This patch enables the MachineOutliner by default in AArch64 under -Oz.
The MachineOutliner offers around a 4.5% improvement on the current -Oz code
size improvements.
We have done work into improving the debuggability of outlined code, so that
users of -Oz won't be surprised by the optimization. We have also been executing
the LLVM test suite and common external tests such as the SPEC suites
continuously with no issue. The outliner has a low compile-time overhead of
roughly 1%. At this point, the outliner would be a really good addition to the
-Oz pass pipeline!
llvm-svn: 338133
Just some gardening here.
Similar to how we moved call information into Candidates, this moves outlined
frame information into OutlinedFunction. This allows us to remove
TargetCostInfo entirely.
Anywhere where we returned a TargetCostInfo struct, we now return an
OutlinedFunction. This establishes OutlinedFunctions as more of a general
repeated sequence, and Candidates as occurrences of those repeated sequences.
llvm-svn: 337848
Before this, TCI contained all the call information for each Candidate.
This moves that information onto the Candidates. As a result, each Candidate
can now supply how it ought to be called. Thus, Candidates will be able to,
say, call the same function in cheaper ways when possible. This also removes
that information from TCI, since it's no longer used there.
A follow-up patch for the AArch64 outliner will demonstrate this.
llvm-svn: 337840
The checking is done deeper inside MachineBasicBlock, but this will
hopefully help to find issues when porting the machine outliner to a
target where Liveness tracking is broken (like ARM).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49023
llvm-svn: 336481
It isn't safe to outline sequences of instructions where x16/x17/nzcv live
across the sequence.
This teaches the outliner to check whether or not a specific canidate has
x16/x17/nzcv live across it and discard the candidate in the case that that is
true.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37573https://reviews.llvm.org/D47655
llvm-svn: 335758
insertOutlinerPrologue was not used by any target, and prologue-esque code was
beginning to appear in insertOutlinerEpilogue. Refactor that into one function,
buildOutlinedFrame.
This just removes insertOutlinerPrologue and renames insertOutlinerEpilogue.
llvm-svn: 335076
This is setting up to fix bug 37573 cleanly.
This moves data structures that are technically both used in some way by the
target and the general-purpose outlining algorithm into MachineOutliner.h. In
particular, the `Candidate` class is of importance.
Before, the outliner passed the locations of `Candidates` to the target, which
would then make some decisions about the prospective outlined function. This
change allows us to just pass `Candidates` along to the target. This will allow
the target to discard `Candidates` that would be considered unsafe before cost
calculation. Thus, we will be able to remove the unsafe candidates described in
the bug without resorting to torching the entire prospective function.
Also, as a side-effect, it makes the outliner a bit cleaner.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37573
llvm-svn: 333952
When we're outlining a sequence that ends in a call, we can save up to
three instructions in the outlined function by turning the call into
a tail-call. I refer to this as thunk outlining because the resulting
outlined function looks like a thunk; suggestions welcome for a better
name.
In addition to making the outlined function shorter, thunk outlining
allows outlining calls which would otherwise be illegal to outline:
we don't need to save/restore LR, so we don't need to prove anything
about the stack access patterns of the callee.
To make this work effectively, I also added
MachineOutlinerInstrType::LegalTerminator to the generic MachineOutliner
code; this allows treating an arbitrary instruction as a terminator in
the suffix tree.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47173
llvm-svn: 333015
Counting the number of instructions is both unintuitive and inaccurate.
On AArch64, this only affects the generated remarks and certain rare
pseudo-instructions, but it will have a bigger impact on other targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46921
llvm-svn: 332685
This breaks the code which saves and restores LR, so we can't outline
without doing something more complicated for stack adjustment.
Found by inspection; we get lucky in most cases because getMemOpInfo
only handles STRWpost, not any other pre/post-increment forms. But it
hits a couple of artificial testcases in the tree.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46920
llvm-svn: 332529
The cost computation assumes we do this correctly, but the actual
lowering was wrong.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46923
llvm-svn: 332514
Because we create a new kind of debug instruction, DBG_LABEL, we need to
check all passes which use isDebugValue() to check MachineInstr is debug
instruction or not. When expelling debug instructions, we should expel
both DBG_VALUE and DBG_LABEL. So, I create a new function,
isDebugInstr(), in MachineInstr to check whether the MachineInstr is
debug instruction or not.
