the base class. If the base class deduction succeeds, use those results. If
it fails, keep using the results from the derived class template deduction.
This prevents an assertion later where the type of deduction failure doesn't
match up with the template deduction info.
llvm-svn: 167550
instantiate it if it can be instantiated and implicitly define it if it can be
implicitly defined. This matches g++'s approach. Remove some cases from
SemaOverload which were marking functions as referenced when just planning how
overload resolution would proceed; such cases are not actually references.
llvm-svn: 167514
Spent longer than reasonable looking for a nice way to test this & decided to
give up for now. Open to suggestions/requests. Richard Smith suggested adding
something to ASTMatchers but it wasn't readily apparent how to test this with
that.
llvm-svn: 167507
The problem is as follows: C++11 has contexts which are not
potentially-evaluated, and yet in which we are required or encouraged to
perform constant evaluation. In such contexts, we are not permitted to
implicitly define special member functions for literal types, therefore
we cannot evalaute those constant expressions.
Punt on this in one more context for now by skipping checking constexpr
variable initializers if they occur in dependent contexts.
llvm-svn: 166956
Previously, the warning would erroneously fire on this:
for (Test *a in someArray)
use(a.weakProp);
...because it looks like the same property is being accessed over and over.
However, clearly this is not the case. We now ignore loops like this for
local variables, but continue to warn if the base object is a parameter,
global variable, or instance variable, on the assumption that these are
not repeatedly usually assigned to within loops.
Additionally, do-while loops where the condition is 'false' are not really
loops at all; usually they're just used for semicolon-swallowing macros or
using "break" like "goto".
<rdar://problem/12578785&12578849>
llvm-svn: 166942
whether the initializer is value-dependent rather than whether we are in a
dependent context. This allows us to detect some errors sooner, and fixes a
crash-on-invalid if a dependent type leaks out to a non-dependent context in
error recovery.
llvm-svn: 166898
might have been used in constant expressions, rather than suppressing it for
variables which are const. The important thing here is that such variables
can have their values used without actually being marked as 'used'.
llvm-svn: 166896
This code checks the ASM string to see if the output size is able to fit within
the variable specified as the output. For instance, scalar-to-vector conversions
may not really work. It's on by default, but can be turned off with a flag if
you think you know what you're doing.
This is placed under a flag ('-Wasm-operand-widths') and flag group ('-Wasm').
<rdar://problem/12284092>
llvm-svn: 166737
defined without a previous declaration. This is similar to
-Wmissing-prototypes, but for variables instead of functions.
Patch by Ed Schouten.
llvm-svn: 166498
libraries have an incorrect definition of std::common_type (inherited from a
bug in the standard -- see LWG issue 2141), whereby they produce reference
types when they should not.
If we instantiate a typedef named std::common_type<...>::type, which is defined
in a system header as decltype(... ? ... : ...), and the decltype produces a
reference type, convert it to the non-reference type. (This doesn't affect any
LWG2141-conforming implementation of common_type, such as libc++'s, because the
default implementation of common_type<...>::type isn't supposed to produce a
reference type.)
This is horrible. I'm really sorry. :( Better ideas appreciated!
llvm-svn: 166455
found: if an overloaded operator& is present before a template definition,
the expression &T::foo is represented as a CXXOperatorCallExpr, not as a
UnaryOperator, so we didn't notice that it's permitted to reference a non-static
data member of an unrelated class.
While investigating this, I discovered another problem in this area: we are
treating template default arguments as unevaluated contexts during substitution,
resulting in performing incorrect checks for uses of non-static data members in
C++11. That is not fixed by this patch (I'll look into this soon; it's related
to the failure to correctly instantiate constexpr function templates), but was
resulting in this bug not firing in C++11 mode (except with -Wc++98-compat).
Original message:
PR14124: When performing template instantiation of a qualified-id outside of a
class, diagnose if the qualified-id instantiates to a non-static class member.
llvm-svn: 166385
since it also has an implicit exception specification. Downgrade the error to
an extwarn, since at least for operator delete, system headers like to declare
it as 'noexcept' whereas the implicit definition does not have an explicit
exception specification. Move the exception specification for user-declared
'operator delete' functions from the type-as-written into the type, to reflect
reality and to allow us to detect whether there was an implicit exception spec
or not.
llvm-svn: 166372
initialized by a reference constant expression.
