always produce as pretty of results as it does in LLVM and Clang, but
I don't mind and the value of having a single canonical ordering is very
high IMO.
Let me know if you spot really serious problems here.
llvm-svn: 198703
Summary:
Made ClangTidyAction more slim and moved its declaration to header to
allow easy creation of Clang-tidy ASTConsumer. Don't derive from
clang::ento::AnalysisAction, use clang::ento::CreateAnalysisConsumer instead
(I'll propose making this function a part of a public API in a separate patch).
Use MultiplexConsumer instead of a custom class.
Don't re-filter checkers list for each TU.
Reviewers: klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2481
llvm-svn: 198402
Summary:
Allow disabling checks by regex. By default, disable alpha.* checks,
that are not particularly good tested (e.g. IdempotentOperationChecker, see
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2427).
Fixed a bug, that would disable all analyzer checks, when using a regex more
strict, than 'clang-analyzer-', for example --checks='clang-analyzer-deadcode-'.
Added --list-checks to list all enabled checks. This is useful to test specific
values in --checks/--disable-checks.
Reviewers: djasper, klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
CC: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2444
llvm-svn: 197717
This is implemented in a way that the current static analyzer
architecture allows, in the future we might want to revisit this.
With this change static analyzer checks are available from clang-tidy
by specifying -checks=clang-analyzer-<name>.
This change also fixes the use of the compilation database to allow
clang-tidy to be used like any other clang tool.
llvm-svn: 194707
This is the first version of a possible clang-tidy architecture. The
purpose of clang-tidy is to detect errors in adhering to common coding
patterns, e.g. described in the LLVM Coding Standards.
This is still heavily in flux.
Review: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D884
llvm-svn: 187345