We need to ensure that the sign bits of the result all match
so we can't fold to undef.
Similar to PR46585.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83163
zext_vector_inreg needs to produces 0s in the extended bits and
sext_vector_inreg needs to produce upper bits that are all the
same. So we should fold them to a 0 vector instead of undef.
Fixes PR46585.
Currently matchBinOpReduction only handles shufflevector reduction patterns, but in many cases these only occur in the final stages of a reduction, once we're down to legal vector widths.
Before this its likely that we are performing reductions using subvector extractions to repeatedly split the source vector in half and perform the binop on the halves.
Assuming we've found a non-partial reduction, this patch continues looking for subvector reductions as far as it can beyond the last shufflevector.
Fixes PR37890
Given a loop with two subloops, it should be possible for both to be
converted to hardware loops. That's what this patch does, simply enough.
It slightly alters the loop iterating order to try and convert all
subloops. If one (or more) succeeds, it stops as before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78502
SelectionDAGBuilder converts logic-of-compares into multiple branches based
on a boolean TLI setting in isJumpExpensive(). But that probably never
considered the pattern of extracted bools from a vector compare - it seems
unlikely that we would want to turn vector logic into control-flow.
The motivating x86 reduction case is shown in PR44565:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44565
...and that test shows the expected improvement from using pmovmsk codegen.
For AArch64, I modified the test to include an extra op because the simpler
test gets transformed by a codegen invocation of SimplifyCFG.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82602
There was a rogue 'assert' in AArch64ISelLowering for the tuple.get intrinsics,
that shouldn't really have been there (I suspect this was a remnant from when
we expected the wider vector always to have come from a vector CONCAT).
When I tried to create a more minimal reproducer, I found a bug in
DAGCombiner where it drops the scalable flag when trying to fold:
extract_subv (bitcast X), Index --> bitcast (extract_subv X, Index')
This patch fixes both issues.
Reviewers: david-arm, efriedma, spatel
Reviewed By: efriedma
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82910
Whilst trying to assemble the following test:
clang/test/CodeGen/aarch64-sve-intrinsics/acle_sve_set2.c
I discovered we were hitting some warnings about possible invalid
calls to getVectorNumElements() in getCopyToPartsVector(). I've
tried to fix these by using ElementCount types where possible and
I've made the assumption that we don't support using a fixed width
vector to copy parts of a scalable vector, and vice versa. Looking
at how the copy is implemented I think that's the right thing for
now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82744
This patch uses ranges for debug information when a function contains basic block sections rather than using [lowpc, highpc]. This is also the first in a series of patches for debug info and does not contain the support for linker relaxation. That will be done as a follow up patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78851
The caller can't handle the node having multiple results like a
masked load does. So we need to detect the case and do our own
result replacement.
Fixes PR46532.
In visitSCALAR_TO_VECTOR we try to optimise cases such as:
scalar_to_vector (extract_vector_elt %x)
into vector shuffles of %x. However, it led to numerous warnings
when %x is a scalable vector type, so for now I've changed the
code to only perform the combination on fixed length vectors.
Although we probably could change the code to work with scalable
vectors in certain cases, without a proper profit analysis it
doesn't seem worth it at the moment.
This change fixes up one of the warnings in:
llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/sve-merging-stores.ll
I've also added a simplified version of the same test to:
llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/sve-fp.ll
which already has checks for no warnings.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82872
Before this instruction supported output values, it fit fairly
naturally as a terminator. However, being a terminator while also
supporting outputs causes some trouble, as the physreg->vreg COPY
operations cannot be in the same block.
Modeling it as a non-terminator allows it to be handled the same way
as invoke is handled already.
Most of the changes here were created by auditing all the existing
users of MachineBasicBlock::isEHPad() and
MachineBasicBlock::hasEHPadSuccessor(), and adding calls to
isInlineAsmBrIndirectTarget or mayHaveInlineAsmBr, as appropriate.
Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers, void
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79794
This prevents the outlined functions from pulling in a lot of unnecessary code
in our downstream libraries/linker. Which stops outlining making codesize
worse in c++ code with no-exceptions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57254
As per documentation of `hasPairLoad`:
"`RequiredAlignment` gives the minimal alignment constraints that must be met to be able to select this paired load."
In this sense, `0` is strictly equivalent to `1`. We make this obvious by using `Align` instead of unsigned.
There is only one implementor of this interface.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82958
It's perfectly valid to do certain DAG combines where we extract
subvectors from a concat vector when we have scalable vector types.
However, we can do this in a way that avoids generating compiler
warnings by replacing calls to getVectorNumElements() with
getVectorMinNumElements(). Due to the way subvector extracts are
designed to work with scalable vector types this is ok.
This eliminates some warnings from existing tests in this file:
llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/sve-intrinsics-loads.ll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82655
Summary:
This is a fix for PR45009.
When working on D67492 I made DwarfExpression emit a single
DW_OP_entry_value operation covering the whole composite location
description that is produced if a register does not have a valid DWARF
number, and is instead composed of multiple register pieces. Looking
closer at the standard, this appears to not be valid DWARF. A
DW_OP_entry_value operation's block can only be a DWARF expression or a
register location description, so it appears to not be valid for it to
hold a composite location description like that.
See DWARFv5 sec. 2.5.1.7:
"The DW_OP_entry_value operation pushes the value that the described
location held upon entering the current subprogram. It has two
operands: an unsigned LEB128 length, followed by a block containing a
DWARF expression or a register location description (see Section
2.6.1.1.3 on page 39)."
Here is a dwarf-discuss mail thread regarding this:
http://lists.dwarfstd.org/pipermail/dwarf-discuss-dwarfstd.org/2020-March/004610.html
There was not a strong consensus reached there, but people seem to lean
towards that operations specified under 2.6 (e.g. DW_OP_piece) may not
be part of a DWARF expression, and thus the DW_OP_entry_value operation
can't contain those.
Perhaps we instead want to emit a entry value operation per each
DW_OP_reg* operation, e.g.:
- DW_OP_entry_value(DW_OP_regx sub_reg0),
DW_OP_stack_value,
DW_OP_piece 8,
- DW_OP_entry_value(DW_OP_regx sub_reg1),
DW_OP_stack_value,
DW_OP_piece 8,
[...]
The question then becomes how the call site should look; should a
composite location description be emitted there, and we then leave it up
to the debugger to match those two composite location descriptions?
Another alternative could be to emit a call site parameter entry for
each sub-register, but firstly I'm unsure if that is even valid DWARF,
and secondly it seems like that would complicate the collection of call
site values quite a bit. As far as I can tell GCC does not emit any
entry values / call sites in these cases, so we do not have something to
compare with, but the former seems like the more reasonable approach.
Currently when trying to emit a call site entry for a parameter composed
of multiple DWARF registers a (DwarfRegs.size() == 1) assert is
triggered in addMachineRegExpression(). Until the call site
representation is figured out, and until there is use for these entry
values in practice, this commit simply stops the invalid DWARF from
being emitted.
Reviewers: djtodoro, vsk, aprantl
Reviewed By: djtodoro, vsk
Subscribers: jyknight, hiraditya, fedor.sergeev, jrtc27, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75270
While validating live-out values, record instructions that look like
a reduction. This will comprise of a vector op (for now only vadd),
a vorr (vmov) which store the previous value of vadd and then a vpsel
in the exit block which is predicated upon a vctp. This vctp will
combine the last two iterations using the vmov and vadd into a vector
which can then be consumed by a vaddv.
Once we have determined that it's safe to perform tail-predication,
we need to change this sequence of instructions so that the
predication doesn't produce incorrect code. This involves changing
the register allocation of the vadd so it updates itself and the
predication on the final iteration will not update the falsely
predicated lanes. This mimics what the vmov, vctp and vpsel do and
so we then don't need any of those instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75533
It's pretty silly to diagnose on a scalar copy but the build does that:
loop variable 'SibReg' of type 'const llvm::Register' creates a copy from type 'const llvm::Register' [-Wrange-loop-analysis]
With an undef operand, it's possible for getVRegDef to fail and return
null. This is an edge case very little code bothered to
consider. Proper gMIR should use G_IMPLICIT_DEF instead.
