISD::RETURNADDR` is lowered on the emscripten target
to the new Emscripten runtime function `emscripten_return_address`, which
implements the functionality.
Patch by Guanzhong Chen
Reviewers: tlively, aheejin
Reviewed By: tlively
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62210
llvm-svn: 361454
In general dynamic/local dynamic TLS models, with -fno-plt,
* x86: emit `calll *___tls_get_addr@GOT(%ebx)` instead of `calll ___tls_get_addr@PLT`
Note, on x86, if we can get rid of %ebx as the PIC register,
it may be better to use a register not preserved across function calls.
* x86_64: emit `callq *__tls_get_addr@GOTPCREL(%rip)` instead of `callq __tls_get_addr@PLT`
Reorganize the code by separating 32-bit and 64-bit.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62106
llvm-svn: 361453
Summary:
With now a clear distinction between string and numeric substitutions,
this patch introduces separate classes to represent them with a parent
class implementing the common interface. Diagnostics in
printSubstitutions() are also adapted to not require knowing which
substitution is being looked at since it does not hinder clarity and
makes the implementation simpler.
Reviewers: jhenderson, jdenny, probinson, arichardson
Subscribers: llvm-commits, probinson, arichardson, hiraditya
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62241
llvm-svn: 361446
Summary:
Terminology introduced by [[#]] blocks is confusing and does not
integrate well with existing terminology.
First, variables referred by [[]] blocks are called "pattern variables"
while the text a CHECK directive needs to match is called a "CHECK
pattern". This is inconsistent with variables in [[#]] blocks since
[[#]] blocks are also found in CHECK pattern yet those variables are
called "numeric variable".
Second, the replacing of both [[]] and [[#]] blocks by the value of the
variable or expression they contain is represented by a
FileCheckPatternSubstitution class. The naming refers to being a
substitution in a CHECK pattern but could be wrongly understood as being
a substitution of a pattern variable.
Third and lastly, comments use "numeric expression" to refer both to the
[[#]] blocks as well as to the numeric expressions these blocks contain
which get evaluated at match time.
This patch solves these confusions by
- calling variables in [[]] and [[#]] blocks as string and numeric
variables respectively;
- referring to [[]] and [[#]] as substitution *blocks*, with the former
being a string substitution block and the latter a numeric
substitution block;
- calling [[]] and [[#]] blocks to be replaced by the value of a
variable or expression they contain a substitution (as opposed to
definition when these blocks are used to defined a variable), with the
former being a string substitution and the latter a numeric
substitution;
- renaming the FileCheckPatternSubstitution as a FileCheckSubstitution
class with FileCheckStringSubstitution and
FileCheckNumericSubstitution subclasses;
- restricting the use of "numeric expression" to refer to the expression
that is evaluated in a numeric substitution.
While numeric substitution blocks only support numeric substitutions of
numeric expressions at the moment there are plans to augment numeric
substitution blocks to support numeric definitions as well as both a
numeric definition and numeric substitution in the same numeric
substitution block.
Reviewers: jhenderson, jdenny, probinson, arichardson
Subscribers: hiraditya, arichardson, probinson, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62146
llvm-svn: 361445
Summary: If we are building the tests for the runtimes we should make them depend on gtest so that gtest is built and ready before we run any of the check-* targets.
Reviewers: phosek, compnerd
Reviewed By: compnerd
Subscribers: mgorny, winksaville, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62269
llvm-svn: 361436
This allows using anything that isn't a literal integer as the bounds
for a foreach. Some of the diagnostics aren't perfect, but nobody ever
accused tablegen of having good errors. For example, the existing
wording suggests a bitrange is valid, but as far as I can tell this
has never worked.
Fixes bug 41958.
llvm-svn: 361434
This change is a consequence of the discussion in "RFC: Place libs in
Clang-dedicated directories", specifically the suggestion that
libunwind, libc++abi and libc++ shouldn't be using Clang resource
directory. Tools like clangd make this assumption, but this is
currently not true for the LLVM_ENABLE_PER_TARGET_RUNTIME_DIR build.
