The new behavior matches GNU objdump. A pair of angle brackets makes tests slightly easier.
`.foo:` is not unique and thus cannot be used in a `CHECK-LABEL:` directive.
Without `-LABEL`, the CHECK line can match the `Disassembly of section`
line and causes the next `CHECK-NEXT:` to fail.
```
Disassembly of section .foo:
0000000000001634 .foo:
```
Bdragon: <> has metalinguistic connotation. it just "feels right"
Reviewed By: rupprecht
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75713
Ported the D64906 technique to AArch64. It deletes 3 alignments at
PT_LOAD boundaries for the default case: the size of an aarch64 binary
decreases by at most 192kb.
If `sh_addralign(.tdata) < sh_addralign(.tbss)`,
we can potentially make `p_vaddr(PT_TLS)%p_align(PT_TLS) != 0`.
ld.so that are known to have problems if p_vaddr%p_align!=0:
* musl<=1.1.22
* FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT (and before) rtld-elf arm64
New test aarch64-tls-vaddr-align.s checks that our workaround makes p_vaddr%p_align = 0.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64930
llvm-svn: 369344
This reverts D53906.
D53906 increased p_align of PT_TLS on ARM/AArch64 to 32/64 to make the
static TLS layout compatible with Android Bionic's ELF TLS. However,
this may cause glibc ARM/AArch64 programs to crash (see PR41527).
The faulty PT_TLS in the executable satisfies p_vaddr%p_align != 0. The
remainder is normally 0 but may be non-zero with the hack in place. The
problem is that we increase PT_TLS's p_align after OutputSections'
addresses are fixed (assignAddress()). It is possible that
p_vaddr%old_p_align = 0 while p_vaddr%new_p_align != 0.
For a thread local variable defined in the executable, lld computed TLS
offset (local exec) is different from glibc computed TLS offset from
another module (initial exec/generic dynamic). Note: PR41527 said the
bug affects initial exec but actually generic dynamic is affected as
well.
(glibc is correct in that it compute offsets that satisfy
`offset%p_align == p_vaddr%p_align`, which is a basic ELF requirement.
This hack appears to work on FreeBSD rtld, musl<=1.1.22, and Bionic, but
that is just because they (and lld) incorrectly compute offsets that
satisfy `offset%p_align = 0` instead.)
Android developers are fine to revert this patch, carry this patch in
their tree before figuring out a long-term solution (e.g. a dummy .tdata
with sh_addralign=64 sh_size={0,1} in crtbegin*.o files. The overhead is
now insignificant after D62059).
Reviewed By: rprichard, srhines
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62055
llvm-svn: 361090
ARM and AArch64 use TLS variant 1, where the first two words after the
thread pointer are reserved for the TCB, followed by the executable's TLS
segment. Both the thread pointer and the TLS segment are aligned to at
least the TLS segment's alignment.
Android/Bionic historically has not supported ELF TLS, and it has
allocated memory after the thread pointer for several Bionic TLS slots
(currently 9 but soon only 8). At least one of these allocations
(TLS_SLOT_STACK_GUARD == 5) is widespread throughout Android/AArch64
binaries and can't be changed.
To reconcile this disagreement about TLS memory layout, set the minimum
alignment for executable TLS segments to 8 words on ARM/AArch64, which
reserves at least 8 words of memory after the TP (2 for the ABI-specified
TCB and 6 for alignment padding). For simplicity, and because lld doesn't
know when it's targeting Android, increase the alignment regardless of
operating system.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53906
llvm-svn: 350681
The changes to the instructions performed by TLS relaxation and the errata
patching are performed with relocations. As these are applied so late the
errata scanning won't see the changes in the section data made by the TLS
relaxation. This can lead to a TLS relaxed sequence being patched when it
doesn't need to be.
The fix checks to see if there is a R_RELAX_TLS_IE_TO_LE instruction at the
same address as the ADRP as this indicates the presence of a relaxation
of a sequence that might get recognised as a patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54854
llvm-svn: 347649
Fangrui Song