If there is an unresolved member access AST node, and the base is
implicit, do not access/use it for generating candidate overloads for
code completion results.
Fixes PR31093.
llvm-svn: 298903
Summary:
If promise_type has get_return_object_on_allocation_failure defined,
check if an allocation function returns nullptr, and if so,
return the result of get_return_object_on_allocation_failure().
Reviewers: rsmith, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31399
llvm-svn: 298891
Summary:
This patch implements parsing of [[clang::suppress(rule, ...)]]
and [[gsl::suppress(rule, ...)]] attributes.
C++ Core Guidelines depend heavily on tool support for
rule enforcement. They also propose a way to suppress
warnings [1] which is by annotating any ancestor in AST
with the C++11 attribute [[gsl::suppress(rule1,...)]].
To have a mechanism to suppress non-C++ Core
Guidelines specific, an additional spelling of [[clang::suppress]]
is defined.
For example, to suppress the warning cppcoreguidelines-slicing,
one could do
```
[[clang::suppress("cppcoreguidelines-slicing")]]
void f() { ... code that does slicing ... }
```
or
```
void g() {
Derived b;
[[clang::suppress("cppcoreguidelines-slicing")]]
Base a{b};
[[clang::suppress("cppcoreguidelines-slicing")]] {
doSomething();
Base a2{b};
}
}
```
This parsing can then be used by clang-tidy, which includes multiple
C++ Core Guidelines rules, to suppress warnings (see
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24888).
For the exact naming of the rule in the attribute, there
are different possibilities, which will be defined in the
corresponding clang-tidy patch.
Currently, clang-tidy supports suppressing of warnings through "//
NOLINT" comments. There are some advantages that the attribute has:
- Suppressing specific warnings instead of all warnings
- Suppressing warnings in a block (namespace, function, compound
statement)
- Code formatting may split a statement into multiple lines,
thus a "// NOLINT" comment may be on the wrong line
I'm looking forward to your comments!
[1] https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#inforce-enforcement
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman, rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24886
llvm-svn: 298880
for unused values.
This fixes a regression caused by r298676, where constructor calls to
classes with non-trivial dtor were marked as unused if the first
argument is an initializer list. This is inconsistent (as the test
shows) and also warns on a reasonbly common code pattern where people
just call constructors to create and immediately destroy an object.
llvm-svn: 298853
Details:
Emit suspend expression which roughly looks like:
auto && x = CommonExpr();
if (!x.await_ready()) {
llvm_coro_save();
x.await_suspend(...); (*)
llvm_coro_suspend(); (**)
}
x.await_resume();
where the result of the entire expression is the result of x.await_resume()
(*) If x.await_suspend return type is bool, it allows to veto a suspend:
if (x.await_suspend(...))
llvm_coro_suspend();
(**) llvm_coro_suspend() encodes three possible continuations as a switch instruction:
%where-to = call i8 @llvm.coro.suspend(...)
switch i8 %where-to, label %coro.ret [ ; jump to epilogue to suspend
i8 0, label %yield.ready ; go here when resumed
i8 1, label %yield.cleanup ; go here when destroyed
]
llvm-svn: 298784
For target environment amdgiz and amdgizcl (giz means Generic Is Zero), AMDGPU will use new address space mapping where generic address space is 0 and private address space is 5. The data layout is also changed correspondingly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31210
llvm-svn: 298767
This typically is only for a new enough linker (bfd >= 2.16.2 or gold), but
our ppc suppport post-dates this and it should work on all linux platforms. It
is guaranteed to work on all elfv2 platforms.
llvm-svn: 298765
The checker currently warns on copying, moving, or calling methods on an object
that was recently std::move'd from. It understands a set of "state reset"
methods that bring a moved-from object back to a well-specified state.
Patch by Peter Szecsi!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24246
llvm-svn: 298698
attributes.
These patches don't work because we can't currently access the parameter
information in a reliable way when building attributes. I thought this
would be relatively straightforward to fix, but it seems not to be the
case. Fixing this will requrie a substantial re-plumbing of machinery to
allow attributes to be handled in this location, and several other fixes
to the attribute machinery should probably be made at the same time. All
of this will make the patch .... substantially more complicated.
Reverting for now as there are active miscompiles caused by the current
version.
llvm-svn: 298695
This change fixes a crash on initialization of a reference from ({}) during
template instantiation and incidentally improves diagnostics.
This reverts a prior attempt to handle this in r286721. Instead, we teach the
initialization code that initialization cannot be performed if a source type
is required and the initializer is an initializer list (which is not an
expression and does not have a type), and likewise for function-style cast
expressions.
llvm-svn: 298676
Summary:
Clang companion patch to LLVM patch D31027, which adds support
for emitting minimized bitcode file for use in the thin link step.
Add a cc1 option -fthin-link-bitcode=<file> to trigger this behavior.
Depends on D31027.
Reviewers: mehdi_amini, pcc
Subscribers: cfe-commits, Prazek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31050
llvm-svn: 298639
Correct class-template deprecation behavior
Based on the comment in the test, and my reading of the standard, a deprecated warning should be issued in the following case:
template<typename T> [[deprecated]] class Foo{}; Foo<int> f;
This was not the case, because the ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl creation did not also copy the deprecated attribute.
Note: I did NOT audit the complete set of attributes to see WHICH ones should be copied, so instead I simply copy ONLY the deprecated attribute.
Previous DiffRev: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27486, was reverted.
