This will allow the ScopInfo to build the polyhedral representation for
non-affine regions that contain loops. Such loops are basically not visible
in the SCoP representation. Accesses that are variant in such loops are
therefor represented as non-affine accesses.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8153
llvm-svn: 234713
If a scalar was defined and used only in a non-affine subregion we do
not need to model the accesses. However, if the scalar was defined
inside the region and escapes the region we have to model the access.
The same is true if the scalar was defined outside and used inside the
region.
llvm-svn: 230960
This allows us to model non-affine regions in the SCoP representation.
SCoP statements can now describe either basic blocks or non-affine
regions. In the latter case all accesses in the region are accumulated
for the statement and write accesses, except in the entry, have to be
marked as may-write.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7846
llvm-svn: 230329
These write are important as they will force the scheduling and code
generation of an otherwise trivial statement and also impose an order of
execution needed to guarantee the correct final value for a scalar in a loop.
Added test case modeled after ClamAV/clamscan.
llvm-svn: 228847
This allows us to model PHI nodes in the polyhedral description
without demoting them. The modeling however will result in the
same accesses as the demotion would have introduced.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7415
llvm-svn: 228433
In TempScopInfo::buildCondition we extract the conditions to guard the
BB *in addition of* loop bounds. This means we should only consider the
conditions in the paths (in CFG) that do not contain cycles (loops).
At the same time, we set the invert flag if the FalseBB of the current
branch dominates our target BB to indicate that we reach the target BB
with an inverted condition from the current branch.
In this case, the path from the FalseBB contains a cycle if the FalseBB
is the target of a backedge. The conditions implied by such a path should
not be consider. We can identify such a case by checking if the TrueBB
also dominates our target BB, which means we can also reach our target
BB from the TrueBB, without going through the backedge.
llvm-svn: 222907
We will use ScalarEvolution in the ScopInfo.cpp to get the loop trip
count, not cache it in the TempScop object.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6070
llvm-svn: 221035
Now MaxLoopDepth only lives in Scops not in TempScops anymore.
This is the first part of a series of changes to make TempScops
obsolete.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6069
llvm-svn: 221026
Without this patch, the testcase would fail on the delinearization of the second
array:
; void foo(long n, long m, long o, double A[n][m][o]) {
; for (long i = 0; i < n; i++)
; for (long j = 0; j < m; j++)
; for (long k = 0; k < o; k++) {
; A[i+3][j-4][k+7] = 1.0;
; A[i][0][k] = 2.0;
; }
; }
; CHECK: [n, m, o] -> { Stmt_for_body6[i0, i1, i2] -> MemRef_A[3 + i0, -4 + i1, 7 + i2] };
; CHECK: [n, m, o] -> { Stmt_for_body6[i0, i1, i2] -> MemRef_A[i0, 0, i2] };
Here is the output of FileCheck on the testcase without this patch:
; CHECK: [n, m, o] -> { Stmt_for_body6[i0, i1, i2] -> MemRef_A[i0, 0, i2] };
^
<stdin>:26:2: note: possible intended match here
[n, m, o] -> { Stmt_for_body6[i0, i1, i2] -> MemRef_A[o0] };
^
It is possible to find a good delinearization for A[i][0][k] only in the context
of the delinearization of both array accesses.
There are two ways to delinearize together all array subscripts touching the
same base address: either duplicate the code from scop detection to first gather
all array references and then run the delinearization; or as implemented in this
patch, use the same delinearization info that we computed during scop detection.
llvm-svn: 210117
Instead of relying on the delinearization to infer the size of an element,
compute the element size from the base address type. This is a much more precise
way of computing the element size than before, as we would have mixed together
the size of an element with the strides of the innermost dimension.
llvm-svn: 209695
definition below all of the header #include lines, Polly edition.
If you want to know more details about this, you can see the recent
commits to Debug.h in LLVM. This is just the Polly segment of a cleanup
I'm doing globally for this macro.
llvm-svn: 206852
Value::user_iterator changes in LLVM r203364. Converts several of these
loops to nice range based loops in the process.