This change addresses that by moving the output of these libraries to
lib/$target/c++ and include/c++ directories, leaving resource directory
only for compiler-rt runtimes and Clang builtin headers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59168
llvm-svn: 361432
We effectively had a second set of isel patterns that tried to use a
regular store instruction and an extract_subreg instruction. Or a masked move
and an extract_subreg. These patterns were intended to override the
matching of VEXTRACT instructions by taking advantage of the priority
of the explicit immediate 0 for the index.
This patch instaed just disables the immediate 0 matchin the VEXTRACT
patterns. This each of the component pieces of the larger patterns will
match by themselves.
This found a bug of sorts were we didn't use 128-bit store for 512->128
extract on KNL. Its unclear what the right thing here should be.
Using the vextract avoids constraining the register allocator to use
xmm0-15. But it always results in a longer encoding if the register
allocator ends up choosing xmm0-15 anyway.
llvm-svn: 361431
We were turning roundss/sd/ps/pd intrinsics with immediates of 1 or 2 into
llvm.floor/ceil. The llvm.ceil/floor intrinsics are supposed to correspond
to the libm functions. For the libm functions we need to disable the
precision exception so the llvm.floor/ceil functions should always map to
encodings 0x9 and 0xA.
We had a mix of isel patterns where some used 0x9 and 0xA and others used
0x1 and 0x2. We need to be consistent and always use 0x9 and 0xA.
Since we have no way in isel of knowing where the llvm.ceil/floor came
from, we can't map X86 specific intrinsics with encodings 1 or 2 to it.
We could map 0x9 and 0xA to llvm.ceil/floor instead, but I'd really like
to see a use case and optimization advantage first.
I've left the backend test cases to show the blend we now emit without
the extra isel patterns. But I've removed the InstCombine tests completely.
llvm-svn: 361425
This fix is for the problem from https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38714.
Specifically, Simple Register Coalescing creates following conversion :
undef %0.sub_32:gpr64 = ORRWrs $wzr, %3:gpr32common, 0, debug-location !24;
It copies 32-bit value from gpr32 into gpr64. But Live DEBUG_VALUE analysis
is not able to create debug location record for that instruction. So the problem
is in that debug info for argc variable is incorrect. The fix is
to write custom isCopyInstrImpl() which would recognize the ORRWrs instr.
llvm-svn: 361417
Summary: Avoid visiting an instruction more than once by using a map.
Reviewers: davidxl
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62262
llvm-svn: 361416
Summary:
EH Frames aren't supported on AIX with the system compiler, but the definition of HAVE_EHTABLE_SUPPORT misses this which causes linking problems on AIX. This patch updates the definition of HAVE_EHTABLE_SUPPORT in both JITLink and RuntimeDyld.
Author: daltenty
Reviewers: sfertile, xingxue, hubert.reinterpretcase
Reviewed By: xingxue
Subscribers: hiraditya, jsji, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62203
llvm-svn: 361410
Keep it optional in cases this is ever needed in some global
context. Currently it's only used for getting an upper bound inline
asm code size.
For AMDGPU, gfx10 increases the maximum instruction size to
20-bytes. This avoids penalizing older subtargets when estimating code
size, and making some annoying branch relaxation test adjustments.
llvm-svn: 361405
If a template parameter refers to a pointer to member, but the mangling
of that was a string literal instead of a real symbol, llvm-undname used
to crash instead of rejecting the input.
llvm-svn: 361402
This is a minimal start to correcting a problem most directly discussed in PR38086:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38086
We have been hacking around a limitation for FP select patterns by using the
fast-math-flags on the condition of the select rather than the select itself.
This patch just allows FMF to appear with the 'select' opcode. No changes are
needed to "FPMathOperator" because it already includes select-of-FP because
that definition is based on the (return) value type.
Once we have this ability, we can start correcting and adding IR transforms
to use the FMF on a 'select' instruction. The instcombine and vectorizer test
diffs only show that the IRBuilder change is behaving as expected by applying
an FMF guard value to 'select'.
For reference:
rL241901 - allowed FMF with fcmp
rL255555 - allowed FMF with FP calls
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61917
llvm-svn: 361401
Does not affect update_llc_test_checks, or the actual output,
but is not accepted by the actual FileCheck.
