Extend the -fmodule-file option to support the [<name>=]<file> value format.
If the name is omitted, then the old semantics is preserved (the module file
is loaded whether needed or not). If the name is specified, then the mapping
is treated as just another prebuilt module search mechanism, similar to
-fprebuilt-module-path, and the module file is only loaded if actually used
(e.g., via import). With one exception: this mapping also overrides module
file references embedded in other modules (which can be useful if module files
are moved/renamed as often happens during remote compilation).
This override semantics requires some extra work: we now store the module name
in addition to the file name in the serialized AST representation.
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35020
llvm-svn: 312220
Extend the -fmodule-file option to support the [<name>=]<file> value format.
If the name is omitted, then the old semantics is preserved (the module file
is loaded whether needed or not). If the name is specified, then the mapping
is treated as just another prebuilt module search mechanism, similar to
-fprebuilt-module-path, and the module file is only loaded if actually used
(e.g., via import). With one exception: this mapping also overrides module
file references embedded in other modules (which can be useful if module files
are moved/renamed as often happens during remote compilation).
This override semantics requires some extra work: we now store the module name
in addition to the file name in the serialized AST representation.
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35020
llvm-svn: 312105
This patch adds support for a `header` declaration in a module map to specify
certain `stat` information (currently, size and mtime) about that header file.
This has two purposes:
- It removes the need to eagerly `stat` every file referenced by a module map.
Instead, we track a list of unresolved header files with each size / mtime
(actually, for simplicity, we track submodules with such headers), and when
attempting to look up a header file based on a `FileEntry`, we check if there
are any unresolved header directives with that `FileEntry`'s size / mtime and
perform deferred `stat`s if so.
- It permits a preprocessed module to be compiled without the original files
being present on disk. The only reason we used to need those files was to get
the `stat` information in order to do header -> module lookups when using the
module. If we're provided with the `stat` information in the preprocessed
module, we can avoid requiring the files to exist.
Unlike most `header` directives, if a `header` directive with `stat`
information has no corresponding on-disk file the enclosing module is *not*
marked unavailable (so that behavior is consistent regardless of whether we've
resolved a header directive, and so that preprocessed modules don't get marked
unavailable). We could actually do this for all `header` directives: the only
reason we mark the module unavailable if headers are missing is to give a
diagnostic slightly earlier (rather than waiting until we actually try to build
the module / load and validate its .pcm file).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33703
llvm-svn: 304515
Summary: In order for libc++ to add `<experimental/coroutine>` to its module map, there has to be a feature that can be used to detect if coroutines support is enabled in Clang.
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33538
llvm-svn: 304107
Summary: In order for libc++ to add `<experimental/coroutine>` to its module map, there has to be a feature that can be used to detect if coroutines support is enabled in Clang.
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33538
llvm-svn: 304054
The 'no_undeclared_includes' attribute should be used in a module to
tell that only non-modular headers and headers from used modules are
accepted.
The main motivation behind this is to prevent dep cycles between system
libraries (such as darwin) and libc++.
Patch by Richard Smith!
llvm-svn: 284797
This adds support for modules that require (non-)freestanding
environment, such as the compiler builtin mm_malloc submodule.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23871
llvm-svn: 280613
This adds support for modules that require (no-)gnu-inline-asm
environment, such as the compiler builtin cpuid submodule.
This is the gnu-inline-asm variant of https://reviews.llvm.org/D23871
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23905
rdar://problem/26931199
llvm-svn: 280159
In this mode, there is no need to load any module map and the programmer can
simply use "@import" syntax to load the module directly from a prebuilt
module path. When loading from prebuilt module path, we don't support
rebuilding of the module files and we ignore compatible configuration
mismatches.
rdar://27290316
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D23125
llvm-svn: 279096
If this flag is set, we error out when a module build is required. This is
useful in environments where all required modules are passed via -fmodule-file.
llvm-svn: 230006
This allows a module to specify that it logically contains a file, but that
said file is non-modular and intended for textual inclusion. This allows
layering checks to work properly in the presence of such files.
llvm-svn: 220448
#include_next interacts poorly with modules: it depends on where in the list of
include paths the current file was found. Files covered by module maps are not
found in include search paths when building the module (and are not found in
include search paths when @importing the module either), so this isn't really
meaningful. Instead, we fake up the result that #include_next *should* have
given: find the first path that would have resulted in the given file being
picked, and search from there onwards.
llvm-svn: 220177
being on by default. -fno-cxx-modules can still be used to enable C modules but
not C++ modules, but C++ modules is not significantly less stable than C
modules any more.
