declaration has a dependent type.
This fixes a bug where clang errors out on a valid code.
rdar://problem/28051467
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24110
llvm-svn: 280330
explicit specialization to a warning for C++98 mode (this is a defect report
resolution, so per our informal policy it should apply in C++98), and turn
the warning on by default for C++11 and later. In all cases where it fires, the
right thing to do is to remove the pointless explicit instantiation.
llvm-svn: 280308
within the instantiation of that same specialization. This could previously
happen for eagerly-instantiated function templates, variable templates,
exception specifications, default arguments, and a handful of other cases.
We still have an issue here for default template arguments that recursively
make use of themselves and likewise for substitution into the type of a
non-type template parameter, but in those cases we're producing a different
entity each time, so they should instead be caught by the instantiation depth
limit. However, currently we will typically run out of stack before we reach
it. :(
llvm-svn: 280190
per-frame stack usage enough to cause it to hit our stack limit. This is not
ideal; we should find a better way of dealing with this, such as increasing
our stack allocation when built with ASan.
llvm-svn: 279668
they're redeclarations. This is necessary in order for name lookup to correctly
find the most recent declaration of the name (which affects default template
argument lookup and cross-module merging, among other things).
llvm-svn: 275612
classes.
MSVC actively uses unqualified lookup in dependent bases, lookup at the
instantiation point (non-dependent names may be resolved on things
declared later) etc. and all this stuff is the main cause of
incompatibility between clang and MSVC.
Clang tries to emulate MSVC behavior but it may fail in many cases.
clang could store lexed tokens for member functions definitions within
ClassTemplateDecl for later parsing during template instantiation.
It will allow resolving many possible issues with lookup in dependent
base classes and removing many already existing MSVC-specific
hacks/workarounds from the clang code.
llvm-svn: 272774
The code had a typo it was doing:
Param->setUninstantiatedDefaultArg(Param->getUninstantiatedDefaultArg());
This is a no-op but may assert, we wanted to do:
Param->setUninstantiatedDefaultArg(OldParam->getUninstantiatedDefaultArg());
This fixes PR28082.
llvm-svn: 272425
Wilson.
An unqualified lookup for in base classes may cause stack overflow if
the base class is a specialization of current class.
Patch by Will Wilson.
llvm-svn: 271251
Also make explicit instantiation decls not apply to nested classes when
targeting MSVC. That dll attributes are not inherited by inner classes
might be the explanation for MSVC's behaviour here.
llvm-svn: 270897
Summary:
In dependent contexts where we know a type name is required, such as a
new expression, we can recover by forming a DependentNameType.
This generalizes our existing compatibility hack for default arguments
for template type parameters.
Works towards parsing atlctrlw.h, which is PR26748.
Reviewers: avt77, rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20500
llvm-svn: 270615
This reversal is being done with r267453's author's (i.e. Richard Smith's) permission.
This fixes https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27601
Also, per Richard's request the examples from the bug report have been added to our test suite.
llvm-svn: 270016
With this patch compiler emits warning if it tries to make implicit instantiation
of a template but cannot find the template definition. The warning can be suppressed
by explicit instantiation declaration or by command line options
-Wundefined-var-template and -Wundefined-func-template. The implementation follows
the discussion of http://reviews.llvm.org/D12326.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16396
llvm-svn: 266719
This is a fix for https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25561 which was a
crash on invalid. Change the handling of invalid decls to have a catch-all
case to prevent unexpecting decls from triggering an assertion.
llvm-svn: 265467
This feature works outside of templates by forming a DeclRefExpr to a
FieldDecl instead of a MemberExpr, which requires a base object in
addition to the FieldDecl.
Previously, while building up the template AST before instantiation, we
formed a CXXDependentScopeMemberExpr, which always instantiates to a
MemberExpr. Now, in unevaluated contexts we form a
DependentScopeDeclRefExpr, which is a more flexible node that can
instantiate to either a MemberExpr or a DeclRefExpr depending on lookup
results.
Fixes PR26893.
llvm-svn: 263279
In VisitNonTypeTemplateParamDecl, before SubstExpr with the default argument,
we should create a ConstantEvaluated ExpressionEvaluationContext. Without this,
it is possible to use a PotentiallyEvaluated ExpressionEvaluationContext; and
MaybeODRUseExprs will not be cleared when popping the context, causing
assertion failure.
This is similar to how we handle the context before SubstExpr with the
default argument, in SubstDefaultTemplateArgument.
