Summary:
When replacing a SDValue, we should remove the replaced value from
SoftenedFloats (and possibly the other maps as well?).
When we revisit a Node because it needs analyzing again, we have to
remove all result values from SoftenedFloats (and possibly other maps?).
This fixes the fp128 test failures with expensive checks for X86.
I think we probably should also remove the values from the other maps
(PromotedIntegers and so on), let me know what you think.
Reviewers: baldrick, bogner, davidxl, ab, arsenm, pirama, chh, RKSimon
Reviewed By: chh
Subscribers: danalbert, wdng, srhines, hfinkel, sepavloff, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29265
llvm-svn: 296964
Part 1 was submitted in http://reviews.llvm.org/D15134.
Changes in this part:
* X86RegisterInfo.td, X86RecognizableInstr.cpp: Add FR128 register class.
* X86CallingConv.td: Pass f128 values in XMM registers or on stack.
* X86InstrCompiler.td, X86InstrInfo.td, X86InstrSSE.td:
Add instruction selection patterns for f128.
* X86ISelLowering.cpp:
When target has MMX registers, configure MVT::f128 in FR128RegClass,
with TypeSoftenFloat action, and custom actions for some opcodes.
Add missed cases of MVT::f128 in places that handle f32, f64, or vector types.
Add TODO comment to support f128 type in inline assembly code.
* SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp:
Fix infinite loop when f128 type can have
VT == TLI.getTypeToTransformTo(Ctx, VT).
* Add unit tests for x86-64 fp128 type.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11438
llvm-svn: 255558
Florian Hahn