Also remove some of the scare words from the modules documentation. We're
certainly not going to remove modules support (though we might change the
interface), and it works well enough to bootstrap and build lots of
non-trivial code.
Note that this does not represent a commitment to the current interface nor
implementation, and we still intend to follow whatever direction the C and C++
committees take regarding modules support.
llvm-svn: 218717
This name, while more verbose, plays more nicely with tools that use
file extensions to determine file types. The existing spelling
'module.map' will continue to work, but the new spelling will take
precedence.
In frameworks, this new filename will only go in a new 'Modules'
sub-directory.
Similarly, add a module.private.modulemap corresponding to
module_private.map.
llvm-svn: 204261
it, importers of B should not see the macro. This is complicated by the fact
that A's macro could also be visible through a different path. The rules (as
hashed out on cfe-commits) are included as a documentation update in this
change.
With this, the number of regressions in libc++'s testsuite when modules are
enabled drops from 47 to 7. Those remaining 7 are also macro-related, and are
due to remaining bugs in this change (in particular, the handling of submodules
is imperfect).
llvm-svn: 202560
requires ! feature
The purpose of this is to allow (for instance) the module map for /usr/include
to exclude <tgmath.h> and <complex.h> when building in C++ (these headers are
instead provided by the C++ standard library in this case, and the glibc C
<tgmath.h> header would otherwise try to include <complex.h>, resulting in a
module cycle).
llvm-svn: 193549
With this option, arbitrarily named module map files can be specified
to be loaded as required for headers in the respective (sub)directories.
This, together with the extern module declaration allows for specifying
module maps in a modular fashion without the need for files called
"module.map".
Among other things, this allows a directory to contain two modules that
are completely independent of one another.
Review: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1697.
llvm-svn: 191284
Review: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1546.
I have picked up this patch form Lawrence
(http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1063) and did a few changes.
From the original change description (updated as appropriate):
This patch adds a check that ensures that modules only use modules they
have so declared. To this end, it adds a statement on intended module
use to the module.map grammar:
use module-id
A module can then only use headers from other modules if it 'uses' them.
This enforcement is off by default, but may be turned on with the new
option -fmodules-decluse.
When enforcing the module semantics, we also need to consider a source
file part of a module. This is achieved with a compiler option
-fmodule-name=<module-id>.
The compiler at present only applies restrictions to the module directly
being built.
llvm-svn: 191283
This patch is the first step to make module-map-files modular (instead
of requiring a single "module.map"-file per include directory). This
step adds a new "extern module" declaration that enables
module-map-files to reference one another along with a very basic
implementation.
The next steps are:
* Combine this with the use-declaration (from
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1546) in order to only load module
map files required for a specific compilation.
* Add an additional flag to start with a specific module-map-file (instead
of requiring there to be at least one "module.map").
Review: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1637
llvm-svn: 190497
It was really hard to tell that modules are experimental. This makes it
really clear by
* Noting the experimental status in the title.
* Moving the "warning" above the table of contents.
llvm-svn: 190340
- There is no reason to have a modules specific flag for disabling
autolinking. Instead, convert the existing flag into -fno-autolink (which
should cover other autolinking code generation paths like #pragmas if and
when we support them).
llvm-svn: 179612
This option can be useful for end users who want to know why they
ended up with a ton of different variants of the "std" module in their
module cache. This problem should go away over time, as we reduce the
need for module variants, but it will never go away entirely.
llvm-svn: 178148
Boris Kolpackov