This change is NFC upstream. We pass in the loop's block to the kernel
rewriter explicitly, instead of assuming it's the loop's top block. This
change is made for downstream targets where this assumption doesn't hold.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104811
With new pm becomes the default, the old-style test command becomes exactly the same as the new test command, i.e. the two commands are now redundant.
We should just delete the old command. (unless someone wants to add enable-new-pm=0 to all old commands.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104895
Do this by making opaque pointers a valid pointer element type,
for which we implicitly create an opaque pointer (moving the logic
from getPointerTo into PointerType::get).
We'll never create something like a "pointer to opaque pointer",
but accept it in the API, because a lot of code reasonably assumes
that you can create a pointer to pointer type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104902
There's no reason to use the weaker name-only analysis when we
have a function prototype to check (in fact, we probably should
not even have that name-only function exposed for general use,
but removing it requires auditing all of the callers).
The version of getLibFunc that takes a Function argument also
does some prototype checking to make sure the arguments/return
type match the expected signature of a real library call.
This is NFC-intended because the code in MemoryBuiltins does its
own function signature checking. For now, that means there may
be some redundancy in the checking, but that should not be above
the noise for compile-time. Ideally, we can move the checks to
a single location.
There's still a hole in the logic that allows the example in
https://llvm.org/PR50846 to cause a compiler crash.
To reflect that the size may be scalable, a TypeSize is returned
instead of an unsigned. In places where the result is used,
it currently relies on an implicit cast of TypeSize -> uint64_t,
which asserts that the type is not scalable.
This patch is NFC for fixed-width vectors.
Reviewed By: aemerson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104454
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D103612, a definition of an instance of
`Fortran::parser::AnalyzedObjectsAsFortran` was moved (that object is
used in unparsing). That, in turn, introduced a dependency of the unit
tests on the `FortranEvaluate` library, which defines
`AnalyzedObjectsAsFortran`.
That dependency was missed in D103612 and has caused shared-library
builds to fail. I'm submitting this without a review, as it's rather
straightforward omission.
When clang driver is used with -save-temps to compile OpenCL program,
clang driver first launches clang -cc1 -E to generate preprocessor expansion output,
then launches clang -cc1 with the generated preprocessor expansion output as input
to generate LLVM IR.
Currently clang by default passes "-finclude-default-header" "-fdeclare-opencl-builtins"
in both steps, which causes default header included again in the second step, which
causes error.
This patch let clang not to include default header when input type is preprocessor expansion
output, which fixes the issue.
Reviewed by: Anastasia Stulova
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104800
This patch adds a new option for the new Flang driver:
`-fno-analyzed-objects-for-unparse`. The semantics are similar to
`-funparse-typed-exprs-to-f18-fc` from `f18`. For consistency, the
latter is replaced with `-fno-analyzed-objects-for-unparse`.
The new option controls the behaviour of the unparser (i.e. the action
corresponding to `-fdebug-unparse`). The default behaviour is to use the
analyzed objects when unparsing. The new flag can be used to turn this
off, so that the original parse-tree objects are used. The analyzed
objects are generated during the semantic checks [1].
This patch also updates the semantics of
`-fno-analyzed-objects-for-unparse`/`-funparse-typed-exprs-to-f18-fc`
in `f18`, so that this flag is always taken into account when `Unparse`
is used (this way the semantics in `f18` and `flang-new` are identical).
The added test file is based on example from Peter Steinfeld.
[1]
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/flang/docs/Semantics.md
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103612
Note regarding C++ for OpenCL:
When compiling C++ for OpenCL, DW_LANG_C_plus_plus* is emitted.
There is no DWARF language code defined for C++ for OpenCL as of yet,
but DWARF issue 210514.1 has been raised to request one.
In the mean time, continuing to emit DW_LANG_C_plus_plus* for C++ for
OpenCL allows the potential to distinguish between C++ for OpenCL and
OpenCL C in !DICompileUnit nodes, whereas using DW_LANG_OpenCL for
C++ for OpenCL would prevent this.
This change therefore leaves C++ for OpenCL as-is.
Reviewed By: shchenz, Anastasia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104118
These were disabled in 473a3a773e
because they failed on 32 bit platforms. (Arm for sure but I assume
any 32 bit)
This was due to the printf formatter used. These assumed
that types like uint64_t/size_t would be certain size/type and
that changes on 32 bit.
Instead use "z" to print the size_t and PRI<...> formatters
for the addr_t (always uint64_t) and the int32_t.
Consider the code
```
void f(int a0, int b0, int c)
{
int a1 = a0 - b0;
int b1 = (unsigned)a1 + c;
if (c == 0) {
int d = 7L / b1;
}
}
```
At the point of divisiion by `b1` that is considered to be non-zero,
which results in a new constraint for `$a0 - $b0 + $c`. The type
of this sym is unsigned, however, the simplified sym is `$a0 -
$b0` and its type is signed. This is probably the result of the
inherent improper handling of casts. Anyway, Range assignment
for constraints use this type information. Therefore, we must
make sure that first we simplify the symbol and only then we
assign the range.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104844
This patch extends applyLoopGuards to detect a single-cond range check
idiom that InstCombine generates.
It extends applyLoopGuards to detect conditions of the form
(-C1 + X < C2). InstCombine will create this form when combining two
checks of the form (X u< C2 + C1) and (X >=u C1).