Our odr-use modeling still needs work here: we don't yet implement the 'set of
potential results of an expression' DR.
llvm-svn: 166361
Also, unify ObjCShouldCallSuperDealloc and ObjCShouldCallSuperFinalize.
The two have identical behavior and will never be active at the same time.
There's one last simplification now, which is that if we see a call to
[super foo] and we are currently in a method named 'foo', we will
/unconditionally/ clear the ObjCShouldCallSuper flag, rather than check
first to see if we're in a method where calling super is required. There's
no reason to pay the extra lookup price here.
llvm-svn: 166285
source locations in places where it is necessary for diagnostics. By itself,
this causes assertions, so while I'm here, also fix property synthesis
for properties of C++ class type so we use so we properly set up a scope
and mark variable declarations.
<rdar://problem/12514189>.
llvm-svn: 166219
Within the body of the loop the underlying map may be modified via
Sema::AddOverloadCandidate
-> Sema::CompareReferenceRelationship
-> Sema::RequireCompleteType
to avoid the use of invalid iterators the sequence is copied first.
A reliable, though large, test case is available - it will be reduced and
committed shortly.
Patch by Robert Muth. Review by myself, Nico Weber, and Rafael Espindola.
llvm-svn: 166188
GCC and Clang both do not warn on:
struct a { virtual void func(); };
struct b: a { virtual void func(); void func(int); };
struct c: b { void func(int); using b::func; };
but if the "using" was using a::func GCC would still remain silent where Clang
would warn. This change makes Clang consistent with GCC's existing behavior.
llvm-svn: 166154
Because PNaCl bitcode must be target-independent, it uses some
different bitcode representations from other targets (e.g. byval and
sret for structures). This means that without additional type
information, it cannot meet some native ABI requirements for some
targets (e.g. passing structures containing unions by value on
x86-64). To allow generation of code which uses the correct native
ABIs, we also support triples such as x86_64-nacl, which uses
target-dependent IR (as opposed to le32-nacl, which uses byval and
sret).
To allow interoperation between the two types of code, this patch adds
a calling convention attribute to be used in code compiled with the
target-dependent triple, which will generate code using the le32-style
bitcode. This calling convention does not need to be explicitly
supported in the backend because it determines bitcode representation
rather than native conventions (the backend just needs to undersand
how to handle byval and sret for the Native Client OS).
This patch implements __attribute__((pnaclcall)) to generate calls in
bitcode according to the le32 bitcode conventions, an attribute which
is accepted by any Native Client target, but issues a warning
otherwise.
llvm-svn: 166065
This implementation doesn't warn on anything that GCC doesn't warn on with the
exception of templates specializations (GCC doesn't warn, Clang does). The
specific skipped cases (boolean, constant expressions, enums) are open for
debate/adjustment if anyone wants to demonstrate that GCC is being overly
conservative here. The only really obvious false positive I found was in the
Clang regression suite's MPI test - apparently MPI uses specific flag values in
pointer constants. (eg: #define FOO (void*)~0)
llvm-svn: 166039
-The front-end now builds a single assembly string and feeds it to the
AsmParser. The front-end iterates on a per statement basis by calling the
ParseStatement() function. Please note, the calling of ParseStatement() and
and any notion of MCAsmParsedOperands will be sunk into the MC layer in the
near future. I plan to expose more basic APIs such as getClobbers, etc.
-The enumeration of the AsmString expressions have been reworked to use SMLocs
rather than assembly Pieces, which were being parsed in the front-end.
-The test case, t8(), was modified due to r129223. I'll have to find a way to
work around things such as these.
Sorry for the large commit, but breaking this in multiple smaller commits proved
too irritating.
llvm-svn: 165957
When suggesting "foo::bar" as a correction for "fob::bar" we mistakenly
replaced only "bar" with "foo::bar" producing "fob::foo::bar" which was broken.
