As noted in the comment, we might want to account for this case,
but I didn't look at what that would mean for the asm.
I'm also not sure why this only reproduces with avx512, but I'm
putting a conservative fix in for now to avoid the crash.
Also, if both sides of an add are zexted, shouldn't we shrink that add?
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32316
llvm-svn: 298107
We weren't able to handle isel of the 128/256-bit FMA instructions when AVX512F was enabled but VLX and FMA weren't.
I didn't mask FeatureAVX512 imply FeatureFMA as I wasn't sure I wanted disabling FMA to also disable AVX512. Instead we just can't prevent FMA instructions if AVX512 is enabled.
Another option would be to promote 128/256-bit to 512-bit, do the operation and extract it. But that requires a lot of extra isel patterns. Since no CPUs exist that support AVX512, but not FMA just using the VEX instructions seems better.
llvm-svn: 298051
This bug only exists on the scalar llvm.fma instrinsics. Looks like we don't test the llvm.fma intrinsics very thoroughly. In fact I don't see any tests for the vector versions.
llvm-svn: 298045
Don't scalarize VSELECT->SETCC when operands/results needs to be widened,
or when the type of the SETCC operands are different from those of the VSELECT.
(VSELECT SETCC) and (VSELECT (AND/OR/XOR (SETCC,SETCC))) are handled.
The previous splitting of VSELECT->SETCC in DAGCombiner::visitVSELECT() is
no longer needed and has been removed.
Updated tests:
test/CodeGen/ARM/vuzp.ll
test/CodeGen/NVPTX/f16x2-instructions.ll
test/CodeGen/X86/2011-10-19-widen_vselect.ll
test/CodeGen/X86/2011-10-21-widen-cmp.ll
test/CodeGen/X86/psubus.ll
test/CodeGen/X86/vselect-pcmp.ll
Review: Eli Friedman, Simon Pilgrim
https://reviews.llvm.org/D29489
llvm-svn: 297930
If we got unlucky with register allocation and actual constpool placement, we
could end up producing a tTBB_JT with an index that's already been clobbered.
Technically, we might be able to fix this situation up with a MOV, but I think
the constant islands pass is complex enough without having to deal with more
weird edge-cases.
llvm-svn: 297871
Using the module ID here is wrong for a couple of reasons:
1) The module ID is not persisted, so we can end up with different
object file contents given the same input file (for example if the same
file is accessed via different paths).
2) With ThinLTO the module ID field may contain the path to a bitcode file,
which is incorrect, as the .file argument is supposed to contain the path to
a source file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30584
llvm-svn: 297853
Summary: D25742 improved the precision of debug locations for PGO by removing debug locations from common tail when tail-merging. However, if identical insturctions that are merged into a common tail have the same debug locations, there's no need to remove them. This patch creates a merged debug location of identical instructions across SameTails and assign it to the instruction in the common tail, so that the debug locations are maintained if they are same across identical instructions.
Reviewers: aprantl, probinson, MatzeB, rob.lougher
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: andreadb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30226
llvm-svn: 297805
On MachO platforms that use subsections-via-symbols dead code stripping will
drop prefix data. Unfortunately there is no great way to convey the relationship
between a function and its prefix data to the linker. We are forced to use a bit
of a hack: we give the prefix data it’s own symbol, and mark the actual function
entry an .alt_entry.
Patch by Moritz Angermann!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30770
llvm-svn: 297804
Reduced version of D26357 - based on the discussion on llvm-dev about canonicalization of UMIN/UMAX/SMIN/SMAX as well as ABS I've reduced that patch to just the ABS ISD node (with x86/sse support) to improve basic combines and lowering.
ARM/AArch64, Hexagon, PowerPC and NVPTX all have similar instructions allowing us to make this a generic opcode and move away from the hard coded tablegen patterns which makes it tricky to match more complex patterns.
At the moment this patch doesn't attempt legalization as we only create an ABS node if its legal/custom.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29639
llvm-svn: 297780
Each Calling convention (CC) defines a static list of registers that should be preserved by a callee function. All other registers should be saved by the caller.
