to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Avoid storing duplicated "std::string"s.
clangd's global-symbol-builder takes 20+GB memory running across LLVM
repository. With this patch, the used memory is ~10GB (running on 48
threads, most of meory are AST-related).
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45479
llvm-svn: 329784
Summary: Tool results are deduplicated by the result key.
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: klimek, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41729
llvm-svn: 321864
Summary:
This defines a `clang::tooling::ToolExecutor` interface that can be extended to support different execution plans including standalone execution on a given set of TUs or parallel execution on all TUs in a codebase.
In order to enable multiprocessing execution, tool actions are expected to output result into a `ToolResults` interface provided by executors. The `ToolResults` interface abstracts how results are stored e.g. in-memory for standalone executions or on-disk for large-scale execution.
New executors can be registered as `ToolExecutorPlugin`s via the `ToolExecutorPluginRegistry`. CLI tools can use `createExecutorFromCommandLineArgs` to create a specific registered executor according to the command-line arguments.
This patch also implements `StandaloneToolExecutor` which has the same behavior as the current `ClangTool` interface, i.e. execute frontend actions on a given set of TUs. At this point, it's simply a wrapper around `ClangTool` at this point.
This is still experimental but expected to replace the existing `ClangTool` interface so that specific tools would not need to worry about execution.
Reviewers: klimek, arphaman, hokein, sammccall
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits, djasper, mgorny, omtcyfz
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34272
llvm-svn: 316653
Chandler Carruth