Summary:
expect() forwards its command to sendline(). This can be problematic if the command already contains a newline: sendline() unconditionally adds a newline to the command, which causes the command to run twice (hitting enter in lldb runs the previous command). The expect() helper looks for the prompt and finds the first one, but because the command has run a second time, the buffer will contain the contents of the second time the command ran, causing potential erroneous matching.
Simplify the editline test, which was using different commands to workaround this misunderstanding.
Reviewers: labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70324
Summary:
This adds several 5C/5D escape codes that allow moving forward/backward words similar to bash command line navigation.
On my terminal, `ctrl+v ctrl+<left arrow>` prints `^[[1;5D`. However, it seems inputrc also maps other escape variants of this to forward/backward word, so I've included those too. Similar for 5C = ctrl+right arrow.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, labath
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere, labath
Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70137
Summary:
In r367234 we introduced a central place to hold the set up commands for
the various ways we have of launching lldb. However, a number of
commands still remained outside of that.
This patch moves the remaining set up commands into this function, which
allows us to remove manual clang module path setting code in
TestBatchMode.
One unfortunate victim of this approach is TestSTTYBeforeAndAfter which,
due to how it launches lldb (pexpect->expect->lldb), fails get the
quoting right. It would be possible to fix the quoting there, it would be a bit
icky, and none of the commands in this list are really relevant for what this
test is doing, so I just remove the commands outright.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jankratochvil
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67173
llvm-svn: 371019
Summary:
The changes here fall into several categories.
- some tests were redirecting inferior stdout/err to a file. For these I
make sure we use an absolute path for the file. I also create a
lldbutil.read_file_on_target helper function to encapsulate the
differences between reading a file locally and remotely.
- some tests were redirecting the pexpect I/O into a file. For these I
use a python StringIO object to avoid creating a file altogether.
- the TestSettings inferior was creating a file. Here, I make sure the
inferior is launched with pwd=build-dir so that the files end up
created there.
- lldb-mi --log (used by some tests) creates a log file in PWD without
the ability say differently. To make this work I make sure to run
lldb-mi with PWD=build_dir. This in turn necessitated a couple of
changes in other lldb-mi tests, which were using relative paths to
access the source tree.
Reviewers: aprantl
Subscribers: ki.stfu, mehdi_amini, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44159
llvm-svn: 327625
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
This module was originally intended to be imported by top-level
scripts to be able to find the LLDB packages and third party
libraries. Packages themselves shouldn't need to import it,
because by the time it gets into the package, the top-level
script should have already done this. Indeed, it was just
adding the same values to sys.path multiple times, so this
patch is essentially no functional change.
To make sure it doesn't get re-introduced, we also delete the
`use_lldb_suite` module from `lldbsuite/test`, although the
original copy still remains in `lldb/test`
llvm-svn: 251963
For convenience, we had added the folder that dotest.py was in
to sys.path, so that we could easily write things like
`import lldbutil` from anywhere and any test. This introduces
a subtle problem when using Python's package system, because when
unittest2 imports a particular test suite, the test suite is detached
from the package. Thus, writing "import lldbutil" from dotest imports
it as part of the package, and writing the same line from a test
does a fresh import since the importing module was not part of
the same package.
The real way to fix this is to use absolute imports everywhere. Instead
of writing "import lldbutil", we need to write "import
lldbsuite.test.util". This patch fixes up that and all other similar
cases, and additionally removes the script directory from sys.path
to ensure that this can't happen again.
llvm-svn: 251886
This is the conclusion of an effort to get LLDB's Python code
structured into a bona-fide Python package. This has a number
of benefits, but most notably the ability to more easily share
Python code between different but related pieces of LLDB's Python
infrastructure (for example, `scripts` can now share code with
`test`).
llvm-svn: 251532
Jonas Devlieghere