Some CCs use additional condition: If the register is used for passing/returning arguments – the caller needs to save it - even if it is part of the Callee Saved Registers (CSR) list.
The current LLVM implementation doesn’t support it. It will save a register if it is part of the static CSR list and will not care if the register is passed/returned by the callee.
The solution is to dynamically allocate the CSR lists (Only for these CCs). The lists will be updated with actual registers that should be saved by the callee.
Since we need the allocated lists to live as long as the function exists, the list should reside inside the Machine Register Info (MRI) which is a property of the Machine Function and managed by it (and has the same life span).
The lists should be saved in the MRI and populated upon LowerCall and LowerFormalArguments.
The patch will also assist to implement future no_caller_saved_regsiters attribute intended for interrupt handler CC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28566
llvm-svn: 297715
When checking if chain node is foldable, make sure the intermediate nodes have a single use across all results not just the result that was used to reach the chain node.
This recovers a test case that was severely broken by r296476, my making sure we don't create ADD/ADC that loads and stores when there is also a flag dependency.
llvm-svn: 297698
Recommiting with compiler time improvements
Recommitting after fixup of 32-bit aliasing sign offset bug in DAGCombiner.
* Simplify Consecutive Merge Store Candidate Search
Now that address aliasing is much less conservative, push through
simplified store merging search and chain alias analysis which only
checks for parallel stores through the chain subgraph. This is cleaner
as the separation of non-interfering loads/stores from the
store-merging logic.
When merging stores search up the chain through a single load, and
finds all possible stores by looking down from through a load and a
TokenFactor to all stores visited.
This improves the quality of the output SelectionDAG and the output
Codegen (save perhaps for some ARM cases where we correctly constructs
wider loads, but then promotes them to float operations which appear
but requires more expensive constant generation).
Some minor peephole optimizations to deal with improved SubDAG shapes (listed below)
Additional Minor Changes:
1. Finishes removing unused AliasLoad code
2. Unifies the chain aggregation in the merged stores across code
paths
3. Re-add the Store node to the worklist after calling
SimplifyDemandedBits.
4. Increase GatherAllAliasesMaxDepth from 6 to 18. That number is
arbitrary, but seems sufficient to not cause regressions in
tests.
5. Remove Chain dependencies of Memory operations on CopyfromReg
nodes as these are captured by data dependence
6. Forward loads-store values through tokenfactors containing
{CopyToReg,CopyFromReg} Values.
7. Peephole to convert buildvector of extract_vector_elt to
extract_subvector if possible (see
CodeGen/AArch64/store-merge.ll)
8. Store merging for the ARM target is restricted to 32-bit as
some in some contexts invalid 64-bit operations are being
generated. This can be removed once appropriate checks are
added.
This finishes the change Matt Arsenault started in r246307 and
jyknight's original patch.
Many tests required some changes as memory operations are now
reorderable, improving load-store forwarding. One test in
particular is worth noting:
CodeGen/PowerPC/ppc64-align-long-double.ll - Improved load-store
forwarding converts a load-store pair into a parallel store and
a memory-realized bitcast of the same value. However, because we
lose the sharing of the explicit and implicit store values we
must create another local store. A similar transformation
happens before SelectionDAG as well.
Reviewers: arsenm, hfinkel, tstellarAMD, jyknight, nhaehnle
llvm-svn: 297695
rL230225 made the assumption that only the lower 32-bits of an MMX register load is used as a shift value, when in fact the whole 64-bits are reloaded and treated as a i64 to determine the shift value.
This patch reverts rL230225 to ensure that the whole 64-bits of memory are folded and ensures that the upper 32-bit are zero'd for cases where the shift value has come from a scalar source.
Found during fuzz testing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30833
llvm-svn: 297667
I am leaving the code in clang which filters mxcsr from the clobber list because that is still technically correct and will be useful again when the MXCSR register is reintroduced.
llvm-svn: 297664
This commit adds tail call support to the MachineOutliner pass. This allows
the outliner to insert jumps rather than calls in areas where tail calling is
possible. Outlined tail calls include the return or terminator of the basic
block being outlined from.