Built and tested cleanly for me, yay for being able to fully build and
test Polly changes!
llvm-svn: 203381
In rare cases the modification of one scop can effect the validity of other
scops, as code generation of an earlier scop may make the scalar evolution
functions derived for later scops less precise. The example that triggered this
patch was a scop that contained an 'or' expression as follows:
%add13710 = or i32 %j.19, 1
--> {(1 + (4 * %l)),+,2}<nsw><%for.body81>
Scev could only analyze the 'or' as it knew %j.19 is a multiple of 2. This
information was not available after the first scop was code generated (or
independent-blocks was run on it) and SCEV could not derive a precise SCEV
expression any more. This means we could not any more code generate this SCoP.
My current understanding is that there is always the risk that an earlier code
generation change invalidates later scops. As the example we have seen here is
difficult to avoid, we use this occasion to guard us against all such
invalidations.
This patch "solves" this issue by verifying right before we start working on
a detected scop, if this scop is in fact still valid. This adds a certain
overhead. However the verification we run is anyways very fast and secondly
it is only run on detected scops. So the overhead should not be very large. As
a later optimization we could detect scops only on demand, such that we need
to run scop-detections always only a single time.
This should fix the single last failure in the LLVM test-suite for the new
scev-based code generation.
llvm-svn: 201593
The MayAliasSet class is currently not used and just confuses people. We can
reintroduce it in case need a more precise tracking of alias sets.
llvm-svn: 201191
Use 0 >= 1 instead of 0 != 0 to represent 'false'. This might be slightly more
efficient as isl may create a union of sets for 0 != 0, whereas this is never
needed for the expression 0 >= 1.
Contributed-by: Alexandre Isoard <alexandre.isoard@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 190384
Ensure that the scalar write access corresponds to the result of a load
instruction appears after the generic read access corresponds to the load
instruction.
llvm-svn: 186419
Fix inspired from c2d4a0627e95c34a819b9d4ffb4db62daa78dade.
Given the following code
for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
;
}
S: A[i] = 0
When translate the data reference A[i] in statement S using scev, we need to
retrieve the scev of 'i' at the location of 'S'. If we do not do this the
scev that we obtain will be expressed as {0,+,1}_for and will reference loop
iterators that do not surround 'S'. What we really want is the scev to be
instantiated to the value of 'i' after the loop. This value is {10}.
This used to crash in:
int loopDimension = getLoopDepth(Expr->getLoop());
isl_aff *LAff = isl_aff_set_coefficient_si(
isl_aff_zero_on_domain(LocalSpace), isl_dim_in, loopDimension, 1);
(gdb) p Expr->dump()
{8,+,8}<nw><%do.body>
(gdb) p getLoopDepth(Expr->getLoop())
$5 = 0
isl_space *Space = isl_space_set_alloc(Ctx, 0, NbLoopSpaces);
isl_local_space *LocalSpace = isl_local_space_from_space(Space);
As we are trying to create a memory access in a stmt that is outside all loops,
LocalSpace has 0 dimensions:
(gdb) p NbLoopSpaces
$12 = 0
(gdb) p Statement.BB->dump()
if.then: ; preds = %do.end
%0 = load float* %add.ptr, align 4
store float %0, float* %q.1.reg2mem, align 4
br label %if.end.single_exit
and so the scev for %add.ptr should be taken at the place where it is used,
i.e., it should be the value on the last iteration of the do.body loop, and not
"{8,+,8}<nw><%do.body>".
llvm-svn: 179148
After this commit, polly is clang-format clean. This can be tested with
'ninja polly-check-format'. Updates to clang-format may change this, but the
differences will hopefully be both small and general improvements to the
formatting.
We currently have some not very nice formatting for a couple of items, DEBUG()
stmts for example. I believe the benefit of being clang-format clean outweights
the not perfect layout of this code.
llvm-svn: 177796
Johannes Doerfert