I initially tried to apply this restriction to all SSA MIR, so then
getVRegDef would never fail anywhere. However, ProcessImplicitDefs
does technically run while the function is in SSA. ProcessImplicitDefs
and DetectDeadLanes would need to either move, or a new pseudo-SSA
type of function property would need to be introduced.
Basically a NFC, but allows subclasses access to the entire PeelingModuloScheduleExpander
class. We are doing this to allow backends, particularly one that are not necessarily
upstreamed, to inherit from PeelingModuloScheduleExpander and access its basic structures.
Renames Info into LoopInfo for consistency in PeelingModuloScheduleExpander.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82673
In RISC-V vector extension, users could group multiple vector registers
as one pseudo register. In mixed width operations, users could use
partial vector registers to reduce the register pressure. The parameter
to control register grouping and partial use is called LMUL. LMUL is a
part of the type. So, we have a bunch of vector types. In order to
support all these types, we need new MVT types in LLVM. In this patch, I
added several MVT types that are used in RISC-V vector implementation.
This is a standalone patch for MVT types without RISC-V related implementation.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81724
This is a followup on D78403.
I'm unsure about `getAtomicOpAlign` overloads that take `AtomicRMWInst` and `AtomicCmpXchgInst`, shouldn't `getAlign` provide the correct answer already?
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81369
Fix a warning in getNode() when extracting a subvector from a
concat vector. We can simply replace the call to getVectorNumElements
with getVectorMinNumElements as this follows the defined behaviour
for EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82746
When trying to reduce a BUILD_VECTOR to a SHUFFLE_VECTOR it's
important that we carefully check the vector types that led to
that BUILD_VECTOR. In the test I have attached to this commit
there is a case where the results of two SVE faddv instructions
are being stored to consecutive memory locations. With my fix,
as part of merging those stores we discover that each BUILD_VECTOR
element came from an extract of a SVE vector element and
therefore bail out.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82564
If a constant is only allsignbits in the demanded/active bits, then sign extend it to an allsignbits bool pattern for OR/XOR ops.
This also requires SimplifyDemandedBits XOR handling to be modified to call ShrinkDemandedConstant on any (non-NOT) XOR pattern to account for non-splat cases.
Next step towards fixing PR45808 - with this patch we now get a <-1,-1,0,0> v4i64 constant instead of <1,1,0,0>.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82257
Pre-commit for D82257, this adds a DemandedElts arg to ShrinkDemandedConstant/targetShrinkDemandedConstant which will allow future patches to (optionally) add vector support.
reduceBuildVecExtToExtBuildVec was breaking a splat(zext(x)) pattern into buildvector(x, 0, x, 0, ..) resulting in much more complex insert+shuffle codegen.
We already go to some lengths to avoid this in SimplifyDemandedVectorElts etc. when we encounter splat buildvectors.
It should be OK to fold all splat(aext(x)) patterns - we might need to tighten this if we find a case where we mustn't introduce a buildvector(x, undef, x, undef, ..) but I can't find one.
Fixes PR46461.
The translation of cmpxchg added by
9481399c0f specifically skipped weak
cmpxchg due to not understanding the meaning. Weak cmpxchg was added
in 420a216817. As explained in the
commit message, the weak mode is implicit in how
ATOMIC_CMP_SWAP_WITH_SUCCESS is lowered. If it's expanded to a regular
ATOMIC_CMP_SWAP, it's replaced with a strong cmpxchg.
This handling seems weird to me, but this was already following the
DAG behavior. I would expect the strong IR instruction to not have the
boolean output. Failing that, I might expect the IRTranslator to emit
ATOMIC_CMP_SWAP and a constant for the boolean.
Craig Topper