This implements the 'using enum maybe-qualified-enum-tag ;' part of
1099. It introduces a new 'UsingEnumDecl', subclassed from
'BaseUsingDecl'. Much of the diff is the boilerplate needed to get the
new class set up.
There is one case where we accept ill-formed, but I believe this is
merely an extended case of an existing bug, so consider it
orthogonal. AFAICT in class-scope the c++20 rule is that no 2 using
decls can bring in the same target decl ([namespace.udecl]/8). But we
already accept:
struct A { enum { a }; };
struct B : A { using A::a; };
struct C : B { using A::a;
using B::a; }; // same enumerator
this patch permits mixtures of 'using enum Bob;' and 'using Bob::member;' in the same way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102241
Non-comprehensive list of cases:
* Dumping template arguments;
* Corresponding parameter contains a deduced type;
* Template arguments are for a DeclRefExpr that hadMultipleCandidates()
Type information is added in the form of prefixes (u8, u, U, L),
suffixes (U, L, UL, LL, ULL) or explicit casts to printed integral template
argument, if MSVC codeview mode is disabled.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77598
ASTContext were only passed to the StmtPrinter in some places, while it
is always available in DeclPrinter. The context is used by StmtPrinter to better
print statements in some cases, like printing constants as written.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97043
NamedDecl::printName will print the pretty-printed name of the entity, which
is not what we want here (we should print "enum { e };" instead of "enum
(unnamed enum at input.cc:1:5) { e };").
For now only DecompositionDecl and MDGuidDecl have an overloaded printName so
this does not result in any functional change, but this change is needed since
I will be adding overloads to better handle unnamed entities in diagnostics.
Summary:
If no valid interface definition was found previously we would crash.
With this change instead we just print `<<error-type>>` in place
of the NULL interface. In the future this could be improved by
saving the invalid interface's name and using that.
Reviewers: sammccall, gribozavr
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83513
Summary:
For https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/382
This commit adds access specifier information to the hover
contents. For example, the hover information of a class field or
member function will now indicate if the field or member is private,
public, or protected. This can be particularly useful when a developer
is in the implementation file and wants to know if a particular member
definition is public or private.
Reviewers: kadircet
Reviewed By: kadircet
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80472
This is a code clean up of the PropertyAttributeKind and
ObjCPropertyAttributeKind enums in ObjCPropertyDecl and ObjCDeclSpec that are
exactly identical. This non-functional change consolidates these enums
into one. The changes are to many files across clang (and comments in LLVM) so
that everything refers to the new consolidated enum in DeclObjCCommon.h.
2nd Landing Attempt...
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77233
This is a code clean up of the PropertyAttributeKind and
ObjCPropertyAttributeKind enums in ObjCPropertyDecl and ObjCDeclSpec that are
exactly identical. This non-functional change consolidates these enums
into one. The changes are to many files across clang (and comments in LLVM) so
that everything refers to the new consolidated enum in DeclObjCCommon.h.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77233
Add support for type-constraints in template type parameters.
Also add support for template type parameters as pack expansions (where the type constraint can now contain an unexpanded parameter pack).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44352
Function trailing requires clauses now parsed, supported in overload resolution and when calling, referencing and taking the address of functions or function templates.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43357
Partial revert of r372681 "Support for DWARF-5 C++ language tags".
The change introduced new external linkage languages ("C++11" and
"C++14") which not supported in C++.
It also changed the definition of the existing enum to use the DWARF
constants. The problem is that "LinkageSpecDeclBits.Language" (the field
that reserves this enum) is actually defined as 3 bits length
(bitfield), which cannot contain the new DWARF constants. Defining the
enum as integer literals is more appropriate for maintaining valid
values.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69935
__attribute__((objc_direct)) is an attribute on methods declaration, and
__attribute__((objc_direct_members)) on implementation, categories or
extensions.
