Type::getAsReferenceType() -> Type::getAs<ReferenceType>()
Type::getAsRecordType() -> Type::getAs<RecordType>()
Type::getAsPointerType() -> Type::getAs<PointerType>()
Type::getAsBlockPointerType() -> Type::getAs<BlockPointerType>()
Type::getAsLValueReferenceType() -> Type::getAs<LValueReferenceType>()
Type::getAsRValueReferenceType() -> Type::getAs<RValueReferenceType>()
Type::getAsMemberPointerType() -> Type::getAs<MemberPointerType>()
Type::getAsReferenceType() -> Type::getAs<ReferenceType>()
Type::getAsTagType() -> Type::getAs<TagType>()
And remove Type::getAsReferenceType(), etc.
This change is similar to one I made a couple weeks ago, but that was partly
reverted pending some additional design discussion. With Doug's pending smart
pointer changes for Types, it seemed natural to take this approach.
llvm-svn: 77510
and __has_trivial_constructor builtin pseudo-functions and
additionally implements __has_trivial_copy and __has_trivial_assign,
from John McCall!
llvm-svn: 76916
point that covers templates and non-templates. This should eliminate
the flood of warnings I introduced yesterday.
Removed the ActOnClassTemplate action, which is no longer used.
llvm-svn: 76881
value. This is on by default, and controlled by -Wreturn-type (-Wmost
-Wall). I believe there should be very few false positives, though
the most interesting case would be:
int() { bar(); }
when bar does:
bar() { while (1) ; }
Here, we assume functions return, unless they are marked with the
noreturn attribute. I can envision a fixit note for functions that
never return normally that don't have a noreturn attribute to add a
noreturn attribute.
If anyone spots other false positives, let me know!
llvm-svn: 76821
templates, e.g.,
template<typename T>
struct Outer {
struct Inner;
};
template<typename T>
struct Outer<T>::Inner {
// ...
};
Implementing this feature required some extensions to ActOnTag, which
now takes a set of template parameter lists, and is the precursor to
removing the ActOnClassTemplate function from the parser Action
interface. The reason for this approach is simple: the parser cannot
tell the difference between a class template definition and the
definition of a member of a class template; both have template
parameter lists, and semantic analysis determines what that template
parameter list means.
There is still some cleanup to do with ActOnTag and
ActOnClassTemplate. This commit provides the basic functionality we
need, however.
llvm-svn: 76820
until Doug Gregor's Type smart pointer code lands (or more discussion occurs).
These methods just call the new Type::getAs<XXX> methods, so we still have
reduced implementation redundancy. Having explicit getAsXXXType() methods makes
it easier to set breakpoints in the debugger.
llvm-svn: 76193
Note: One day, it might be useful to consider adding this info to DeclGroup (as the comments in FunctionDecl/VarDecl suggest). For now, I think this works fine. I considered moving this to ValueDecl (a common ancestor of FunctionDecl/VarDecl/FieldDecl), however this would add overhead to EnumConstantDecl (which would burn memory and isn't necessary).
llvm-svn: 75635
- Declaration context of ParmVarDecls (that we got from the Declarator) was not their containing function.
- C++ out-of-line method definitions didn't get an access specifier.
Both were exposed by a crash when emitting a C++ method to a PCH file (assert at Decl::CheckAccessDeclContext()).
llvm-svn: 75597
The idea is to segregate Objective-C "object" pointers from general C pointers (utilizing the recently added ObjCObjectPointerType). The fun starts in Sema::GetTypeForDeclarator(), where "SomeInterface *" is now represented by a single AST node (rather than a PointerType whose Pointee is an ObjCInterfaceType). Since a significant amount of code assumed ObjC object pointers where based on C pointers/structs, this patch is very tedious. It should also explain why it is hard to accomplish this in smaller, self-contained patches.
This patch does most of the "heavy lifting" related to moving from PointerType->ObjCObjectPointerType. It doesn't include all potential "cleanups". The good news is additional cleanups can be done later (some are noted in the code). This patch is so large that I didn't want to include any changes that are purely aesthetic.
By making the ObjC types truly built-in, they are much easier to work with (and require fewer "hacks"). For example, there is no need for ASTContext::isObjCIdStructType() or ASTContext::isObjCClassStructType()! We believe this change (and the follow-up cleanups) will pay dividends over time.
Given the amount of code change, I do expect some fallout from this change (though it does pass all of the clang tests). If you notice any problems, please let us know asap! Thanks.
llvm-svn: 75314
Fariborz Jahanian