This corrects that replacement in as many places as I could find & provides
test cases for all those cases I could find a test case for. There are a couple
that don't seem to be reachable (one looks entirely dead, the other just
doesn't seem to ever get called with a namespace to namespace change).
Review by Richard Smith ( http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D57 ).
llvm-svn: 165817
This only applies if the type has a name. (we could potentially do something
crazy with decltype in C++11 to qualify members of unnamed types but that
seems excessive)
It might be nice to also suggest a fixit for "&this->i", "&foo->i",
and "&foo.i" but those expressions produce 'bound' member functions that have
a different AST representation & make error recovery a little trickier. Left
as future work.
llvm-svn: 165763
now unused static helper function.
The test case needs to be remove temporarily until I can better filter memory
operands that aren't actual variable reference.
llvm-svn: 165751
This is a "safe" pattern, or at least one that cannot be helped by using
a strong local variable. However, if the single read is within a loop,
it should /always/ be treated as potentially dangerous.
<rdar://problem/12437490>
llvm-svn: 165719
Previously, [foo weakProp] was not being treated the same as foo.weakProp.
Now, for every explicit message send, we check if it's a property access,
and if so, if the property is weak. Then for every assignment of a
message, we have to do the same thing again.
This is a potentially expensive increase because determining whether a
method is a property accessor requires searching through the methods it
overrides. However, without it -Warc-repeated-use-of-weak will miss cases
from people who prefer not to use dot syntax. If this turns out to be
too expensive, we can try caching the result somewhere, or even lose
precision by not checking superclass methods. The warning is off-by-default,
though.
<rdar://problem/12407765>
llvm-svn: 165718
Then, switch users of PropertyIfSetterOrGetter and LookupPropertyDecl
(the latter by name) over to findPropertyDecl. This actually makes
-Wreceiver-is-weak a bit stronger than it was before.
llvm-svn: 165628
Old algorithm:
1. See if the name looks like a getter or setter.
2. Use the name to look up a property in the current ObjCContainer
and all its protocols.
3. If the current container is an interface, also look in all categories
and superclasses (and superclass categories, and so on).
New algorithm:
1. See if the method is marked as a property accessor. If so, look through
all properties in the current container and find one that has a matching
selector.
2. Find all overrides of the method using ObjCMethodDecl's
getOverriddenMethods. This collects methods in superclasses and protocols
(as well as superclass categories, which isn't really necessary), and
checks if THEY are accessors. This part is not done recursively, since
getOverriddenMethods is already recursive.
This lets us handle getters and setters that do not match the property
names.
llvm-svn: 165627
This more accurately reflects its use: this flag is set when a method
matches the getter or setter name for a property in the same class,
and does not actually specify whether or not the definition of the method
will be synthesized (either implicitly or explicitly with @synthesize).
This renames the setter and backing field as well, and changes the
(soon-to-be-obsolete?) XML dump format to use 'property_accessor'
instead of 'synthesized'.
llvm-svn: 165626
write out the macro history for that macro. Similarly, we need to cope
with reading a macro definition that has been #undef'd.
Take advantage of this new ability so that global code-completion
results can refer to #undef'd macros, rather than losing them
entirely. For multiply defined/#undef'd macros, we will still get the
wrong result, but it's better than getting no result.
llvm-svn: 165502
This appears to be consistent with GCC's implementation of the same warning
under -Wparentheses. Suppressing a << b + c for cases where 'a' is a user
defined type for compatibility with C++ stream IO. Otherwise suggest
parentheses around the addition or subtraction subexpression.
(this came up when MSVC was complaining (incorrectly, so far as I can tell)
about a perceived violation of this within the LLVM codebase, PR14001)
llvm-svn: 165283
a non-inline namespace, then reopens it as inline to try to add its symbols to
the surrounding namespace. In this one special case, permit the namespace to be
reopened as inline, and patch up the name lookup tables to match.
llvm-svn: 165263
For GNU attributes, instead of reusing attribute source
location for the scope location, use SourceLocation() since
GNU attributes don not have scope tokens.
llvm-svn: 165234
- General C++11 attributes were previously parsed and ignored. Now they are parsed and stored in AST.
