If a loop is not rotated (for example when optimizing for size), the latch is not the backedge. If we promote an expression to post-inc form, we not only increase register pressure and add a COPY for that IV expression but for all IVs!
Motivating testcase:
void f(float *a, float *b, float *c, int n) {
while (n-- > 0)
*c++ = *a++ + *b++;
}
It's imperative that the pointer increments be located in the latch block and not the header block; if not, we cannot use post-increment loads and stores and we have to keep both the post-inc and pre-inc values around until the end of the latch which bloats register usage.
llvm-svn: 278658
LowerTargetConstantPool is not properly setting the TargetFlag to indicate
desired relocation. Coding error, the offset parameter was omitted, so the
TargetFlag was used as the offset, and the TargetFlag defaulted to zero.
This only affects -fpic compilation, and only those items created in a
Constant Pool, for example a vector of constants. Halide ran into this issue.
llvm-svn: 278614
From the point of view of register assignment, byval parameters are
ignored: a byval parameter is not going to be assigned to a register,
and it will not affect the assignments of subsequent parameters.
When matching registers with parameters in the bit tracker, make sure
to skip byval parameters before advancing the registers.
llvm-svn: 278375
This change makes it possible for tail-duplication and tail-merging to
be disjoint. By being less aggressive when merging during layout, there are no
overlapping cases between tail-duplication and tail-merging, provided the
thresholds are disjoint.
There is a remaining TODO to benchmark the succ_size() test for non-layout tail
merging.
llvm-svn: 278265
Floating point instructions use general purpose registers, so the few
instructions that can put floating point immediates into registers are,
in fact, integer instruction. Use them explicitly instead of having
pseudo-instructions specifically for dealing with floating point values.
Simplify the constant loading instructions (from sdata) to have only two:
one for 32-bit values and one for 64-bit values: CONST32 and CONST64.
llvm-svn: 278244
When the same base address is used to load two different data types, LSR
would assume a memory type of "void". This type is not sized and has no
alignment information. Checking for it causes a crash.
llvm-svn: 277601
Identify patterns where the address is aligned to an 8-byte boundary,
but both the base address and the constant offset are both proper
multiples of 4. In such cases, extract Base+4 into a separate instruc-
tion, and use S2_storerd_io, instead of using S4_storerd_rr.
llvm-svn: 277497
Scavenging slots were only reserved when pseudo-instruction expansion in
frame lowering created new virtual registers. It is possible to still
need a scavenging slot even if no virtual registers were created, in cases
where the stack is large enough to overflow instruction offsets.
llvm-svn: 277355
The DAG combiner will try to merge consecutive stores into a bigger
store, unless the resulting store is not fast. Misaligned vector stores
are allowed on Hexagon, but are not fast. Add a testcase to make sure
this type of merging does not occur.
Patch by Pranav Bhandarkar.
llvm-svn: 277182
The DAG combiner tries to merge stores to adjacent vector wide memory
locations by creating stores which are integral multiples of the vector
width. Discourage this by informing it that this is slow. This should
not affect legalization passes, because all of them ignore the "Fast"
argument.
Patch by Pranav Bhandarkar.
llvm-svn: 277178
Software pipelining is an optimization for improving ILP by
overlapping loop iterations. Swing Modulo Scheduling (SMS) is
an implementation of software pipelining that attempts to
reduce register pressure and generate efficient pipelines with
a low compile-time cost.
This implementaion of SMS is a target-independent back-end pass.
When enabled, the pass should run just prior to the register
allocation pass, while the machine IR is in SSA form. If the pass
is successful, then the original loop is replaced by the optimized
loop. The optimized loop contains one or more prolog blocks, the
pipelined kernel, and one or more epilog blocks.
This pass is enabled for Hexagon only. To enable for other targets,
a couple of target specific hooks must be implemented, and the
pass needs to be called from the target's TargetMachine
implementation.
Differential Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16829
llvm-svn: 277169
If the mask of a vector shuffle has alternating odd or even numbers
starting with 1 or 0 respectively up to the largest possible index
for the given type in the given HVX mode (single of double) we can
generate vpacko or vpacke instruction respectively.
E.g.