Tail call support allows the outliner to take returns and terminators into
consideration while finding candidates to outline. It also allows the outliner
to save more instructions. For example, in the X86-64 outliner, a tail called
outlined function saves one instruction since no return has to be inserted.
llvm-svn: 297653
For AVX-512 we force the input to zero if the input is undef or the mask is all ones to break an execution dependency. This patch brings the same behavior to AVX2.
llvm-svn: 297652
We were already forcing undef inputs to become a zero vector, this now catches an all ones mask too.
Ideally we'd use undef and let execution dep fix handle picking the best register/clearance for the undef, but I don't think it can handle the early clobber today.
llvm-svn: 297651
This reverts r297596.
There were other issues that were making this not work that have been fixed now. Reverting this results in a more accurate table.
llvm-svn: 297602
This exposed that we have several intrinsic instructions that have identical TSFlags to other instructions. We should merge their patterns and kill of the duplicate. I'll fix that in a follow up patch.
llvm-svn: 297596
The immediate should be 1 or 2, not 0 or 1. This was found while adding bounds checking to clang. In fact the existing clang builtin test failed if we ran it all the way to assembly.
llvm-svn: 297591
I noticed unnecessary 'sbb' instructions in D30472 and while looking at 'ptest' codegen recently.
This happens because we were transforming any 'setb' - even when we only wanted a single-bit result.
This patch moves those transforms under visitAdd/visitSub, so we we're only creating sbb/adc when it
is a win. I don't know why we need a SETCC_CARRY node type, but I'm not proposing to change that
existing behavior in this patch.
Also, I'm skeptical that sbb/adc are a win for all micro-arches, so I added comments to the test files
where this transform still fires.
The test changes here are all cases where we no longer produce sbb/adc. Avoiding partial register
stalls (generating an xor to clear a register) is not handled in some cases, but that's a separate
issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30611
llvm-svn: 297586
I'm pretty sure there are more problems lurking here. But I think this fixes PR32241.
I've added the test case from that bug and added asserts that will fail if we ever try to copy between high registers and mask registers again.
llvm-svn: 297574
Without SSE41 (pextrb) we currently extract byte elements from a vector by spilling to stack and reloading the byte.
This patch is an initial attempt at using MOVD/PEXTRW to extract the relevant DWORD/WORD from the vector and then shift+truncate to collect the correct byte.
Extraction of multiple bytes this way would result in code bloat, but as explained in the patch we could probably afford to be more aggressive with the supported extractions before again falling back on spilling - possibly through counting the number of extracts and which DWORD/WORD they originate?
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29841
llvm-svn: 297568
This only requires a 64-bit memory source, not the whole 128-bits. But the 128-bit case is still supported via X86InstrInfo::foldMemoryOperandImpl
llvm-svn: 297523
SelectionDAG::ComputeNumSignBits is poor at build_vector handling, meaning that we can't see that all the vXi64 sources are in fact sign extended i32 or smaller.
llvm-svn: 297486
Summary:
Depends on D30379
This improves the state of things for the sub class of operation.
Reviewers: jyknight, nemanjai, mkuper, spatel, RKSimon, zvi, bkramer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30436
llvm-svn: 297482
If we are transferring MMX registers to XMM for conversion we could use the MMX equivalents (CVTPI2PD + CVTPI2PS) without affecting rounding/exceptions etc.
llvm-svn: 297481
Summary: As per title. This is extracted from D29872 and I threw SADDO in.
Reviewers: jyknight, nemanjai, mkuper, spatel, RKSimon, zvi, bkramer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30379
llvm-svn: 297479
If we are transferring XMM conversion results to MMX registers we could use the MMX equivalents (CVTPD2PI/CVTTPD2PI + CVTPS2PI/CVTTPS2PI) with affecting rounding/expections etc.
llvm-svn: 297476
Summary: This essentially does the same transform as for ADC.
Reviewers: jyknight, nemanjai, mkuper, spatel, RKSimon, zvi, bkramer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30417
llvm-svn: 297416
Summary: This essentially does the same transform as for SUBC.
