expressions are integer. It can also be ValueDecl expressions
Use the type information from the TemplateParameterList instead
Patch by Olivier Goffart!
llvm-svn: 178611
When support was added for declaration arguments, the case of variadic
declaration arguments was not supported. This patch fixes that problem by
not crashing when certain ValueDecl's are null.
Patch by Olivier Goffart!
llvm-svn: 178610
Value depenedent expressions for default arguments cannot be evaluated.
Instead, use the desugared template type to get an argument expression that
can be used. This is needed for both integer and declaration arguements.
Also, move this common code into a separate function.
Patch by Olivier Goffart!
llvm-svn: 178609
however, it doesn't do that unless we're optimizing. Change
that and haul out to a helper function. Also make this a driver
test appropriate rather than an assembly test.
llvm-svn: 178606
- Find the correct region to represent the first array element when
constructing a CXXConstructorCall.
- If the array is trivial, model the copy with a primitive load/store.
- Don't warn about the "uninitialized" subscript in the AST -- we don't use
the helper variable that Sema provides.
<rdar://problem/13091608>
llvm-svn: 178602
a normal cleanup when entering a @try or @synchronized to
ensure that we clean that up if an exception is triggered.
Apparently GCC did this, so it's hard to argue that we shouldn't
do at least as much.
rdar://12364847
llvm-svn: 178599
This reverts commit r178497 since the backend has been fixed.
Also add a test to ensure that we're emitting template information for unions.
llvm-svn: 178587
overriding a non-deleted virtual function. The existing check for this doesn't
catch this case, because it fires before we mark the method as deleted.
llvm-svn: 178563
variable in a C99 inline (but not static-inline or extern-inline)
function definition.
The standard doesn't actually say that this doesn't apply to
"extern inline" definitions, but that seems like a useful extension,
and it at least doesn't have the obvious flaw that a static
mutable variable in an externally-available definition does.
rdar://13535367
llvm-svn: 178520
Refactor invalidateRegions to take SVals instead of Regions as input and teach RegionStore
about processing LazyCompoundVal as a top-level “escaping” value.
This addresses several false positives that get triggered by the NewDelete checker, but the
underlying issue is reproducible with other checkers as well (for example, MallocChecker).
llvm-svn: 178518
This is a heuristic to make up for the fact that the analyzer doesn't
model C++ containers very well. One example is modeling that
'std::distance(I, E) == 0' implies 'I == E'. In the future, it would be
nice to model this explicitly, but for now it just results in a lot of
false positives.
The actual heuristic checks if the base type has a member named 'begin' or
'iterator'. If so, we treat the constructors and destructors of that type
as opaque, rather than inlining them.
This is intended to drastically reduce the number of false positives
reported with experimental destructor support turned on. We can tweak the
heuristic in the future, but we'd rather err on the side of false negatives
for now.
<rdar://problem/13497258>
llvm-svn: 178516
This is controlled by the 'suppress-c++-stdlib' analyzer-config flag.
It is currently off by default.
This is more suppression than we'd like to do, since obviously there can
be user-caused issues within 'std', but it gives us the option to wield
a large hammer to suppress false positives the user likely can't work
around.
llvm-svn: 178513
when we actually end a lexical block.
* Added new test for line table / block cleanup.
* Follow-up to r177819 / rdar://problem/13115369
llvm-svn: 178490
visible. There's a lot of potential badness in how we're modelling
these things, but getting this much correct is reasonably easy.
rdar://13535367
llvm-svn: 178488
Evaluating a C++ new expression now includes generating an intermediate
ExplodedNode, and this node could very well represent a previously-
reachable state in the ExplodedGraph. If so, we can short-circuit the
rest of the evaluation.
Caught by the assertion a few lines later.
<rdar://problem/13510065>
llvm-svn: 178401
We can check if the receiver is nil in the node that corresponds to the StmtPoint of the message send.
At that point, the receiver is guaranteed to be live. We will find at least one unreclaimed node due to
my previous commit (look for StmtPoint instead of PostStmt) and the fact that the nil receiver nodes are tagged.
+ a couple of extra tests.
llvm-svn: 178381
* Store the .block_descriptor (instead of self) in the alloca so we
can guarantee that all captured variables are available at -O0.
* Add the missing OpDeref for the alloca.
rdar://problem/12767564
llvm-svn: 178361
We already avoided warning for
extern "C" const char *Version_string = "2.9";
now we also don't produce any warnings for
extern "C" {
extern const char *Version_string2 = "2.9";
}
llvm-svn: 178333
Argyrios Kyrtzidis