The entries are added if there are "_init" or "_fini" entries in
the symbol table respectively. According to the behavior of ld,
entries are inserted even for undefined symbols.
Symbol names can be overridden by using -init and -fini command
line switches. If used, these switches neither add new symbol table
entries nor require those symbols to be resolved.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13385
llvm-svn: 249297
Add symbol specified with -u as undefined which may cause additional
object files from archives to be linked into the resulting binary.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13345
llvm-svn: 249295
Sort by:
ALLOC
ALLOC && NOBITS
ALLOC & EXEC
ALLOC & EXEC && NOBITS
ALLOC & WRITE
ALLOC & WRITE && NOBITS
<nothing> (ignoring NOBITS)
The dynamic section is finalized early because it adds strings to the dynamic string table, which comes before the dynamic table.
llvm-svn: 249071
The new name starts with a verb, and it does not imply that it errors
out and exit (it acutally can just emit a warning depending on settings.)
llvm-svn: 249016
Sort by:
ALLOC
ALLOC && NOBITS
ALLOC & EXEC
ALLOC & EXEC && NOBITS
ALLOC & WRITE
ALLOC & WRITE && NOBITS
<nothing> (ignoring NOBITS)
The dynamic section is finalized early because it adds strings to the dynamic string table, which comes before the dynamic table.
llvm-svn: 248845
Since FreeBSD 4.1, the kernel expects binaries to be marked with
ELFOSABI_FREEBSD in the ELF header to exec() them. LLD unconditionally
sets OSABI to ELF_OSABINONE, and everything linked with it won't run
on FreeBSD (unless explicitly rebranded).
Example:
% ./aarch64-hello
ELF binary type "0" not known.
zsh: exec format error: ./aarch64-hello
FreeBSD could be modified to accept ELF_OSABINONE, but that would break all
existing binaries, so the kernel needs to support both ABINONE and ABIFREEBSD.
I plan to push this change in FreeBSD one day, which, unfortunately, is
not today. This code patches lld so it sets the header field correctly.
For completeness, the rationale of this change is explained in the FreeBSD
commit message, and it's apparently to pleasee binutils maintainers at the time.
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=59342
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13140
llvm-svn: 248554
This is just enough to get PLT working on 32 bit x86.
The idea behind using a virtual interface is that it should be easy to
convert any of the functions to template parameters if any turns out to be
performance critical.
llvm-svn: 248308
This is more consistent with OutputSection. This is also part of removing
the "Chunk" term from the ELF linker, since we just have input/output sections
and program headers.
llvm-svn: 248183
Rafael Espindola