Reviewers: jyknight, nemanjai, mkuper, spatel, RKSimon, zvi, bkramer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30437
llvm-svn: 297404
As discussed in the review thread for rL297026, this is actually 2 changes that
would independently fix all of the test cases in the patch:
1. Return undef in FoldConstantArithmetic for div/rem by 0.
2. Move basic undef simplifications for div/rem (simplifyDivRem()) before
foldBinopIntoSelect() as a matter of efficiency.
I will handle the case of vectors with any zero element as a follow-up. That change
is the DAG sibling for D30665 + adding a check of vector elements to FoldConstantVectorArithmetic().
I'm deleting the test for PR30693 because it does not test for the actual bug any more
(dangers of using bugpoint).
Differential Revision:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D30741
llvm-svn: 297384
This helps in cases involving bitfields where an AND is exposed by
legalization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30472
llvm-svn: 297249
evex2vex pass defines 2 tables which maps EVEX instructions to their VEX identical when possible. Adding all missing entries.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30501
llvm-svn: 297126
A bit more painful than G_INSERT because it was more widely used, but this
should simplify the handling of extract operations in most locations.
llvm-svn: 297100
Fixed the asan bot failure which led to the last commit of the outliner being reverted.
The change is in lib/CodeGen/MachineOutliner.cpp in the SuffixTree's constructor. LeafVector
is no longer initialized using reserve but just a standard constructor.
llvm-svn: 297081
Use the store size of the argument type, which will be a byte-sized
quantity, rather than dividing the size in bits by 8.
Fixes PR32136 and re-enables copy elision from i64 arguments.
Reverts the workaround in from r296950.
llvm-svn: 297045
Refactoring of duplicated code and more fixes to follow.
This is motivated by the post-commit comments for r296699:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20170306/435182.html
Ie, we can crash if we're missing obvious simplifications like this that
exist in the IR simplifier or if these occur later than expected.
The x86 change for non-splat division shows a potential opportunity to improve
vector codegen: we assumed that since only one lane had meaningful results, we
should do the math in scalar. But that means moving back and forth from vector
registers.
llvm-svn: 297026
These are not x86-specific, but the problem is not visible for all targets
because it is masked by other transforms. These can lead to compiler crashes.
llvm-svn: 297017
Summary:
Functions with the "xray-log-args" attribute will have a special XRay sled kind
emitted, for compiler-rt to copy any call arguments to your logging handler.
For practical and performance reasons, only the first argument is supported, and
only up to 64 bits.
Reviewers: dberris
Reviewed By: dberris
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29702
llvm-svn: 296998
As described on PR31712, we miss a variety of legalization combines because we lower these to X86ISD::VSEXT/VZEXT despite them having the same functionality. This patch makes 128-bit (SSE41) SIGN/ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_IN_REG ops legal, adds the necessary tablegen plumbing and uses a helper 'getExtendInVec' to decide when to use SIGN/ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_IN_REG or VSEXT/VZEXT.
We're missing a couple of shuffle combines that will be added in a future patch for review.
Later patches can then support the AVX2 cases as a mixture of SIGN/ZERO_EXTEND and SIGN/ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_IN_REG, and then finally deal with the AVX512 cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30549
llvm-svn: 296985
The larger goal is to move the ADC/SBB transforms currently in
combineX86SetCC() to combineAddOrSubToADCOrSBB() because we're
creating ADC/SBB in lots of places where we shouldn't.
This was intended to be an NFC change, but avx-512 has something
strange going on. It doesn't seem like any of the affected tests
should really be using SET+TEST or ADC; a simple ADD could replace
several instructions. But that's another bug...
llvm-svn: 296978
select Cond, C +/- 1, C --> add(ext Cond), C -- with a target hook.
This is part of the ongoing process to obsolete D24480. The motivation is to
canonicalize to select IR in InstCombine whenever possible, so we need to have a way to
undo that easily in codegen.
PowerPC is an obvious winner for this kind of transform because it has fast and complete
bit-twiddling abilities but generally lousy conditional execution perf (although this might
have changed in recent implementations).
x86 also sees some wins, but the effect is limited because these transforms already mostly
exist in its target-specific combineSelectOfTwoConstants(). The fact that we see any x86
changes just shows that that code is a mess of special-case holes. We may be able to remove
some of that logic now.