- Add support to parse arguments of attributes that in 'gnu' namespace.
- Differentiate unknown attributes and known attributes that can't be applied to statements when emitting diagnostic.
llvm-svn: 165082
Clang will now honor the FP_CONTRACT pragma and emit LLVM
fmuladd intrinsics for expressions of the form A * B + C (when they occur in a
single statement).
llvm-svn: 164989
Also applies to -Wnonnull, -Wtype-safety, and -Wnon-pod-varargs.
All of these can be better checked at instantiation time.
This change does not actually affect regular CallExpr function calls,
since the checks there only happen after overload resolution.
However, it will affect Objective-C method calls.
<rdar://problem/12373934>
llvm-svn: 164984
-Allow Sema to do more processing on the initial Expr before checking it.
-Remove the special conditions in HandleExpr()
-Move the code so that only one call site is needed.
-Removed the function from Sema and only call it locally.
-Warn on potentially evaluated reference variables, not just casts to r-values.
-Update tests.
llvm-svn: 164951
Summary:
When issuing a diagnostic message for the -Wimplicit-fallthrough diagnostics, always try to find the latest macro, defined at the point of fallthrough, which is immediately expanded to "[[clang::fallthrough]]", and use it's name instead of the actual sequence.
Known issues:
* uses PP.getSpelling() to compare macro definition with a string (anyone can suggest a convenient way to fill a token array, or maybe lex it in runtime?);
* this can be generalized and used in other similar cases, any ideas where it should reside then?
Reviewers: doug.gregor, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D50
llvm-svn: 164858
New output:
warning: weak property may be unpredictably set to nil
note: property declared here
note: assign the value to a strong variable to keep the object alive
during use
<rdar://problem/12277204>
llvm-svn: 164857
The infrastructure for -Warc-repeated-use-of-weak got a little too heavy
to leave sitting at the top of Sema.cpp.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 164856
Like properties, loading from a weak ivar twice in the same function can
give you inconsistent results if the object is deallocated between the
two loads. It is safer to assign to a strong local variable and use that.
Second half of <rdar://problem/12280249>.
llvm-svn: 164855
The motivating example:
if (self.weakProp)
use(self.weakProp);
As with any non-atomic test-then-use, it is possible a weak property to be
non-nil at the 'if', but be deallocated by the time it is used. The correct
way to write this example is as follows:
id tmp = self.weakProp;
if (tmp)
use(tmp);
The warning is controlled by -Warc-repeated-use-of-receiver, and uses the
property name and base to determine if the same property on the same object
is being accessed multiple times. In cases where the base is more
complicated than just a single Decl (e.g. 'foo.bar.weakProp'), it picks a
Decl for some degree of uniquing and reports the problem under a subflag,
-Warc-maybe-repeated-use-of-receiver. This gives a way to tune the
aggressiveness of the warning for a particular project.
The warning is not on by default because it is not flow-sensitive and thus
may have a higher-than-acceptable rate of false positives, though it is
less noisy than -Wreceiver-is-weak. On the other hand, it will not warn
about some cases that may be legitimate issues that -Wreceiver-is-weak
will catch, and it does not attempt to reason about methods returning weak
values.
Even though this is not a real "analysis-based" check I've put the bug
emission code in AnalysisBasedWarnings for two reasons: (1) to run on
every kind of code body (function, method, block, or lambda), and (2) to
suggest that it may be enhanced by flow-sensitive analysis in the future.
The second (smaller) half of this work is to extend it to weak locals
and weak ivars. This should use most of the same infrastructure.
Part of <rdar://problem/12280249>
llvm-svn: 164854
This checker is annotation driven. It checks that the annotated
invalidation method accesses all ivars of the enclosing objects that are
objects of type, which in turn contains an invalidation method.