Sorry, i should have noticed this before committing,
not the very next second after..
llvm-svn: 361398
This fixes PR41886: llvm-objdump -d -r -j .text doesn't show inline relocations of .text
While here, switch to stable_sort() because we don't want to change the order of relocations applied to the same location. gABI says consecutive relocation records are composed together and their order matters. In practise it is difficult to see relocations applied to the same location not consecutive, we just have to keep the relative order of relocations with the same offset.
Reviewed By: grimar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62253
llvm-svn: 361395
The input LoopCost value can be zero, but if so it should be recalculated with the current VF. After that it should always be non-zero.
llvm-svn: 361387
Summary: This helps building internal tools on top of the library.
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: tschuett, llvm-commits, bdb, ondrasej
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62239
llvm-svn: 361385
This patch brings various error messages into line with each other, by
removing trailing full stops, and making the first letter lower-case.
This addresses https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40859.
Reviewed by: jhenderson, rupprecht, jakehehrlich
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62072
Patch by Alex Brachet
llvm-svn: 361384
Summary:
Another target that prefers to use `-march` in tests
```
llvm/test/CodeGen/SPARC$ grep -ri mtriple | wc -l
25
llvm/test/CodeGen/SPARC$ grep -ri march | wc -l
165
```
This test is being affected by a further patch,
so regenerate it to better visualize the changes
Reviewers: RKSimon, dcederman, gberry
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: jyknight, fedor.sergeev, jrtc27, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62242
llvm-svn: 361381
When the tiny code model is requested for a target machine that does not
support this, we get an error message (which is nice) but also this diagnostic
and request to submit a bug report:
fatal error: error in backend: Target does not support the tiny CodeModel
[Inferior 2 (process 31509) exited with code 0106]
clang-9: error: clang frontend command failed with exit code 70 (use -v to see invocation)
(gdb) clang version 9.0.0 (http://llvm.org/git/clang.git 29994b0c63a40f9c97c664170244a7bba5ecc15e) (http://llvm.org/git/llvm.git 95606fdf91c2d63a931e865f4b78b2e9828ddc74)
Target: arm-arm-none-eabi
Thread model: posix
clang-9: note: diagnostic msg: PLEASE submit a bug report to https://bugs.llvm.org/ and include the crash backtrace, preprocessed source, and associated run script.
clang-9: note: diagnostic msg:
********************
PLEASE ATTACH THE FOLLOWING FILES TO THE BUG REPORT:
Preprocessed source(s) and associated run script(s) are located at:
clang-9: note: diagnostic msg: /tmp/tiny-dfe1a2.c
clang-9: note: diagnostic msg: /tmp/tiny-dfe1a2.sh
clang-9: note: diagnostic msg:
But this is not a bug, this is a feature. :-) Not only is this not a bug, this
is also pretty confusing. This patch causes just to print the fatal error and
not the diagnostic:
fatal error: error in backend: Target does not support the tiny CodeModel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62236
llvm-svn: 361370
This adds proper handling of the NONAME-keyword, which makes llvm-dlltool
generate an import using the ordinal instead of the name.
Patch by by Jannik Vogel, test added by Stefan Schmidt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62175
llvm-svn: 361367
This is the second part of the commit fixing PR38917 (hoisting
partitially redundant machine instruction). Most of PRE (partitial
redundancy elimination) and CSE work is done on LLVM IR, but some of
redundancy arises during DAG legalization. Machine CSE is not enough
to deal with it. This simple PRE implementation works a little bit
intricately: it passes before CSE, looking for partitial redundancy
and transforming it to fully redundancy, anticipating that the next
CSE step will eliminate this created redundancy. If CSE doesn't
eliminate this, than created instruction will remain dead and eliminated
later by Remove Dead Machine Instructions pass.
The third part of the commit is supposed to refactor MachineCSE,
to make it more clear and to merge MachinePRE with MachineCSE,
so one need no rely on further Remove Dead pass to clear instrs
not eliminated by CSE.
First step: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54839
Fixes llvm.org/PR38917
llvm-svn: 361356
Sam Parker