As a CFG is often structured we can simplify the steps performed during
domain generation. When we push domain information we can utilize the
information from a block A to build the domain of a block B, if A dominates B
and there is no loop backede on a path from A to B. When we pull domain
information we can use information from a block A to build the domain of a
block B if B post-dominates A. This patch implements both ideas and thereby
simplifies domains that were not simplified by isl. For the FINAL basic block
in test/ScopInfo/complex-successor-structure-3.ll we used to build a universe
set with 81 basic sets. Now it actually is represented as universe set.
While the initial idea to utilize the graph structure depended on the
dominator and post-dominator tree we can use the available region
information as a coarse grained replacement. To this end we push the
region entry domain to the region exit and pull it from the region
entry for the region exit if applicable.
With this patch we now successfully compile
External/SPEC/CINT2006/400_perlbench/400_perlbench
and
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/loop_unroll.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18450
llvm-svn: 265285
These caused LNT failures due to new assertions when running with
-polly-position=before-vectorizer -polly-process-unprofitable for:
FAIL: clamscan.compile_time
FAIL: cjpeg.compile_time
FAIL: consumer-jpeg.compile_time
FAIL: shapes.compile_time
FAIL: clamscan.execution_time
FAIL: cjpeg.execution_time
FAIL: consumer-jpeg.execution_time
FAIL: shapes.execution_time
The failures have been introduced by r264782, but r264789 had to be reverted
as it depended on the earlier patch.
llvm-svn: 264885
As a CFG is often structured we can simplify the steps performed
during domain generation. When we push domain information we can
utilize the information from a block A to build the domain of a
block B, if A dominates B. When we pull domain information we can
use information from a block A to build the domain of a block B
if B post-dominates A. This patch implements both ideas and thereby
simplifies domains that were not simplified by isl. For the FINAL
basic block in
test/ScopInfo/complex-successor-structure-3.ll .
we used to build a universe set with 81 basic sets. Now it actually is
represented as universe set.
While the initial idea to utilize the graph structure depended on the
dominator and post-dominator tree we can use the available region
information as a coarse grained replacement. To this end we push the
region entry domain to the region exit and pull it from the region
entry for the region exit.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18450
llvm-svn: 264789
Before adding a MK_Value READ MemoryAccess, check whether the read is
necessary or synthesizable. Synthesizable values are later generated by
the SCEVExpander and therefore do not need to be transferred
explicitly. This can happen because the check for synthesizability has
presumbly been forgotten in the case where a phi's incoming value has
been defined in a different statement.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15687
llvm-svn: 258998
ISL 0.16 will change how sets are printed which breaks 117 unit tests
that text-compare printed sets. This patch re-formats most of these unit
tests using a script and small manual editing on top of that. When
actually updating ISL, most work is done by just re-running the script
to adapt to the changed output.
Some tests that compare IR and tests with single CHECK-lines that can be
easily updated manually are not included here.
The re-format script will also be committed afterwards. The per-test
formatter invocation command lines options will not be added in the near
future because it is ad hoc and would overwrite the manual edits.
Ideally it also shouldn't be required anymore because ISL's set printing
has become more stable in 0.16.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16095
llvm-svn: 257851
Only when we check for wrapping we want to use the store size, for all
other cases we use the alloc size now.
Suggested by: Tobias Grosser <tobias@grosser.es>
llvm-svn: 252941
In case we also model scalar reads it can happen that a pointer appears in both
a scalar read access as well as the base pointer of an array access. As this
is a little surprising, we add a specific test case to document this behaviour.
To my understanding it should be OK to have a read from an array A[] and
read/write accesses to A[...]. isl is treating these arrays as unrelated as
their dimensionality differs. This seems to be correct as A[] remains constant
throughout the execution of the scop and is not affected by the reads/writes to
A[...]. If this causes confusion, it might make sense to make this behaviour
more obvious by using different names (e.g., A_scalar[], A[...]).
llvm-svn: 252615
Johannes Doerfert