Fallback to stringification and string comparison if we cannot compare
the `IdentifierInfo`s, which is the case for C++ overloaded operators,
constructors, destructors, etc.
Examples:
{ "std", "basic_string", "basic_string", 2} // match the 2 param std::string constructor
{ "std", "basic_string", "~basic_string" } // match the std::string destructor
{ "aaa", "bbb", "operator int" } // matches the struct bbb conversion operator to int
Reviewed By: martong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111535
Refactor the code to make it more readable.
It will set up further changes, and improvements to this code in
subsequent patches.
This is a non-functional change.
Reviewed By: martong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111534
This NFC change accomplishes three things:
1) Splits up the single unittest into reasonable segments.
2) Extends the test infra using a template to select the AST-node
from which it is supposed to construct a `CallEvent`.
3) Adds a *lot* of different tests, documenting the current
capabilities of the `CallDescription`. The corresponding tests are
marked with `FIXME`s, where the current behavior should be different.
Both `CXXMemberCallExpr` and `CXXOperatorCallExpr` are derived from
`CallExpr`, so they are matched by using the default template parameter.
On the other hand, `CXXConstructExpr` is not derived from `CallExpr`.
In case we want to match for them, we need to pass the type explicitly
to the `CallDescriptionAction`.
About destructors:
They have no AST-node, but they are generated in the CFG machinery in
the analyzer. Thus, to be able to match against them, we would need to
construct a CFG and walk on that instead of simply walking the AST.
I'm also relaxing the `EXPECT`ation in the
`CallDescriptionConsumer::performTest()`, to check the `LookupResult`
only if we matched for the `CallDescription`.
This is necessary to allow tests in which we expect *no* matches at all.
Reviewed By: martong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111794
As reported on https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/0771/ (Snippet 2) - (and mentioned on rGdc4259d5a38409) we are repeating the T1.isNull() check instead of checking T2.isNull() as well, and at this point neither should be null - so we're better off with an assertion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107347
When using explicit Clang modules, some declarations might unexpectedly become invisible.
This is caused by the mechanism that loads PCM files passed via `-fmodule-file=<path>` and creates an `IdentifierInfo` for the module name. The `IdentifierInfo` creation takes place when the `ASTReader` is in a weird state, with modules that are loaded but not yet set up properly. This patch delays the creation of `IdentifierInfo` until the `ASTReader` is done with reading the PCM.
Note that the `-fmodule-file=<name>=<path>` form of the argument doesn't suffer from this issue, since it doesn't create `IdentifierInfo` for the module name.
Reviewed By: dexonsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111543
The clang behavior was poor before this patch:
```
void B::foo() override {}
// Before: clang emited "expcted function body after function
// declarator", and skiped all contents until it hits a ";", the
// following function f() is discarded.
// VS
// Now "override is not allowed" with a remove fixit, and following f()
// is retained.
void f();
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111883
Previously, we reported the same value as for C17, now we report 202000L, which
is the same value currently used by GCC.
Once C23 ships, this value will be bumped to the correct date.
The C and C++ standards require the argument to __has_cpp_attribute and
__has_c_attribute to be expanded ([cpp.cond]p5). It would make little sense
to expand the argument to those operators but not expand the argument to
__has_attribute and __has_declspec, so those were both also changed in this
patch.
Note that it might make sense for the other builtins to also expand their
argument, but it wasn't as clear to me whether the behavior would be correct
there, and so they were left for a future revision.
How many place you need to modify when implementing a new extension for RISC-V?
At least 7 places as I know:
- Add new SubtargetFeature at RISCV.td
- -march parser in RISCV.cpp
- RISCVTargetInfo::initFeatureMap@RISCV.cpp for handling feature vector.
- RISCVTargetInfo::getTargetDefines@RISCV.cpp for pre-define marco.
- Arch string parser for ELF attribute in RISCVAsmParser.cpp
- ELF attribute emittion in RISCVAsmParser.cpp, and make sure it's in
canonical order...
- ELF attribute emittion in RISCVTargetStreamer.cpp, and again, must in
canonical order...
And now, this patch provide an unified infrastructure for handling (almost)
everything of RISC-V arch string.
After this patch, you only need to update 2 places for implement an extension
for RISC-V:
- Add new SubtargetFeature at RISCV.td, hmmm, it's hard to avoid.
- Add new entry to RISCVSupportedExtension@RISCVISAInfo.cpp or
SupportedExperimentalExtensions@RISCVISAInfo.cpp .
Most codes are come from existing -march parser, but with few new feature/bug
fixes:
- Accept version for -march, e.g. -march=rv32i2p0.
- Reject version info with `p` but without minor version number like `rv32i2p`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105168
This patch updates test files after D105169.
Autogenerated test codes are changed by `utils/update_cc_test_checks.py,` and non-autogenerated test codes are changed as follows:
(1) I wrote a python script that (partially) updates the tests using regex: {F18594904} The script is not perfect, but I believe it gives hints about which patterns are updated to have `noundef` attached.
(2) The remaining tests are updated manually.
Reviewed By: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108453
Turning on `enable_noundef_analysis` flag allows better codegen by removing freeze instructions.
I modified clang by renaming `enable_noundef_analysis` flag to `disable-noundef-analysis` and turning it off by default.