This patch has no new test case. I have run regression test and there is
no difference in regression test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45342
Patch by Hsiangkai Wang.
llvm-svn: 331844
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290
llvm-svn: 331272
This commit makes it so that if you outline a def of some register, then the
call instruction created by the outliner actually reflects that the register
is defined by the call. It also makes it so that outlined functions don't
have the TracksLiveness property.
Outlined calls shouldn't break liveness assumptions that someone might make.
This also un-XFAILs the noredzone test, and updates the calls test.
llvm-svn: 331095
The program might have unusual expectations for functions; for example,
the Linux kernel's build system warns if it finds references from .text
to .init.data.
I'm not sure this is something we actually want to make any guarantees
about (there isn't any explicit rule that would disallow outlining
in this case), but we might want to be conservative anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46091
llvm-svn: 331007
Before, the outliner would grab ADRPs that used LR/W30. This patch fixes
that by checking for explicit uses of those registers before the special-casing
for ADRPs.
This also adds a test that ensures that those sorts of ADRPs won't be outlined.
llvm-svn: 330783
First off, this is more correct than having the B. Second off, this was making
a bot upset. This fixes that.
Update the test to include -verify-machineinstrs as well to prevent stuff like
this slipping by non debug/assert builds in the future.
llvm-svn: 330459
This patch adds a hasRedZone() function to AArch64MachineFunctionInfo. It
returns true if the function is known to use a redzone, false if it is known
to not use a redzone, and no value otherwise.
This removes the requirement to pass -mno-red-zone when outlining for AArch64.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D45189
llvm-svn: 329120
This commit simplifies the call outlining logic by removing references to the
Function associated with the callee. To do this, it requires that valid
callee save info is available to the outliner.
llvm-svn: 328719
If an ADRP appears with, say, a CPI operand, we shouldn't outline it.
This moves the check for unsafe operands so that it occurs before the special-case
for ADRPs. Also add a test for outlining ADRPs.
llvm-svn: 328674
When outlining calls, the outliner needs to update CFI to ensure that, say,
exception handling works. This commit adds that functionality and adds a test
just for call outlining.
Call outlining stuff in machine-outliner.mir should be moved into
machine-outliner-calls.mir in a later commit.
llvm-svn: 327917
At the point the outliner runs, KILLs don't impact anything, but they're still
considered unique instructions. This commit makes them invisible like
DebugValues so that they can still be outlined without impacting outlining
decisions.
llvm-svn: 327760
This feature enables special handling of cheap as move in the existing
custom handling specifically for Exynos processors.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42387
llvm-svn: 323774
The Large System Extension added an atomic compare-and-swap instruction
that operates on a pair of 64-bit registers, which we can use to
implement a 128-bit cmpxchg.
Because i128 is not a legal type for AArch64 we have to do all of the
instruction selection in C++, and the instruction requires even/odd
register pairs, so we have to wrap it in REG_SEQUENCE and EXTRACT_SUBREG
nodes. This is very similar to what we do for 64-bit cmpxchg in the ARM
backend.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42104
llvm-svn: 323634
*Mostly* NFC. Still updating the test though just for completeness.
This moves the hasAddressTaken check to MachineOutliner.cpp and replaces it
with a per-basic block test rather than a per-function test. The old test was
too conservative and was preventing functions in C programs from being
outlined even though they were safe to outline.
This was mostly a problem in C sources.
llvm-svn: 322425
ADRP instructions weren't being outlined because they're PC-relative and thus
fail the LR checks. This patch adds a special case for ADRPs to
getOutliningType to make sure that ADRPs can be outlined and updates the MIR
test.
llvm-svn: 322207
This commit does two things. Firstly, it adds a collection of flags which can
be passed along to the target to encode information about the MBB that an
instruction lives in to the outliner.
Second, it adds some of those flags to the AArch64 outliner in order to add
more stack instructions to the list of legal instructions that are handled
by the outliner. The two flags added check if
- There are calls in the MachineBasicBlock containing the instruction
- The link register is available in the entire block
If the link register is available and there are no calls, then a stack
instruction can always be outlined without fixups, regardless of what it is,
since in this case, the outliner will never modify the stack to create a
call or outlined frame.