Part of PR13986.
rdar://24480205
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17576
llvm-svn: 261803
Or, do not set Sema's CurContext to the template declaration's when substituting into default template arguments of said template declaration.
If we do push the template declaration context on to Sema, and the template declaration is at namespace scope, Sema can get confused and try and do odr analysis when substituting into default template arguments, even though the substitution could be occurring within a dependent context.
I'm not sure why this was being done, perhaps there was concern that if a default template argument referred to a previous template parameter, it might not be found during substitution - but all regression tests pass, and I can't craft a test that would cause it to fails (if some one does, please inform me, and i'll craft a different fix for the PR).
This patch removes a single line of code, but unfortunately adds more than it removes, because of the tests. Some day I still hope to commit a patch that removes far more lines than it adds, while leaving clang better for it ;)
Sorry that r253590 ("Change the expression evaluation context from Unevaluated to ConstantEvaluated while substituting into non-type template argument defaults") caused the PR!
llvm-svn: 258110
Covers significantly more code in the template template pack argument
test and fixes the resulting assert problem.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15743
llvm-svn: 257326
By storing the instantiated expression back in the ParmVarDecl,
we remove the last need for separately storing the sub-expression
of a CXXDefaultArgExpr. This makes PCH/Modules merging quite
simple: CXXDefaultArgExpr records are serialized as references
to the ParmVarDecl, and we ignore redundant attempts to overwrite
the instantiated expression.
This has some extremely marginal impact on user-facing semantics.
However, the major effect is that it avoids IRGen errors about
conflicting definitions due to lambdas in the argument being
instantiated multiple times while sharing the same mangling.
It should also slightly improve memory usage and module file size.
rdar://23810407
llvm-svn: 256983
This is the 5th Lit test patch.
Expanded expected diagnostics to vary by C++ dialect.
Expanded RUN line to: default, C++98/03 and C++11.
llvm-svn: 255196
This time, I went with the first approach from
http://reviews.llvm.org/D6700, where clang actually attempts to form an
implicit member reference from an UnresolvedLookupExpr. We know that
there are only two possible outcomes at this point, a DeclRefExpr of the
FieldDecl or an error, but its safer to reuse the existing machinery for
this.
llvm-svn: 250856
consider the following:
enum E *p;
enum E { e };
The above snippet is not ANSI C because 'enum E' has not bee defined
when we are processing the declaration of 'p'; however, it is a popular
extension to make the above work. This would fail using the Microsoft
enum semantics because the definition of 'E' would implicitly have a
fixed underlying type of 'int' which would trigger diagnostic messages
about a mismatch between the declaration and the definition.
Instead, treat fixed underlying types as not fixed for the purposes of
the diagnostic.
llvm-svn: 249674
Our self hosting buildbots found a few more tests which weren't updated
to reflect that the enum semantics are part of the Microsoft ABI.
llvm-svn: 249670
that change turns out to not be reasonable: mutating the AST of a parsed
template during instantiation is not a sound thing to do, does not work across
chained PCH / modules builds, and is in any case a special-case workaround to a
more general problem that should be solved centrally.
llvm-svn: 249342
partial specialization can perform conversions on the argument. Be sure we
start again from the original argument when checking each possible template.
llvm-svn: 249114
We get into this bad state when someone defines a new member function
for a class but forgets to add the declaration to the class body.
Calling the new member function from a member function template of the
class will crash during instantiation.
llvm-svn: 248925
This doesn't quite get alias template equivalence right yet, but handles the
egregious cases where we would silently give the wrong answers.
llvm-svn: 248431
Summary:
This change adds support for `__builtin_ms_va_list`, a GCC extension for
variadic `ms_abi` functions. The existing `__builtin_va_list` support is
inadequate for this because `va_list` is defined differently in the Win64
ABI vs. the System V/AMD64 ABI.
Depends on D1622.
Reviewers: rsmith, rnk, rjmccall
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D1623
llvm-svn: 247941
Summary:
`OpaqueValueExpr`s may not have a source expression (as in the case when
they are created due to a default argument error).
This can cause an assertion failure in `TransformOpaqueValueExpr` during
template instantiation.
This patch fixes the assertion failure.
Reviewers: hfinkel, rsmith
Subscribers: fraggamuffin, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11582
Patch by Rachel Craik!
llvm-svn: 246600
If a function declaration is found inside a template function as in:
template<class T> void f() {
void g(int x = T::v) except(T::w);
}
it must be instantiated along with the enclosing template function,
including default arguments and exception specification.
Together with the patch committed in r240974 this implements DR1484.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11194
llvm-svn: 245810
Richard Smith