LLVM_ON_WIN32 is set exactly with MSVC and MinGW (but not Cygwin) in
HandleLLVMOptions.cmake, which is where _WIN32 defined too. Just use the
default macro instead of a reinvented one.
See thread "Replacing LLVM_ON_WIN32 with just _WIN32" on llvm-dev and cfe-dev.
No intended behavior change.
llvm-svn: 331069
Summary:
Noticed during review of D41102.
I'm not sure whether there are any principal reasons why it returns raw owning pointer,
or it is just a old code that was not updated post-C++11.
I'm not too sure what testing i should do, because `check-all` is not error clean here for some reason,
but it does not //appear// asif those failures are related to these changes.
This is clang part.
Clang-tools-extra part is D43780.
Reviewers: klimek, bkramer, alexfh, pcc
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43779
llvm-svn: 326201
This is a short-term fix for PR33650 aimed to get the modules build bots green again.
Remove all the places where we use the LLVM_YAML_IS_(FLOW_)?SEQUENCE_VECTOR
macros to try to locally specialize a global template for a global type. That's
not how C++ works.
Instead, we now centrally define how to format vectors of fundamental types and
of string (std::string and StringRef). We use flow formatting for the former
cases, since that's the obvious right thing to do; in the latter case, it's
less clear what the right choice is, but flow formatting is really bad for some
cases (due to very long strings), so we pick block formatting. (Many of the
cases that were using flow formatting for strings are improved by this change.)
Other than the flow -> block formatting change for some vectors of strings,
this should result in no functionality change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34907
Corresponding LLVM change is r306878.
llvm-svn: 306881
Summary: ... which applies a set of `AtomicChange`s on code.
Reviewers: klimek, djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30777
llvm-svn: 298913
Summary:
An AtomicChange is used to create and group a set of source edits, e.g.
replacements or header insertions. Edits in an AtomicChange should be related,
e.g. replacements for the same type reference and the corresponding header
insertion/deletion.
An AtomicChange is uniquely identified by a key position and will either be
fully applied or not applied at all. The key position should be the location
of the key syntactical element that is being changed, e.g. the call to a
refactored method.
Next step: add a tool that applies AtomicChange.
Reviewers: klimek, djasper
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: alexshap, cfe-commits, djasper, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27054
llvm-svn: 296616
Summary:
The new error information contains the type of error (e.g. overlap or bad file path)
and the replacement(s) that is causing the error. This enables us to resolve some errors.
For example, for insertion at the same location conflict, we need to know the
existing replacement which conflicts with the new replacement in order to calculate
the new position to be insert before/after the existing replacement (for merging).
Reviewers: klimek, bkramer
Subscribers: djasper, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26853
llvm-svn: 287639
Summary:
The current version does not deduplicate equivalent file paths correctly.
For example, a relative path and an absolute path are considered inequivalent.
Comparing FileEnry addresses these issues.
Reviewers: djasper
Subscribers: alexshap, klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26288
llvm-svn: 286096
Summary:
If there are multiple <File, Replacements> pairs with the same file
path after removing dots, we only keep one pair (with path after dots being
removed) and discard the rest.
Reviewers: djasper
Subscribers: klimek, hokein, bkramer, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25565
llvm-svn: 284219
Summary:
Now two replacements are considered order-independent if applying them in
either order produces the same result. These include (but not restricted
to) replacements that:
- don't overlap (being directly adjacent is fine) and
- are overlapping deletions.
- are insertions at the same offset and applying them in either order
has the same effect, i.e. X + Y = Y + X if one inserts text X and the
other inserts text Y.
Discussion about this design can be found in D24717
Reviewers: djasper, klimek
Subscribers: omtcyfz, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24800
llvm-svn: 282577
Summary:
Diff to r281457:
- added a test case `CalculateRangesOfInsertionAroundReplacement`.
Reviewers: djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24606
llvm-svn: 281891
Summary:
Extend `tooling::Replacements::add()` to support adding order-independent replacements.
