The ISelLowering code turned insertion turned the element for the
lowest lane of a BUILD_VECTOR into an INSERT_SUBREG, this prohibited
the patterns for SCALAR_TO_VECTOR(Load) to match later. Restrict this
to cases without a load argument.
Reported in rdar://22223823
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12467
llvm-svn: 246462
X86FastISel has been using the wrong register class for VBLENDVPS which
produces a VR128 and needs an extra copy to the target register. The
problem was already hit by the existing test cases when using
> llvm-lit -Dllc="llc -verify-machineinstr"
llvm-svn: 246461
There were really two problems here. The first was that we had the truth tables
for signed i1 comparisons backward. I imagine these are not very common, but if
you have:
setcc i1 x, y, LT
this has the '0 1' and the '1 0' results flipped compared to:
setcc i1 x, y, ULT
because, in the signed case, '1 0' is really '-1 0', and the answer is not the
same as in the unsigned case.
The second problem was that we did not have patterns (at all) for the unsigned
comparisons select_cc nodes for i1 comparison operands. This was the specific
cause of PR24552. These had to be added (and a missing Altivec promotion added
as well) to make sure these function for all types. I've added a bunch more
test cases for these patterns, and there are a few FIXMEs in the test case
regarding code-quality.
Fixes PR24552.
llvm-svn: 246400
Add support for MIR serialization of PowerPC-specific operand target flags
(based on the generic infrastructure added in r244185 and r245383).
I won't even pretend that this is good test coverage, but this includes the
regression test associated with r246372. Adding an MIR test for that fix is far
superior to adding an IR-level test because particular instruction-scheduling
decisions are necessary in order to expose the bug, and using an MIR test we
can start the pipeline post-scheduling.
llvm-svn: 246373
Even through ADDISdtprelHA generally has r3 as its source register, it is
possible for the instruction scheduler to move things around such that some
other register is the source. We need to print the actual source register, not
always r3. Fixes PR24394.
The test case will come in a follow-up commit because it depends on MIR
target-flags parsing.
llvm-svn: 246372
This is especially visible in softfp mode, for example in the implementation of libm fabs/fneg functions. If we have:
%1 = vmovdrr r0, r1
%2 = fabs %1
then move the fabs before the vmovdrr:
%1 = and r1, #0x7FFFFFFF
%2 = vmovdrr r0, r1
This is never a lose, and could be a serious win because the vmovdrr may be followed by a vmovrrd, which would enable us to remove the conversion into FPRs completely.
We already do this for f32, but not for f64. Tests are added for both.
llvm-svn: 246360
The VOP3 encoding of these allows any SGPR pair for the i1
output, but this was forced before to always use vcc.
This doesn't yet try to use this, but does add the operand
to the definitions so the main change is adding vcc to the
output of the VOP2 encoding.
llvm-svn: 246358
Without a memory operand, mayLoad or mayStore instructions
are treated as hasUnorderedMemRef, which results in much worse
scheduling.
We really should have a verifier check that any
non-side effecting mayLoad or mayStore has a memory operand.
There are a few instructions (interp and images) which I'm
not sure what / where to add these.
llvm-svn: 246356
Summary:
We were assuming tha if the use operand had a sub-register that
the immediate was 64-bits, but this was breaking the case of
folding a 64-bit immediate into another 64-bit instruction.
Reviewers: arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12255
llvm-svn: 246354
This has been causing the prologue_end to be incorrectly positioned.
Patch by Vladimir Radosavljevic.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11293
llvm-svn: 246309
For targets that didn't support this, this will let us respect the
langref instead of failing to select.
Note that we don't need to change the 32-bit x86/PPC lowerings (to
account for the result type/# difference) because they're both
custom and bypass type legalization.
llvm-svn: 246258
more than 2 instructions.
I introduced this regression a while back and did not noticed it because I
somehow forgot to push the initial test cases for the pass!
Fix that as well!
llvm-svn: 246239
We can now run 32-bit programs with empty catch bodies. The next step
is to change PEI so that we get funclet prologues and epilogues.
llvm-svn: 246235
Summary:
Let NVPTX backend detect integer min and max patterns during isel and emit intrinsics that enable hardware support.
Reviewers: jholewinski, meheff, jingyue
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits, meheff, jingyue, eliben, jholewinski
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12377
llvm-svn: 246107
Previously in isProfitableToIfCvt() in ARMBaseInstrInfo.cpp, the multiplication between an integer and a branch probability is done manually in an unsafe way that may lead to overflow. This patch corrects those cases by using BranchProbability's member function scale() to avoid overflow (which stores the intermediate result in int64).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12295
llvm-svn: 246106
Things of note:
- Other linkage types aren't handled yet. We'll figure it out with dynamic linking.
- Special LLVM globals are either ignored, or error out for now.
- TLS isn't supported yet (WebAssembly will have threads later).
- There currently isn't a syntax for alignment, I left it in a comment so it's easy to hook up.
- Undef is convereted to whatever the type's appropriate null value is.
- assert versus report_fatal_error: follow what other AsmPrinters do, and assert only on what should have been caught elsewhere.
llvm-svn: 246092
A corresponding clang change will make it so that clang can consume part
of an assembler token. The assembler treats '.' as an identifier
character while clang does not, so it's view of the token stream is a
little different.
llvm-svn: 246089
We removed access to the DataLayout on the TargetMachine and
deprecated the C API function LLVMGetTargetMachineData() in r243114.