The motivation for doing this was checking which instructions are most often
missed by the outliner. Instructions like, say
%sp<def> = ADDXri %sp, 32, 0; flags: FrameDestroy
are very common, but cannot be outlined in the case that the outliner might
modify the stack. This commit allows us to outline instructions like this.
llvm-svn: 322048
r319980 added new patterns to the machine combiner for transforming (fsub (fmul
x y) z) into (fmla (fneg z) x y). That is, fsub's where the first source
operand is an fmul are transformed. We previously only matched the case where
the second source operand of an fsub was an fmul, transforming (fsub z (fmul x
y)) into (fmls z x y). Now, if we have an fsub where both source operands are
fmuls, both of the above patterns are applicable.
However, the order in which we add the patterns to the list of candidates
determines the transformation that takes place, since only the first pattern
that matches will be used. This patch changes the order these two patterns are
added to the list of candidates such that we prefer the case where the second
source operand is an fmul (the fmls case), rather than the other one (the
fmla/fneg case). When both source operands are fmuls, this ordering results in
fewer instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41587
llvm-svn: 321491
LR was undefined entering outlined functions that contain calls. This made the
machine verifier unhappy when expensive checks were enabled. This fixes that.
llvm-svn: 321014
Work towards the unification of MIR and debug output by printing
`%stack.0` instead of `<fi#0>`, and `%fixed-stack.0` instead of
`<fi#-4>` (supposing there are 4 fixed stack objects).
Only debug syntax is affected.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41027
llvm-svn: 320827
The outliner previously would never outline calls. Calls are pretty common in
files, so it makes sense to outline them. In fact, in the LLVM test suite, if
you count the number of instructions that the outliner misses when you outline
calls vs when you don't, it turns out that, on average, around 6% of the
instructions encountered are calls. So, if we outline calls, we can find more
candidates, and thus save some more space.
This commit adds that functionality and updates the mir test to reflect that.
llvm-svn: 320229
The offset overflow check before was incorrect. It would always give the
correct result, but it was comparing the SCALED potential fixed-up offset
against an UNSCALED minimum/maximum. As a result, the outliner was missing a
bunch of frame setup/destroy instructions that ought to have been safe to
outline. This fixes that, and adds an instruction to the .mir test that
failed the old test.
llvm-svn: 320090
Summary:
This patch adds MachineCombiner patterns for transforming
(fsub (fmul x y) z) into (fma x y (fneg z)). This has a lower
latency on micro architectures where fneg is cheap.
Patch based on work by George Steed.
Reviewers: rengolin, joelkevinjones, joel_k_jones, evandro, efriedma
Reviewed By: evandro
Subscribers: aemerson, javed.absar, llvm-commits, kristof.beyls
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40306
llvm-svn: 319980
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format, avoid
printing "vreg" for virtual registers (which is one of the current MIR
possibilities).
Basically:
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E "s/%vreg([0-9]+)/%\1/g"
* grep -nr '%vreg' . and fix if needed
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E "s/ vreg([0-9]+)/ %\1/g"
* grep -nr 'vreg[0-9]\+' . and fix if needed
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40420
llvm-svn: 319427
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format,
always print registers as lowercase.
* Only debug printing is affected. It now follows MIR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40417
llvm-svn: 319187
All these headers already depend on CodeGen headers so moving them into
CodeGen fixes the layering (since CodeGen depends on Target, not the
other way around).
llvm-svn: 318490
If the address of a local is used in a comparison, AArch64 can fold the
address-calculation into the comparison via "adds". Unfortunately, a couple of
places (both hit in this one test) are not ready to deal with that yet and just
assume the first source operand is a register.
llvm-svn: 316035
Say you have two identical linkonceodr functions, one in M1 and one in M2.
Say that the outliner outlines A,B,C from one function, and D,E,F from another
function (where letters are instructions). Now those functions are not
identical, and cannot be deduped. Locally to M1 and M2, these outlining
choices would be good-- to the whole program, however, this might not be true!
To mitigate this, this commit makes it so that the outliner sees linkonceodr
functions as unsafe to outline from. It also adds a flag,
-enable-linkonceodr-outlining, which allows the user to specify that they
want to outline from such functions when they know what they're doing.
