This change makes dependentName a modifier, rather than a token type.
It can be combined with:
- type (new, standard) - this combination replaces dependentType like T::typename Foo
- unknown (new, nonstandard) - for general dependent names
- Field, etc - when the name is dependent but we heuristically resolve it
While here, fix cases where template-template-parameter cases were
incorrectly flagged as type-dependent.
And the merging of modifiers when resolving conflicts accidentally
happens to work around a bug that showed up in a test.
The behavior observed through the pre-standard protocol should be mostly
unchanged (it'll see the bugfixes only). This is done in a somehat
fragile way but it's not expected to live long.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95706
These allow (function-) local variables to be distinguished, but also a
bunch more cases.
It's not quite independent with existing information (e.g. the
field/variable distinction is redundant if you have class-scope + static
attributes) but I don't think this is terribly important.
Depends on D77811
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95701
- Infrastructure to support modifiers (protocol etc)
- standard modifiers:
- declaration (but no definition, yet)
- deprecated
- readonly (based on a fairly fuzzy const checking)
- static (for class members and locals, but *not* file-scope things!)
- abstract (for C++ classes, and pure-virtual methods)
- nonstandard modifier:
- deduced (on "auto" whose Kind is Class etc)
Happy to drop this if it's controversial at all.
- While here, update sample tweak to use our internal names, in
anticipation of theia TM scopes going away.
This addresses some of the goals of D77702, but leaves some things undone.
Mostly because I think these will want some discussion.
- no split between dependent type/name.
(We may want to model this as a modifier, type+dependent vs ???+dependent)
- no split between primitive/typedef.
(Is introducing a nonstandard kind is worth this distinction?)
- no nonstandard local attribute
This probably makes sense, I'm wondering if we want others and how
they fit together.
There's one minor regression in explicit template specialization declarations
due to a latent bug in findExplicitReferences, but fixing it after seems OK.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77811
`clang-tidy -std=c++20` with `modernize-use-nullptr` mistakenly inserts `nullptr` in place of the comparison operator if the comparison internally expands in the AST to a rewritten spaceship operator. This can be reproduced by running the new `modernize-use-nullptr-cxx20.cpp` test without applying the supplied patch to `UseNullptrCheck.cpp`; the current clang-tidy will mistakenly replace:
```result = (a1 < a2);```
with
```result = (a1 nullptr a2);```
Reviewed By: njames93
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95714
`modernize-loop-convert` handles //array-like// objects like vectors fairly well, but strips slightly too much information from the iteration expression by converting:
```
Vector<Vector<int>> X;
for (int J = 0; J < X[5].size(); ++J)
copyArg(X[5][J]);
```
to
```
Vector<Vector<int>> X;
for (int J : X) // should be for (int J : X[5])
copyArg(J);
```
The `[5]` is a call to `operator[]` and gets stripped by `LoopConvertCheck::getContainerString`. This patch fixes that and adds several test cases.
Reviewed By: njames93
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95771
The new trace event includes what's already in the queue when adding.
For tracers that follow contexts, the trace event will span the time that the action
spends in the queue.
For tracers that follow threads, the trace will be a tiny span on the enqueuing thread.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96027
Use IgnoreUnlessSpelledInSource to make the matcher code smaller and
more visibly-related to the code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91303
Current indexes merge logic skip data from the static index if the file is in the dynamic index, but sometimes the dynamic index does not contain references (e.g. preamble (dynamic) index vs background (static) index).
This problem is masked with the fact, that the preamble index file list consists of file URI's and other indexes file lists consist of file paths.
This patch introduces the index contents (symbols, references, etc.), which makes indexes merge more flexible and makes it able to use URI's for the index file list.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94952
Follow-up on D95925: adds better detection for function arguments and also
checks for conflicts in muli-variable init statements in ForStmt.
Reviewed By: hokein
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96009
This patch allows detecting conflicts with variables defined in the current
CompoundStmt or If/While/For variable init statements.
Reviewed By: hokein
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95925
Use mapAnyOf() and matchers based on it.
Use of binaryOperation() means that modernize-loop-convert and
readability-container-size-empty can now be used with rewritten binary
operators.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94131
See: https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/668
```
struct A { virtual void foo() = 0; };
struct B : A { void foo() override; };
```
Find refs on `A::foo()` will show:
- decls of `A::foo()`
- decls of `B::foo()`
- refs to `A::foo()`
- no refs to `B::foo()`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95812
`std::lock_guard` is an RAII class that needs a variable name whose scope determines the guard's lifetime. This particular usage lacked a variable name, meaning the guard could be destroyed before the line that it was indented to protect.
This line was identified by building clang with the latest MSVC preview release, which declares the std::lock_guard constructor to be `[[nodiscard]]` to draw attention to such issues.
Reviewed By: kadircet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95725
This requires a second index query for refs to overrides, as the refs
call doesn't tell you which ref points at which symbol.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95451
Unfortunately this treats overrides declarations as declarations, not as
references. I don't plan to land this until I have a fix for that issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95450
LLVMTestingSupport is not part of libLLVM, and therefore can not
be linked to via LLVM_LINK_COMPONENTS. Instead, it needs to be
specified explicitly to ensure that it is linked explicitly
even if LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB is used. This is consistent with handling
in clangd.
Fixes PR#48931
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95653
On second thought, this can't properly be reused for highlighting.
Consider this example, which Quality wants to consider function-scope,
but highlighting must consider class-scope:
void foo() {
class X {
int ^y;
};
}
This prepares for reuse from the semantic highlighting code.
There's a bit of yak-shaving here:
- when the enum is moved into the clangd namespace, promote it to a
scoped enum. This means teaching the decision forest infrastructure
to deal with scoped enums.
- AccessibleScope isn't quite the right name: e.g. public class members
are treated as accessible, but still have class scope. So rename to
SymbolScope.
- Rename some QualitySignals members to avoid name conflicts.
(the string) SymbolScope -> Scope
(the enum) Scope -> ScopeKind
Fail gracefully instead. Prevent further misuse by enforcing the factory builder
instead of the constructor.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94420
(ClangTidy configuration block hasn't been in any release, so we should be OK
to move it around like this)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95362
Clangd currently throws away any protocol messages whenever an optional
field has an unexpected type. This patch changes the behaviour to treat
`null` fields as missing.
This enables clangd to be more tolerant against small violations to the
LSP spec.
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/vscode-clangd/issues/134
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95229
FindTarget on the virtual keyword or access specifier of a base specifier will now resolve to type of the base specifier.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95338
Selection now includes the virtual and access modifier as part of their range for cxx base specifiers.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95231
This is a common symbol that's missing from our mapping because
cppreference yields multiple headers.
Add it manually by picking cstddef to prevent insertion of some stdlib-internal
headers instead.
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/666.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95423
Sam McCall