However the way I tried to be backward compatible was broken: I
changed the wrapper of the TargetMachine to be a structure that
includes the DataLayout as well. However the TargetMachine is also
wrapped by the ExecutionEngine, in the more classic way. A client
using the TargetMachine wrapped by the ExecutionEngine and trying
to get the DataLayout would break.
It seems tricky to solve the problem completely in the C API
implementation. This patch tries to address this backward
compatibility in a more lighter way in the C++ API. The C API is
restored in its original state and the removed C++ API is
reintroduced, but privately. The C API is friended to the
TargetMachine and should be the only consumer for this API.
Reviewers: ributzka
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12263
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 246082
There is no context where s_mov_b64 is emitted
and could potentially be moved to the VALU.
It is currently only emitted for materializing
immediates, which can't be dependent on vector sources.
The immediate splitting is already done when selecting
constants. I'm not sure what contexts if any the register
splitting would have been used before.
Also clean up using s_mov_b64 in place of v_mov_b64_pseudo,
although this isn't required and just skips the extra step
of eliminating the copy from the SReg_64.
llvm-svn: 246080
When splitting 64-bit operations, create the correct
VALU instructions immediately.
This was splitting things like s_or_b64 into the two
s_or_b32s and then pushing the new instructions
onto the worklist. There's no reason we need
to do this intermediate step.
llvm-svn: 246077
This takes the existing static function hasLiveCondCodeDef and makes it a member function of the X86InstrInfo class. This is a useful utility function that an upcoming change would like to use. NFC.
Patch by: Kevin B. Smith
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12371
llvm-svn: 246073
We removed access to the DataLayout on the TargetMachine and
deprecated the C API function LLVMGetTargetMachineData() in r243114.
However the way I tried to be backward compatible was broken: I
changed the wrapper of the TargetMachine to be a structure that
includes the DataLayout as well. However the TargetMachine is also
wrapped by the ExecutionEngine, in the more classic way. A client
using the TargetMachine wrapped by the ExecutionEngine and trying
to get the DataLayout would break.
It seems tricky to solve the problem completely in the C API
implementation. This patch tries to address this backward
compatibility in a more lighter way in the C++ API. The C API is
restored in its original state and the removed C++ API is
reintroduced, but privately. The C API is friended to the
TargetMachine and should be the only consumer for this API.
Reviewers: ributzka
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12263
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 246052
We removed access to the DataLayout on the TargetMachine and
deprecated the C API function LLVMGetTargetMachineData() in r243114.
However the way I tried to be backward compatible was broken: I
changed the wrapper of the TargetMachine to be a structure that
includes the DataLayout as well. However the TargetMachine is also
wrapped by the ExecutionEngine, in the more classic way. A client
using the TargetMachine wrapped by the ExecutionEngine and trying
to get the DataLayout would break.
It seems tricky to solve the problem completely in the C API
implementation. This patch tries to address this backward
compatibility in a more lighter way in the C++ API. The C API is
restored in its original state and the removed C++ API is
reintroduced, but privately. The C API is friended to the
TargetMachine and should be the only consumer for this API.
Reviewers: ributzka
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12263
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 246044
If you're going to realign %sp to get object alignment properly (which
the code does), and stack offsets and alignments are calculated going
down from %fp (which they are), then the total stack size had better
be a multiple of the alignment. LLVM did indeed ensure that.
And then, after aligning, the sparc frame code added 96 (for sparcv8)
to the frame size, making any requested alignment of 64-bytes or
higher *guaranteed* to be misaligned. The test case added with r245668
even tests this exact scenario, and asserted the incorrect behavior,
which I somehow failed to notice. D'oh.
This change fixes the frame lowering code to align the stack size
*after* adding the spill area, instead.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12349
llvm-svn: 246042
This is a fix for disassembling unusual instruction sequences in 64-bit
mode w.r.t the CALL rel16 instruction. It might be desirable to move the
check somewhere else, but it essentially mimics the special case
handling with JCXZ in 16-bit mode.
The current behavior accepts the opcode size prefix and causes the
call's immediate to stop disassembling after 2 bytes. When debugging
sequences of instructions with this pattern, the disassembler output
becomes extremely unreliable and essentially useless (if you jump midway
into what lldb thinks is a unified instruction, you'll lose %rip). So we
ignore the prefix and consume all 4 bytes when disassembling a 64-bit
mode binary.
Note: in Vol. 2A 3-99 the Intel spec states that CALL rel16 is N.S. N.S.
is defined as:
Indicates an instruction syntax that requires an address override
prefix in 64-bit mode and is not supported. Using an address
override prefix in 64-bit mode may result in model-specific
execution behavior. (Vol. 2A 3-7)
Since 0x66 is an operand override prefix we should be OK (although we
may want to warn about 0x67 prefixes to 0xe8). On the CPUs I tested
with, they all ignore the 0x66 prefix in 64-bit mode.
Patch by Matthew Barney!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9573
llvm-svn: 246038
Summary:
This change lowers the aarch64 integer vector min/max intrinsic nodes to
generic min/max nodes and replaces the intrinsic selection patterns with
the generic ones.
There should already be testing in place for this, so no further tests
were added.
Reviewers: jmolloy
Subscribers: aemerson, llvm-commits, rengolin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12276
llvm-svn: 246030
This should be no functional change but for the record: For three cases
in X86FastISel this will change the order in which the FalseMBB and
TrueMBB of a conditional branch is addedd to the successor/predecessor
lists.
llvm-svn: 245997
Quentin Colombet