%42 = shufflevector <32 x i16> %37, <32 x i16> %41,
<32 x i32> <i32 1, i32 3, ..., i32 63>
is %42.h = vpacko(%41.w, %37.w)
Patch by Pranav Bhandarkar.
llvm-svn: 277168
Rebalances address calculation trees and applies Hexagon-specific
optimizations to the trees to improve instruction selection.
Patch by Tobias Edler von Koch.
llvm-svn: 277151
Normally, CFI instructions should be inserted after allocframe, but
if allocframe is in the same packet with a call, the CFI instructions
should be inserted before that packet.
llvm-svn: 277020
Before adding a new preheader block, check if there is a candidate block
where the loop setup could be placed speculatively. This will be off by
default.
llvm-svn: 276919
Consider this case:
vreg1 = A2_zxth vreg0 (1)
...
vreg2 = A2_zxth vreg1 (2)
Redundant instruction elimination could delete the instruction (1)
because the user (2) only cares about the low 16 bits. Then it could
delete (2) because the input is already zero-extended. The problem
is that the properties allowing each individual instruction to be
deleted depend on the existence of the other instruction, so either
one can be deleted, but not both.
The existing check for this situation in RIE was insufficient. The
fix is to update all dependent cells when an instruction is removed
(replaced via COPY) in RIE.
llvm-svn: 276792
Schedule a load and its use in the same packet in MISched. Previously,
isResourceAvailable was returning false for dependences in the same
packet, which prevented MISched from packetizing a load and its use in
the same packet for v60.
Patch by Ikhlas Ajbar.
llvm-svn: 275804
The machine scheduler needs to account for available resources
more accurately in order to avoid scheduling an instruction that
forces a new packet to be created.
This occurs in two ways: First, an instruction without an available
resource may have a large priority due to other metrics and be
scheduled when there are other instructions with available resources.
Second, an instruction with a non-zero latency may become available
prematurely. In both these cases, we attempt change the priority
in order to allow a better instruction to be scheduled.
Patch by Brendon Cahoon.
llvm-svn: 275793
An instruction may have multiple predecessors that are candidates
for using .cur. However, only one of them can use .cur in the
packet. When this case occurs, we need to make sure that only
one of the dependences gets a 0 latency value.
Patch by Brendon Cahoon.
llvm-svn: 275790
- Treat bitwise OR with a frame index as an ADD wherever possible, fold it
into addressing mode.
- Extend patterns for memops to allow memops with frame indexes as address
operands.
llvm-svn: 275569
On Hexagon is it legal to packetize the instructions setting up call
arguments with the call instruction itself. This was already done,
except for tail calls. Make sure tail calls are handled as well.
llvm-svn: 275458
Transform: (store ch addr (add x (add (shl y c) e)))
to: (store ch addr (add x (shl (add y d) c))),
where e = (shl d c) for some integer d.
The purpose of this is to enable generation of loads/stores with
shifted addressing mode, i.e. mem(x+y<<#c). For that, the shift
value c must be 0, 1 or 2.
llvm-svn: 273466
The aggressive anti-dependency breaker can rename the restored callee-
saved registers. To prevent this, mark these registers are live on all
paths to the return/tail-call instructions, and add implicit use operands
for them to these instructions.
llvm-svn: 270898
When looking for an available spill slot, the register scavenger would stop
after finding the first one with no register assigned to it. That slot may
have size and alignment that do not meet the requirements of the register
that is to be spilled. Instead, find an available slot that is the closest
in size and alignment to one that is needed to spill a register from RC.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20295
llvm-svn: 269969
Recent changes to the instruction selection code exposed a problem where
a dead node was not removed on time. This node had both input and output
chains, which lead to an apparent cycle.
llvm-svn: 269458
When generating .cfi_offset instructions, make sure that the offset is
calculated with respect to the register used to define the CFA (which is
currently always FP+8).
llvm-svn: 269191
An example from Hexagon where things went wrong:
%R0<def> = L2_loadrigp <ga:@fp04> ; load function address
J2_callr %R0<kill>, ..., %R0<imp-def> ; call *R0, return value in R0
ScheduleDAGInstrs::buildSchedGraph would visit all instructions going
backwards, and in each instruction it would visit all operands in their
order on the operand list. In the case of this call, it visited the use
of R0 first, then removed it from the set Uses after it visited the def.
