Support lax convertions on compound assignment expressions like:
typedef __attribute__((vector_size(8))) double float64x1_t;
typedef __attribute__((vector_size(16))) double float64x2_t;
float64x1_t vget_low_f64(float64x2_t __p0);
double c = 3.0;
float64x2_t v = {0.0, 1.0};
c += vget_low_f64(v);
This restores one more valid behavior pre r266366, and is a incremental
follow up from work committed in r274646.
While here, make the check more strict, add FIXMEs, clean up variable
names to match what they can actually be and update testcases to reflect
that. We now reject:
typedef float float2 __attribute__ ((vector_size (8)));
double d;
f2 += d;
which doesn't fit as a direct bitcast anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24472
rdar://problem/28033929
llvm-svn: 282968
Before r266366, clang used to support constructs like:
typedef __attribute__((vector_size(8))) double float64x1_t;
typedef __attribute__((vector_size(16))) double float64x2_t;
float64x1_t vget_low_f64(float64x2_t __p0);
double y = 3.0 + vget_low_f64(v);
But it would reject:
double y = vget_low_f64(v) + 3.0;
It also always rejected assignments:
double y = vget_low_f64(v);
This patch: (a) revivies the behavior of `3.0 + vget_low_f64(v)` prior to
r266366, (b) add support for `vget_low_f64(v) + 3.0` and (c) add support for
assignments.
These vector semantics have never really been tied up but it seems
odd that we used to support some binop froms but do not support
assignment. If we did support scalar for the purposes of arithmetic, we
should probably be able to reinterpret as scalar for the purposes of
assignment too.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21700
rdar://problem/26093791
llvm-svn: 274646
to consider the storage size of the vector instead of its
sizeof. In other words, ban <3 x int> to <4 x int> casts,
which produced invalid IR anyway.
Also, attempt to be a little more rigorous, or at least
explicit, about when enums are allowed in these casts.
rdar://21901132
llvm-svn: 243069
We never aka vector types because our attributed syntax for it is less
comprehensible than the typedefs. This leaves the user in the dark when
the typedef isn't named that well.
Example:
v2s v; v4f w;
w = v;
The naming in this cases isn't even that bad, but the error we give is
useless without looking up the actual typedefs.
t.c:6:5: error: assigning to 'v4f' from incompatible type 'v2s'
Now:
t.c:6:5: error: assigning to 'v4f' (vector of 4 'float' values) from
incompatible type 'v2s' (vector of 2 'int' values)
We do this for all diagnostics that print a vector type.
llvm-svn: 207267
When a lax conversion featured a vector and a non-vector, we were
only requiring the non-vector to be a scalar type, but really it
needs to be a real type (i.e. integral or real floating); it is
not reasonable to allow a pointer, member pointer, or complex
type here.
r198474 required lax conversions to match in "data size", i.e.
element size * element count, forbidding matches that happen
only because a vector is rounded up to the nearest power of two
in size. Unfortunately, the erroneous logic was repeated in
several different places; unify them to use the new condition,
so that it triggers for arbitrary conversions and not just
those performed as part of binary operator checking.
rdar://15931426
llvm-svn: 200810
Err on the side of brevity and rename (while providing aliases for the original
name) -Wbool-conversions, -Wint-conversions, and -Wvector-conversions for
consistency with constant, literal, string, and sign conversion warnings. And
name the diagnostic groups explicitly while I'm here rather than rewriting the
string in the groups and sema td files.
Curiously, vector-conversion is not under -Wconversion. Perhaps it should be.
llvm-svn: 152776
method parameter, provide a note pointing at the parameter itself so
the user does not have to manually look for the function/method being
called and match up parameters to arguments. For example, we now get:
t.c:4:5: warning: incompatible pointer types passing 'long *' to
parameter of
type 'int *' [-pedantic]
f(long_ptr);
^~~~~~~~
t.c:1:13: note: passing argument to parameter 'x' here
void f(int *x);
^
llvm-svn: 102038
destination type for initialization, assignment, parameter-passing,
etc. The main issue fixed here is that we used rather confusing
wording for diagnostics such as
t.c:2:9: warning: initializing 'char const [2]' discards qualifiers,
expected 'char *' [-pedantic]
char *name = __func__;
^ ~~~~~~~~
We're not initializing a 'char const [2]', we're initializing a 'char
*' with an expression of type 'char const [2]'. Similar problems
existed for other diagnostics in this area, so I've normalized them all
with more precise descriptive text to say what we're
initializing/converting/assigning/etc. from and to. The warning for
the code above is now:
t.c:2:9: warning: initializing 'char *' from an expression of type
'char const [2]' discards qualifiers [-pedantic]
char *name = __func__;
^ ~~~~~~~~
Fixes <rdar://problem/7447179>.
llvm-svn: 100832
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
Bruno Cardoso Lopes