This is driven by
__attribute((annotation("objc_instance_variable_invalidator")).
llvm-svn: 164716
where an attribute is attached to a forward declaration of a template function,
and refers to parameters of that declaration, but is then inherited by the
definition of that function. When the definition is instantiated, the
parameter references need to be remapped.
llvm-svn: 164710
typeid (and a couple other non-standard places where we can transform an
unevaluated expression into an evaluated expression) is special
because it introduces an an expression evaluation context,
which conflicts with the mechanism to compute the current
lambda mangling context. PR12123.
I would appreciate if someone would double-check that we get the mangling
correct with this patch.
llvm-svn: 164658
enough information so we can mangle them correctly in cases involving
dependent parameter types. (This specifically impacts cases involving
null pointers and cases involving parameters of reference type.)
Fix the mangler to use this information instead of trying to scavenge
it out of the parameter declaration.
<rdar://problem/12296776>.
llvm-svn: 164656
If an MS-style inline asm is matched to multiple instructions, e.g., with a
a WAIT-prefix, then we need to examine the operands of the last instruction
instruction, not the prefix instruction.
llvm-svn: 164608
into the enclosing scope; this is a more accurate model but is
(I believe) unnecessary in my test case due to other flaws.
However, one of those flaws is now intentional: blocks which
appear in return statements can be trivially observed to not
extend in lifetime past the return, and so we can allow a jump
past them. Do the necessary magic in IR-generation to make
this work.
llvm-svn: 164589
function being instantiated. An error recovery codepath was recursively
performing name lookup (and triggering an unbounded stack of template
instantiations which blew out the stack before hitting the depth limit).
Patch by Wei Pan!
llvm-svn: 164586
This makes the wording more informative, and consistent with the other
warnings about uninitialized variables.
Also, me and David who reviewed this couldn't figure out why we would
need to do a lookup to get the name of the variable; so just print the
name directly.
llvm-svn: 164366
but can be dereferenced to form an expression which does have viable begin/end
functions, then typo-correct the range, even if something else goes wrong with
the statement (such as inaccessible begin/end or the wrong type of loop
variable).
In order to ensure we recover correctly and produce any followup diagnostics in
this case, redo semantic analysis on the for-range statement outside of the
diagnostic trap, after issuing the typo-correction.
llvm-svn: 164323
This is some really old code (took me a while to find the test cases) & the
diagnostic text is slightly incorrect (it should really only apply to
re/declarations/, redefinitions are an error regardless of whether the types
match). Not sure if anyone cares about it, though.
For now this just makes the diagnostic more clear in less obvious cases where
the type of a declaration might not be explicitly written (eg: because it
uses decltype)
llvm-svn: 164313
definition info; it needs to be there because the mangler needs to
access it before we're finished defining the lambda class.
PR12808.
llvm-svn: 164186
This makes Clang warn about self references in in-class initializers,
for example:
struct S {
int a = a + 42;
};
This basically just moves UninitializedFieldVisitor up a bit in
SemaDeclCXX.cpp, and adds a call to it from ActOnCXXInClassMemberInitializer.
llvm-svn: 164131
is no compelling argument that this is a generally useful warning,
and imposes a strong stylistic argument on code beyond what it was
intended to find warnings in.
llvm-svn: 164083
Retain cycles happen in the case where a block is persisted past its
life on the stack, and the way that occurs is by copying the block.
We should thus look through any explicit copies we see.
Note that Block_copy is actually a type-safe wrapper for _Block_copy,
which does all the real work.
<rdar://problem/12219663>
llvm-svn: 164039
Specifically, this should warn:
__block block_t a = ^{ a(); };
Furthermore, this case which previously warned now does not, since the value
of 'b' is captured before the assignment occurs:
block_t b; // not __block
b = ^{ b(); };
(This will of course warn under -Wuninitialized, as before.)
<rdar://problem/11015883>
llvm-svn: 163962
type checking for non-static data member initializers in a dependent
class, because our ASTs lose too much information to when
type-checking an initializer. Fixes <rdar://problem/11974632>,
although the result is still rather unsatisfactory.
llvm-svn: 163871
TypeSourceInfo, we may have lost some adjustments made to the type of
that function due to declaration merging. Adjust the resulting type
correspondingly. Fixes PR12948 / <rdar://problem/11552434>.
llvm-svn: 163845
Abramo Bagnara