Test updates are made as a separate patch: D108453
Reviewed By: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105169
RecordMemberExprValidator was not looking through ElaboratedType
nodes when looking for candidates which occur in base classes.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111830
Mimic the behavior of including headers where a system includer makes an
includee a system header too.
rdar://84049469
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111476
By default clang emits complete contructors as alias of base constructors if they are the same.
The backend is supposed to emit symbols for the alias, otherwise it causes undefined symbols.
@yaxunl observed that this issue is related to the llvm options `-amdgpu-early-inline-all=true`
and `-amdgpu-function-calls=false`. This issue is resolved by only inlining global values
with internal linkage. The `getCalleeFunction()` in AMDGPUResourceUsageAnalysis also had
to be extended to support aliases to functions. inline-calls.ll was corrected appropriately.
Reviewed By: yaxunl, #amdgpu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109707
This patch remove the override in AIX target,
so the int128 is enabled in 64 bit mode or with ForceEnableInt128.
Reviewed By: lkail
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111078
When building frameworks, headermaps responsible for mapping angle-included headers to their source file location are passed via
`-I` and not `-index-header-map`. Also, `-index-header-map` is only used for indexing purposes and not during most builds.
This patch holds on to the framework's name in HeaderFileInfo as this is retrieveable for cases outside of IndexHeaderMaps and
still represents the framework that is being built.
resolves: rdar://84046893
Reviewed By: jansvoboda11
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111468
The attributes string doesn't include 'f' or 'h'. I don't think
any code looks at the header name without those.
Reviewed By: simon_tatham
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111755
This was committed as ec6c847179, but then reverted after a failure
in: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/84/builds/13983
I was not able to reproduce the problem, but I added an extra check
for a NULL QualType just in case.
Original comit message:
The patch adds missing diagnostics for cases like:
float F3 = ((__float128)F1 * (__float128)F2) / 2.0f;
Sema::checkDeviceDecl (renamed to checkTypeSupport) is changed to work
with a type without the corresponding ValueDecl. It is also refactored
so that host diagnostics for unsupported types can be added here as
well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109315
[git-clang-format][PR46815] Add diffstat functionality
Adding a --diffstat parameter to git-clang-format that essentially uses git diff --stat, i.e. lists the files needing
formatting. This is useful for CI integration or manual usage where one wants to list the files not properly formatted.
I use it for the Suricata project's github action (CI) integration that verifies proper formatting of a pull request
according to project guidelines where it's very helpful to say which files are not properly formatted. I find the list
of files much more useful than e.g. showing the diff in this case using git-clang-format --diff.
An alternative would be to take an additional parameter to diff, e.g. git-clang-format --diff --stat
The goal is not to provide the whole git diff --stat=... parameter functionality, just plain git diff --stat.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, JakeMerdichAMD
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84375
This is a bug which gets reported from time to time and we've had multiple attempts to fix it, but don't want to fix it by adding frontEnd to the mix.
This patch aim to find a trivial, but not that sophisticated way of emitting the error without the additional impact of adding libFrontEnd to clang-format.
See {D90121} for analysis of why we don't want those previous attempts
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111815
'(self.prop)' produces a surprising AST where ParenExpr
resides inside `PseudoObjectExpr.
This breaks ObjCMethodCall::getMessageKind() which in turn causes us
to perform unnecessary dynamic dispatch bifurcation when evaluating
body-farmed property accessors, which in turn causes us
to explore infeasible paths.
Looks like lldb has some issues with this - somehow it causes lldb to
treat a "char[N]" type as an array of chars (prints them out
individually) but a "char [N]" is printed as a string. (even though the
DWARF doesn't have this string in it - it's something to do with the
string lldb generates for itself using clang)
This reverts commit 277623f4d5.
Based on post-commit review discussion on
2bd8493847 with Richard Smith.
Other uses of forcing HasEmptyPlaceHolder to false seem OK to me -
they're all around pointer/reference types where the pointer/reference
token will appear at the rightmost side of the left side of the type
name, so they make nested types (eg: the "int" in "int *") behave as
though there is a non-empty placeholder (because the "*" is essentially
the placeholder as far as the "int" is concerned).
Previously without -disable-free, -clear-ast-before-backend would crash in ~ASTContext() due to various reasons.
This works around that by doing a lot of the cleanup ahead of the destructor so that the destructor doesn't actually do any manual cleanup if we've already cleaned up beforehand.
This actually does save a measurable amount of memory with -clear-ast-before-backend, although at an almost unnoticeable runtime cost:
https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=5d755b32f2775b9219f6d6e2feda5e1417dc993b&to=58ef1c7ad7e2ad45f9c97597905a8cf05a26258c&stat=max-rss
Previously we weren't doing any cleanup with -disable-free, so I tried measuring the impact of always doing the cleanup and didn't measure anything noticeable on llvm-compile-time-tracker.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111767
Not all constants are emitted within the context of a function, so use
the module's ASTContext instead because 1) that's the same as the
current function ASTContext, and 2) the module can never be null.
Fixes PR50787.
It seems that Clang 11 regressed functionality that was working in
Clang 10 regarding calling a few overloaded operators in an immediate
context. Specifically, we were not checking for immediate invocations
of array subscripting and the arrow operators, but we properly handle
the other overloaded operators.
This fixes the two problematic operators and adds some test coverage to
show they're equivalent to calling the operator directly.
This addresses PR50779.
Balazs Benics