A `direct` property specifier is added (@property(direct) type name)
These attributes / specifiers cause the method to have no associated
Objective-C metadata (for the property or the method itself), and the
calling convention to be a direct C function call.
The symbol for the method has enforced hidden visibility and such direct
calls are hence unreachable cross image. An explicit C function must be
made if so desired to wrap them.
The implicit `self` and `_cmd` arguments are preserved, however to
maintain compatibility with the usual `objc_msgSend` semantics,
3 fundamental precautions are taken:
1) for instance methods, `self` is nil-checked. On arm64 backends this
typically adds a single instruction (cbz x0, <closest-ret>) to the
codegen, for the vast majority of the cases when the return type is a
scalar.
2) for class methods, because the class may not be realized/initialized
yet, a call to `[self self]` is emitted. When the proper deployment
target is used, this is optimized to `objc_opt_self(self)`.
However, long term we might want to emit something better that the
optimizer can reason about. When inlining kicks in, these calls
aren't optimized away as the optimizer has no idea that a single call
is really necessary.
3) the calling convention for the `_cmd` argument is changed: the caller
leaves the second argument to the call undefined, and the selector is
loaded inside the body when it's referenced only.
As far as error reporting goes, the compiler refuses:
- making any overloads direct,
- making an overload of a direct method,
- implementations marked as direct when the declaration in the
interface isn't (the other way around is allowed, as the direct
attribute is inherited from the declaration),
- marking methods required for protocol conformance as direct,
- messaging an unqualified `id` with a direct method,
- forming any @selector() expression with only direct selectors.
As warnings:
- any inconsistency of direct-related calling convention when
@selector() or messaging is used,
- forming any @selector() expression with a possibly direct selector.
Lastly an `objc_direct_members` attribute is added that can decorate
`@implementation` blocks and causes methods only declared there (and in
no `@interface`) to be automatically direct. When decorating an
`@interface` then all methods and properties declared in this block are
marked direct.
Radar-ID: rdar://problem/2684889
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69991
Reviewed-By: John McCall
Summary:
This doesn't cover decls in diagnostics, which use NamedDecl::getNameForDiagnostic().
(That should also be fixed later I think).
This covers some cases of https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/76
(hover, but not outline or sighelp)
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70236
This patch provides support for DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_11,
DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_14 tags in the Clang C++ frontend.
Patch by Sourabh Singh Tomar!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67613
Reapplies r372663 after adapting a failing test in the LLDB testsuite.
llvm-svn: 372681
This patch provides support for DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_11,
DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_14 tags in the Clang C++ frontend.
Patch by Sourabh Singh Tomar!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67613
llvm-svn: 372663
Summary:
this revision adds Lexing, Parsing and Basic Semantic for the consteval specifier as specified by http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1073r3.html
with this patch, the consteval specifier is treated as constexpr but can only be applied to function declaration.
Changes:
- add the consteval keyword.
- add parsing of consteval specifier for normal declarations and lambdas expressions.
- add the whether a declaration is constexpr is now represented by and enum everywhere except for variable because they can't be consteval.
- adapt diagnostic about constexpr to print constexpr or consteval depending on the case.
- add tests for basic semantic.
Reviewers: rsmith, martong, shafik
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: eraman, efriedma, rnkovacs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61790
llvm-svn: 363362
This caused Clang to start erroring on the following:
struct S {
template <typename = int> explicit S();
};
struct T : S {};
struct U : T {
U();
};
U::U() {}
$ clang -c /tmp/x.cc
/tmp/x.cc:10:4: error: call to implicitly-deleted default constructor of 'T'
U::U() {}
^
/tmp/x.cc:5:12: note: default constructor of 'T' is implicitly deleted
because base class 'S' has no default constructor
struct T : S {};
^
1 error generated.
See discussion on the cfe-commits email thread.
This also reverts the follow-ups r359966 and r359968.
> this patch adds support for the explicit bool specifier.
