Update examples and docs to demonstrate using `__lldb_init_module` instead of
the idiom that checks for `lldb.debugger` at the top-level.
```
if __name__ == '__main__':
...
elif lldb.debugger:
...
```
Is replaced with:
```
if __name__ == '__main__':
...
def __lldb_init_module(debugger, internal_dict):
...
```
This change is for two reasons. First, it's generally encouraged not to only
use the convenience singletons (`lldb.{debugger,process,target,etc}`)
interactively from the `script` command. Second, there's a bug where
registering a python class as a command (using `command script add -c ...`),
result in the command not being runnable. Note that registering function-backed
commands does not have this bug.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117237
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
Dave Lee