This has a few advantages
* Less C++ code (about 300 lines less).
* Less machine code (about 14 KB of text on a linux x86_64 build).
* It is more debugger friendly. Just set a breakpoint on the exit function and
you get the complete lld stack trace of when the error was found.
* It is a more robust API. The errors are handled early and we don't get a
std::error_code hot potato being passed around.
* In most cases the error function in a better position to print diagnostics
(it has more context).
llvm-svn: 244215
Module-definition files (.def files) are yet another way to
specify parameters to the linker. You can write a list of dllexported
symbols in module-definition files instead of using /export command
line option. It also supports a few more directives.
The parser code is taken from lib/Driver/WinLinkModuleDef.cpp
with the following modifications.
- variable names are updated to comply with the LLVM coding style.
- Instead of returning parsing results as "directive" objects,
it updates Config object directly.
llvm-svn: 239929
The previous implementation's driver file is cluttered by lots of
small functions, and it was hard to find important functions.
Make a separate file to prevent that issue.
llvm-svn: 238482
This is an initial patch for a section-based COFF linker.
The patch has 2300 lines of code including comments and blank lines.
Before diving into details, you want to start from reading README
because it should give you an overview of the design.
All important things are written in the README file, so I write
summary here.
- The linker is already able to self-link on Windows.
- It's significantly faster than the existing implementation.
The existing one takes 5 seconds to link LLD on my machine,
while the new one only takes 1.2 seconds, even though the new
one is not multi-threaded yet. (And a proof-of-concept multi-
threaded version was able to link it in 0.5 seconds.)
- It uses much less memory (250MB vs. 2GB virtual memory space
to self-host).
- IMHO the new code is much simpler and easier to read than
the existing PE/COFF port.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10036
llvm-svn: 238458