>
> Changes:
> - The parsing for the explicit(bool) specifier was added in ParseDecl.cpp.
> - The storage of the explicit specifier was changed. the explicit specifier was stored as a boolean value in the FunctionDeclBitfields and in the DeclSpec class. now it is stored as a PointerIntPair<Expr*, 2> with a flag and a potential expression in CXXConstructorDecl, CXXDeductionGuideDecl, CXXConversionDecl and in the DeclSpec class.
> - Following the AST change, Serialization, ASTMatchers, ASTComparator and ASTPrinter were adapted.
> - Template instantiation was adapted to instantiate the potential expressions of the explicit(bool) specifier When instantiating their associated declaration.
> - The Add*Candidate functions were adapted, they now take a Boolean indicating if the context allowing explicit constructor or conversion function and this boolean is used to remove invalid overloads that required template instantiation to be detected.
> - Test for Semantic and Serialization were added.
>
> This patch is not yet complete. I still need to check that interaction with CTAD and deduction guides is correct. and add more tests for AST operations. But I wanted first feedback.
> Perhaps this patch should be spited in smaller patches, but making each patch testable as a standalone may be tricky.
>
> Patch by Tyker
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60934
llvm-svn: 360024
this patch adds support for the explicit bool specifier.
Changes:
- The parsing for the explicit(bool) specifier was added in ParseDecl.cpp.
- The storage of the explicit specifier was changed. the explicit specifier was stored as a boolean value in the FunctionDeclBitfields and in the DeclSpec class. now it is stored as a PointerIntPair<Expr*, 2> with a flag and a potential expression in CXXConstructorDecl, CXXDeductionGuideDecl, CXXConversionDecl and in the DeclSpec class.
- Following the AST change, Serialization, ASTMatchers, ASTComparator and ASTPrinter were adapted.
- Template instantiation was adapted to instantiate the potential expressions of the explicit(bool) specifier When instantiating their associated declaration.
- The Add*Candidate functions were adapted, they now take a Boolean indicating if the context allowing explicit constructor or conversion function and this boolean is used to remove invalid overloads that required template instantiation to be detected.
- Test for Semantic and Serialization were added.
This patch is not yet complete. I still need to check that interaction with CTAD and deduction guides is correct. and add more tests for AST operations. But I wanted first feedback.
Perhaps this patch should be spited in smaller patches, but making each patch testable as a standalone may be tricky.
Patch by Tyker
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60934
llvm-svn: 359949
This patch implements parsing and sema for "omp declare mapper"
directive. User defined mapper, i.e., declare mapper directive, is a new
feature in OpenMP 5.0. It is introduced to extend existing map clauses
for the purpose of simplifying the copy of complex data structures
between host and device (i.e., deep copy). An example is shown below:
struct S { int len; int *d; };
#pragma omp declare mapper(struct S s) map(s, s.d[0:s.len]) // Memory region that d points to is also mapped using this mapper.
Contributed-by: Lingda Li <lildmh@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56326
llvm-svn: 352906
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Add support for OMP5.0 requires directive and unified_address clause.
Patches to follow will include support for additional clauses.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52359
llvm-svn: 343063
For example, given:
struct T1 {
struct T2 *p0;
};
-ast-print produced:
struct T1 {
struct T2;
struct T2 *p0;
};
Compiling that produces a warning that the first struct T2 declaration
does not declare anything.
Details:
A tag decl group is one or more decls that share a type specifier that
is a tag decl (that is, a struct/union/class/enum decl). Within
functions, the parser builds such a tag decl group as part of a
DeclStmt. However, in decl contexts, such as file scope or a member
list, the parser does not group together the members of a tag decl
group. Previously, detection of tag decl groups during printing was
implemented but only if the tag decl was unnamed. Otherwise, as in
the above example, the members of the group did not print together and
so sometimes introduced warnings.
This patch extends detection of tag decl groups in decl contexts to
any tag decl that is recorded in the AST as not free-standing.