This caused the DAG to be missing the data dependence edge on R0 between
the load and the call.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20102
llvm-svn: 269076
ScheduleDAGMI::initQueues changes the RegionBegin to the first non-debug
instruction. Since it does not track register pressure, it does not affect
any RP trackers. ScheduleDAGMILive inherits initQueues from ScheduleDAGMI,
and it does reset the TopTPTracker in its schedule method. Any derived,
target-specific scheduler will need to do it as well, but the TopRPTracker
is only exposed as a "const" object to derived classes. Without the ability
to modify the tracker directly, this leaves a derived scheduler with a
potential of having the TopRPTracker out-of-sync with the CurrentTop.
The symptom of the problem:
void llvm::ScheduleDAGMILive::scheduleMI(llvm::SUnit *, bool):
Assertion `TopRPTracker.getPos() == CurrentTop && "out of sync"' failed.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19438
llvm-svn: 267918
When a block is tail-duplicated, the PHI nodes from that block are
replaced with appropriate COPY instructions. When those PHI nodes
contained use operands with subregisters, the subregisters were
dropped from the COPY instructions, resulting in incorrect code.
Keep track of the subregister information and use this information
when remapping instructions from the duplicated block.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19337
llvm-svn: 267583
Currently each Function points to a DISubprogram and DISubprogram has a
scope field. For member functions the scope is a DICompositeType. DIScopes
point to the DICompileUnit to facilitate type uniquing.
Distinct DISubprograms (with isDefinition: true) are not part of the type
hierarchy and cannot be uniqued. This change removes the subprograms
list from DICompileUnit and instead adds a pointer to the owning compile
unit to distinct DISubprograms. This would make it easy for ThinLTO to
strip unneeded DISubprograms and their transitively referenced debug info.
Motivation
----------
Materializing DISubprograms is currently the most expensive operation when
doing a ThinLTO build of clang.
We want the DISubprogram to be stored in a separate Bitcode block (or the
same block as the function body) so we can avoid having to expensively
deserialize all DISubprograms together with the global metadata. If a
function has been inlined into another subprogram we need to store a
reference the block containing the inlined subprogram.
Attached to https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27284 is a python script
that updates LLVM IR testcases to the new format.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19034
<rdar://problem/25256815>
llvm-svn: 266446
In PIC mode, the registers R14, R15 and R28 are reserved for use by
the PLT handling code. This causes all functions to clobber these
registers. While this is not new for regular function calls, it does
also apply to save/restore functions, which do not follow the standard
ABI conventions with respect to the volatile/non-volatile registers.
Patch by Jyotsna Verma.
llvm-svn: 264324
Replace spills to memory with spills to registers, if possible. This
applies mostly to predicate registers (both scalar and vector), since
they are very limited in number. A spill of a predicate register may
happen even if there is a general-purpose register available. In cases
like this the stack spill/reload may be eliminated completely.
This optimization will consider all stack objects, regardless of where
they came from and try to match the live range of the stack slot with
a dead range of a register from an appropriate register class.
llvm-svn: 260758
Rewrite the code to handle all pseudo-instructions in a single pass.
This temporarily reverts spill slot optimization that used general-
purpose registers to hold values of spilled predicate registers.
llvm-svn: 260696
We can generate the actual instructions from the intrinsics without the
need for pseudo-instructions. Also, since the intrinsics have a side-
effect in a form of a store, attempt to optimize away loads from the
store location.
llvm-svn: 260690
The DataLayout can calculate alignment of vectors based on the alignment
of the element type and the number of elements. In fact, it is the product
of these two values. The problem is that for vectors of N x i1, this will
return the alignment of N bytes, since the alignment of i1 is 8 bits. The
vector types of vNi1 should be aligned to N bits instead. Provide explicit
alignment for HVX vectors to avoid such complications.
llvm-svn: 260678
Fix the lit bug that enabled this "feature" (empty triple is substring
of all possible target triples) and change the two outliers to use the
documented * syntax.
llvm-svn: 259799
If converter was somewhat careless about "diamond" cases, where there
was no join block, or in other words, where the true/false blocks did
not have analyzable branches. In such cases, it was possible for it to
remove (needed) branches, resulting in a loss of entire basic blocks.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16156
llvm-svn: 258310
This removes an unpleasant hack involving a global variable for special
lowering of certain memcpy calls. These are now lowered as intended in
EmitTargetCodeForMemcpy in the same way that other targets do it.
llvm-svn: 255785
(This is the second attempt to submit this patch. The first caused two assertion
failures and was reverted. See https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25687)
The patch in http://reviews.llvm.org/D13745 is broken into four parts:
1. New interfaces without functional changes (http://reviews.llvm.org/D13908).
2. Use new interfaces in SelectionDAG, while in other passes treat probabilities
as weights (http://reviews.llvm.org/D14361).