My guess is that other targets will want to enable this hook for most cases. The likely
follow-ups would be to add value type and/or the constants themselves as parameters for the
hook. As the tests in select_const.ll show, we can transform any select-of-constants to
math/logic, but the general transform for any 2 constants needs one more instruction
(multiply or 'and').
ARM is one target that I think may not want this for most cases. I see infinite loops there
because it wants to use selects to enable conditionally executed instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30537
llvm-svn: 296977
Long ago (2010 according to svn blame), combineShuffle probably needed to prevent the accidental creation of illegal i64 types but there doesn't appear to be any combines that can cause this any more as they all have their own legality checks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30213
llvm-svn: 296966
Summary:
When replacing a SDValue, we should remove the replaced value from
SoftenedFloats (and possibly the other maps as well?).
When we revisit a Node because it needs analyzing again, we have to
remove all result values from SoftenedFloats (and possibly other maps?).
This fixes the fp128 test failures with expensive checks for X86.
I think we probably should also remove the values from the other maps
(PromotedIntegers and so on), let me know what you think.
Reviewers: baldrick, bogner, davidxl, ab, arsenm, pirama, chh, RKSimon
Reviewed By: chh
Subscribers: danalbert, wdng, srhines, hfinkel, sepavloff, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29265
llvm-svn: 296964
This fixes cases where i1 types were not properly legalized yet and lead
to the creating of 0-sized stack slots.
This fixes http://llvm.org/PR32136
llvm-svn: 296950
This patch causes compile times for some patterns to explode. I have
a (large, unreduced) test case that slows down by more than 20x and
several test cases slow down by 2x. I'm sending some of the test cases
directly to Nirav and following up with more details in the review log,
but this should unblock anyone else hitting this.
llvm-svn: 296862
VZEROUPPER should not be issued on Knights Landing (KNL), but on Skylake-avx512 it should be.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29874
llvm-svn: 296859
For chains of triangles with small join blocks that can be tail duplicated, a
simple calculation of probabilities is insufficient. Tail duplication
can be profitable in 3 different ways for these cases:
1) The post-dominators marked 50% are actually taken 56% (This shrinks with
longer chains)
2) The chains are statically correlated. Branch probabilities have a very
U-shaped distribution.
[http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:24015805]
If the branches in a chain are likely to be from the same side of the
distribution as their predecessor, but are independent at runtime, this
transformation is profitable. (Because the cost of being wrong is a small
fixed cost, unlike the standard triangle layout where the cost of being
wrong scales with the # of triangles.)
3) The chains are dynamically correlated. If the probability that a previous
branch was taken positively influences whether the next branch will be
taken
We believe that 2 and 3 are common enough to justify the small margin in 1.
The code pre-scans a function's CFG to identify this pattern and marks the edges
so that the standard layout algorithm can use the computed results.
llvm-svn: 296845
Summary:
Currently, when 't1: i1 = setcc t2, t3, cc' followed by 't4: i1 = xor t1, Constant:i1<-1>' is folded into 't5: i1 = setcc t2, t3 !cc', SDLoc of newly created SDValue 't5' follows SDLoc of 't4', not 't1'. However, as the opcode of newly created SDValue is 'setcc', it make more sense to take DebugLoc from 't1' than 't4'. For the code below
```
extern int bar();
extern int baz();
int foo(int x, int y) {
if (x != y)
return bar();
else
return baz();
}
```
, following is the bitcode representation of 'foo' at the end of llvm-ir level optimization:
```
define i32 @foo(i32 %x, i32 %y) !dbg !4 {
entry:
tail call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %x, i64 0, metadata !9, metadata !11), !dbg !12
tail call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %y, i64 0, metadata !10, metadata !11), !dbg !13
%cmp = icmp ne i32 %x, %y, !dbg !14
br i1 %cmp, label %if.then, label %if.else, !dbg !16
if.then: ; preds = %entry
%call = tail call i32 (...) @bar() #3, !dbg !17
br label %return, !dbg !18
if.else: ; preds = %entry
%call1 = tail call i32 (...) @baz() #3, !dbg !19
br label %return, !dbg !20
return: ; preds = %if.else, %if.then
%retval.0 = phi i32 [ %call, %if.then ], [ %call1, %if.else ]
ret i32 %retval.0, !dbg !21
}
!14 = !DILocation(line: 5, column: 9, scope: !15)
!16 = !DILocation(line: 5, column: 7, scope: !4)
```
As you can see, in 'entry' block, 'icmp' instruction and 'br' instruction have different debug locations. However, with current implementation, there's no distinction between debug locations of these two when they are lowered to asm instructions. This is because 'icmp' and 'br' become 'setcc' 'xor' and 'brcond' in SelectionDAG, where SDLoc of 'setcc' follows the debug location of 'icmp' but SDLOC of 'xor' and 'brcond' follows the debug location of 'br' instruction, and SDLoc of 'xor' overwrites SDLoc of 'setcc' when they are folded. This patch addresses this issue.