Reviewed by: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45465
llvm-svn: 332314
For example, given:
void fn() {
struct T *p0;
struct T { int i; } *p1;
}
-ast-print produced:
void fn() {
struct T { int i; } *p0;
struct T { int i; } *p1;
}
Compiling that fails with a redefinition error.
Given:
void fn() {
struct T *p0;
struct __attribute__((deprecated)) T *p1;
}
-ast-print dropped the attribute.
Details:
For a tag specifier (that is, struct/union/class/enum used as a type
specifier in a declaration) that was also a tag declaration (that is,
first occurrence of the tag) or tag redeclaration (that is, later
occurrence that specifies attributes or a member list), clang printed
the tag specifier as either (1) the full tag definition if one
existed, or (2) the first tag declaration otherwise. Redefinition
errors were sometimes introduced, as in the first example above. Even
when that was impossible because no member list was ever specified,
attributes were sometimes lost, thus changing semantics and
diagnostics, as in the second example above.
This patch fixes a major culprit for these problems. It does so by
creating an ElaboratedType with a new OwnedDecl member wherever an
occurrence of a tag type is a (re)declaration of that tag type.
PrintingPolicy's IncludeTagDefinition used to trigger printing of the
member list, attributes, etc. for a tag specifier by using a tag
(re)declaration selected as described above. Now, it triggers the
same thing except it uses the tag (re)declaration stored in the
OwnedDecl. Of course, other tooling can now make use of the new
OwnedDecl as well.
Also, to be more faithful to the original source, this patch
suppresses printing of attributes inherited from previous
declarations.
Reviewed by: rsmith, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45463
llvm-svn: 332281
FunctionProtoType.
We previously re-evaluated the expression each time we wanted to know whether
the type is noexcept or not. We now evaluate the expression exactly once.
This is not quite "no functional change": it fixes a crasher bug during AST
deserialization where we would try to evaluate the noexcept specification in a
situation where we have not deserialized sufficient portions of the AST to
permit such evaluation.
llvm-svn: 331428
For example, given:
void fn() {
enum __attribute__((deprecated)) T *p;
}
-ast-print produced:
void fn() {
enum T __attribute__((deprecated(""))) *p;
}
-ast-print on that produced:
void fn() {
enum T *p __attribute__((deprecated("")));
}
The attribute is on enum T in the first case, but it's on p in the
other cases.
Details:
Within enum declarations, enum attributes were always printed after
the tag and any member list. When no member list was present but the
enum was a type specifier in a variable declaration, the attribute
then applied to the variable not the enum, changing the semantics.
This patch fixes that by always printing attributes between the enum's
keyword and tag, as clang already does for structs, unions, and
classes.
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45456
llvm-svn: 330722
So I wrote a clang-tidy check to lint out redundant `isa`, `cast`, and
`dyn_cast`s for fun. This is a portion of what it found for clang; I
plan to do similar cleanups in LLVM and other subprojects when I find
time.
Because of the volume of changes, I explicitly avoided making any change
that wasn't highly local and obviously correct to me (e.g. we still have
a number of foo(cast<Bar>(baz)) that I didn't touch, since overloading
is a thing and the cast<Bar> did actually change the type -- just up the
class hierarchy).
I also tried to leave the types we were cast<>ing to somewhere nearby,
in cases where it wasn't locally obvious what we were dealing with
before.
llvm-svn: 326416
Both are related to handling anonymous structures.
* clang didn't handle () around an anonymous struct variable.
* clang also crashed on syntax errors that could lead to other
syntactic constructs following the declaration of an
anonymous struct. While the code is invalid, that's not
a good reason to panic compiler.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41788
llvm-svn: 322742
When requesting a tooltip for a function call in an IDE, the fully
qualified name helps to remove ambiguity in the function signature.
Patch by Nikolai Kosjar!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40013
llvm-svn: 318896
Richard Smith