This patch fixes the issues brought up here by the reverter: https://reviews.llvm.org/rL298410
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31245
llvm-svn: 298634
After r297760, __isOSVersionAtLeast in compiler-rt loads the CoreFoundation
symbols at runtime. This means that `@available` will always fail when used in a
binary without a linked CoreFoundation.
This commit forces Clang to emit a reference to a CoreFoundation symbol when
`@available` is used to ensure that linking will fail when CoreFoundation isn't
linked with the build product.
rdar://31039592
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30977
llvm-svn: 298588
that became supported after r297019
The commit r297019 expanded the performSelector ObjC method family heuristic
to ensure that -Wobjc-unsafe-perform-selector covers all performSelector
variations. However, this made the -Warc-performSelector-leaks too noisy, as
that warning produces mostly false positives since the selector is unknown.
This commit reverts the ObjC method family heuristics introduced in r297019.
This ensures that -Warc-performSelector-leaks isn't too noisy. The commit still
preserves the coverage of -Wobjc-unsafe-perform-selector.
rdar://31124629
llvm-svn: 298587
Summary:
This patch adopts the recent changes that renamed `set_exception(exception_pointer)` to `unhandled_exception()`.
Additionally `unhandled_exception()` is now required, and so an error is emitted when exceptions are enabled but the promise type does not provide the member.
When exceptions are disabled a warning is emitted instead of an error, The warning notes that the `unhandled_exception()` function is required when exceptions are enabled.
Reviewers: rsmith, GorNishanov, aaron.ballman, majnemer
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30859
llvm-svn: 298565
It seems MS headers have started using __readgsqword, and since it's
used in a header that doesn't include intrin.h, we can't implement it as
an inline function anymore.
That was already the case for __readfsdword, which Saleem added support
for in r220859. This patch reuses that codegen to implement all of
__read[fg]s{byte,word,dword,qword}.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31248
llvm-svn: 298538
explaining why we have to ignore errors here even though in other parts
of codegen we can be more strict with builtins.
Also add a test case based on the code in a TSan test that found this
issue.
llvm-svn: 298494
declarations and calls instead of just definitions, and then teach it to
*not* attach such attributes even if the source code contains them.
This follows the design direction discussed on cfe-dev here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2017-January/052066.html
The idea is that for C standard library builtins, even if the library
vendor chooses to annotate their routines with __attribute__((nonnull)),
we will ignore those attributes which pertain to pointer arguments that
have an associated size. This allows the widespread (and seemingly
reasonable) pattern of calling these routines with a null pointer and
a zero size. I have only done this for the library builtins currently
recognized by Clang, but we can now trivially add to this set. This will
be controllable with -fno-builtin if anyone should care to do so.
Note that this does *not* change the AST. As a consequence, warnings,
static analysis, and source code rewriting are not impacted.
This isn't even a regression on any platform as neither Clang nor LLVM
have ever put 'nonnull' onto these arguments for declarations. All this
patch does is enable it on other declarations while preventing us from
ever accidentally enabling it on these libc functions due to a library
vendor.
It will also allow any other libraries using this annotation to gain
optimizations based on the annotation even when only a declaration is
visible.
llvm-svn: 298491
We don't know whether some other instantiation of the template might be able to
reach the annotation, so warning on it has a high chance of false positives.
Patch by Ahmed Asadi!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31069
llvm-svn: 298477
The alias was only ever used on darwin and had some issues there,
and isn't used in practice much. Also fixes a problem with -mno-altivec
not turning off -maltivec.
Also add a diagnostic for faltivec/fno-altivec that directs users to use
maltivec options and include the altivec.h file explicitly.
llvm-svn: 298449
Summary: We need to be able to disable samplepgo for specific files by supporting -fno-auto-profile and -fno-profile-sample-use
Reviewers: davidxl, dnovillo, echristo
Reviewed By: echristo
Subscribers: echristo, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31213
llvm-svn: 298446
Summary:
Because SamplePGO passes will be invoked twice in ThinLTO build: once at compile phase, the other at backend. We want to make sure the IR at the 2nd phase matches the hot part in pro
file, thus we do not want to inline hot callsites in the first phase.
Reviewers: tejohnson, eraman
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, cfe-commits, Prazek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31202
llvm-svn: 298429
This patch introduces X86AsmParser with the ability to handle the aforementioned ops within compound "MS" arithmetical expressions.
Currently - only supported as a stand alone Operand, e.g.:
"TYPE X"
now allowed :
"4 + TYPE X * 128"
LLVM side: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31174
llvm-svn: 298426
For variables in generic address spaces, for example:
```
unsigned char V[6442450944];
...
```
the address space is not yet known when we get into
*getConstantArrayType*, it is 0. AMDGCN target's
address space 0 has 32 bits pointers, so when we
call *getPointerWidth* with 0, the array size is
trimmed to 32 bits, which is not right.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30845
llvm-svn: 298420
Based on the comment in the test, and my reading of the standard, a deprecated warning should be issued in the following case:
template<typename T> [[deprecated]] class Foo{}; Foo<int> f;
This was not the case, because the ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl creation did not also copy the deprecated attribute.
Note: I did NOT audit the complete set of attributes to see WHICH ones should be copied, so instead I simply copy ONLY the deprecated attribute.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27486
llvm-svn: 298410
In such a case, as when using the NS_ENUM macro, for indexing purposes treat the typedef as 'transparent',
meaning we treat its references as symbols of the underlying tag symbol.
Also provide a libclang API to check for such typedefs.
llvm-svn: 298392
Fix the current parsing of subframeworks in modulemaps to lookup for
headers based on whether they are frameworks.
rdar://problem/30563982
llvm-svn: 298391
Erik Verbruggen