Summary: The new name is more accurate with regard to the functionality.
Reviewers: dsanders
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8968
llvm-svn: 235984
Summary: This removes multiple calls to getReg() and saves us column space in the source file.
Reviewers: dsanders
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8924
llvm-svn: 235978
This adds debug location to constant nodes of Selection DAG and updates
all places that create constants to pass debug locations
(see PR13269).
Can't guarantee that all locations are correct, but in a lot of cases choice
is obvious, so most of them should be. At least all tests pass.
Tests for these changes do not cover everything, instead just check it for
SDNodes, ARM and AArch64 where it's easy to get incorrect locations on
constants.
This is not complete fix as FastISel contains workaround for wrong debug
locations, which drops locations from instructions on processing constants,
but there isn't currently a way to use debug locations from constants there
as llvm::Constant doesn't cache it (yet). Although this is a bit different
issue, not directly related to these changes.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9084
llvm-svn: 235977
When creating a global variable with a type of a struct with bitfields, we must
forcibly set the alignment of the global from the RecordDecl. We must do this so
that the proper bitfield alignment makes its way down to LLVM, since clang will
mangle the bitfields into one large type.
llvm-svn: 235976
Summary:
When using GDB with MI, if there aren't children for a variable,
it doesn't include a "children" value in the response. LLDB does
and sets it to "[]" while variables with children have an unquoted
list: children=[...].
This removes the children value entirely when there are no children
making this match GDB in behavior.
Test Plan: Ran tests on Mac OS X and they passed.
Reviewers: abidh, domipheus
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9320
llvm-svn: 235974
Summary:
Without the synchronisation between the two thread creation events the following case could
happen:
- threads A and B are running. A hits a breakpoint. We note that we want to stop B.
- before we could stop it, B creates a new thread C, we get the stop notification for B, but we
don't record C's existence yet.
- we resume B
- before we get the C notification, B stops again (e.g. hits a breakpoint, gets our SIGSTOP,
etc.)
- we see all known threads have stopped, and we notify LLDB
- C notification comes, we note it's existence and resume it
=> we have an inconsistent state (LLDB thinks we've stopped, but C is running)
I resolve this by doing a blocking wait for for the C notification when we get the creation
notification on the parent (B) thread. This way the two events are synchronised, but we don't
need to introduce the intermediate "launching" state which would complicate handling of thread
states as all code would need to be aware of the third possible state.
Test Plan:
This is an obscure corner case, which I had not observed in practise, so I have no
test for it. I have tested that this commit does not regress in existing tests though.
Reviewers: chaoren, vharron
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9217
llvm-svn: 235969
As a space optimization, this instruction would just encode the pointer
type of the first operand and use the knowledge that the second and
third operands would be of the pointee type of the first. When typed
pointers go away, this assumption will no longer be available - so
encode the type of the second operand explicitly and rely on that for
the third.
Test case added to demonstrate the backwards compatibility concern,
which only comes up when the definition of the second operand comes
after the use (hence the weird basic block sequence) - at which point
the type needs to be explicitly encoded in the bitcode and the record
length changes to accommodate this.
llvm-svn: 235966
This papers over a layering violation currently between libc++abi and libunwind.
It reaches into the sources to get the declaration of an ABI defined function.
This should allow the ARM buildbot to continue building libc++abi again.
llvm-svn: 235965
Attempting to default the option to ON for ARM doesnt seem to work. Force the
check lower and perform the check at the two sites that matter: the CPPFLAGS
definition and the header search path setup.
llvm-svn: 235964
This matches other assemblers and is less unexpected (e.g. PR23227).
On ELF, I tried binutils gas v2.24 and nasm 2.10.09, and they both
agree on LShr. On COFF, I couldn't get my hands on an assembler yet,
so don't change the behavior. For now, don't change it on non-AArch64
Darwin either, as the other assembler is gas v1.38, which does an AShr.
llvm-svn: 235963
Support up to 2^16 arguments to a function. If we do hit the limit,
assert out rather than restarting at 0 as we've done historically.
This fixes PR23332. A clang test will follow.
llvm-svn: 235955
Embed UBSan runtime into TSan and MSan runtimes in the same as we do
in ASan. Extend UBSan test suite to also run tests for these
combinations.
llvm-svn: 235954
Embed UBSan runtime into TSan and MSan runtimes in the same as we do
in ASan. Extend UBSan test suite to also run tests for these
combinations.
llvm-svn: 235953
Defaulting to AShr without consulting the target MCAsmInfo isn't OK.
Add a flag to fix that. Keep it off for now: target migrations will
follow in separate commits.
llvm-svn: 235951
I previously thought switch clusters would need to use uint64_t in case
the weights of multiple cases overflowed a 32-bit int. It turns
out that the weights on a terminator instruction are capped to allow for
being added together, so using a uint32_t should be safe.
llvm-svn: 235945
Reverse libLTO's default behaviour for preserving use-list order in
bitcode, and add API for controlling it. The default setting is now
`false` (don't preserve them), which is consistent with `clang`'s
default behaviour.
Users of libLTO should call `lto_codegen_should_embed_uselists(CG,true)`
prior to calling `lto_codegen_write_merged_modules()` whenever the
output file isn't part of the production workflow in order to reproduce
results with subsequent calls to `llc`.
(I haven't added tests since `llvm-lto` (the test tool for LTO) doesn't
support bitcode output, and even if it did: there isn't actually a good
way to test whether a tool has passed the flag. If the order is already
"natural" (if the order will already round-trip) then no use-list
directives are emitted at all. At some point I'll circle back to add
tests to `llvm-as` (etc.) that they actually respect the flag, at which
point I can somehow add a test here as well.)
llvm-svn: 235943
Previously, the code would try to put a fall-through case last,
even if that meant moving a case with much higher branch weight
further down the chain.
Ordering by branch weight is most important, putting a fall-through
block last is secondary.
llvm-svn: 235942
the active module macros at the point of definition, rather than reconstructing
it from the macro history. No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 235941
Summary:
Currently, launching lldb-gdbserver from platform on Android requires root for
mkfifo() and an explicit TMPDIR variable. This should remove both requirements.
Test Plan: Successfully launched lldb-gdbserver on a non-rooted Android device.
Reviewers: tberghammer, vharron, clayborg
Reviewed By: clayborg
Subscribers: tberghammer, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9307
llvm-svn: 235940
This makes sure that the front end is specific about what they're expecting
the backend to produce. Update a FIXME with the idea that the target-features
could be more precise using backend knowledge.
llvm-svn: 235936
Alexey Bataev