Changing this handles most code size regressions in the test suite caused by
competing with linker dedupe. It also doesn't have a huge impact on the code
size improvements from the outliner. There are 6 tests that regress > 5% from
outlining WITH linkonceodrs to outlining WITHOUT linkonceodrs. Overall, most
tests either improve or are not impacted.
Not outlined vs outlined without linkonceodrs:
https://hastebin.com/raw/qeguxavuda
Not outlined vs outlined with linkonceodrs:
https://hastebin.com/raw/edepoqoqic
Outlined with linkonceodrs vs outlined without linkonceodrs:
https://hastebin.com/raw/awiqifiheb
Numbers generated using compare.py with -m size.__text. Tests run for AArch64
with -Oz -mllvm -enable-machine-outliner -mno-red-zone.
llvm-svn: 315136
This commit allows the outliner to avoid saving and restoring the link register
on AArch64 when it is dead within an entire class of candidates.
This introduces changes to the way the outliner interfaces with the target.
For example, the target now interfaces with the outliner using a
MachineOutlinerInfo struct rather than by using getOutliningCallOverhead and
getOutliningFrameOverhead.
This also improves several comments on the outliner's cost model.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D36721
llvm-svn: 314341
MachineScheduler when clustering loads or stores checks if base
pointers point to the same memory. This check is done through
comparison of base registers of two memory instructions. This
works fine when instructions have separate offset operand. If
they require a full calculated pointer such instructions can
never be clustered according to such logic.
Changed shouldClusterMemOps to accept base registers as well and
let it decide what to do about it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37698
llvm-svn: 313208
Add new predicate to more accurately model the cost of arithmetic and
logical operations shifted left.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37151
llvm-svn: 311943
Instead of loading 0 from a constant pool, it's of course much better to
materialize it using an fmov and the zero register.
Thanks to Ahmed Bougacha for the suggestion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37102
llvm-svn: 311662
Before, the outliner would mark all instructions that read from/modify LR as
illegal. This doesn't handle W30, which overlaps with LR. This shouldn't be
outlined.
This commit fixes that by making modifiesRegister() and readsRegister() look at
W30 + take in a TRI argument. This makes sure that modifiesRegister() and
readsRegister() won't outline either of W30 and LR.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D36435
llvm-svn: 310422
This commit
- Removes IsTailCall and replaces it with a target-defined unsigned
- Refactors getOutliningCallOverhead and getOutliningFrameOverhead so that they don't use IsTailCall
- Adds a call class + frame class classification to OutlinedFunction and Candidate respectively
This accomplishes a couple things.
Firstly, we don't need the notion of *tail call* in the general outlining algorithm.
Secondly, we now can have different "outlining classes" for each candidate within a set of candidates.
This will make it easy to add new ways to outline sequences for certain targets and dynamically choose
an appropriate cost model for a sequence depending on the context that that sequence lives in.
Ultimately, this should get us closer to being able to do something like, say avoid saving the link
register when outlining AArch64 instructions.
llvm-svn: 309475
This is some more cleanup in preparation for some actual
functional changes. This splits getOutliningBenefit into
two cost functions: getOutliningCallOverhead and
getOutliningFrameOverhead. These functions return the
number of instructions that would be required to call
a specific function and the number of instructions
that would be required to construct a frame for a
specific funtion. The actual outlining benefit logic
is moved into the outliner, which calls these functions.
The goal of refactoring getOutliningBenefit is to:
- Get us closer to getting rid of the IsTailCall flag
- Further split up "target-specific" things and
"general algorithm" things
llvm-svn: 309356
Summary:
This patch is the first step in reducing HW prefetcher instruction tag
collisions in inner loops for Falkor. It adds a pass that annotates IR
loads with metadata to indicate that they are known to be strided loads,
and adds a target lowering hook that translates this metadata to a
target-specific MachineMemOperand flag.
A follow on change will use this MachineMemOperand flag to re-write
instructions to reduce tag collisions.
Reviewers: mcrosier, t.p.northover
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34963
llvm-svn: 308059
Summary: Add target hooks for printing and parsing target MMO flags.
Targets may override getSerializableMachineMemOperandTargetFlags() to
return a mapping from string to flag value for target MMO values that
should be serialized/parsed in MIR output.
Add implementation of this hook for AArch64 SuppressPair MMO flag.
