containers.
Summary:
sizeof(some_std_string) is likely to be an error. This check finds this
pattern and suggests using .size() instead.
Reviewers: djasper, klimek, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12759
llvm-svn: 247297
Changes mostly address formatting and unification of the style. Use
MarkDown style for inline code snippets and lists. Added some text
for a few checks.
The idea is to move most of the documentation out to separate rST files and have
implementation files refer to the corresponding documentation files.
llvm-svn: 246169
Summary:
The existing check converts the code pattern below:
void f()
{
}
to:
void f()
override {
}
which is fairly sub-optimal. This patch fixes this by inserting the
override keyword on the same line as the function declaration if
possible, so that we instead get:
void f() override
{
}
We do this by looking for the last token before the start of the body
and inserting the override keyword at the end of its location. Note
that we handle const, volatile and ref-qualifiers correctly.
Test Plan: Includes an automated test.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9286
llvm-svn: 245401
Summary:
Support replacements in macro arguments in the
misc-inefficient-algorithm check.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11677
llvm-svn: 243747
As there don't seem to be a good way of formulating a matcher that
finds all pairs of functions and their ParmVarDecls, just match on
functionDecls and iterate over their parameters. This should also be
more efficient as some checks are only performed once per function.
llvm-svn: 243267
The parameters of the function templates were being marked as
incorrectly be marked as unused. Added a test for this and changed the
check to use the same
isReferenced() || !getDeclName()
logic as Sema::DiagnoseUnusedParameters.
Patch Scott Wallace, thank you!
llvm-svn: 242912
Enhance clang-tidy misc-macro-repeated-side-effects to handle ? and : better.
When ? is used in a macro, there are 2 possible control flow paths through the macro.
These paths are tracked separately so problems can be detected properly.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10653
llvm-svn: 241245
Summary:
There were false positives in C++ code where macro argument was a type.
Reviewers: alexfh
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10801
llvm-svn: 240938
The misc-static-assert check will not warn on the followings:
assert(NULL == "shouldn't warn");
assert(__null == "shouldn't warn");
Where NULL is a macro defined as __null.
llvm-svn: 236812
Summary:
Do not warn on .reset(.release()) expressions if the deleters are not
compatible.
Using plain assignment will probably not work.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: curdeius, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8422
llvm-svn: 234512
Followup to http://reviews.llvm.org/D8465, which would break a test in
clang-tidy. clang-tidy previously assumes that source locations of
defaulted/deleted members are (incorrectly) not including the '= ...' part.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8466
llvm-svn: 233032
The misc-static-assert check will not warn on assert(false), assert(False),
assert(FALSE); where false / False / FALSE are macros expanding to the false or
0 literals.
Also added corresponding test cases.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D8328
Patch by Szabolcs Sipos!
llvm-svn: 232306
The patch was generated using this command:
$ clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -header-filter=.*clang-tidy.* -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-header-guard clang-tidy.*
$ svn revert --recursive clangt-tidy/llvm/
(to revert a few buggy fixes)
llvm-svn: 231669