map constraints and MCInst operands to inline asm operands. This replaces the
getMCInstOperandNum() function.
The logic to determine the constraints are not in place, so we still default to
a register constraint (i.e., "r"). Also, we no longer build the MCInst but
rather return just the opcode to get the MCInstrDesc.
llvm-svn: 164979
MatchInstructionImpl() function.
These values are used by the ConvertToMCInst() function to index into the
ConversionTable. The values are also needed to call the GetMCInstOperandNum()
function.
llvm-svn: 163101
AsmMatcherEmitter. This function maps inline assembly operands to MCInst
operands.
For example, '__asm mov j, eax' is represented by the follow MCInst:
<MCInst 1460 <MCOperand Reg:0> <MCOperand Imm:1> <MCOperand Reg:0>
<MCOperand Expr:(j)> <MCOperand Reg:0> <MCOperand Reg:43>>
The first 5 MCInst operands are a result of j matching as a memory operand
consisting of a BaseReg (Reg:0), MemScale (Imm:1), MemIndexReg(Reg:0),
Expr (Expr:(j), and a MemSegReg (Reg:0). The 6th MCInst operand represents
the eax register (Reg:43).
This translation is necessary to determine the Input and Output Exprs. If a
single asm operand maps to multiple MCInst operands, the index of the first
MCInst operand is returned. Ideally, it would return the operand we really
care out (i.e., the Expr:(j) in this case), but I haven't found an easy way
of doing this yet.
llvm-svn: 162920
Adding arbitrary records to ARM.td would break
basic-arm-instructions.s because selection of nop vs mov r0,r0 was
ambiguous (this will be tested by a subsequent addition to ARM.td).
An imperfect but sensible fix is to give precedence to match rules
that have more constraints.
llvm-svn: 162824
When reporting an error for a defm, we would previously only report the
location of the outer defm, which is not always where the error is.
Now we also print the location of the expanded multiclass defs:
lib/Target/X86/X86InstrSSE.td:2902:12: error: foo
defm ADD : basic_sse12_fp_binop_s<0x58, "add", fadd, SSE_ALU_ITINS_S>,
^
lib/Target/X86/X86InstrSSE.td:2801:11: note: instantiated from multiclass
defm PD : sse12_fp_packed<opc, !strconcat(OpcodeStr, "pd"), OpNode, VR128,
^
lib/Target/X86/X86InstrSSE.td:194:5: note: instantiated from multiclass
def rm : PI<opc, MRMSrcMem, (outs RC:$dst), (ins RC:$src1, x86memop:$src2),
^
llvm-svn: 162409
No change in interface or functionality. Purely under-the-hood
details of the generated function that change.
The X86 assembly parser is reduced in size by over 15% and ARM by
over 10%.
No performance change by my measurements.
llvm-svn: 162337
Make sure the tblgen'erated asm matcher correctly returns numoperands+1
as the ErrorInfo when the problem was that there weren't enough operands
specified.
rdar://9142751
llvm-svn: 160144
"Invalid operand" may be a completely correct diagnostic, but it's often
insufficiently specific to really help identify and fix the problem in
assembly source. Allow a target to specify a more-specific diagnostic kind
for each AsmOperandClass derived definition and use that to provide
more detailed diagnostics when an operant of that class resulted in a
match failure.
rdar://8987109
llvm-svn: 159050
When returning a 'cannot match due to missing CPU features' error code,
if there are multiple potential matches with different feature sets,
return the smallest set of missing features from the alternatives as
that's most likely to be the one that's desired.
llvm-svn: 158673
Previously, if an instruction definition was missing the mnemonic,
the next line would just assert(). Issue a real diagnostic instead.
llvm-svn: 156263
When an instruction match is found, but the subtarget features it
requires are not available (missing floating point unit, or thumb vs arm
mode, for example), issue a diagnostic that identifies what the feature
mismatch is.
rdar://11257547
llvm-svn: 155499
Assembly matchers for instructions with a two-operand form. ARM is full
of these, for example:
add {Rd}, Rn, Rm // Rd is optional and is the same as Rn if omitted.
The property TwoOperandAliasConstraint on the instruction definition controls
when, and if, an alias will be formed. No explicit InstAlias definitions
are required.
rdar://11255754
llvm-svn: 155172
Chad Rosier