3. Use new interfaces in all other passes.
4. Remove old interfaces.
This patch is 3+4 above. In this patch, MBB won't provide weight-based
interfaces any more, which are totally replaced by probability-based ones.
The interface addSuccessor() is redesigned so that the default probability is
unknown. We allow unknown probabilities but don't allow using it together
with known probabilities in successor list. That is to say, we either have a
list of successors with all known probabilities, or all unknown
probabilities. In the latter case, we assume each successor has 1/N
probability where N is the number of successors. An assertion checks if the
user is attempting to add a successor with the disallowed mixed use as stated
above. This can help us catch many misuses.
All uses of weight-based interfaces are now updated to use probability-based
ones.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14973
llvm-svn: 254377
and the follow-up r254356: "Fix a bug in MachineBlockPlacement that may cause assertion failure during BranchProbability construction."
Asserts were firing in Chromium builds. See PR25687.
llvm-svn: 254366
The patch in http://reviews.llvm.org/D13745 is broken into four parts:
1. New interfaces without functional changes (http://reviews.llvm.org/D13908).
2. Use new interfaces in SelectionDAG, while in other passes treat probabilities
as weights (http://reviews.llvm.org/D14361).
3. Use new interfaces in all other passes.
4. Remove old interfaces.
This patch is 3+4 above. In this patch, MBB won't provide weight-based
interfaces any more, which are totally replaced by probability-based ones.
The interface addSuccessor() is redesigned so that the default probability is
unknown. We allow unknown probabilities but don't allow using it together
with known probabilities in successor list. That is to say, we either have a
list of successors with all known probabilities, or all unknown
probabilities. In the latter case, we assume each successor has 1/N
probability where N is the number of successors. An assertion checks if the
user is attempting to add a successor with the disallowed mixed use as stated
above. This can help us catch many misuses.
All uses of weight-based interfaces are now updated to use probability-based
ones.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14973
llvm-svn: 254348
The patch in http://reviews.llvm.org/D13745 is broken into four parts:
1. New interfaces without functional changes.
2. Use new interfaces in SelectionDAG, while in other passes treat probabilities
as weights.
3. Use new interfaces in all other passes.
4. Remove old interfaces.
This the second patch above. In this patch SelectionDAG starts to use
probability-based interfaces in MBB to add successors but other MC passes are
still using weight-based interfaces. Therefore, we need to maintain correct
weight list in MBB even when probability-based interfaces are used. This is
done by updating weight list in probability-based interfaces by treating the
numerator of probabilities as weights. This change affects many test cases
that check successor weight values. I will update those test cases once this
patch looks good to you.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14361
llvm-svn: 253965
Note, this was reviewed (and more details are in) http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20151109/312083.html
These intrinsics currently have an explicit alignment argument which is
required to be a constant integer. It represents the alignment of the
source and dest, and so must be the minimum of those.
This change allows source and dest to each have their own alignments
by using the alignment attribute on their arguments. The alignment
argument itself is removed.
There are a few places in the code for which the code needs to be
checked by an expert as to whether using only src/dest alignment is
safe. For those places, they currently take the minimum of src/dest
alignments which matches the current behaviour.
For example, code which used to read:
call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i32(i8* %dest, i8* %src, i32 500, i32 8, i1 false)
will now read:
call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i32(i8* align 8 %dest, i8* align 8 %src, i32 500, i1 false)
For out of tree owners, I was able to strip alignment from calls using sed by replacing:
(call.*llvm\.memset.*)i32\ [0-9]*\,\ i1 false\)
with:
$1i1 false)
and similarly for memmove and memcpy.
I then added back in alignment to test cases which needed it.
A similar commit will be made to clang which actually has many differences in alignment as now
IRBuilder can generate different source/dest alignments on calls.
