The Caller cost info would be reset everytime a callee was inlined. If the
caller has lots of calls and there is some mutual recursion going on, the
caller cost info could be calculated many times.
This patch reduces inliner runtime from 240s to 0.5s for a function with 20000
small function calls.
This is a more conservative version of r98089 that doesn't break the clang
test CodeGenCXX/temp-order.cpp. That test relies on rather extreme inlining
for constant folding.
llvm-svn: 98099
The Caller cost info would be reset everytime a callee was inlined. If the
caller has lots of calls and there is some mutual recursion going on, the
caller cost info could be calculated many times.
This patch reduces inliner runtime from 240s to 0.5s for a function with 20000
small function calls.
llvm-svn: 98089
After running a batch of measurements, it is clear that the inliner metrics
need some adjustments:
Own argument bonus: 20 -> 5
Outgoing argument penalty: 0 -> 5
Alloca bonus: 10 -> 5
Constant instr bonus: 7 -> 5
Dead successor bonus: 40 -> 5*(avg instrs/block)
The new cost metrics are generaly 25 points higher than before, so we may need
to move thresholds.
With this change, InlineConstants::CallPenalty becomes a political correction:
if (!isa<IntrinsicInst>(II) && !callIsSmall(CS.getCalledFunction()))
NumInsts += InlineConstants::CallPenalty + CS.arg_size();
The code size is accurately modelled by CS.arg_size(). CallPenalty is added
because calls tend to take a long time, so it may not be worth it to inline a
function with lots of calls.
All of the political corrections are in the InlineConstants namespace:
IndirectCallBonus, CallPenalty, LastCallToStaticBonus, ColdccPenalty,
NoreturnPenalty.
llvm-svn: 94615
A GEP with all constant indices is already considered free by
analyzeBasicBlock(), so don't give it an extra bonus in
CountCodeReductionForAlloca().
This patch should remove a small positive bias toward inlining functions with
variable-index GEPs, and remove a smaller negative bias from functions with
all-constant index GEPs.
llvm-svn: 94591
Functions containing indirectbr are marked NeverInline by analyzeBasicBlock(),
so there is no point in giving indirectbr special treatment in
CountCodeReductionForConstant. It is never called.
No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 94590
Gabor Greif