Reviewers: atrick, bogner, andreadb, craig.topper, aprantl
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: jlebar, mkuper, jholewinski, andreadb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29813
llvm-svn: 296825
MMX extraction often ends up as extract_i32(bitcast_v2i32(extract_i64(bitcast_v1i64(x86mmx v), 0)), 0) which fails to simplify on 32-bit targets as i64 isn't legal
llvm-svn: 296782
This bug was introduced with:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL296699
There may be a way to loosen the restriction, but for now just bail out
on any opaque constant.
The tests show that opacity is target-specific. This goes back to cost
calculations in ConstantHoisting based on TTI->getIntImmCost().
llvm-svn: 296768
Summary:
This can be used to optimize large multiplications after legalization.
Depends on D29565
Reviewers: mkuper, spatel, RKSimon, zvi, bkramer, aaboud, craig.topper
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29587
llvm-svn: 296711
This is part of the ongoing attempt to improve select codegen for all targets and select
canonicalization in IR (see D24480 for more background). The transform is a subset of what
is done in InstCombine's FoldOpIntoSelect().
I first noticed a regression in the x86 avx512-insert-extract.ll tests with a patch that
hopes to convert more selects to basic math ops. This appears to be a general missing DAG
transform though, so I added tests for all standard binops in rL296621
(PowerPC was chosen semi-randomly; it has scripted FileCheck support, but so do ARM and x86).
The poor output for "sel_constants_shl_constant" is tracked with:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32105
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30502
llvm-svn: 296699
Summary:
Avoids tons of prologue boilerplate when arguments are passed in memory
and left in memory. This can happen in a debug build or in a release
build when an argument alloca is escaped. This will dramatically affect
the code size of x86 debug builds, because X86 fast isel doesn't handle
arguments passed in memory at all. It only handles the x86_64 case of up
to 6 basic register parameters.
This is implemented by analyzing the entry block before ISel to identify
copy elision candidates. A copy elision candidate is an argument that is
used to fully initialize an alloca before any other possibly escaping
uses of that alloca. If an argument is a copy elision candidate, we set
a flag on the InputArg. If the the target generates loads from a fixed
stack object that matches the size and alignment requirements of the
alloca, the SelectionDAG builder will delete the stack object created
for the alloca and replace it with the fixed stack object. The load is
left behind to satisfy any remaining uses of the argument value. The
store is now dead and is therefore elided. The fixed stack object is
also marked as mutable, as it may now be modified by the user, and it
would be invalid to rematerialize the initial load from it.
Supersedes D28388
Fixes PR26328
Reviewers: chandlerc, MatzeB, qcolombet, inglorion, hans
Subscribers: igorb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29668
llvm-svn: 296683
Add check that deleted nodes do not get added to worklist. This can
occur when a node's operand is simplified to an existing node.
This fixes PR32108.
Reviewers: jyknight, hfinkel, chandlerc
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30506
llvm-svn: 296668
Resubmit r295336 after the bug with non-zero offset patterns on BE targets is fixed (r296336).
Support {a|s}ext, {a|z|s}ext load nodes as a part of load combine patters.
Reviewed By: filcab
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29591
llvm-svn: 296651
Simon Pilgrim