Reviewers: bogner, hfinkel, qcolombet, MatzeB
Subscribers: mcrosier, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34962
llvm-svn: 307877
This patch contains a pass that transforms CBZ/CBNZ/TBZ/TBNZ instructions into a
conditional branch (Bcc), when the NZCV flags can be set for "free". This is
preferred on targets that have more flexibility when scheduling Bcc
instructions as compared to CBZ/CBNZ/TBZ/TBNZ (assuming all other variables are
equal). This can reduce register pressure and is also the default behavior for
GCC.
A few examples:
add w8, w0, w1 -> cmn w0, w1 ; CMN is an alias of ADDS.
cbz w8, .LBB_2 -> b.eq .LBB0_2 ; single def/use of w8 removed.
add w8, w0, w1 -> adds w8, w0, w1 ; w8 has multiple uses.
cbz w8, .LBB1_2 -> b.eq .LBB1_2
sub w8, w0, w1 -> subs w8, w0, w1 ; w8 has multiple uses.
tbz w8, #31, .LBB6_2 -> b.ge .LBB6_2
In looking at all current sub-target machine descriptions, this transformation
appears to be either positive or neutral.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34220.
llvm-svn: 306144
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
llvm-svn: 304787
1. RegisterClass::getSize() is split into two functions:
- TargetRegisterInfo::getRegSizeInBits(const TargetRegisterClass &RC) const;
- TargetRegisterInfo::getSpillSize(const TargetRegisterClass &RC) const;
2. RegisterClass::getAlignment() is replaced by:
- TargetRegisterInfo::getSpillAlignment(const TargetRegisterClass &RC) const;
This will allow making those values depend on subtarget features in the
future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31783
llvm-svn: 301221
In addition to the original commit, tighten the condition for when to
pad empty functions to COFF Windows. This avoids running into problems
when targeting e.g. Win32 AMDGPU, which caused test failures when this
was committed initially.
llvm-svn: 301047
Empty functions can lead to duplicate entries in the Guard CF Function
Table of a binary due to multiple functions sharing the same RVA,
causing the kernel to refuse to load that binary.
We had a terrific bug due to this in Chromium.
It turns out we were already doing this for Mach-O in certain
situations. This patch expands the code for that in
AsmPrinter::EmitFunctionBody() and renames
TargetInstrInfo::getNoopForMachoTarget() to simply getNoop() since it
seems it was used for not just Mach-O anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32330
llvm-svn: 301040
This concludes the refinements to Falkor Machine Model.
It includes SchedPredicates for immediate zero and LSL Fast.
Forwarding logic is also modeled for vector multiply and
accumulate only.
llvm-svn: 299810
When I tested r298734, I thought that red zones were enabled by default like in
X86. Since red zones are behind a flag on AArch64 the testing wasn't true.
llvm-svn: 298747
AArch64 doesn't require -mno-red-zone; stack fixups are sufficient here. This was
unnecessarily copied over from the X86 target.
(You can now outline with red zones! Yay!)
Removing the requirement passes all Single/MultiSource tests.
llvm-svn: 298734
Forgot to remove some output before committing last time. (Instruction fixups
don't actually overflow anywhere in the test suite so far, so I missed it).
To prevent the outliner from screaming "Overflow!" in the event that that
does happen, this commit removes that output.
llvm-svn: 298260
This commit adds the necessary target hooks for outlining in AArch64. It also
refactors the switch statement used in `getMemOpBaseRegImmOfsWidth` into a
more general function, `getMemOpInfo`. This allows the outliner to share that
code without copying and pasting it.
The AArch64 outliner can be run using -mllvm -enable-machine-outliner, as with
the X86-64 outliner.
The test for this pass verifies that the outliner does, in fact outline
functions, fixes up the stack accesses properly, and can correctly generate a
tail call. In the future, this test should be replaced with a MIR test, so that
we can properly test immediate offset overflows in fixed-up instructions.
llvm-svn: 298162
In fact this default implementation should be the only implementation,
keep it virtual for now to accomodate targets that don't model flags
correctly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30747
llvm-svn: 297980
Summary:
A53 scheduler causes an assertion failure on all CRC instructions:
include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineInstr.h:280: const llvm::MachineOperand
&llvm::MachineInstr::getOperand(unsigned int) const: Assertion `i <
getNumOperands() && "getOperand() out of range!"' failed.