Two replacements are considered order-independent if one of the following conditions is true:
- They do not overlap. (This is already supported.)
- One replacement is insertion, and the other is a replacement with
length > 0, and the insertion is adjecent to but not contained in the
other replacement. In this case, the replacement should always change
the original code instead of the inserted text.
Reviewers: klimek, djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24515
llvm-svn: 281457
Previously, we would search through all replacements when inserting a
new one to check for overlaps. Instead, make use of the fact that we
already have a set of replacments without overlaps to find the potential
overlap with lower_bound.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23119
llvm-svn: 277597
Summary:
- Implement clang::tooling::Replacements as a class to provide interfaces to
control how replacements for a single file are combined and provide guarantee
on the order of replacements being applied.
- tooling::Replacements only contains replacements for the same file now.
Use std::map<std::string, tooling::Replacements> to represent multi-file
replacements.
- Error handling for the interface change will be improved in followup patches.
Reviewers: djasper, klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21748
llvm-svn: 277335
Summary:
return llvm::Expected<> to carry error status and error information.
This is the first step towards introducing "Error" into tooling::Replacements.
Reviewers: djasper, klimek
Subscribers: ioeric, klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21601
llvm-svn: 275062
Summary:
Added calculateRangesAfterReplaments() to calculate original ranges as well as
newly affacted ranges in the new code.
Reviewers: klimek, djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21547
llvm-svn: 273290
Summary:
formatAndApplyAllReplacements takes a set of Replacements, applies them on a
Rewriter, and reformats the changed code.
Reviewers: klimek, djasper
Subscribers: ioeric, klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17852
llvm-svn: 264745
This is a commonly useful feature to have, and we have implemented it
multiple times with different kinds of bugs. This implementation
centralizes the idea in a set of functions that we can then use from the various
tools.
Reverts r262234, which is a revert of r262232, and puts the functions
into FOrmat.h, as they are closely coupled to clang-format, and we
otherwise introduce a cyclic dependency between libFormat and
libTooling.
Patch by Eric Liu.
llvm-svn: 262323
the case where a specific range is replaced by new text. Previously,
the calculation would shift any position from within a replaced region
to the first character after the region. This is undersirable, e.g. for
clang-format's include sorting.
llvm-svn: 253859
To implement this nicely, add a function that merges two sets of
replacements that are meant to be done in sequence. This functionality
will also be useful for other applications, e.g. formatting the result
of clang-tidy fixes.
llvm-svn: 248367
The default language options will lead to incorrect replacements in C++
code, for example when trying to replace nested name specifiers ending
in "::".
llvm-svn: 238922
This was horribly broken due to how the sort predicate works. We would
report a conflict for files with a replacement in the same position but
different names if the length differed. Just ignore paths as this is often
what the user wants. Files can occur with different names (due to symlinks
or relative paths) and we don't ever want to do the same edit in one file
twice.
llvm-svn: 217439
After post-commit review and community discussion, this seems like a
reasonable direction to continue, making ownership semantics explicit in
the source using the type system.
llvm-svn: 215323
This reverts commit r213307.
Reverting to have some on-list discussion/confirmation about the ongoing
direction of smart pointer usage in the LLVM project.
llvm-svn: 213325
(after fixing a bug in MultiplexConsumer I noticed the ownership of the
nested consumers was implemented with raw pointers - so this fixes
that... and follows the source back to its origin pushing unique_ptr
ownership up through there too)
llvm-svn: 213307
The result of getBufferForFile() must be freed.
(Should we change functions that expect the caller to assume ownership so
that they return unique_ptrs instead? Then the type system makes sure we get
this right.)
llvm-svn: 207074
During the transition of clang::tooling::Replacements from std::set to
std::vector, functions such as clang::tooling::applyAllReplacements() have been
duplicated to take a std::vector<Replacement>. Applying this same temporary
duplication to clang::tooling::shiftedCodePosition().
llvm-svn: 189358
Nico Weber