In IRBuilder itself, a new argument was added. Instead of calling:
CreateMemCpy(Dst, Src, getInt64(Size), DstAlign, /* isVolatile */ false)
you now call
CreateMemCpy(Dst, Src, getInt64(Size), DstAlign, SrcAlign, /* isVolatile */ false)
There is a temporary class (IntegerAlignment) which takes the source alignment and rejects
implicit conversion from bool. This is to prevent isVolatile here from passing its default
parameter to the source alignment.
Note, changes in future can now be made to codegen. I didn't change anything here, but this
change should enable better memcpy code sequences.
Reviewed by Hal Finkel.
llvm-svn: 253511
Previously, subprograms contained a metadata reference to the function they
described. Because most clients need to get or set a subprogram for a given
function rather than the other way around, this created unneeded inefficiency.
For example, many passes needed to call the function llvm::makeSubprogramMap()
to build a mapping from functions to subprograms, and the IR linker needed to
fix up function references in a way that caused quadratic complexity in the IR
linking phase of LTO.
This change reverses the direction of the edge by storing the subprogram as
function-level metadata and removing DISubprogram's function field.
Since this is an IR change, a bitcode upgrade has been provided.
Fixes PR23367. An upgrade script for textual IR for out-of-tree clients is
attached to the PR.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14265
llvm-svn: 252219
Do not tail duplicate blocks where the successor has a phi node,
and the corresponding value in that phi node uses a subregister.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D13922
llvm-svn: 250877
Emit the CFI instructions after all code transformation have been done.
This will avoid any interference between CFI instructions and packetization.
llvm-svn: 250714
In if-conversion, there is a utility function MergeBlocks() that is used to merge blocks. However, when new edges are built in this function the edge weight is either not provided or not updated properly, leading to a modified CFG with incorrect edge weights. This patch corrects this issue.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12513
llvm-svn: 248030
As a follow-up to r246098, require `DISubprogram` definitions
(`isDefinition: true`) to be 'distinct'. Specifically, add an assembler
check, a verifier check, and bitcode upgrading logic to combat testcase
bitrot after the `DIBuilder` change.
While working on the testcases, I realized that
test/Linker/subprogram-linkonce-weak-odr.ll isn't relevant anymore. Its
purpose was to check for a corner case in PR22792 where two subprogram
definitions match exactly and share the same metadata node. The new
verifier check, requiring that subprogram definitions are 'distinct',
precludes that possibility.
I updated almost all the IR with the following script:
git grep -l -E -e '= !DISubprogram\(.* isDefinition: true' |
grep -v test/Bitcode |
xargs sed -i '' -e 's/= \(!DISubprogram(.*, isDefinition: true\)/= distinct \1/'
Likely some variant of would work for out-of-tree testcases.
llvm-svn: 246327
Since r241097, `DIBuilder` has only created distinct `DICompileUnit`s.
The backend is liable to start relying on that (if it hasn't already),
so make uniquable `DICompileUnit`s illegal and automatically upgrade old
bitcode. This is a nice cleanup, since we can remove an unnecessary
`DenseSet` (and the associated uniquing info) from `LLVMContextImpl`.
Almost all the testcases were updated with this script:
git grep -e '= !DICompileUnit' -l -- test |
grep -v test/Bitcode |
xargs sed -i '' -e 's,= !DICompileUnit,= distinct !DICompileUnit,'
I imagine something similar should work for out-of-tree testcases.
llvm-svn: 243885
Remove the fake `DW_TAG_auto_variable` and `DW_TAG_arg_variable` tags,
using `DW_TAG_variable` in their place Stop exposing the `tag:` field at
all in the assembly format for `DILocalVariable`.
Most of the testcase updates were generated by the following sed script:
find test/ -name "*.ll" -o -name "*.mir" |
xargs grep -l 'DILocalVariable' |
xargs sed -i '' \
-e 's/tag: DW_TAG_arg_variable, //' \
-e 's/tag: DW_TAG_auto_variable, //'
There were only a handful of tests in `test/Assembly` that I needed to
update by hand.
(Note: a follow-up could change `DILocalVariable::DILocalVariable()` to
set the tag to `DW_TAG_formal_parameter` instead of `DW_TAG_variable`
(as appropriate), instead of having that logic magically in the backend
in `DbgVariable`. I've added a FIXME to that effect.)
llvm-svn: 243774
James Molloy