VZEROUPPER should not be issued on Knights Landing (KNL), but on Skylake-avx512 it should be.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29874
llvm-svn: 296859
This is a tiny patch with a big pile of test changes.
This partially fixes PR27885:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27885
My motivating case looks like this:
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[0,1,0,2]
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2,2,3]
- vpblendw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,1,2,3],xmm1[4,5,6,7]
+ vshufps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2],xmm1[0,2]
And this happens several times in the diffs. For chips with domain-crossing penalties,
the instruction count and size reduction should usually overcome any potential
domain-crossing penalty due to using an FP op in a sequence of int ops. For chips such
as recent Intel big cores and Atom, there is no domain-crossing penalty for shufps, so
using shufps is a pure win.
So the test case diffs all appear to be improvements except one test in
vector-shuffle-combining.ll where we miss an opportunity to use a shift to generate
zero elements and one test in combine-sra.ll where multiple uses prevent the expected
shuffle combining.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27692
llvm-svn: 289837
This patch helps avoids poor legalization of boolean vector results (e.g. 8f32 -> 8i1 -> 8i16) that feed into SINT_TO_FP by inserting an early SIGN_EXTEND and so help improve the truncation logic.
This is not necessary for AVX512 targets where boolean vectors are legal - AVX512 manages to lower ( sint_to_fp vXi1 ) into some form of ( select mask, 1.0f , 0.0f ) in most cases.
Fix for PR13248
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26583
llvm-svn: 286979
Until AVX512DQ we only support i64/vXi64 sitofp conversion as scalars.
This patch sees if the sign bit extends far enough that we can truncate to a i32 type and then perform sitofp without loss of precision.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24345
llvm-svn: 281502
This patch helps avoid false dependencies on undef registers by updating the machine instructions' undef operand to use a register that the instruction is truly dependent on, or use a register with clearance higher than Pref.
Pseudo example:
loop:
xmm0 = ...
xmm1 = vcvtsi2sdl eax, xmm0<undef>
... = inst xmm0
jmp loop
In this example, selecting xmm0 as the undef register creates false dependency between loop iterations.
This false dependency cannot be solved by inserting an xor before vcvtsi2sdl because xmm0 is alive at the point of the vcvtsi2sdl instruction.
Selecting a different register instead of xmm0, especially a register that is not used in the loop, will eliminate this problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22466
llvm-svn: 278321
Amjad Aboud