Revert "[libc++] Fix <atomic> failures on GCC"
Revert "[libc++] Change memory_order to an enum class"
Revert "[libc++] decoupling Freestanding atomic<T> from libatomic.a"
The lldb formatter nededs to be updated. Shafik and Louis will
coordinate to do so.
llvm-svn: 355417
Summary:
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D58201, we turned memory_order into an enum
class in C++20 mode. However, we were not casting memory_order to its
underlying type correctly for the GCC implementation, which broke the
build bots. I also fixed a test that was failing in C++17 mode on GCC 5.
Reviewers: EricWF, jfb, mclow.lists
Subscribers: zoecarver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58966
llvm-svn: 355409
Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I'd like to make libc++ behave better with what freestanding should
be, so that it can be a tool we use in improving the standard. To do that we
need to try stuff out, both with "freestanding the language mode" and
"freestanding the library subset".
Let's start with the super basic: run the libc++ tests in freestanding, using
clang as the compiler, and see what works. The easiest hack to do this:
In utils/libcxx/test/config.py add:
self.cxx.compile_flags += ['-ffreestanding']
Run the tests and they all fail.
Why? Because in freestanding `main` isn't special. This "not special" property
has two effects: main doesn't get mangled, and main isn't allowed to omit its
`return` statement. The first means main gets mangled and the linker can't
create a valid executable for us to test. The second means we spew out warnings
(ew) and the compiler doesn't insert the `return` we omitted, and main just
falls of the end and does whatever undefined behavior (if you're luck, ud2
leading to non-zero return code).
Let's start my work with the basics. This patch changes all libc++ tests to
declare `main` as `int main(int, char**` so it mangles consistently (enabling us
to declare another `extern "C"` main for freestanding which calls the mangled
one), and adds `return 0;` to all places where it was missing. This touches 6124
files, and I apologize.
The former was done with The Magic Of Sed.
The later was done with a (not quite correct but decent) clang tool:
https://gist.github.com/jfbastien/793819ff360baa845483dde81170feed
This works for most tests, though I did have to adjust a few places when e.g.
the test runs with `-x c`, macros are used for main (such as for the filesystem
tests), etc.
Once this is in we can create a freestanding bot which will prevent further
regressions. After that, we can start the real work of supporting C++
freestanding fairly well in libc++.
<rdar://problem/47754795>
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, miyuki, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57624
llvm-svn: 353086
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
I have a big patch coming up, and this indirection is required to avoid hitting the following after my big change:
error: empty struct has size 0 in C, size 1 in C++ [-Werror,-Wextern-c-compat]
llvm-svn: 350772
test/support/msvc_stdlib_force_include.hpp
When testing MSVC's STL with C1XX, simulate a couple more compiler feature-test macros.
When testing MSVC's STL, simulate a few library feature-test macros.
test/std/atomics/atomics.lockfree/isalwayslockfree.pass.cpp
The vector_size attribute is a non-Standard extension that's supported by Clang and GCC,
but not C1XX. Therefore, guard this with `__has_attribute(vector_size)`.
Additionally, while these tests pass when MSVC's STL is compiled with Clang,
I don't consider this to be a supported scenario for our library,
so also guard this with defined(_LIBCPP_VERSION).
test/std/utilities/function.objects/func.not_fn/not_fn.pass.cpp
N4713 23.14.10 [func.not_fn]/1 depicts only `call_wrapper(call_wrapper&&) = default;`
and `call_wrapper(const call_wrapper&) = default;`. According to
15.8.2 [class.copy.assign]/2 and /4, this makes call_wrapper non-assignable.
Therefore, guard the assignability tests as libc++ specific.
Add a (void) cast to tolerate not_fn() being marked as nodiscard.
Fixes D41213.
llvm-svn: 322144
* Fix non-null violation in strstream.cpp
Overflow was calling memcpy with a null parameter and a size of 0.
* Fix std/atomics/atomics.flag/ tests:
a.test_and_set() was reading from an uninitialized atomic, but wasn't
using the value. The tests now clear the flag before performing the
first test_and_set. This allows UBSAN to test that clear doesn't read
an invalid value.
* Fix std/experimental/algorithms/alg.random.sample/sample.pass.cpp
The tests were dereferencing a past-the-end pointer to an array so that
they could do pointer arithmetic with it. Instead of dereference the iterator
I changed the tests to use the special 'base()' test iterator method.
* Add -fno-sanitize=float-divide-by-zero to suppress division by zero UBSAN diagnostics.
The tests that cause float division by zero are explicitly aware that they
are doing that. Since this is well defined for IEEE floats suppress the warnings
for now.
llvm-svn: 273107
Summary:
Replace non-Standard "atomic_flag f(false);" with Standard "atomic_flag f;" in clear tests.
Although the value of 'f' is unspecified it shouldn't matter because these tests always call `f.test_and_set()` without checking the result, so the initial state shouldn't matter.
The test init03.pass.cpp is explicitly testing this non-Standard extension; It has been moved into the `test/libcxx` directory.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, STL_MSFT
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19758
llvm-svn: 268355
Summary:
This was voted into C++17 at the Jacksonville meeting. The final P0152R1
paper will be in the upcoming post-Jacksonville mailing, and is also
available here:
http://jfbastien.github.io/papers/P0152R1.html
Reviewers: mclow.lists, rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17951
llvm-svn: 264413
This patch goes through and enables C++11 and C++14 features for newer GCC's.
The main changes are:
1. Turn on variable templates. (Uses __cpp_variable_templates)
2. Assert atomic<Tp> is trivially copyable (Uses _GNUC_VER >= 501).
3. Turn on trailing return support for GCC. (Uses _GNUC_VER >= 404)
4. XFAIL void_t test for GCC 5.1 and 5.2. Fixed in GCC 6.
llvm-svn: 255585
Summary:
After putting this question up on cfe-dev I have decided that it would be best to allow the use of `<atomic>` in C++03. Although static initialization is a concern the syntax required to get it is C++11 only. Meaning that C++11 constant static initialization cannot silently break in C++03, it will always cause a syntax error. Furthermore `ATOMIC_VAR_INIT` and `ATOMIC_FLAG_INIT` remain defined in C++03 even though they cannot be used because C++03 usages will cause better error messages.
The main change in this patch is to replace `__has_feature(cxx_atomic)`, which only returns true when C++ >= 11, to `__has_extension(c_atomic)` which returns true whenever clang supports the required atomic builtins.
This patch adds the following macros:
* `_LIBCPP_HAS_C_ATOMIC_IMP` - Defined on clang versions which provide the C `_Atomic` keyword.
* `_LIBCPP_HAS_GCC_ATOMIC_IMP` - Defined on GCC > 4.7. We must use the fallback atomic implementation.
* `_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_ATOMIC_HEADER` - Defined when it is not safe to include `<atomic>`.
`_LIBCPP_HAS_C_ATOMIC_IMP` and `_LIBCPP_HAS_GCC_ATOMIC_IMP` are mutually exclusive, only one should be defined. If neither is defined then `<atomic>` is not implemented and including `<atomic>` will issue an error.
Reviewers: chandlerc, jroelofs, mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11555
llvm-svn: 245463
Billy Robert O'Neal III