In practice, this enables us to correctly compute a tight trip count
bounds for code as in the function below. InstCombine will fold the
minimum iteration check created by LoopRotate with the user check (< 8).
void unsigned_check(short *pred, unsigned width) {
if (width < 8) {
for (int x = 0; x < width; x++)
pred[x] = pred[x] * pred[x];
}
}
As a consequence, LLVM creates dead vector loops for the code above,
e.g. see https://godbolt.org/z/cb8eTcqEThttps://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/SHHW4d
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104741
Separate out the case that uses llvm-dis without
--force-opaque-pointers. This will generally produce a different
result from the other cases, because things like global symbol
pointers will be non-opaque in this case.
This corrects the test added in
31f9960c38
and temporarily patched in
3b4aad1186.
This test checks that the memory tag read
command errors when you use it on a platform
without memory tagging.
(which is why we skip the test if you actually
have MTE)
The problem with this test is that there's
two levels of unsupported each with it's own
specific error.
On anything that isn't AArch64, there's no
tagging extension we support. So you're told
that that is the case. As in "this won't ever work".
When you're on AArch64 we know that MTE could
be present on the remote and when we find that it
isn't, we tell you that instead.
Expect a different error message on AArch64 to fix
the test.
Function Records are required to be aligned on 8 bytes. This is enforced for each
records except the first, when one relies on the default alignment within an
std::string. There's no such guarantee, and indeed on 32 bits for some
implementation of std::string this is not enforced.
Provide a portable implementation based on llvm's MemoryBuffer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104745
This custom lowers <4 x i8> vector loads using a 32-bit load, followed by 2
SSHLL instructions to extend it to e.g. a <4 x i32> vector. Before, it was
really inefficient and expensive to construct a <4 x i32> for this as 4 byte
loads and 4 moves were used. With this improvement SLP vectorisation might for
example become profitable, see D103629.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104782
On PowerPC, VSRpRC represents the pairs of even and odd VSX register,
and VRRC corresponds to higher 32 VSX registers. In some cases, extra
copies are produced when handling incoming VRRC arguments with VSRpRC.
This patch changes allocation order of VSRpRC to eliminate this kind of
copy.
Stack frame sizes may increase if allocating non-volatile registers, and
some other vector copies happen. They need fix in future changes.
Reviewed By: nemanjai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104855
Commit 728cc0075e made comdat symbols
from LTO objects be treated as any regular comdat symbol. This works
great for symbols that actually are IMAGE_COMDAT_SELECT_ANY, but
if the symbols have a less trivial selection type that require comparing
either the section chunk size or contents, we can't check that before
actually doing the LTO compilation.
Therefore bring back one aspect of handling from before; that comdat
resolution with a leader from an LTO symbol is essentially skipped,
like it was before 728cc0075e.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104605
For a bfi chain like:
a = bfi input, x, y
b = bfi a, x', y'
The previous code was RAUW'ing a with x, mutating the second 'b' bfi, and when
SelectionDAG's CSE code ended up deleting it unexpectedly, bad things happend.
There's no need to RAUW in this case because we can just return our newly
created replacement BFI node. It also looked incorrect because it didn't account
for other users of the 'a' bfi.
Since it seems that chains of more than 2 BFI nodes are hard/impossible to
produce without this combine kicking in at some point, I've removed that
functionality since it had no test coverage.
rdar://79095399
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104868
This patch teaches the compiler to generate code to handle larger RVV
stack sizes and stack offsets which resolve an amount larger than 2047
vector registers in size.
The previous behaviour was asserting on such large values as it was only
able to materialize the constant by feeding it to the 12-bit immediate
of an `ADDI` instruction. The compiler can now materialize this amount
into a temporary register before continuing with the computation.
A test case for this scenario is included which also checks that the
temporary register used to materialize the amount doesn't require an
additional spill slot over what we're already reserving for RVV code.
Reviewed By: rogfer01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104727
Previously this instruction could be used only in assembler. This change
makes it available for compiler also. Scheduling information was copied
from FTST instruction, hopefully this can be a satisfactory approximation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104853
... even on targets preferring RELA. The section is only consumed by ld.lld
which can handle REL.
Follow-up to D104080 as I explained in the review. There are two advantages:
* The D104080 code only handles RELA, so arm/i386/mips32 etc may warn for -fprofile-use=/-fprofile-sample-use= usage.
* Decrease object file size for RELA targets
While here, change the relocation to relocate weights, instead of 0,1,2,3,..
I failed to catch the issue during review.
`icfEqClass` only makes sense on ConcatInputSections since (in contrast
to literal sections) they are deduplicated as an atomic unit.
Similarly, `hasPersonality` and `replacement` don't make sense on
literal sections.
This mirrors LLD-ELF, which stores `icfEqClass` only on non-mergeable
sections.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, gkm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104670
These allow getting a whole register from a larger lmul. Or
inserting a whole register into a larger lmul register. Fractional
lmuls are not supported as they would require a vslide.
Based on this update to the intrinsic doc
https://github.com/riscv/rvv-intrinsic-doc/pull/99
Reviewed By: HsiangKai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104822
sanitize-coverage-old-pm.c is passing intermittently on different
arm v7 machines. This patch moves it to unsupported on all arm 32
targets reporting armv8l core.
Hendrik Greving