The case statements corresponding to CRC instructions are incorrect and should
be removed.
Also adding a testcase while on this.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, javed.absar, apazos, rengolin
Reviewed By: rengolin
Subscribers: evandro, aemerson, llvm-commits, rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30274
llvm-svn: 297582
This patch moves the class for scheduling adjacent instructions,
MacroFusion, to the target.
In AArch64, it also expands the fusion to all instructions pairs in a
scheduling block, beyond just among the predecessors of the branch at the
end.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28489
llvm-svn: 293737
Summary:
This patch prepares more for tail call support in XRay. Until the logging part supports tail calls, this is just staging, so it seems LLVM part is mostly ready with this patch.
Related: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28948 (compiler-rt)
Reviewers: dberris, rengolin
Reviewed By: dberris
Subscribers: llvm-commits, iid_iunknown, aemerson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28947
llvm-svn: 293080
In order to follow the pattern of the existing 'slow-misaligned-128store'
option, rename the option 'no-quad-ldst-pairs' to 'slow-paired-128'.
llvm-svn: 292954
ARM seems to prefer that long literals be formed from their little end in
order to promote the fusion of the instrs pairs MOV/MOVK and MOVK/MOVK on
Cortex A57 and others (v. "Cortex A57 Software Optimisation Guide", section
4.14).
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28697
llvm-svn: 292422
Rename from addOperand to just add, to match the other method that has been
added to MachineInstrBuilder for adding more than just 1 operand.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D28057 for the whole discussion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28556
llvm-svn: 291891
Summary:
Make AArch64InstrInfo::foldMemoryOperandImpl more general by folding all
full COPYs between register classes of the same size that are either
spilled or refilled.
Reviewers: MatzeB, qcolombet
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27271
llvm-svn: 288439
Summary:
In AArch64InstrInfo::foldMemoryOperandImpl, catch more cases where the
COPY being spilled is copying from WZR/XZR, but the source register is
not in the COPY destination register's regclass.
For example, when spilling:
%vreg0 = COPY %XZR ; %vreg0:GPR64common
without this change, the code in TargetInstrInfo::foldMemoryOperand()
and canFoldCopy() that normally handles cases like this would fail to
optimize since %XZR is not in GPR64common. So the spill code generated
would be:
%vreg0 = COPY %XZR
STR %vreg
instead of the new code generated:
STR %XZR
Reviewers: qcolombet, MatzeB
Subscribers: mcrosier, aemerson, t.p.northover, llvm-commits, rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26976
llvm-svn: 288176
This makes the createGenericSchedLive() function that constructs the
default scheduler available for the public API. This should help when
you want to get a scheduler and the default list of DAG mutations.
This also shrinks the list of default DAG mutations:
{Load|Store}ClusterDAGMutation and MacroFusionDAGMutation are no longer
added by default. Targets can easily add them if they need them. It also
makes it easier for targets to add alternative/custom macrofusion or
clustering mutations while staying with the default
createGenericSchedLive(). It also saves the callback back and forth in
TargetInstrInfo::enableClusterLoads()/enableClusterStores().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26986
llvm-svn: 288057
AArch64InstrInfo::shouldScheduleAdjacent() determines whether two
instruction can benefit from macroop fusion on apple CPUs. The list
turned out to be incomplete:
- the "rr" variants of the instructions were missing
- even the "rs" variants can have shift value == 0 and behave like the
"rr" variants
This also splits the MacropFusion target feature into
ArithmeticBccFusion and ArithmeticCbzFusion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25142
llvm-svn: 283243
Currently, the machine combiner can proceed matching when -ffast-math is on.
It should also match when only -ffp-contract=fast is specified as was the
case before when DAGCombiner was doing the job.
Patch by: Abderrazek Zaafrani <a.zaafrani@samsung.com>.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24366
llvm-svn: 281649
We currently return 4 for stackmaps and patchpoints, which is very optimistic
and can in rare cases cause the branch relaxation pass to fail to relax certain
branches.
This patch causes getInstSizeInBytes to return a pessimistic estimate of the
size as the number of bytes requested in the stackmap/patchpoint. In the future,
we could provide a more accurate estimate by sharing some of the logic in
AArch64::LowerSTACKMAP/PATCHPOINT.
Fixes part of https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28750
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24073
llvm-svn: 281301
Jessica Paquette